« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Pelosi Knew – UPDATED

Dennis Hastert, call your office.

UPDATE: The Daily Caller reports that the House GOP will introduce a privileged resolution calling on the Ethics Committee to investigate Pelosi’s and Hoyer’s handling of the Massa allegations. Specifically, the resolution calls on the committee to find out what the Democratic leadserhip knew about Massa, when they knew it, and what they did – or didn’t do – about it.

Good for the House GOP. This is exactly what Democrats would have done had the roles been reversed. And I think it’s safe to say now that this action officially makes the Massa allegations a scandal and a campaign issue. As they should be.

UPDATE 2: The GOP resolution passed the House on a vote of 402-2. No Democrats voted against the resolution, which means shenanigans are afoot. It is now up to the House GOP to keep Democrats honest on this.

The Eric Massa sideshow just became a full-fledged election year scandal aimed like a dagger directly at the Democrats’ House majority. Numerous press outlets are now reporting that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office was informed in October of last year about the former New York representative’s odd behavior with male subordinates.

Joe Racalto, Massa’s chief of staff, was uneasy that Massa, 50, was living with several young, unmarried male staffers and using sexually explicit language with them, one source said. But what finally prompted him to call Pelosi’s director of member services, the source said, was a lunch date that Massa made with a congressional aide in his 20s who worked in the office of Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.).

According to a person briefed on the call, Racalto was concerned that the lunch followed a pattern by Massa — who is married and has two children — of trying to spend time alone with young gay men with no ostensible work purpose. Racalto, according to this person, also alerted Frank’s chief of staff. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity of the matter.

Last week, Pelosi said the she first heard of concerns about Massa’s behavior in early March. Pelosi said her staff did not inform her of every rumor about members of Congress. But that explanation is no longer operative, since this was not a rumor that her staff picked up. It was a plea for intervention by none other than the member’s chief of staff, his highest ranking aide.

Pelosi’s “hear no evil” act is now about as believable as her pledge to run the “most ethical Congress in history.” She knew, and chose to do nothing.

Once upon a time, Pelosi was harshly critical of a House leadership which she said should have known about former congressman Mark Foley’s interactions with young male House pages.

“The children who work as Pages in the Congress are Members’ special trust. Statements by the Republican Leadership indicate that they violated this trust when they were made aware of the internet stalking of an underage Page by Mr. Foley and covered it up for six months to a year.

Many junior staffers in congressional offices are young people, fresh out of college. Although they are not children, they are deserving of protection from sex starved congressmen who seek to use their high position to score a bit more than campaign contributions.

Yet Pelosi did nothing. For six months she and her office looked the other way as Massa shared a house with five staffers and abused his official position to try and bed young male staffers on his and other members’ staffs. Pelosi’s failure to do anything to stop Massa’s behavior once his Chief of Staff made her office aware of it is unethical and shameful and casts a pall over the entire House.

Republicans are reportedly weighing a call for an investigation into Pelosi’s and Democratic Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s actions in handling the Massa allegations. And well they should. There will be charges of “politicization” and cries of “partisanship,” as Hoyer pre-emptively charged on the Sunday shows. But these criticisms should be seen for what they are: baseless attempts to distract from the issue at hand. Namely, the Democrats’ callous disregard for serious and credible allegations of behavior that meets the legal definition of sexual harrassment occurring in the people’s House.

COMMENTS

  • bk
  • gwalt

    Sarcasm Off.

    When the Larry Craig story broke (which the so-called journalist had been sitting on it for months) CNN was leading the top and bottom of the hour with Craig. I joked that CNN should become the Larry Craig network. (Same for Joe Wilson—-Gloria Vanderbilt had it the topic of every show for weeks).

    CNN has become quite unwatchable as these so-called journalists take themselves so seriously as…..serious journalists. Ergo the SNL skits of late.

    They have literally and figuratively become a parody.

  • larryp

    the donks should have a “no-confidence” voter and then vote her out of the Speaker chair.Now. she is a disgrace.

  • skorrent1

    It’s perfectly ok for “young gay men” to work for Bahney Fwank (from his basement?) but it is horrible for Massa to meet one for lunch?

    I guess I get it. Has nothing to do with voting loyalty. All about “protection from sex starved congressmen”.

    • JoeG

      Barny wasn’t messing around with staffers.

    • Mark Impomeni

      Being a young gay staffer is not illegal. Using your position of authority to try and ingratiate yourself sexually with people subordinate to you is.

      Receiving allegations of potentially illegal behavior and covering it up is unethical at best and possibly legally culpable at worst.

      Now do you get it? Or did I use too many big words?

      • JSobieski

        its like breaching a contract—behavior that results in liability.

        For it to become a crime, there would have to an assault, blackmail, or something more

        • Locked and Loaded

          - for Radicals – and do it very visibly in all the media available.

          Call Pelosi out personally, ridicule her unmercifully, and don’t let up.

          Tell me this nut won’t crack, and we will have accomplished many objectives.

        • texasgalt

          I heard once before from a certain company lawyer explaining an “indiscretion”. It’s a private matter and we are in love, he said. Ya, it was’t illegal but then . . .

          A week later his young tart ran off to Brazil with the company credit card.

          Back in the world of politics, where one party controls all the levers of power, all Pelosi has to do is use the old Clinton defense of “so what?” and the MSM will have no interest. The voters may have a different view.

          • JSobieski

            and being questioned under oath is legitimate in the context of a civil sexual harassment case

            I am no Clinton defender, just wanted to be precise

          • texasgalt
        • http://electionsanalysis.blog.com paint_it_red

          The issue for Massa is that he groped a subordinate. That’s assault and sexual harassment. He is properly being shown the door.

          The bigger issue, of course, is Pelosi and Hoyer knew about it, and did not act on it when they knew. Assault and sexual harassment (regardless of sexual intent – which is Massa’s stupid defense) were tolerated by the Democratic leadership because they thought they could use that to own the guy and work his vote over on health care.

          Only when it became clear that he was a “no” vote did they conduct an ethics investigation. To the Democratic regime in power, ethics is a weapon they wield when convenient for political gain, not a mandate to act in a moral fashion.

          • qixlqatl
        • JHancock

          Thus an “ethical” investigation. South Carolina’s Govenor having a foreign affair wasn’t technically illegal either, but it did raise doubts about his fitness as a govenor.

  • johnt

    Always the last to know, out of the loop, no wonder healthcare dictatorship is in trouble.
    In the meantime, friendly liberals advise us not to pay too much attention to this. I wonder what they know or how widespread these adventures range, apart from Foley/Craig, who seem to be the boundary lines of interest for our media.

  • Tbone

    his herd.

    • WIBadger

      …now THAT’s funny. Never heard that expression before. Good one !

    • http://barnettlaw.org Frozen_Man

      Just don’t picture Barney in his cowboy hat and chaps.

  • archer52

    Easy boys. Easy. What is the issue with Massa they are trying to prevent us from seeing. Watch the hands, not the words. Is Massa bi-sexual? Here’s the issue, with the left working so hard to normalize gay relationships why are they using the “gay fear” tool as a way to discredit Massa?

    The author buys in with this statement.

    “Many junior staffers in congressional offices are young people, fresh out of college. Although they are not children, they are deserving of protection from sex starved congressmen who seek to use their high position to score a bit more than campaign contributions.

    Yet Pelosi did nothing. For six months she and her office looked the other way as Massa shared a house with five staffers and abused his official position to try and bed young male staffers on his and other members? staffs. Pelosi?s failure to do anything to stop Massa?s behavior once his Chief of Staff made her office aware of it is unethical and shameful and casts a pall over the entire House.”

    Where is the evidence of gay sex, or attempted gay sex? We have a complaint-

    “Joe Racalto, Massa?s chief of staff, was uneasy that Massa, 50, was living with several young, unmarried male staffers and using sexually explicit language with them”

    What is “explicit language” and how does that translate into gay sex? When I was an active police officer we would make comments to one another that could easily be construed as “explicit” . For example when someone told us to do something we didn’t want to do I’ve heard comments involving the offender’s opportunity to perform a certain act upon the offended officer’s privates. Certainly not a very mature response, but hardly a serious offer. So, again what exactly happened? And why is it important now.

    If Massa was becoming a problem for a number of reasons, the left could have handled it several ways- One, admit he’s a nut and a democrat and take the hit. Two- ignore him and hope he goes away (not likely). Three- start a preemptive series of strikes to isolate and discredit him early on. How? Make him gay bashing, closet homosexual, who is a serial liar. So when he says Rahm came after him naked and threatened him, you can say “Of course he when he thinks of Rahm, he sees him as “naked”, that how “those” people think.” Yet, if Massa was supporting the healthcare takeover, he could spend the weekends with Barney Frank in a San Fran bathhouse and nobody on the left would blink.

    When Beck interviewed Massa it was obvious something had happened between the time Beck talked to him on the phone and the interview. I also noted several interrogation “tells” in Massa’s speech and mannerisms. Beck also pushed past several important issues trying to get to a specific accusation. I comment on that in my post-

    http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/03/09/becks-interview-goes-south-he-was-used-it-happens/

    As Massa uncovered the ugly underside of being in D.C. Beck didn’t want to hear it. Like I said in the post- “It was like if Glenn was trying to interview a mobster and was saying, ?Okay beyond the murder, kidnapping, drug dealing and extortion, what do you do that?s criminal??”

    I don’t like Massa, he’s a worm. However, Sammy the Bull Gravano turned informant and his testimony bagged some really big fish. I understand later he went back to being what he was, a sociopathic criminal. But sometimes, as I learned early on, you have to deal with the witnesses you can find. You aren’t going to get a priest inside the mob.

    • Mark Impomeni

      This is no longer about Massa. It’s about Pelosi’s management of the House and her lying to the press.

      Massa could have been having all the gay sex he wanted with whomever he wanted outside of his subordinates and it would be nobody’s business but God’s and his wife’s.

      It’s the staffers that makes this Pelosi’s responsibility. And she failed. Case closed.

  • Duke

    Ya hey, I know – half the people on here are opposed to term limits for our rulers in Washington! I don’t see any other way for the sane people in flyover country to clean out this nest of corruption and greed that exists in the dissyland that we have to call our nation’s capitol.

    • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

      is the machines that support them. We’d only be trading one puppet for another at this point. To make real change both of the big parties machine politics needs to fracture/crack/fundamentally change and end up with some new blood altogether.

      It’s hard to make real change when the *new* politician is handpicked by a state or national committee that likely is run by/beholden to the person being replaced.

    • Next93

      N/T

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    The RNC… let her keep her position… don’t interrupt the dems and risk shoving someone even slightly competent into her job… wait until after the 2010 elections then bring everything out when she’s no longer *majority leader*…

    She should be front and center the picture girl of dem incompetency and corruption until at least after the elections…

  • talgus

    You occasionally risk having a premature blowup. Nancy and crew always keep their dirt evidence hidden until it can be most politically effective. Foley is an effective case in point. Charges introduced after the last date of selection of a substitute candidate in the state. Obama also knows it is easier to disqualify an opponent than beat them in the election.

  • Common_Cents

    What is the motivation and implication of the REP resolution passing 402-2 for an investigation?

    • GT350

      All those representatives have been pushed too hard to support her policy initiatives. There’s no support left. At a certain point, it’s less risky to shoot your own commanding officer than go one more time into the breech at her behest.

      At least, that was the experience of the French soldiers during WWI.

  • tomswifty

    Great quotes in “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” :)

  • Trelaina
    • rbdwiggins

      (15) answered “Present,” and (12) did not vote.

      Roll Call 107

  • skully

    From Breitbart: “GOP loses bid for ethics probe of Dem leaders” – they are saying :

    Instead, the House voted 402-1 to allow the panel to determine the next step?a move that could kill any further investigation.

    If that is true, why did all the Republicans for for that measure? I’m confused….

    • skully

      No formatting or links working for me today.

    • joayn

      So, basically it is up to the committee to proceed.

      In the comment section at The Hill:

      “This entire article demonstrates a complete lack of understanding about the Motion to Refer. If the House voted to open the probe, they would have voted directly on the resolution. THE HOUSE DID NOT VOTE ON THE RESOLUTION. Clyburn moved to refer the Resolution to the Ethics Committee ? and moved for immediate vote on the motion to refer. The motion to refer simply sends a resolution to a committee, without any instruction or direction to follow the resolution. The motion to refer has been used by Democratic leaders in the past to avoid a vote on a motion to table the resolution (which would be the ultimate negative disposition, and probably not have enough votes to pass) but to avoid accepting the resolution itself. The Hill isn’t normally this bad, but really guys?your article is completely wrong.”

      http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/86213-gop-looks-to-force-ethics-investigation-of-dem-leaders-knowledge-on-massa

  • in_awe

    Whatever the specifics of this vote, the entire Massa issue is a diversion from the health care debacle and the immigration overhaul Obama has started rolling.

    Sure, go after Pelosi and Massa – but don’t lose sight of what else of more importance is being moved along while our eye is off the ball.

  • http://electionsanalysis.blog.com paint_it_red

    What!?! Pelosi is accused of lying for political gain and is now actively attempting to discredit the accuser and change the subject?? I’m shocked! *sarcasm*

    • proudgop

      For ie via Yahoo (AP)

      “Democrats block investigation of possible Massa cover-up”

      wonder if the news media will hound Pelosi and cronies like they did to republicans during Foley debacle

  • irbobert

    Can you just picture this: Pelosi, Reid, Hoyer, Biden et,al., forming a large daisy chain and kissing each others ******* good bye?

  • edwlstr

    Good slogans, but let’s not carry this to far. Get the dirt out of the Dems house? Who’s going to be left to turn out the lights.