« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

At RedState Gathering, I Just Met the Next U.S. President

It’s been awhile since my last blog entry.  It’s not that I haven’t had things to say.  It’s just that I’ve been busy running my small business during tough economic times.  Nonetheless, I’ve been actively reading the site and keeping abreast of the issues.

Several months ago I made the decision to attend my first RedState Gathering…and I’m writing this blog from the event.   I can already tell this is not a decision I will ever regret.

Call me naive, but before today I had not heard of Herman Cain.  This is surprising because I’m truly a political news junkie.  Yes, I had heard of someone named “Cain” and had heard about a political activist who used to be the CEO of Godfather’s Pizza, but I never paid much attention.  After all, the potential GOP field for 2012 President is already overloaded.

My eyes have been opened.  Cain was one of several speakers at today’s Gathering.  He brought the house down.  If he decides to run — and he is “prayerfully considering” it — he will be a force to reckon with.  A true, full-fledged, articulate conservative with the charisma to invigorate America in ways which will make Obama pale in comparison.  And, oh, yes…he happens to be a minority.

I look forward to hearing more from him and seeing him become more prominent and visible in the political arena.

I kid you not…if he decides to run (and I pray he does)…watch out!

Mr. Ed

“Straight from the Horse’s Mouth.”

COMMENTS

  • danasdaddy

    It airs weeknights from 7-10 pm Eastern on WSB (750 AM or 95.5 FM). You can also listen live at wsbradio.com. The page for Herman’s show can be found here.

    • zornorph

      I so wish he’d been elected to that GA-Sen seat instead of Isackson. History might now be very different.

  • danasdaddy

    I voted for Herman in that election, but you’re right…it would have been better had he won.

  • oblio

    I might have treked out to the gathering had I known he was there, and if work wasn’t so busy. While I enjoy Boortz, I really like it when Herman subs for him on our Macon affiliate.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Not all of them.

    Just what I could get on my FlipVideo cam until it filled up (I’ve got a first-gen model that now only holds about 22 minutes). I’ve got one or two more clips on my Blackberry that I’ll try to load later (don’t have my cable with me and I’m in the last panel discussion).

    Herman started this next clip with, “Spending is not a strategy!”

    I’ll try to post later today the last clip or two I shot with my Blackberry.

    I hope you enjoyed the videos!

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW! (45 days until Nov. 2 — what are YOU DOING to help get out the vote in your precinct?)

    Please help GOTV! And that’s not a cable channel. Yet.

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      Here are the last two clips, shot on my Blackberry Pearl. Sorry for the low resolution and bad audio. But, if you can hear them, you will enjoy Mr. Cain’s comments.

      We need a leader of the free world, not a “position holder.”

      Please help GOTV!

      For Liberty,
      ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
      Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW! (43 days until Nov. 2 — what are YOU DOING to help get out the vote in your precinct?)

  • JadedByPolitics

    about the Precinct Committeeman Project and he was just delightful and promised to find the information and put it up on his website. That was back when Erick was on the early morning show and Herman Cain’s show was after and if he runs for President he has my FULL FAITH & SUPPORT!

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      he ran for US Senate.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        a 2012 primary battle between Cain, Watts and Barbour. Cain was the first Georgia Republican I voted for after my 2000 conservative epiphany.

  • NeoKong

    All of the cuff too.
    The crowd ate it up.

  • texasgalt

    Made of awesome. Natural born speaker and leader- no teleprompter required.

    http://www.hermancain.org/

    twitter: @THEHermanCain

    • Patch Eye Pete (EPU)

      Were you at the gathering, or at least at the affair at El Arroyos? I am seeing a picture of a guy in a red shirt that says “Texasgalt” on the back.

      • texasgalt

        That was me.

        I was there most of the time, but between a very sick wife who couldn’t get out of our room for over a day and 2 grandsons I had to see for a bit, I had to sneak away off and on.

        I want to affirm this: the RedState Gathering was fantastic and such a value. I am sure the unbelievably low registration fee of $35 was due to the generosity of the sponsors and they have my thanks.

        Lastly, I wish every RedStater could have been there to have seen Cain speak . . . and I mean that with all due respect to Chuck DeVore, Nikki Haley, Mike Lee and everybody else who came to the podium. All were excellent.

        • Patch Eye Pete (EPU)

          And I don’t think I did. Do you recall meeting me there? The handsome bald guy? I know that BooBooKitty said HE was the handsome baldy, but I think there’s no question I am the class of the cue ball heads.

          • texasgalt

            Next time ;-)

          • E Pluribus Unum

            And your bio that you wrote up in one of those diaries. Yes’ next time make it a point.

  • Doc Holliday

    but he deserves to have a voice. We should fund him so that he gets the chance to be on the stage. He is right about Ireland.

  • derhoosier

    I saw the post title, clicked the link and thought, boy, there’s only about a 1% chance this person’s picked out who I like and before I read the first sentence, had a second, happier thought, “I sure hope they’re right!” Hey, anyone speaking at the RS gathering would have to be better than this incompetent we have now.

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    VB

  • traversecityconservative

    Great speaker, great ideas, very Conservative, has worked in the private sector and turned a business around…I would LOVE to see him debate Obama.

  • lukematthews

    I’ve heard him before and he has the fire in the belly many of these ‘first tier’ candidates don’t have.

  • Oz

    The title mislead me :-)

    • Patch Eye Pete (EPU)

      nt

  • Patch Eye Pete (EPU)

    I met Herman at RightOnline earlier this year, but I’ve been following him for years.

    If he jumps’ then right now I am in — unless Jim DeMint were to run, who has seemingly made no noises at all about running.

    • pilgrim

      We rode on the elevator, and he told me posted a new diary. I’m so happy Mr Ed is with me with his promoting Herm Cain instead of against me promoting Huckabee.

  • konni

    I was so glad to read your post and see that I wasn’t the only one that didn’t know who this great speaker, and seemingly great conservative was. I hate it when that happens. I mean, since becoming immersed in the conservative movement, I thought, how on earth could I not have known about him? I did recognize him as the guy who does the introduction video on the LibertyCentral website, but that was it. I’m already spreadin’ the word about him. Absolutely loved everything he had to say, as well as the strength and conviction he had when he said it.

  • NHConservative0227

    How’s that for attracting women and minorities to beat the Dems at their own game??

    • acat

      She’s. Not. Qualified.

      She needs more executive experience. Period.

      Mew

      • Ann_W

        some people will continue to make this point. Thank you.

        • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

          She might be a tad more popular than Huckabee, but other than a few kool-ade drinking worshipers she doesn’t attract much support.

          And once again, she’s doing a great job as a fund raiser and rabble rousing bomb thrower. She should stick with that.

        • acat

          If Palin could get an Art Chance (and ideally, *the* Art Chance) and promise to make him chief of staff, and further promise to actually *listen* to him – she’d be okay as POTUS.

          Cain, Daniels, Jindal, and Pawlenty have all had some experience working with hostile bureaucrats.

          Palin is an outstanding bomb-thrower, and that plus a good staff qualifies her for veep at most – and ideally, for SecInterior or SecEd. (not SecState, that post causes severe cognitive damage)

          She’s not ready for the big chair, and not just because Art doesn’t like her.

          Mew

          • JSobieski

            That department needs a bomb thrower to shake things up and an unapologetic American.

            Any other cabinet position would be beneath her. How many political rock starts would even consider Sec of Interior? Look, I am not some Palin-bot, but Palin is unlikely to even consider any kind of cabinet position. Secretary of State would be the one she might.

            If not her then Guliani or Bolton.

          • BA Cyclone

            I am not sure of Palin’s acumen as a diplomat, but I agree she could do the country great service to empty the swamp of the State Dept.

            I am quite fearful of what Palin would do should she run for Prez any time soon. I think she’s doing fine work for the GOP right now, and the role she is serving seems to more accurately fit her skills from what I can tell.

          • acat

            Seriously, Palin needs, if I can borrow from Heinlein, learn to take orders, and learn to give orders, in a big executive environment.

            Even if she’s only at SecInterior for two years and then moves over to SecState, or U.N. Ambassador or something – the thing she lacks isn’t international flavor – I get that she can see russia from her house is a metaphor – but experience in taming and neutering bureaucrats.

            Period.

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            I agree with you, I don’t want Palin to run for President in 2012. But you have also have to be realistic? Sec of Interior? When is the last time someone who can raise money like she does, pack in auditoriums like she does, take the position of Sec of Interior?

            She has absolutely neutered bureaucrats—according to Achance she gutted the government of Alaska.

            Like her or not, she is a Tier 1 Presidential candidate if for no other reason that she has the largest die hard base than anyone else. The idea that someone like that is going to start as Sec of Interior, move to UN ambassador, etc. is silly. She would have to be an idiot to take any of those jobs, and Palin is not idiot.

            I stand by my assessment that she would be the best possible Secretary of State in a post-Obama world, and the position is big enough that it wouldn’t be a political step down.

          • acat

            I would like to think she’s smart enough to know that she doesn’t yet know her enemy, i.e. the entrenched bureaucracy in D.C.

            I would like to think she’s smart enough to realize that being inside the belly of the beast, even in a relatively low-order post would serve her better than going straight to the top of the ticket.

            Any of these positions, or maybe veep – but that’s really a *weaker* post than SecInterior – with a relatively older POTUS, then a run for the top slot in 2016 makes the most sense to me.

            Unfortunately, I don’t see too much of this kind of analysis in Palin’s most ardent supporters. Anything critical is written off as “you hate her!”

            Well… no. I don’t hate her. I do, however, remember how Clinton and George W both got rolled in their first two years…

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            VP is not a weaker position than Sec of Interior.

            Look, I am not pushing a Palin Presidential run (quite the opposite), but saying that she should first start of an Interior, work her way up to UN Ambassador, and then . .. . is simply nuts. It will never happen.

            Palin running for President is in the realm of probability at this point.
            Palin winning the Republican nomination is a possibility. Not sure what the Vegas odds are on a Palin Presidency in 2013, but its not de minimis.

            The path you set is in defiance of reality. Might as well suggest that Newt for a state legislative position, and the Mitt Romney would make a great county commissioner.

            Every President has gotten rolled by the bureaucracy since WWII without exception.

            If you want to a start a big fight with the Palin fans out there, I absolutely dare you to write a diary suggesting that she start of as Secretary of the Interior and then move her way up to UN Ambassador.

            I dare you to do it. It will be as inflammatory to folks as suggesting that O’Donnell should get married and focus on getting a reality TV show (two things that are far more likely than Palin even becoming Sec of the Interior).

            If you want someone to take a job, there has to be some reason why they would want it.

          • acat

            1) To get a good worm’s eye view of D.C.
            2) To have a post where she can be visible, do a *lot* of house cleaning, and still be inside the White House enough to learn the ropes.
            3) To be a “good soldier” – which, following the Palin modus operandi, is her next move.

            I do not do diaries, and I don’t object to Palin shooting for the moon – at least she won’t blow her toes off – but her advocates claiming she’s ready for the big char are, to put it simply, not different than Obama’s followers except in the object of their fascination.

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            I am in favor of neither of those two people, but I don’t hear you saying they should get “DC experience” by going to Secretary of the Interior. What was Reagan’s DC experience?

            Frankly, I think a governor has more experience dealing with bureaucracy that DC legislators. I would suggest that two term governors are the people we should look to for Presidential candidates.

            I am not a Palin fan, but I still find your logic troubling. You don’t question Romney’s capabilities even though his DC experience is the same as Palin’s —ZIP.

            The Presidency may be a bridge to far, but Secretary of Interior or UN Ambassador are below her politically. Its kind of insulting, to be honest.

            Let me guess, you want the Rolling Stones to be the opening act for your high school punk band?

          • acat

            Huck can’t attract independents.
            Romney is hamstrung by Romneycare, like it or not, fair or not.

            I don’t see either being the nominee, although I expect they could divide the conservatives, religious from fiscal, and we could end up with a weak RINO candidate yet again.

            C’est la guerre.

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            Huckabee for House Chaplain?

            I can’t believe you don’t realize how you come across. Now, I actually am hoping for a smack down for pure popcorn value.

          • calgacus

            in 2008, when he was asked. I am sure he’d be glad to be a V.P. though.

          • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

            but he’d be glad to sleep with your girlfriend. I’d rather see the GOP nominate Gordon Gecko!

          • acat
          • JSobieski

            Huckabee’s DC experience? ZERO
            Palin’s DC experience? ZERO

            So why do you treat Palin different?

            I am repeating myself in “bringing it” but you don’t address the point.

          • acat

            I wouldn’t vote for Romney or Huckabee if they were running for dogcatcher.

            I will write in your name before I will back either of those turkeys in the primary.

            I don’t bother indicating why these arguments don’t apply to candidates who I don’t think can win.

            Romney will not get any further in the South in 2012 than he did in 2008.
            Huckabee will not get any further outside of Iowa than he did in 2008.

            Both over-estimated their support, thinking protest votes against McCain were actually votes for them.

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            But I still don’t think you get it. If Palin supporters hear people applying a standard to Palin that is not applied to others, they are going to become very angry.

            My concern is that Palin be dealt with fairly, so that her supporters don’t leave the game in a huff. We are on the same side, but our side needs a better message than the path you suggest.

            Huckabee always has the possibility of winning Iowa. Its quite possible that Palin is the only person who could stop him. People like Pat Robertson have strong showings in Iowa. Seriously, the history of the Iowa caucuses are disturbing

          • acat

            Seriously, Iowa and New Hampshire matter only in that they let the candidates show off their “machines”, that is, that they’ve been able to stump effectively, that they can get people to the polling (or caucusing) places, etc. etc. In short, it doesn’t say a whole lot about the candidates, it’s about the campaigns.

            I don’t think stopping Huckabee in Iowa is a big deal – he’ll get the door slammed later on.

            As for Palin supporters, yeah, we do need to make sure they don’t bolt .. but a lot of that is going to be up to their girl. I really, really don’t think she’s going to try a Murcowski and run as a write-in for POTUS if the Repubs deny her – and I hope she has the wit and wisdom (and believe she does) to hang around another persons’ white house for a term. That fits her modus operandi anyway…

            Mew

          • aesthete

            She’s not made for the job. She’s great at simple rhetoric and bomb-throwing, but nothing in her career demonstrates an ability to corral bureaucrats (which is presumably what she would be doing at State), or that she is much interested in policy at all, judging from her major initiatives as AK governor. Vice President would be best for her, if we’re going for positions in government. Anything else is not within her demonstrated skillset and acumen.

          • JSobieski

            I simply note that acat’s logic applies to Huckabee and Romney, and there is no suggestion that they take on lowly cabinet positions and work their way “up” to UN Ambassador.

            Palin quit, and we can’t have a quiter be President. We need the anti-quiter. But this DC experience crap acat is peddline is crap, although it would take out three potential candidates that I don’t like (bye bye Huckabee, Romney, and Palin)

          • acat

            I’m not saying Palin won’t ever be ready, I’m saying she’s not ready *now*.

            Neither are Huck or Romney, see other posts.

            I’m saying Palin is not ready *now* and what’s missing is a better understanding of the inner workings of D.C.

            If she wins, she will get a much more aggressive greeting than George W got – remember all the W keys pulled out of the keyboards? – and will have a much more opposed bureaucracy. She will need an Art Chance approach in order to succeed – but nothing in her background shows she knows how to go about this.

            I’m trying to talk to her rabid supporters about how to get her ready for a 2016 success. She’ll still be young enough at that point, and she could know enough to really do the job that needs doing.

            What I keep getting, though, is an emotional response from her more rabid supporters, which is ironic since it’s exactly how the Obama supporters reacted when asked to explain his experience….

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            Reagan had no DC experience, and he was the better for it.

            How about she isn’t qualified because she quit? Has only two years of executive experience? These are tests that can applied to all candidates.

            If you want to get more logical responses from Palin supporters, you need to have a more logical and even-handed “test” to apply to potential candidates. Arguing a test that excludes 2 of the top 3 finishers in 2008 as well as Ronald Reagan is not a good test.

          • acat

            than for almost any other candidate because the Dems and the bureaucrats will be loaded for bear if she wins.

            She will have to start shooting – precise shots – right after her hand comes off the Bible. In fact, after the last words of the oath of office, she needs to say “The following people are fired…”

            She *cannot do this* without D.C. experience, or at least an experienced guide.

            Mew

          • aesthete

            For one thing, it would be hilarious to watch the reactions. For another, the UN is such a worthless institution that I would think that appointing Palin would send a strong message that Republicans don’t see it as useful. And yes, I agree that none of those three should be anywhere near the White House.

          • JSobieski

            But you have to admit, its like asking the Rolling Stones to open for your high school tribute band.

          • acat

            So far, she’s a one-hit-wonder, but she’s got potential…

            Mew

          • Ann_W

            But I hope she’ll sit out 2012. We need someone who can wrangle federal spending to the ground. It’ll take some major skills. Not just speaking and tweeting effectiveness.

          • acat

            is to have a non-winning POTUS run… so it’s conceivable that she’s not actually running, just laying groundwork to mesh with someone else later on.

            Mew

          • Ann_W
          • JSobieski

            Heck, what International experience did Bill Clinton have before becoming President. When it comes to taming bureaucrats, Rudy and Palin are our two best bets. Besides, maybe I’m voting Bolton for President. Vote for the stash!

          • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack
          • acat

            They both rode into town with no direct D.C. experience, and they both got into deep trouble because of that lack of experience…

            If Palin is as smart as her supporters claim, then she ought not make the same mistakes.

            Mew

            p.s. Obama is the ultimate example of outsider incompetence… but I get tired of shooting fish in a barrel

          • NHConservative0227

            She had more executive experience than both McCain and Obama as mayor of Wasilla!

            She also has shown she’s willing to fit the good old boys and the GOP establishment even when it could destroy her career in taking on Frank Murkowski.

            I think these “she needs more experience” or she’s “better off in another role” remarks are very similar to the Left’s talking points when discrediting her.

            There are legitimate criticisms of Palin such as her support of McCain, Ayotte, and Fiorina.

            hat being said, she?s still better than the other contenders at this point:

            Romney- Romney care

            Huckabee – Mr. Clemency, raised taxes at Ark governor, and actually had kids get weighed in schools. I think he?s been soft on illegal immigration too.

            Newt- Supported Scozzfavva. Palin supported Doug Hoffman. Also, I still can?t get that picture of Newt and Pelosi sitting together on that couch.

            Overall, Palin has by far been the most active in criticizing Obama. That says alot. I can?t think of anyone who generates more crowds and support. That was a great point by conservativemusician above in that liberals will always show you how they?re afraid of the most.

          • acat

            The minute anyone dares criticize Sarah from Wasilla, this is the reaction of the true believers. If you really believe that running a relatively small city in a relatively small state is the same as running the most political city in the world, you’re delusional.

            I’m no lefty. I could take offense at your idiocy, but .. the fact is, you’re a great example of the problem.

            Your candidate isn’t ready, and any criticism to that effect isn’t accepted.

            Unlike Art Chance, I don’t have an emotional reason for rejecting Palin – but reject her I do, and your arguments in her favor smack of rabid zealotry.

            Mew

          • NHConservative0227

            To resort to calling me an idiot.

            Just goes to show that you have lost the argument.

            All you’re doing is diminishing small towns. Acting as if its trivial and easy to do because it’s only a small town. Actually local politics is extremely important. It brings out many positives in that not only do you have executive responsibility in making decisions and being held accountable, but you also interact more closely with the people than you would if you were governor or in federal office.

            To simply dismiss being mayor of a small town reeks of elitism.

          • acat

            After you resorted to calling me a lefty, and now calling me an elitist? Really?

            Seriously, if this is a common thread among Palin supporters – insult the opponent, then declare victory – she’ll implode in the primaries.

            To answer your non-argument, I’m not diminishing small towns, but even if it’s just quantitative, there’s a difference between handling the Wasilla city council and the U.S. Senate, between the Wasilla parks department and the Department of the Interior. She has more experience than Obama, sure, but .. it is not at nearly the same scale. Not easier, not harder, but quantitatively, and therefore qualitatively different, just like driving a semi is different from driving a car.

            The problem is, that’s *all* the experience she has, and it’s all far removed from the rest of the country. Granted, it’s in “flyover country”, which is a Good Thing, and it’s at a low level, so listening to the citizens is more critical, which is also a Good Thing, but .. the basic point I made above is that if Palin doesn’t get a worms-eye-view of D.C., or get some people on her staff who have such a view, her first term will be more of a disaster than George W’s was… and a part of that is because Palin is such a lightning rod.

            Mew

          • NHConservative0227

            I started out by listing Palin’s support of a few moderate Republicans as an example of some legitimate criticism of her. You responded by calling me a “true believer” in Palin.

            I don’t see anything that shows she’s going to be more of a disaster than GWB. The problem with GWB is that he compromised his conservative principles in the name of compassionate conservatism. Before Obama, the Bush administration had compiled more debt than any previous administration. I don’t see any indication that Palin would do the same.

            I also compared Palin to the current crop of potential GOP candidates:

            Romney- Romney care

            Huckabee – Mr. Clemency, raised taxes at Ark governor, and actually had kids get weighed in schools. I think he?s been soft on illegal immigration too.

            Newt- Supported Scozzfavva. Palin supported Doug Hoffman. Also, I still can?t get that picture of Newt and Pelosi sitting together on that couch.

            Overall, Palin has by far been the most active in criticizing Obama. That says alot. I can?t think of anyone who generates more crowds and support. That was a great point by conservativemusician above in that liberals will always show you how they?re afraid of the most.

            Please tell me how any of the above candidates are better than Palin.

          • acat

            This does not change that Palin will not be ready to be President without some more experience.

            Mew

          • NHConservative0227

            to which you have failed to adequately respond. You haven’t presented any actual reasons as to why Palin shouldn’t be president other than “she lacks experience” in your view.

            Like JSobieski said, experience in DC is like experience at a brothel.

            Also, if you agree that Palin would be better than Romney, Huckabee and Newt then I assume you’ll be supporting her over all three of them?

          • acat

            I would support Palin over Newt, Romney, or Huckabee.
            There are others, including Herman Cain, who I would support over Palin.

            Also, while D.C. experience can be a sleazy experience, it would also be a very revealing one, for both Palin, and for her detractors. Think of it as “lighting up the targets” or “learning the terrain”.

            Mew

          • aesthete

            A small town and its problems are radically diffferent from those of a large city. It is not any more “elitist” to point out this fact than it is to say that flying a Piper is a different experience from flying a C-17. BTW, now that we’re on the topic, what did she do as Wasilla’s mayor that was so breathtakingly amazing from a conservative point of view. Last I checked, her main initiative was having the local government there build an expensive sports center.

          • NHConservative0227

            If I remember correctly she reduced taxes and the size of government. She also allowed citizens to have more of a say, such as whether they wanted the city to pick up their garbage or to have a private company do so.

            When comparing her experience to mayor to a junior senator/community organizer and a career senator/moderate from Arizona I think it compares quite favorably.

            As governor I think she did as excellent job as well. She fought with the oil companies to make them actually drill instead of just sitting on the leases. She had an over 70% approval rating. I think it was legitimate in stepping down due to the frivolous ethics chargers. It was costing the taxpayers alot of money.

            Since then she’s been able to focus on attacking Obama, supporting candidates, and preparing to be the next POTUS.

          • acat

            that both you and JSobieski have done is to compare Palin to only the “big names”, the “star power” candidates. Newt, Romney, Huckabee, McCain*.

            Why not stack her up against some of the other potential candidates?

            Pawlenty – who has much more experience (having actually *completed* terms) against a Dem-majority heavily union state legislature. Pawlenty could give Romney lessons in how to dominate in a blue state.

            Daniels – who has most of Pawlenty’s pros plus a reasonably solid social conservative background. Daniels could run rings around HuckaHucka also.

            Herman Cain – true D.C. outsider, political activist, successful businessman, very gifted speaker. Should be able to mop the floor with Huck or Romney in the debates, and I’d love to see him debate Newt.

            Look, I like Palin. I think she’s a very gifted bomb-thrower – she’s the Lee Atwater of this generation of politicians, and that’s saying something. I do not think her career *thus far* is sufficient. I also think that Romney soiled his chances with Romneycare, and Huckabee’s useless populist rhetoric is not going to play well during an economic downturn.

            All three (four, if we count McCain*, who is not currently in the running except in your post) of the has-beens pale in comparison to Palin, true.

            Palin, though, pales in comparison to some of the other potentials out there.

            Mew

            * Note – I will not speak ill of the current republican senatorial candidate from Arizona

          • JSobieski

            Even AChance wouldn’t say Palin should become Secretary of the Interior in a serious way (it would be his way of saying to go h—-).

          • acat

            I don’t dislike her. Hell, I voted for her.

            She. Is. Not. Ready.

            Mew

          • calgacus

            Jim DeMint should run. That would scare the living daylights out of the establishment. Furthermore, I genuinely think he would win the GOP primary. He has the grassroots support, and a lot of new Senators will owe him. And he is most definitely qualified.

          • JSobieski

            I don’t want Palin to run either, but saying she needs DC experience that nobody else seems to have or suggesting that she accept a position that you would never suggest Romney or Huckabee accept aren’t winning arguments.

            I don’t want everyone against a Palin run (yes that includes me) to be discredited by the argument that Palin somehow needs to take some position like Secretary of Interior.

            AChance hated the woman, but his hatred didn’t disorient his mind to the point where he would suggest that Palin work her way up to UN ambassador. Art was a political realist and made good arguments.

          • acat

            The same thing applies to both of them, to Huckabee in spades.

            Worse, Romney doesn’t appeal to the religious conservatives, and Huckabee doesn’t appeal to the fiscal conservatives. I don’t see a path for either of them to win.

            Why are you still talking about has-beens, and if you’re going to re-hash the past, where’s Newt?

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            DC experience has nothing to do with your previously stated “requirements”

            Look acat, I know you are having problems understanding my arguments so let me say them as simply as possible:

            (1) Don’t argue different requirements for different candidates. I.e. if you really don’t want Palin for other reasons, don’t come up with some lame “DC experience, she should be Sec of Nowheresville” first excuse. Say why she shouldn’t be President, period. Bad arguments just get the Palin-bots on fire, and you are building their future arguments for anti-Palin people being unfair.

            (2) I am on the record repeatedly as being against ALL RETREADS, including Fred Thompson.

            (3) I think Two-term governors should be #1 on the list of contendors for reasons of executive experience (different than BS “DC experience” which is like experience at a brothel).

            (4) The only exceptions to the two-term governor rule for me would be DeMint, Ryan, and Pence because they are each articulate spokespeople for conservative ideas. However, the lack of executive experience is troubling.

            Bottom Line: If you want to cut off a Palin run, at least come up with something that you apply with some consistency. You would never suggest that Romney or Huckabee (the only two people who would likely be worse than Palin) work their way “up” by becoming UN Ambassadors.

          • acat
          • Ann_W

            When you look at what she did as Mayor and Governor it’s not much to get excited about.

            But as everyone is in agreement she’s great at what she’s doing now.

          • acat

            She’d make a great head of the GOP.

            Mew

          • Ann_W
          • calgacus

            Bolton would be a good candidate. It would be good to see him run

    • traversecityconservative

      I’m all for Palin-Cain, Cain-Palin, Palin-Rubio or Rubio-Palin

  • NHConservative0227

    the Tea Parties this past year, it must’ve been on either Hannity or Cavuto that Cain said “there might be a darkhorse candidate out there that they don’t know about!”

    • eburke
  • minncon

    What a one-two punch!

    • acat

      Sorry, minncon. Newt has, and not just in my opinion, shown himself too much the prima donna and not enough the scrappy fighter.

      And that’s without mentioning sharing a couch with Pelosi which, in my opinion, was not a failing, but rather an indication of insider status.

      Mew

      • minncon

        made me want to puke. It was a lot to get over. But the guy’s just so damn smart – and usually right – on the issues.

        However, smart guys don’t always prove out to be leaders. And that’s what we need.

        Point taken, point made! I recant.

        • cwilson

          1) Behavior with regards to his wives

          2) Behavior with regards to Clinton (in one of Newt’s books, he revealed that he would often go to the White House loaded for bear, and then find himself back outside having agreed with Bill on whatever issue he and President Svengali were supposedly fighting about.

          This is not somebody we want sitting in the Oval Office.

          • JSobieski

            His is a creative thinker, but creative thinking involves generating a lot of BAD ideas and sifting through them after the fact.

      • louisiana

        Arne Duncan & Bro Al to promote O’s education *reforms*. I don’t want him anywhere near the White House.

      • BA Cyclone

        Much like Palin, yet in a totally different way, Newt has found some good uses for his skills (in general) and I hope he keeps doing that. (even though I think the chief purpose behind his foundation may be to keep himself relevant politically)

        He would do well to help us keep building a strong bench and promoting conservative principles as far as that goes.

        However as others have rightly said – there is way too much squishy bent for D.C. insider pol in Newt that makes me feel uncomfortable with the idea of him in the WH or anywhere near a Prez ticket.

        The GOP can honestly do SO MUCH better for a Prez ticket – and Cain is just one prime example.

      • Tbone

        this country is not going to elect another black president for 25+ years.

        All the white guilt got cashed in.

        • partyof1

          All the white guilt got cashed in.

          Good! Let us all stand or fall on merit.

        • Long Don Johnson

          a clean and articulate Conservative Black man would be Unbeatable in 2012

        • acat

          I don’t give a damn about his skin tone, it’s Obama’s politics and rank incompetence that are the problems.

          Mew

          • aesthete

            I highly doubt that TBone would say that another woman wouldn’t be elected for another 25+ years had she been President and gone on the same trajectory as Obama: it would ruin the image of Madame President Palin.

            No one gives a tinker’s d*mn about the O’s skin color except idiots who weren’t going to vote for him one way or another.

          • Tbone

            yep. Though it might not be 25 years because women voters as a group are not as discerning as they should be. This is reflected in liberals polling better with women.

          • Tbone

            because of a lot of lunchpail, old line, union type, basically racist Democrats/independents held their white noses and voted for him.

            Spend a little time in the taverns, fraternal clubs and union halls in the rust belt and you will understand what I’m saying.

  • partyof1

    I have been searching and searching for a potential GOP pres. candidate to care about it’s like Cain is reading my mind. And he uses no notes? And he’s accomplished in the real world? Who has been hiding him from me?

    Palin has been a good ”rabble rouser/bomb thrower” as mbecker908 pointed out but even assuming she could win, she’d be another fifty-plus-one president.

    Also I’ve never been able to reconcile the fact that Palin even said yes to McCain in the first place. One of the biggest RINO’s that ever lived walks into the gov. mansion and offers you the kingdoms of the world, and all you have to do is kiss the ring –

    The Sarah Palin that we think we know would have said “thanks but no thanks”. And what would she have done if McCain had won and then said “Sarah, I need you to go out there and tell the people how wonderful cap and trade is”. And put in a good word for amnesty too.”

    I’m not trying to dump on Palin supporters but her actions are more telling to me than her words. We can do better in 2012.

    • Tbone

      “Also I?ve never been able to reconcile the fact that Palin even said yes to McCain in the first place. One of the biggest RINO?s that ever lived walks into the gov. mansion and offers you the kingdoms of the world, and all you have to do is kiss the ring ?”

      But the depth of the stupidity in the above is impressive.

      • acat

        How much of Palin is real, how much is media construct, how much is in reaction to media construct? What’s fact, and what’s .. conjecture?

        Let’s look at some examples.

        1) Palin is clearly pro-life. That’s verifiable fact, it’s real.

        2) Palin is a fiscal conservative. That’s not verifiable. Her actions as governor of Alaska do not paint a picture of someone who is a fiscal conservative, rather they show a pragmatist. The Fiscal Conservatives want her to be one of them, but .. it’s not clear that she is.

        3) Palin is pro-military. This also looks good – she visited the Alaska National Guard frequently, in Iraq and in Alaska. This seems real.

        This kind of analysis is what the Dems failed at in 2006 and 2008, resulting in first Senator and then President Obama. I would prefer (rather strongly) not to fall into the same trap.

        Mew

        • Ann_W
          • Tbone

            Give me a break.

          • Ann_W

            that she’s claiming. It’s legit.

          • Tbone

            Maybe you should tag your posts with “meow” so we can tell you apart.

          • acat

            Cat doesn’t always mean girl.

            Mew

          • Tbone

            Tbone runs a big tent for whiners of all persuasions. ;-)

          • Ann_W

            Oh, and I’m just glad I’m in the tent this time. The first time we had a conversation about Mrs. Palin you told me to shut up and go do my laundry.

          • Tbone

            I hope you are getting a handle on that ring around the collar thingy that seems so important to you people. LOL

          • Ann_W
          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            rule of thumb when Tbone shows up.

            1. He has yet to make a factually based argument at Redstate.
            2. His specialty is throwing ash in the air to cloud your vision.
            3. He’s a firm believer in the Madonna Sarah. All those kids, still a virgin. And a conservative too.
            4. He’s a raving, kool aid spilling idiot, ignore him or or reply with a funny or sarcastic graphic.

          • Ann_W

            I guess I’m a slow learner because he does get under my skin.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            Fact and reason are never in the mix.

        • aesthete

          I’m sure that #3 is real, though I doubt that there are many visceral haters of the military among Republicans.

          • acat

            do “meals on wheels” type “feel good” operations.

            Mew

          • SteveLA

            acat

            I’m sure that you did not intend to say that “meals on wheels” is a bad program or for that matter helping out the elderly is necessarily a bad thing.

            Probably a legitimate argument on if the Federal government should fund it, but for lots of old folks, that hot meal and human contact once a day is what keeps them going.

          • aesthete

            The military has, of late, been used by Presidents of both administrations as an armed component of Americorps: our air missions in Kosovo and Haiti, and the nation-building components of our Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, have aspects of this view. In that regard, I’m not sure which side of the divide Palin’s on, but I suspect it is not on the Wilsonian side of the debate.

          • acat

            The difference being that the Afghan campaign, as currently waged, cannot be won – it can only be lost more slowly. My hope is that the next administration will be willing to seek victory.

            Mew

        • Jack_Savage

          Might want to check the service records of family members.

    • RottDawg

      even Glenn beck was impressed after meeting Herman this weekend…

  • JSobieski

    Nor is it a comparative disadvantage of Palin versus any other candidate. The bureaucracy is not going to single out Palin for bad treatment, they act badly without any extra motivation. You think the State Department is going to more supportive of Huckabee?

  • traversecityconservative

    Okay, I didn’t read ALL the posts but I didn’t notice anyone knocking Cain. We all have our favorites and Newt, Palin, Romney, etc. all seem to have their dissenters. But does Cain have the LEAST amount of dissenters on Redstate if any at all? Does that mean we all agree on a candidate? Just sayin…

    • RottDawg

      I think this goes to show that we truly are raaaacist! If Herman can’t even get any dissenters here at RS, what else could it be? /sarc

  • Pingback: Osvaldo Donhoe

  • Pingback: Eric Llanes