« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Everyone Knows Something That Isn’t True

I don’t know when I learned that everyone has false beliefs. But I see it all the time, both in myself and in others. I’d hate to have my fate decided by some fact I got wrong. Wouldn’t you?

For instance, I never questioned a belief I had held for years: that the hijackers that flew planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11 came through Canada. On twitter I said that to do anything about 9/11, President Bush would have had to fix security in Canada.

It was then that I learned the hijackers all came through from US airports.

I had no reason, up to that embarrassing moment, to challenge my belief. It’s not that I had a particular bond to my false recollection, it’s that it just never occurred to me that there was anything to challenge. Afterward I realized that the hijackers would have complicated their mission greatly by choosing a foreign country as their takeoff point.

It’s difficult to challenge our own beliefs. That’s why we believe them.

I heard of a nurse recently who said it wasn’t until nursing school that she learned rabbits don’t lay eggs.

When I was in the seventh or eighth grade (ca 1977, just a few years after Roe v Wade), we had a required quarter of Home Economics. At some point during the class, we were talking about abortion and I must have asked the teacher the rape question.

“Well, I don’t think that under those conditions a woman would be … relaxed enough,” she said coyly, moving her hands as a harpist would, “to become pregnant.”

That response stuck with me, even though I didn’t believe it, because it seemed from her manner that she was implying a woman must experience orgasm to become pregnant.

So when Todd Akin said that “the female body has ways to shut that whole thing down,” [1] I saw that A) he was about the same age as my Home Ec teacher and B) everyone knows something that isn’t true.

People who have yet to get past these remarks need to do so.  As Dana Loesch said,

We act as though we have decades and years of elections to jack around until we get a perfect, stain-free candidate. We, an imperfect, selfish people act like we’re picking the next Messiah, not a citizen candidate. While we hesitate to push someone into a seat the left acts faster and fills it. While we focus on the trees and fight over tactics, the left solidifies strategy and focuses on the forest.

If what Akin said was more contemptible to you than anything McCaskill has ever said or her voting record, you were never going to vote for him anyway.

The criticism of Akin has been counterproductive for some time. Do people really think it’s better to try to distance the Party from Akin, when we won’t be able to, anyway?

People got mad that Akin made a huge gaffe, and threw him under the bus. Todd Akin, who jumped in to the Congressional Tea Party Caucus when others tested the waters. He stood by you, and you fled him.

We didn’t want to have to fight for Missouri. It was supposed to be in the bag. Unfortunately, we don’t have the luxury of living in the reality we want, only the reality we have — unless you want to cling to something that’s not true, that is.

If Republicans don’t start supporting Todd Akin, or at least don’t stop bashing him and telling the media he can’t win, we’ll likely end up with this woman retaining her Senate seat:

Barack Obama brought you this economy. Claire McCaskill brought you Barack Obama:

 

Todd Akin didn’t say. “George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black,” but Claire McCaskill did.

Claire McCaskill’s first vote would be for the despicable Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader.In all likelihood, her second vote would be against repeal of Obamacare.

Like every other Democrat Senator, Claire McCaskill was the 60th and deciding vote for Obamacare.

 Todd Akin would join the conservative core in the Senate.

Todd Akin has a lifetime 90% rating with FreedomWorks, and an ACU rating of 97%.

Claire McCaskill has a lifetime 21% rating with FreedomWorks and an ACU rating of 15%.

It could come down to this:

  • If we lose Missouri, we lose the Senate
  • If we lose the Senate, we are stuck with Obamacare forever
  • If we are stuck with Obamacare, all further elections will be about dividing the pie between health care and defense
  • Once we start arguing over the pieces of the pie, Democrats and statist Republicans will win every time
  • Once Democrats and statist Republicans win every time, there will be no more need for a Republican Party, and your country will not be recognizable as a constitutional republic.

Republicans, conservatives, libertarians and tea partiers need to decide: is it worth losing the country because our candidate knew something that wasn’t true?

COMMENTS

  • MsDollie

    There is no “Perfect” human ….. thus there is no “Perfect” candidate. Come to think of it, that fact has national implications.
    It is ours to lose.

    • clowngirl

      No, but if a surgeon walks in and casually chops off somebody else – they would be so far beyond “not perfect” as to never be entrusted with the responsibility again.

      However much you try to spin it, coupling the words “legitimate” and “rape” – saying that women can block pregnancy – suggests that any woman who got pregnant during rape was secretly enjoying it – or just making up a story.

      I agree with Ann Coulter that there should be zero tolerance for this kind of thing and we should’ve put up a write in candidate.

      Anyway, having registered my dissent (in 2 comments) I’m now bowing out of this thread.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        Ann Coulter puts her book sales over the nation. That’s all.

      • Bill S

        Your last sentence is good news.

  • votemout2012

    Thank you for this Post. Spot on. Lets get behind Akin and defeat McCaskill in MO.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Akin’s definitely better than McCaskill as Senator.

  • barleycorn

    Excellent post. Spot on accurate. Commonsensical too!

    • barleycorn

      Kowalski. I have experienced “knowing” something that isn’t true. Some things we “learn” in childhood just never come up again until years later. It can be embarrassing. Very embarrassing.

  • http://deadite.wordpress.com deadite

    I was angry at Aiken – mostly for being an idiot. But you make excellent sense. People asked him to get out, he didn’t, and compared to the bag lady that currently holds the seat, who mumbles crazy batshit things, he would be a huge improvement.

    Remember that its Carl Rove who is one of those most dead set against him. Carl Rove who reportedly (http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/10/book-karl-rove-advised-komen-to-restore-planned-parenthood-funding/) advised Komen to back off its rejection of Planned Parenthood (a thuggish and disgusting organization).

    At least Aiken stands on the side of the angels. Its often not apparent if many Republicrats really care.

    My opinion is that States should have the opinion to outlaw or fully endorse abortion. I am personally against it, but realize we don’t live in a dictatorship. Except that of the Supreme Court.

  • http://conservativemormonmom.blogspot.com ew88

    Just wondering what you think of the big Democrat Akin donors. If they wanted him because they thought he’d be easiest to beat (just like Dems wanted Romney whether or not their premise proved accurate) that would make sense.

    • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

      I think they gave money to a Republican.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        5 (nt)

    • votemout2012

      Do you have any proof what so ever Democrats donated to Akin. Because if you have the Proof I like to see it!

  • TravisMonitor

    Speaking of things believe that arent true, IMHO that’s what the 2012 election is all about.

    to wit, Obama’s path to victory is by lying to the American people, and these four big lies are the four pillars of Obama’s campaign:
    1.
    Excuses for his failures by blaming Republicans,e.g. $1 trillion deficits? not mine, theirs. And his phony blame of
    ‘if only they would pass my bills’ when his agenda WAS passed, and didnt work, and now Republicans in the House have a
    dozen jobs bills waiting on the doorstep of the Democrat Senate.
    2.
    “Nobody could have done it better” – the ‘its such a big hole I couldnt fill it’ excuse. Problem: we have the worst recovery since WWII, in
    fact nobody could have done WORSE. Fewer jobs than when Obama was
    elected, lowest growth rate of a ‘recovery’ worst record on deficits and
    debt addition EVER. Clinton is a good liar, and he sold a lemon selling
    that lie to America last month.
    3. Recycling broken promises. Broke
    major promises in 2008, like cut the deficit in half” oops. In 2012, he
    has NOTHING NEW, but is simply recycling the broken promises from 2008 -
    yeah, amnesty for illegal aliens remains a ‘dream’. Who falls for a
    lying politician the SECOND time? Gullible much?
    4. Smears against
    Romney, e.g., false accusations of Romney’s middle class ‘tax hike’ – a
    complete 100% fabrication – when in fact Obama already passed a middle
    class tax hike, in Obamacare, and wants more taxes, and Romney proposes a
    middle class tax rate reduction.

    If Obama
    gets away with selling the American people on the above 4 lies – he
    wins. If Obama gets caught, debunked, outflanked, and his lies are
    exposed, he loses.

    To those of us who are informed enough to see through Obama’s lies,
    it is frustrating to see him winning by convincing people of a pack of lies. Romney’s campaign has to pierce the Obama-media
    veil and show that, not only is the economy doing poorly, but also Obama’s
    Obamacare and other policies have made it that way, and Romney has a
    better plan. The election may well be decided by how well and how much these four arguments hold up or are debunked.

    We have already been hurt politically by our failure to challenge the dominant narratives that help Obama. For example, Republicans haven’t challenge the false “knowledge” that Bush is solely to blame for 2008 financial crisis. that and ‘deregulation’. Poppycock. Sure he shares blame, but so do Democrat majority leader Reid, Democrat Speaker Pelosi, Fannie and Freddie protecters Frank and Dodd, people who used and abused the CRA, like Obama when he sued banks to force them to lend to people who later wouldnt/couldnt pay it back. Not to mention govt regulations and the moral hazard of underwriting fannie and freddie cheap loans while the Fed blew bubbles of easy money. None of that was redegulation nor Bush. And so forth. An unchallenged false meme is now “knowledge”.

    If Obama wins, it will be via a mass delusion of millions of voters “knowing” something that isn’t true.

  • jfree

    He is the candidate and we need the Senate. That is all there is to think about. I sent him money from Texas this week and will do so again next week. It doesn’t matter if I care that he spoke “stupidly” or understand that he knows things that aren’t true.

  • clowngirl

    Loren- if you were to run for the US Senate, I would be horrified to hear you publicly say you thought the planes that hit the World Trade Center and the Pentagon came from Canada.

    Lawyers have to pass the bar, pilots have to get a license, would be doctors need to pass the MCAT just to get INTO med school, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect that someone who takes on the serious responsibility of representing both the Republican Party and the people of a state should should have a working knowledge of major issues and at least minimal political competence. Akin has demonstrated he is sorely lacking in the latter.

    It’s frankly infuriating to see 2 candidates in 2 successive election cycles throw away (or at least seriously jeopardize) an otherwise easily winnable Senate seat. (the other being Ken Buck)

    Whether these comments reflect genuine misogyny or just a disqualifying level of utter stupidity – their failure to show even minimal respect for their party and the high office they seek is inexcusable.

    • 10ab

      Excellent post! Akin’s views are an embarrassment to me. He is not intellectually equipped to be a senator.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        Neither is McCaskill and she is an Obamabot, straight down the line.

    • edintexas

      I’m so glad you believe there are perfect people out there, just waiting to be called to service. I’m even happier you are no longer contributing your aberrant view to this thread.

  • trutexan

    Great post. I’ve shared it with family living in Sprinfield and asked them to share with their fellow voters.

  • westcoastpatriette

    The people who so indignantly overreact to Akin’s stumble look even more stupid than Akin…as if they are above thinking and saying things that aren’t so. Every honest human being has to admit they have done the same thing — more than once in their life — the only difference being they were not on a national stage when they said dumb things. In that regard, our party has shown itself capable of being just as petty, catty and hypocritical as the left dimwits we fight every day.

    I hope Akin kicks butt and all the self-righteous know-it-alls in our party choke on their pompousness. Shunning and abandoning Akin in favor of McCaskill is one of the dumbest things I have witnessed this entire primary.

    • renl57

      If you’re running for the Senate, you have an obligation to show you’re not an idiot, and you don’t wallow in pseudo-science.

      It wasn’t just some dumb remark. Akin didn’t pull this idea out of thin air. It’s a pseudo-scientific theory that’s been floating around social conservative circles as an attempt to weasel out of the question of whether a woman who becomes impregnated by forcible rape should be able to terminate that pregnancy.

      And it’s flat wrong. In every way.

      The only way I could vote for someone who says something like that is if I could make it clear that I’m really voting against his Dem opponent, not that I in any way associate myself with what he said.

      • edintexas

        So you’d rather see McCaskill win than vote “for” Akin. Must be nice to never have made an mistake, nor mispoke, in your life. Wish I was perfect, like those you would vote “for”.

        • pmgreene1962

          Ed, try not to be such a ———like WCP. Geez! :)

          • gretchenstreetman

            Mods: Delete?!?!?

          • streiff

            And we’re done here.

    • westcoastpatriette

      kowalski…and this will be my last word on Akin. But, one of the reasons that what Akin said did not bother me is because, since I am a woman, I have done a lot of research on peri-menopause symptoms and the role hormones play in the process. And severe stress absolutely does play a role in affecting hormones which can affect menstrual cycles and hormonal levels which in turn affect a woman’s ability to conceive. So, that was my first thought when Akin said what he said — that he, in a very clumsy way, was trying to say something like that. Those whose minds went to the gutter and assumed he was referencing whether or not the woman had an orgasm are projecting their own biases.

  • mobjack

    Is there anything a GOP candidate could say that would make you want to throw him/her overboard? Or all all Republicans better than all Democrats? The problem I had with Akin wasn’t that he thought you couldn’t become pregnant as a result of rape; it was the way he wanted to distinguish between “legitimate” rapes and other rapes. If a man drugs a woman and has sex with her while passed out, is that not a “legitimate” rape because she could not or did not struggle? This is a distinction that Republicans should not be trying to make. Being associated with Akin makes the GOP a weaker party, unable to win votes from women. Better to lose the Senate than win with Akin, because winning with Akin means not winning women and not broadening the party.

    • streiff

      “Winning isn’t the most important thing, it is the only thing.”

      “Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser.”

      This comment is absurd. If you really believe that you should not be posting at this site because we believe any conservative or Republican IS better than any conceivable Democrat.

    • grumpyKoz

      What about consensual sex that is later declared rape?
      Is that legitimate rape?

      This is not the line we should be arguing. We are taking about the survival of a civil society as either a free society or one living under tyranny.

      In a free society, the problems, such as the one identified above, are handled appropriately as required.
      In a tyranny, these issues are dealt with in an much more incontinent manor that will strip individuals of their free choice to choose and act. And punishments will be mandated based on the ideals of the tyrant and NOT civil law.

      SO, to answer “Is there anything a GOP candidate could say that would make you want to throw him/her overboard?”, yes there is, but first we must make sure that tyranny is avoided, then we can deal with the inconvenient words.

      The enemy of my enemy IS my friend. To that end, we just give latitude to the use of English language in order to ensure the civil outcome we desire.

    • Bill S

      You forgot to insert the “y” in your username.

      • westcoastpatriette

        I thought the same thing, Bill S. :) )

    • Melody Warbington

      Sure, mobyjack. “I’m switching to the Democratic Party” or “I’m voting for Obama” would do it for me.

  • Pingback: Alexis Fyler

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Melaine Mcmenamin