« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s Bank Heist

What’s the difference between Barack Obama’s $25 billion bank heist of February 9 and a regular street job?

Answer: The street robber has a mask of fabric and a gun of steel. Obama hides behind the mask of socialism and uses the government as his weapon.

Said cnn.com:

‘The deal settles potential state charges about allegations of improper foreclosures based on robosigning, seizures made without proper paperwork.’

Oh, yes, “improper foreclosures” and “robo-signing” (automatically signing foreclosure documents) which both were the result of mountains of paperwork. And why did such practices come to the fore?

Because the banks were inundated with this paperwork after the Democrat party over the last 50 years has forced banks to make millions of bad loans in the first place. This led to a situation which any rational person could see would ultimately go belly up.

And the front man for Obama’s bank heist is his corrupt attorney general Eric Holder. These two are a joke. They couldn’t add up a grocery receipt.

Question: What set off this whole housing crisis in the first place? Can anyone remember the Two Magic Words that were everywhere in 2008?

The two words were “subprime crisis”. But the Media Left quickly dropped them because those words reminded Americans that the collapse was the fault of Democrat handout programs that forced banks to make loans to ‘poor people’ (the very risky “subprime loans”) who didn’t have a prayer of paying them back.

These were loans amounting to trillions of dollars that polluted the entire financial system when they were guaranteed by the government and securitized and sold into the general economy as investment packages.

So then when banks were faced with an avalanche of paperwork to resolve the ensuing foreclosures, Obama & Co. arrogantly charged that they hadn’t crossed every T and dotted every I in foreclosing. And fined them $25 billion.

When in fact the real culprits in this crisis were Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Community Reinvestment Act, ACORN and the entire Democrat agenda to insure house ownership for poor people who couldn’t afford it in the first place and didn’t have the discipline for home ownership either.

What other event hit simultaneous with the “subprime crisis” to compound the calamity?

It was the collapse of a “housing bubble” that was based on too much borrowing based on too-low interest rates, i.e., easy credit.

And according to virtually anyone you ask, one man in the government, Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, set those interest rates too low.

Yet we capitalists always, always, always warn over and over that the government never, ever should set wages or prices.

And disaster was the result because Greenspan was setting the “price” of loan money.

So it was two-pronged socialism that upended the economy: Letting Greenspan set interest rates, and forcing banks to lend trillions to the poor.

But wait, there’s more! What is the third socialist leg of this stool, the 800 lb. gorilla in the room of this economic collapse?

It is this: The transformation of the banking system itself.

Historically banks have been managed and manned by people who knew a few basic things about finance, that Column A and Column B must add up to the same thing. It is not rocket science.

Working in a bank back, say, in the 1950s, you used common sense. You knew that people should be lent money only when they had a solid and provable credit history. When they were gainfully employed. When they had a 20% downpayment so that they had their own skin in the game.

But what did the Democrats say about these diligent bankers?

They called them evil, manipulative people like Mr. Potter in It’s A Wonderful Life. They said that banks didn’t want “the poor” to have houses. And this defamation and caricature and character assassination went on for decades. Obama says it every day.

So who has moved into many positions in the banking and financial system since the 1960s?

You guessed it… incompetent, college-educated, propagandized, left-wing zealots from our universities and business schools who brought with them the implanted idea that banks are institutions of social engineering, not businesses that lend money sensibly and make a profit.

Go into any bank or financial institution today and you are going to find a large proportion of employees who are do-gooders and bleeding hearts and leftists and Obama-lovers and feminists and all sorts of other people with an agenda in hand – urge the banks do “the right thing”.

Yeah, sure… While the guy with the common sense is mopping the floor.

The stories about the buildup of the ‘housing bubble’ are legend, about banks using the flimsiest basis for making loans, practices that would have been grounds for termination 50 years ago.

Indeed what these morons have done, in tandem with relentless government mandates and easy credit, is they destroyed the banking system.

Just like we conservatives said they would.

And when the government came along with something as preposterous as the NINJA loan, which forced banks to loan money to people with No Income, No Job or Assets, such a policy would have been laughed out of the boardroom in the Good Old Days.

But those days, and those bank directors, are gone. In today’s politically-correct banks, many probably thought the NINJA loan was a perfectly good idea. You know, to help “the poor”. While the sensible ones were deathly afraid to contravene the government’s demands.

Will the Democrats retreat on NINJA loans and all the other bad practices now?

No. They will double down, even after Obama himself said what we conservatives have been saying all along, that “the poor might be better off renting.”

Yeah, right, stupid.

It’s a little late for that…

Please visit my blog at www.nikitas3.com for more conservative insights. Enjoy the lively new Arts section.

COMMENTS

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    1) No one is forced to take a settlement. The banks new they were likely going to lose in court and decided (much like many other defendants) to settle out of court to gain certainty and limit legal costs.

    2) The subprime crisis was not created by the CRA (ie government forced loans to poor people). Most subprime loans were made by non-CRA covered entities (ie mortgage brokers) in non-CRA covered zip codes (ie the suburbs) and then sold to Wall Street (not-FNM/FRE). See this summation of a fed study (and the study itself if you wish): http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/kroszner20081203a.htm (just to note Kroszner was a Bush appointee, University of Chicago guy, and AEI scholar as well).

    3) The real culprits of the crisis were: The FSMA, the CFMA, the ratings agencies, Greenspan’s way too low interest rates, the securitaztion process, mortgage brokers, and financially clueless borrowers.

    • acat

      may have covered zip codes, but the Clintons reinterpreted it a good bit more broadly, and the banks went along to avoid a publicity nightmare, knowing they could just pass the bad debt along to Freddie and Fannie.

      Further, nikitas won’t reply to you .. he (or she, I suppose) never does.

      Mew

      • Death_of_the_Donkey

        6%. I believe that is what the Fed found in regards to the CRA’s influence on the bubble. 6%. The real culprits of our mess are mentioned in my post above. The CRA simply wasn’t a significant part of it.

    • Dave_A

      The ‘anti-FED’ folks like to whine about interest rates being low and credit being too easy…

      However, the problem with this, is that ‘easy credit’ in and of itself is not only harmless, but good for the economy…

      Easy credit makes it easy for those who are credit-worthy to borrow money for business ventures & personal consumption.

      The problem is not that money was too cheap, but that it was lent to people who couldn’t pay it back. This is not just due to CRA, but to the entire banking-regulation monstrosity as a whole.

      If the banks were left to their own devices, the ‘easy credit’ would only be available to those who were a reliable risk – those who would pay it back… Thus, no bubble, but money is still cheap enough to keep the economy growing.

      To contrast, if we follow the anti-Fed folks line and make credit more difficult to obtain, the economy will grind to a halt, as there will be no money to invest in growth (both in terms of new ventures AND expansion of existing ones) or consumption,….

  • Juggernaut

    to make Obama look like a hero. I agree the CRA was not the main culprit but played a smaller role. Repealing Glass Steagal while loosening lending standards beyond stupid led to failed subprime loans as the decay set in. Both parties were involved over 20 years of reckless bills.

    In 1998 I learned what No Doc/Low Doc loans meant when I asked a mortgage broker friend who said they were great investment vehicles. I held my opinion back.

    • Dave_A

      And allowing banks to sell investment and insurance products had absolutely nothing to do with ‘the crash’.

      It was over-regulation, not de-regulation.

      • Juggernaut

        companies kept facts hidden, theyhandled it all under one giant corporate umbrella and sold the paper to Ginnie Mae on the bond market. There’s a lot more to it than than most know.

        We have too much regulation now, before the crash know one listened to economist who sounded the alarm bell back in the 1990′s and became more alarmed when real estate in CA and FL began to decline in the late 1990′s. They wrote worthless paper and made loans based on hot air while playing musical chairs. I made money doing it, difference is I rented properties till sold and I never touched variable rate loans nor sub prime.

  • lastgopinillinois

    I have been waiting to hear just one candidate call for the repeal of Jimmy Carters Community Re-investment Act ! But nobody has said one word about it.
    I am surprised, since it is the biggest government takeover of anything in the private sector so far (except for maybe 0bamacare).

    CRA should be anong at least the top four laws that should be repealled immediately upon GOP takeover of the WH in 2013.