« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why This So-Con won’t be voting for Huckabee

A few months ago, I said I would keep an open mind on all of the candidates and give them a pass on their previous statements as much as possible as we headed into a new campaign season.

At the bottom of my list after the 2008 primaries was Mike Huckabee.  I mean the bottom, as in, behind Guiliani. 

This week, Huckabee confirmed that he hasn’t really changed much when it comes to how he would govern.

Here is a quote from The Corner’s report on Huckabee’s speech at King’s College:

Huckabee flatly denied being a “pro-life liberal,” an accusation often made in certain quarters on the right. Not a trace of defensiveness could be detected on this point. To the contrary, the governor gave an all-out defense of his tax hikes while governor of Arkansas on the grounds that they were the only responsible course of action to repair state roads. He snorted with derision at “libertarians” who fail to recognize that “we don’t have a health care crisis in this country, but a health crisis.” He spoke with passion and knowledge on the need for preventative care to bring down exorbitant costs. And then, without the least amount of prompting, he mustered a vigorous defense of Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move” campaign against childhood obesity. This was the “art of governing,” he argued, rather than the cheap “science of campaigning.” He finished his call to a compassionate conservatism by echoing recent comments made by governor Daniels touting prison reform. Invoking a “Biblical standard” of crime enforcement, he granted that criminals must be punished while stressing that the status quo needs to be replaced. Opposed though he is to the decriminalization of drugs, he endorses a more “hopeful,” therapeutic approach that would thwart the creation of “monsters” within our prison walls.

Let me tell you what I have problems with regarding Huckabee:

1) He has defended his tax hikes as the only possible approach to solving the road problem. Now, I understand that there are serious issues, but is this REALLY the ONLY possible approach? What about cutting government employees or at least freezing hiring.

2) Secondly is his fasicination with fixing the health of America. I understand that he had bad health, but the fact that he thinks that government should be a part of such a solution strikes me as again being a part of his “big government conservative” which is an oxymoron if you ask me.

3) He finished his call to “compassionate conservatism” … what ? This may be The Corner’s description rather than Huckabee’s intent, but ANY candidate who uses the term or implies that we need anything other than a smaller, streamlined government is off of my list for 2012.

As a long time pro-lifer, I find it inconceiveable that some pro-lifers are so willing to ignore all of Huckabee’s trends towards bigger government.

I will not forget that bigger government is always the enemy of liberty.

And while I supported Bush because there was a desperate need to get some conservatives onto the Supreme Court and he seemed like the only chance to win the general election, I will not be making the same mistake on a “compassionate conservative” (i.e. big government conservative) this time around.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • aesthete

    While I’m not a social conservative, I strongly agree with you here: Huck is far too conciliatory to B Obama’s spending, and to his “wellness” initiatives. This is something of a theme for Huck: he is far more enthusiastic about spending that he likes than about any cuts to government, which for Huck start and end as hypothetical, non-specific cuts to “waste”, and never move past that point. For my part, it confirms to me that the conservatives most antipathic to libertarians as a phantom threat are the ones most likely to be terrible on fiscal and small govt issues.

    I’ll also add that Huck’s comments on (and proud ignorance of) foreign policy are the most disturbing I’ve heard from any prospective GOP candidate for President, and even worse than those made by many Dems.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    I have never heard him say any such thing. Citation/link, please?

    I do not back Huckabee — but I must say that, three years ago, I heard him talking about the threats from Islam, and he had deeper insights about it than any of the other candidates. This, of course, never appeared in the MSM.

    He was brilliant. I remember thinking at the time, this man “gets it” about Islam because he understands what the Eastern elites do not: namely, how powerful a motivator religion can be. The elites, because they are mostly atheists themselves, assume that if Muslims hate us, it couldn’t possibly have anything to do with what the jihadists themselves say it does — that they are obeying the Qur’an — no, no, no, it must be because of something WE did wrong. Hence, the elites’ absurd and dangerous appeasement efforts.

    But Huckabee, being a religious man himself, understands how it is that for most of humanity, for most of human history, religion has been something people very willingly die for. Radical Islamists are, of course, a very sick, malignant subset of religious people — but here again, Huckabee’s own religious commitment serves him well in understanding what we’re really up against with radical Islam. The Ivy Leaguers, with their hipster conceit that there is no such thing as good or evil, are totally obtuse when it comes to recognizing how evil radical Islam truly is. Huckabee, in contrast, precisely because he follows the One who IS Truth, the One who IS Goodness itself, has a very keen understanding of just how wicked Muhammad was, and how gargantuanly false and horrible Islam is.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    that Americans today don’t know they should be doing and for which they lack the means?

    From a blog post Change or Die

    What if you were given that choice? For real. What if it weren’t just the hyperbolic rhetoric that conflates corporate performance with life and death? Not the overblown exhortations of a rabid boss, or a slick motivational speaker, or a self-dramatizing CEO. We’re talking actual life or death now. Your own life or death. What if a well-informed, trusted authority figure said you had to make difficult and enduring changes in the way you think and act? If you didn’t, your time would end soon — a lot sooner than it had to. Could you change when change really mattered? When it mattered most?

    Yes, you say?

    Try again.

    Yes?

    You’re probably deluding yourself.

    [snip]

    Dr. Raphael “Ray” Levey, founder of the Global Medical Forum, an annual summit meeting of leaders from every constituency in the health system, told the audience, “A relatively small percentage of the population consumes the vast majority of the health-care budget for diseases that are very well known and by and large behavioral.” That is, they’re sick because of how they choose to live their lives, not because of environmental or genetic factors beyond their control. Continued Levey: “Even as far back as when I was in medical school” — he enrolled at Harvard in 1955 — “many articles demonstrated that 80% of the health-care budget was consumed by five behavioral issues.” Levey didn’t bother to name them, but you don’t need an MD to guess what he was talking about: too much smoking, drinking, eating, and stress, and not enough exercise.

    Then the knockout blow was delivered by Dr. Edward Miller, the dean of the medical school and CEO of the hospital at Johns Hopkins University. He turned the discussion to patients whose heart disease is so severe that they undergo bypass surgery, a traumatic and expensive procedure that can cost more than $100,000 if complications arise. About 600,000 people have bypasses every year in the United States, and 1.3 million heart patients have angioplasties — all at a total cost of around $30 billion. The procedures temporarily relieve chest pains but rarely prevent heart attacks or prolong lives. Around half of the time, the bypass grafts clog up in a few years; the angioplasties, in a few months. The causes of this so-called restenosis are complex. It’s sometimes a reaction to the trauma of the surgery itself. But many patients could avoid the return of pain and the need to repeat the surgery — not to mention arrest the course of their disease before it kills them — by switching to healthier lifestyles. Yet very few do. “If you look at people after coronary-artery bypass grafting two years later, 90% of them have not changed their lifestyle,” Miller said. “And that’s been studied over and over and over again. And so we’re missing some link in there. Even though they know they have a very bad disease and they know they should change their lifestyle, for whatever reason, they can’t.”

    Guess what entity constrains insurance companies from fully incentivizing behavior changes?

  • clefi

    While preaching right from wrong (He left his seminary a year before graduating.) when it comes time to walk the talk, he keeps talking as his hands do the wrong – and he believes he is above mere mortal distinctions.

    Three years ago I read everything on the net I could find. I put together the following link list and sent it to FOX when they announced he had manipulated himself a show. Obviously, one of the FOX people handed him my list where he hired a “super-secret investigator firm” to run a background on me. The Huckster took several seconds of air time (not on his show, of course) for what he thought was revenge with the information he was given. Unfortunately for him, if he paid over a buck for the background they gave him, he paid too much.

    Mikey “The Huckster” Huckabee http://bit.ly/bLpjaV

  • garywalter

    Huckabee is just the candidte who can truly assure a conservative victory. I know Pres. Bush sullied the term “compassionate conservatism” but by the same token there will be a second term of BHO unless a true conservative runs who can actually show the desire to govern with thoughtful concern and not just bumper sticker slogans. Huckabee can win the a-political types with his communication skills and crush BHO in debate. Huckabee 2012!

  • Scope

    that your comment is really really a stretch to say that Huckabee is a conservative, given his record as Governor. To say that he is the only candidate that can win against Obama is beyond imagination, unless of course you are working for his campaign. Hey, who am I to say. I’m sure that some still believe that Mike Gravel could beat Obama in 2012.

  • aesthete

    “Compassionate conservatism” sullied Bush’s term.

  • Doc Holliday

    without breaking the site rules.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    a problem that couldn’t be solved by government. And who, when he left the governorship after ten years in AR left no statewide Republican organization.

    Good choice.

  • Doc Holliday
  • Doc Holliday

    like any statist, he can change his mind one what he likes. His core beliefs are that the state and He know better than we do about how to live our lives. He could turn on guns as easily as he turned on Big Macs. No thanks Huckster.

  • powertothepeople

    There is way Huckster is a good option for our nomination.

  • aesthete

    aggressively ignorant and stupid on foreign policy.

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    He’s probably the only “compassionate conservative” (read: right-wing statist) who has more compassion in his conservatism than “W”.

    When I first looked at Huckabee during the 2008 primaries, I really liked him. After I did my homework, all of that changed. You are completely right when you say that he never met a problem that couldn’t be solved by government.

    And that’s just the problem with a lot of “conservatives” these days. They are pro-life or pro-gun or whatever, wear a GOP tag, but all they want to do is use the federal government to advance THEIR vision and values and force it on everyone else. He will also use the federal government to ‘solve problems’ in a ‘compassionate conservative’ way which means taking YOUR money and giving it to OTHERS who haven’t earned it. Newt Gingrich is the same way.

    We need a true conservative in the libertarian (small-L) and anti-federalist tradition who believes in decentralizing America’s government and dismantling the federal bureaucracy. Out of everyone currently on the radar, Mike Pence and Sarah Palin (in my view) are the ONLY ones who truly fit the bill.

  • chihank

    Huckabee is strong in the primary polls at the moment because people view him as a warm loving, Christian who wants to bring people together by sharing the love of Christ. In the aftermath of the AZ shootings, the climate just might aid Huckabee.

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    He is just the type of Republican that needs to go through a serious re-education camp or be uprooted and expelled. He is a chameleon, though—he likes to tout his support for the FairTax as being evidence of his fiscal conservatism. However, TAX REFORM and FISCAL DISCIPLINE are two entirely separate topics.

    Although I FULLY endorse the FairTax as the best solution on the subject of tax reform, you have to couple that with fiscal discipline. Mike Huckabee disgusts me with his support of stuff like the food safety reform act that Congress recently passed.

    Huck has no business being elected to any position of power in post-2008 America.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Go to a “Christian” auto mechanic, or contractor, or vote for a guy because he is a good “Christian”.