« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

State of the Race — 7 days to go: Projected EV count — Romney 261 Obama 236, 41 Toss-up

As of this morning looking at the polls and trends, here is what I have.   Romney has pretty much wrapped up IN, NC, FL, and VA.  The polls showing Florida and Virginia to be close are absurd with their turnout models.  Colorado and New Hampshire are very close to being wrapped up as well.  The trend in Ohio is very good and Governor Kasich believes that Romney will win comfortably in Ohio.  The early voting numbers look absolutely catastrophic for Obama in Ohio.  I would have to agree but I’m not willing to take any chances.   Currently I have Ohio, Nevada, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Maine Congressional District 2 as being toss-ups though the momentum in these states is all on the Romney side.

The big problem for Obama now is not the fact that Romney is so close to clinching this, but the fact that Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota are causing the Obama campaign incredible headaches.  I have these as being a slight lean to Obama right now but the momentum is with Romney in these states as well.  If Romney picks off just one out of Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, or Michigan, the election is over.  This is why you see the Obama campaign buying ad time in these states now because Romney is at 261 EV.  It is not any coincidence why the Obama campaign and operatives had a fit about the Des Moines Register endorsing Romney for president. I loved Romney’s SuperPAC buying a $2 million dollar ad by playing in all the Pennsylvania markets, including Philadelphia.  Romney, the RNC, and the GOP SuperPACs cash advantage has stretched Obama incredibly thin and they are playing this perfectly from a strategic standpoint.

Romney is on the cusp of winning this thing.  It’s all about getting out the vote and going to vote now.   Short diary yes, but I wanted to throw out there what I have and see what other people are thinking out there.

COMMENTS

  • Ausonius

    I certainly hope things are not close, because…even if they are NOT close at all, the Dems will still instantly scream on November 7th: “NOT a mandate! You MUST compromise with us! BIPARTISANSHIP!” And they will do their best to prevent budget care, the repeal of MAObamaCare, and the onerous taxation planned for next year.

    Watch our RINO’s then shake and quake and bake themselves into compromising with the Dems, i.e. giving the Dems practically everything they want.

    If it is a Romney landslide, this Orwellian Big-Lie technique about “no mandate” will only go so far.

    • Viet71

      The Dems are already warming up to claim Romney stole the election because of some investment he has. Much moaning and groaning about this yesterday on FDL — a place, BTW, for conspiracy theorists and theories.

  • Viet71

    How, if at all, do you see Sandy affecting voting in Ohio and Pennsylvania?

    • RealQuiet

      Don’t know. If anything, there is a high probability that the vote would be affected in Pennsylvania for sure, particularly in Eastern PA if the flooding is severe and power outages remain. Probably not so much in Ohio.

  • Common_Cents

    I read both Obama and Romney/Ryan will be campaigning in MN! That IS a shocker that MN could be close???? BIG trouble for Maobama.

  • barleycorn

    I’ve got it 257 R to 236 O, with Maine 01, NH, Ohio, Wisc, Iowa, and Nevada as toss ups.

  • timmcg

    Why do you suppose that Intrade still has Obama over 60%?

    • PowerToThePeople

      Intrade is a joke powered by those willing to waste their time “trading” for politicians. It is clearly dominated by leftist and leftist leaning people and should never, and I repeat never, be used as proof one side or the other is winning.

      • jimmyg

        UK Bookies have Obama as the favorite. http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=482041
        So does Iowa Electronic Markets
        http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres12_quotes.html

        I know that Intrade is not popular around here but what is the explanation for these odds and percentages? The bookies have Obama as a 1 to 3 favorite.

        • PowerToThePeople

          Come on, it is a very simple answer, one that you should be able to figure out on your own. If you want to believe those sites, that is your right, but do not ask us to especially considering all the real numbers out there.

          • timmcg

            If the “real” numbers predicted as well as Intrade, I would not worry about Intrade

            But Intrade got every state right in 2004 & 48 right in 2008. Correctly predicting both a R and a D to win.

          • PowerToThePeople

            Not sure what you do not grasp, it is now a liberal playground. I could care less what happened in those years, it is now a joke.

        • http://www.twitter.com/RWBuckeye Right-Wing Buckeye

          The Detroit Tigers were favored to win the World Series by most book makers. They got swept. Just last Thursday, the Vikings were favored by a TD over the Buccaneers, but lost 36-17. Relying on bookies to be accurate is a fools errand. If handicapping events by bookies was even remotely accurate, I don’t think too many people would risk wagering money on it. Watching an event wouldn’t be much fun, either, if these all-knowing handicappers already told us the outcome.

          • jimmyg

            I did not say that the bookmakers were correct, or that the odds they set portend the election results, what I did ask for was an explanation, in light of the diarists assertion, and the polls back him up, that the wind is at Romney’s back and that Romney is now the favorite. It seems the bookies do not agree with this assertion. I found the fact that Obama is favored by the bookies and futures sites odd in light of the recent polling.

          • http://www.twitter.com/RWBuckeye Right-Wing Buckeye

            I’m not sure I have a good explanation. I just know that I don’t trust the predictions of gambling odds. I really believe that Romney is going to win by a comfortable margin (both popular vote and electoral college tallies). We will know for certain a week from now.

          • jimmyg

            Thanks for the reply. Although PTTP says it is a simple answer, if their was a simple answer to the difference between the polls and and the bookies/future sites he would tell us. I am with you, I do not know why the difference other than I think the pollsters are having a problem this year because of the number of households that are cell phone only which number 34% of all households. In 2008 only 10% of all households were cell phone only. As a result the pollsters have had to constantly adjust their secret sause. http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/06/cell-phone-addi.php

    • Jack_Savage

      How about this, Tim – you and I bet $1,000. Deal?
      Or are you not quite as confident when it is your own cash?

      • leftylurker

        $1000 is too rich for my blood, but I will bet you $100 to the charity of your/my choosing if you like.

        • PowerToThePeople

          I will do one better and it will cost you nothing. Lets bet our accounts. Romney wins, you never come back even to lurk, Obama wins, I will leave. In fact, I will make that bet with any and all of your lefty friends on this site.

          I will even go for that hundred as well. I win, you donate a hundred to this site. I lose, I donate to whomever you chose with the exception of an pro abortion or pro abortion supporting charity. Will not pay a dime to help those scumbags.

          • leftylurker

            I won’t bet leaving, but I will take the $100. Although my charity is USO.

            Internet handshake?

          • PowerToThePeople

            Chicken. Fine you have your wimp bet. When Romney wins, I want this site to see a hundred of your dollars. USO will have to wait till another election where you may win.

          • leftylurker

            I missed commented on common cents…but here I am…Waiting on an email confirming you made your USO contribution. GG Power.

        • Jack_Savage

          Thanks so much for the offer.
          No.
          You and Timmy get together and pool your funds. First, stroke a check to the government to reduce the deficit. Then both of you can take the bet – $1K each. Or not.

          • leftylurker

            If you have $1k to toss around, some of those intrade shares will be a steal for you.

            I do what I can to reduce the deficit every year by paying taxes. =)

          • Jack_Savage

            Have you ever tried to start an account on Intrade? It’s ridiculous.
            I prefer to look someone in the eye when he hands over his cash. Or at least see what he types.
            I am glad you pay taxes, but sadly they are not going to reducing the deficit. I will play a part in reducing the deficit by trillions by voting for Romney. Will you at least join me in that?

      • timmcg

        I don’t think you answered my question. Want to give it another shot and be serious?

        On to your bet, if you think you have an edge in analyzing the race, go to intrade and do it. Or to any of the betting sites.

  • chuckg

    I’m wondering if a +4 Dem Sample in Ohio Polling is an accurate Sample come Tuesday? I just don’t think Ohio is going to look anything like 2008. 2008 was a down year for voter turnout because Republican turnout in Ohio was awful. Suffolk polling has Ohio tied with a +4 Dem sample. That is horrible for Obama. Ohio gave Obama a 4% advantage in 08–with Republicans staying home–with the sweeping “hope and change” and a historical election for Obama. If Romney and Obama are now eyeing Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Penn…..you can bet Ohio is showing some really good things for Romney. Again…this is a sample issue. I just don’t see this being so close–but what do I know???

  • The_Rebel

    There are many individual state polls that went for Obama in big numbers in 2008 that are now lagging substantially this time around. Public Policy Institute of California had a poll out last week showing Obama winning the state by 12%, well down from the 24% he won it by in 2008. In Massachusetts, Obama beat McCain by 26%, but a new poll by the Boston Globe issued Monday show his lead at only 14%, getting only 52% with 9% still undecided. In Oregon, a new poll conducted for The Oregonian gives Obama a 6% lead, garnering only 47% of the vote. He won Oregon in 2008 by 14%.

    Romney in all likelihood won’t win any of these states. But if these deep blue states are showing numbers this bad for Obama, then I believe Romney is doing much better in the so-called swing states than pollsters are currently indicating. If Obama is only leading in Oregon by 6, how can any pollster claim Obama is winning Ohio by 5, as some have.

  • Pingback: Cinderella Zartman

  • Pingback: Renetta Servidio