We need to figure out how to ram this one down their throats - figuratively speaking, of course.

and then out into the blogosphere. These people think that they are mainstream, but the average American wouldn’t touch garbage like this, much less applaud it.

Thanks for the work you did on this one, Caleb. We all need a shower after viewing this disgusting stuff. (Dear Lord, please don’t let the man who wrote this have any children. He’s patently unfit to raise a child.)

And where’s Gov. Palin?

Peggy Noonan?????????????????????????????????????????????

Andrew Sullivan?

Peggy Noonan???????????????????????????????

The silence from the so-called protectors of women’s rights is not just deafening, it’s damning.

Caleb, thanks for grabbing this before they tried to shove it down the memory hole. Well done, sir.

Take Care, mailloux

I thought the left was the party for women?

Derrogatory and sexism at its best!

Something tells me that an NFL quarterback could take this guy.

.. but that term (H-F) is a lot more popular than people may think. Reading the various responses to it on various sites has been interesting. There is definitely a cultural and generational divide. I am not going to defend it for a second. But it is a common term used in young bachelor circles and it is not associated with rape. It most often used in the context of exes (people who break up and end up having sex because they are still attracted to each other.) Perhaps,it is a sign of our cultural decadence that people joke about rough sex so freely, but this doesn’t shock me coming from Camp Heffner. Not for a second.

The article by that Guy (he’s a Devil Incarnate btw) is totally horrible.

It’s really VILE VILE VILE attack to all Conservative women in the country.

That Devil Incarnate should be required to make a public apology against all Conservative Women and to all Americans.

1) That she got on the list ahead of Cindy McCain or Sarah Palin, or Ann Coulter, and
2) That they didn’t refer to her as the Nooner.

Peggy’s been soft on the left a bit these days, I think. I stopped reading the Opinion Journal on line because of her new tone. Apparently the author of this filth hasn’t been reading lately.

It’s a clear sign to me that the author knew exactly what he was doing, because he left out the more powerful targets in his list, the beautiful women I mentioned above, the ones more likely (in his mind) to fight back.

That’s the profile of a man who targets vulnerable women, like a rapist might. How’s that grab you Playboy-writer-dude?

Of course I think he made a mistake thinking that most of them wouldn’t fight back.

I love and trust these women. When they and the three I mentioned speak, and all others who follow their message, I trust whatever comes out of their mouths as accurate, well-intentioned, good for the country. They’re outwardly beautiful because inwardly they love this country, and want to see it improve.

is men, last I checked: real men who at least think they are manly and actually LIKE WOMEN. That means precious few of them are in the testicularly-challenged Democrat party. I wonder if the “guy” who put this thing together actually thinks men talk like that. I bet a lot of his friends are women.

Well, it would’ve been hard to make a list like this about the liberal women because there aren’t any attractive liberal women.
Hillary Clinton?
Diane Feinstein?
Janet Reno?
Napalitano?
Romer?
And Chemical Sam, you are so right about this man picking women who wouldn’t fight back. I’d have loved to see him put Ann Coulter and Sarah Palin on his little list. I’d also like to ball it up and stick it where the sun doesn’t shine.
This list is truly despicable, hateful and inexcusable. It’s that kind of smut that perpetuates REAL sex offenders and makes them think it’s “okay” to treat women like that. Pig.

For its targeted demographic its spot on. Its shooting for young highschool and college age boys and men and trying to plant the idea, that conservative women are shrewish and not quite sane.

My own thought would be to do the same to their side, but nature and exposure have done a far better job than any poison pen ever could.

As inppropriate as it may be, they actually do stumble upon a valid point; the female pundits on the right are much hotter per capita than those on the left or society as a whole.

I have seen maybe one or two really attractive liberal ladies (on Fox ofcourse), but they are few and far between. Most of the lefty ladies look like Rachel Maddow, Joy Behardt, etc.