« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Romney vs Santorum: Who Would Perform Best Against Obama and Why?

Many arguments can be made as to who’s the stronger candidate to face President Obama and why, whether it’s Willard M. Romney’s name recognition and Moderate image or Richard J. Santorum’s appeal to the pivotal base of support that is the grassroots activists. I will be looking at the electoral aspects of their strengths, where, and why they would perform strongest.

WM Romney’s Strengths:

New England-Home to none other than Mitt Romney himself, New England is obviously and unarguably going to be his sole strength. He will play well with the Moderates/Independents, which constitute the majority of voters up here(minus Vermont) and fiscally oriented Conservatives. If he’s the nominee, he would put away New Hampshire, give Obama a serious fight for his money in Maine, and stand a decent shot in Connecticut. Santorum, however, would lose Connecticut in a landslide, be in a slightly weaker position in Maine, and probably still be ahead in New Hampshire. While Santorum would play well with the aforementioned fiscally oriented Conservatives and Independents, he wouldn’t play terribly well with the Moderates.

RJ Santorum’s Strengths:

Midwest-An anchor of Conservatism, the Midwest is likely to vote for the GOP nominee regardless. That said, Santorum has a better chance of turning out the Conservative voters than does Romney. A Romney vs Obama race could well dampen turnout(as did McCain vs Obama in 2008) and put Missouri, the Dakotas, and Nebraska’s Second Congressional district in play, as the district went to Obama in 2008.

Old Confederacy-The biggest anchor of Conservatism since Oklahoma, both candidates should be expected to do well here, right? Not so. The Old Confederacy, more than anywhere else, would be a problem spot for the Moderate Romney. Why? In 2008, John McCain underperformed across the board(losing Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia in the process) because of a rightly perceived Moderate streak running straight through his legislative record. Such would be about the same for Romney, except with more of a Moderate record plus the radical inconsistencies in what he says on a day to day basis, he would be in worse shape than McCain was(losing Georgia and possibly Texas and South Carolina in the process).

Rocky Mountains-With the exceptions of Colorado and New Mexico, the Rocky Mountains are a hotbed of Conservatism. Considering Obama’s approvals as of late, either candidate would stand a chance against Obama in the two swingy states and rake in landslide victories in the others. That said, Conservatives will be less inclined to get out and vote if the Moderate candidate Romney(like John McCain in 2008 and Bob Dole in 1996) is the nominee, while they will turn out big time if the Conservative candidate Santorum is the nominee.

Equal Strengths:

Great Lakes-The Great Lakes states[minus Illinois(Democrat), Indiana(Republican), and New York(Democrat)] will be by and far the most hotly contested region in the entire country in the upcoming Presidential race. Several factors will influence the end result, such as high unemployment, Obama’s flagging approvals, and the ongoing war against public-sector unions. If the union busting is successful, unemployment is high, and Obama’s approvals continue to flag, then it does not matter if the nominee is Romney or Santorum, as either will win handily. But if the inverse happens, then Romney would have to be considered the best bet to defeat Obama. If the latter circumstances transpire, even Romney would face long odds.

Pacific Northwest-The Pacific Northwest has tended toward favoring Liberalism in the past few decades. Oregon may be within reach if my predicted Presidential numbers by Congressional district averages pan out(resulting in a 49.8%-49.4% GOP victory), and Washington is definitely within reach for two reasons. (1) The President has registered negative approval ratings in Washington State, and (2) state Attorney General Rob McKenna is poised for a landslide victory in the Governors race, which may provide coattails for either Romney or Santorum.

These are my views on how either candidate will perform in the various regions, and I would like to hear yours in the comments.

COMMENTS

  • David123

    In the past 50+ years a Republican presidential candidate has carried Pennsylvania 4 times.

    Twice Reagan carried it.
    George H. W. Bush carried it in 1988, which might be thought of as “Reagan’s third term.”
    Nixon carried it in his 1972 49-state blow-out.
    Otherwise, Democrats have carried Pennsylvania. Moderate Republicans have not done well there.

    http://www.270towin.com/states/Pennsylvania

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    The whole meme that Romney will appeal to moderates/independents is a red herring in my opinion. The moderates and independents will have a choice of the O’s dismal record/real persona showing through the last several years or anyone else and when the O loses to generic Republican candidate with a pulse I’m suspecting that the issue of swing voters won’t be an issue.

    I think the biggest fear of the left is having a Republican candidate that doesn’t have the baggage of Gingrich or Romney or is otherwise an easy target for them. Last time around the media essentially helped pick McCain, this time around they’re trying to pick Romney.

    Let’s not repeat that error.

  • David123

    Santorum would lead a united party because he is a consistent, committed conservative. No one posts “anyone but Santorum”; we’ve seen any number of posters claiming they’ll stay home, vote 3rd party, or vote for Obama if Romney is the nominee.

    Santorum has won statewide elections in the key swing-state of Pennsylvania twice. Before that he won Congressional elections in a district that tilted Democratic. Romney’s electoral success rate is less impressive (Newt would rephrase that last sentence much less kindly).

    The Democrats have one basic attack strategy against Santorum – Rick Santorum is “against a woman’s right to choose”. And given Obama’s extreme pro-abortion position in favor of denying medical care to infants who survive abortions, Obama can easily alienate swing voters by using this attack.

    In contrast, Romney presents the Democrats with a target rich environment. Just taking two quotes from Republicans,
    “Mitt looks like the guy who laid you off.”
    “Mitt is a ‘vulture capitalist’.
    … and then there’s …
    Mitt is a “one-percenter”; all this OWS crap is probably to set the stage to run against Mitt.
    Mitt is a flip-flopper – they can run ads of Mitt at some point criticizing Mitt’s current position.
    And given Mitt’s pro-life stance since 2007, the Democrats can also paint him as against a”woman’s right to choose”, just like they’ll paint Santorum.

    In terms of criticizing Obama, Rick Santorum will be able to denounce Obamacare much more effectively than Mitt will. Rick is warming up for the general election now by pointing out flaws common to both Romneycare and Obamacare.

    People know where Rick Santorum stands – it’s easier to respect a person who stands for something and defends his position than it is someone who you just don’t know what they stand for.

  • david1313

    nominating Romney. If he can’t see that then he has zero political instincts. I believe he knows it but is positioning himself for 2016 or 2020. Very selfish motive indeed. He is not Newt’s friend. Friends don’t do that. He said after Iowa, ‘a friend is someone who can sing your heart song back to you when you forget the words.’ He is not Newt’s friend even by his own words.

  • WillWong

    That is all you need to know about what kind of a person Santorum is.

    No matter what, you don’t do this to someone you worked together with for years. He said he loved Newt but Newt has issues blah blah blah. Whatever issues Newt has, no one can and should take that away from him. He was the speaker from 1995 to 1999.

    Santorum had on many occasions addressed him and congressman Gingrich. You don’t do that to your boss or your friend.