« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Rick Perry should be our guy for 2012.

This is not to say that none of the folks currently running have no chance of winning; if you run a good enough campaign – if your campaign is flexible, aggressive, focused, disciplined, anyone can win. One of the many lessons I’ve learned from the fiasco of 2008 is that the a priori declaration that Candidate X and only Candidate X can win an election is an act of stupidity and worse, is self-defeating.

But the reality is that some would be a harder sell than others.

I’m hoping Rick Perry leaps in because of this – among the people running now, and granted that he is not perfect (who the hell is?) he would be the GOP’s “easiest sell” to the voters by far.

He has the executive experience and the record to prove it – Governor for 10 years of the nation’s second largest state with the best record on job growth and development in the nation. Another cool fact is that the Democrats would have a hard time throwing the credit to the last Democrat Governor – especially since his predecessor was not only not a Democrat, but actually George W. Bush.

And even if “critics” point out that the Lt. Governor is more powerful in TX (which is arguable), he can point to the fact that he was Lt. Governor for a while – so he’s got that covered too. Going further, he’s got military experience – a 5 year veteran of the USAF and he’s got significantly more communications skills than W.

Which brings us to the main chink in his armor – TX and the aforementioned George W. Bush. Will the American people be ready to give the Presidency to another Texan so soon after the last Texan left with approval ratings in the toilet? Again, I think his record in TX can take care of that … and again, he can very firmly and respectfully say; “My name is James Richard Perry, not George Walker Bush.”

Add all that to the fact that it’s no secret that the Bush clan openly despises him (witness the endorsements of Kay Bailey Hutchison last year by so many Bushes and Bushies) and he can shake off the attachment quite easily.

And last, but not least, and note that this is extremely important to “moderate” (especially moderate female) voters, he “looks” Presidential.

To complete the ticket; if he can find a socially and fiscally conservative (important) African American or Hispanic running mate – ideally a veteran who’s held flag rank with no skeletons in his (or her) closet, I think it’ll be a ticket that’ll keep the Left up at night. Does anyone know if General Kip Ward a Republican?

COMMENTS

  • red_oakster

    How does Perry jump in and do well in Iowa? He’s at least more suited for Iowa than New Hampshire, and he’d need to do well in one of them to get to South Carolina where he would be well-positioned to win. In Iowa, that means getting ahead of Cain and Santorum and Bachmann and Pawlenty. While it’s possible, it’s unlikely.

    If you’re looking for eleventh hour announcements, Ryan and Palin seem like the only two who might be able to win the nomination with such a late start.

    • Change Jar Conservative

      I don’t think he’ll jump in, but I think Perry jumping into Iowa only needs a top 3 and I don’t think that’s out of the question before he heads to SC for a big win (and virtually ignores New Hampshire).

      Can he make a play for Nevada (which everyone else is ignoring) with sort of an onery, self-made westerner approach and win primary 2 and 3.

  • Finrod

    .

    • Martin Knight
  • NRPax

    I think that should be respected. Personally, I think we need conservatives as Governors as much as a conservative President. Perry seems to be doing well (Says the MD resident who only knows what he reads about Perry), so let him go on being governor.