« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Politico/Molly Ball Attempts Balanced Take On Palin Emails: Alas, PDS Wins The Day

So I’m reading yesterday morning with no plans to write anything and I come across Molly Ball at the top of the page at Politico:

Long-lost Sarah Palin surfaces in emails

It absolutely cracks me up and would rank up there with the greatest pieces of parody ever written if it weren’t meant to be a serious report about Sarah Palin’s emails and time as governor.

Molly Ball is obviously trying to play at being fair and balanced and starts out with a sing songy narrative about what a caring, thoughtful, competent, powerful Governor Palin used to be alternating with what Palin has become…but that only lasted a paragraph….as the Lame stream media is want to do…the whole thing descends into childish and catty PDS rantings from there on.

To hear Molly describe it, (whether the description be direct, or by inference) the old Palin is “Lost”.

What was lost according to Mrs. Ball?

Well, “the popular, charismatic, competent woman of the people.” Palin used to be of course.

Sarah used to be “…warm and supportive with her staff” she was a governor who “frequently misspells in haste or phonetically (“nonsensicle” for “nonsensical”)”.

Palin is such a doofus don’t you know?

Now she’s become an “airhead” or a “prima donna”.

Continuing on with her narrative of the two Sarahs…Mrs. Ball tells us Palin used to be “active in guiding policy, a self-assured politician who knows where she stands. When she feels she’s been left out of the loop.”

This, as opposed to now where she “whines constantly about her treatment by the press.” As if she didn’t have reason or justification.

Palin “uses subterfuge to manipulate her image, ghostwriting a letter to the editor praising her, for instance, of(or?) conducting a phony television interview in which she reads answers from a teleprompter.”

Apparently Ole Moll is an arm chair psychologist in addition to being a crack pot Politico journalist because she has now diagnosed Palin as a paranoid!

“She increasingly sees enemies all around, repeatedly demanding to know whether her privacy has been breached.”

Mrs. Ball continues the Palin is a paranoiac line with this bit of psychobabble:

“She convinces herself that rumors about her last pregnancy have been deliberately and maliciously spread by an enemy in the state Legislature.”

Somehow Ole Moll doesn’t trouble herself with the possibility that Palin might know what she’s talking about in this instance….I mean…someone started this rumor…right?

Is it possible it could have been started by an enemy in the state legislature as opposed to an enemy from parts unknown? Has it occurred to the all knowing Molly Ball that maybe Palin knows full well the source of the rumors that Trig is actually Bristol’s child?

Of course not…there is no way Sarah Palin could be privy to knowledge or evidence that hasn’t been indexed and cataloged in Molly Ball’s all knowing mind.

These possibilities don’t concern Mrs. Ball…Besides…We wouldn’t want to ruin a good narrative with troubling facts or details…Palin is paranoid…that’s all there is to it and that ends the discussion.

Putting her Journ-o-List hat back on Mrs. Ball rambles on firing one cheap shot after another in rapid succession:

Palin is prone to “darker tendencies — defensiveness, thin skin, grudge-keeping — hardened into tics.”.

So now Dr. Ball has diagnosed Sarah as having a psycho/motor disorder commonly exhibited by individuals with Genetic disorders, Psychosomatic anxiety disorders or brain damage induced by oxygen deprivation or head trauma?

What a brilliant person this Molly Ball.

Thought that ended it?

Nope….Ball goes on…and on it seems.

Palin is “doctrinaire” a “Knee jerk partisan”,

Sarah Palin is “Paranoid” (But Molly already said that didn’t she?).

Palin is “Belligerent”, has a “chip on her shoulder”

Finally….Palin is…gasp…“gleefully antagonistic”!

Of course Mrs. Ball couldn’t be accused of being antagonistic could she? Not on the merits of this example of Journ-o-Listic excellence.

Yet still it goes on.

Sarah has become a “polarizing….freelance sharp-tongued partisan” accusing the sweet and innocent so called “objective press” of engaging in “Blood Libel”.

Yeah Sarah…why can’t you just shut up and take it when the press en masse accuses you of being responsible for every left wing paranoid schizophrenic off his meds, (this one was diagnosed by real doctors by the way), who picks up a gun and shoots a congresswoman half a continent away from Alaska and has no connection to you whatsoever?

How dare you Sarah Palin?

The petulance! The arrogance! What unmitigated gall you exhibit in daring to confront the so called “objective press” when they get it so wrong as they try to grind you into pulp….don’t you know you’re supposed to lie down and take it?

Finally I’ll point out the irony of Mrs. Ball actually trying to make the leap from what a great, caring and sympathetic person Sarah Palin was before entering the national political scene to what a “brittle, divisive caricature” Palin has become while pretending the press had nothing to do with creating that caricature!

As if there haven’t been nearly three years of constant and unrelenting yellow journalism and vitriolic fire from the so called “objective press” aimed at Palin, her husband, and even her children for Pete’s sake!

Molly Ball wants to gloss over the belligerence of a journalist renting the home next to Palin’s so he can spy on her family’s comings and goings on a 24/7 basis.

Sarah should forget the hordes of so called “objective journalists” digging through her trash in Alaska and hounding her bus tour whining because she won’t kiss their collective back sides, play by their rules, and open herself and her family up to more of their propagandistic, hateful and despicable abuse.

Sarah should forgive and forget all the gotcha questions and media traps unrelentingly laid in her path for three solid years by a press that patronizes us all by telling us they are objective and just report the news.

“Just the facts mam….We just report the facts.”

Palin should forgive the fact that every Palin hater from the darkest corner of Alaska to the swamps of the Florida Panhandle has been given a megaphone by the “main stream media” to spread any and all lies they can concoct in their feeble minds.

Ball would like to act surprised by Palin’s transformation from, (as she describes it), an “upstart, “natural” political activist to hardened, combative figure”.

But how could she be surprised?

I mean, after the last three years of having supposedly objective purveyors of the news twist Palin’s every word and utterance into something unrecognizable from what was actually said…after three years of having her name, her family and her deepest and dearest held beliefs held up for scorn and ridicule….after three years of having her character, honor, motives and intelligence dragged through the mud in a fashion that would make Saul Alinski himself blush…do these vermin really expect her to cow tow to them and lay out the red carpet for them?

Some one PLEASE tell me…why would she? Why should she?

I think she’s handling them just as she should…she is treating them as they have treated her….and she’s winning by doing so because she’s showing them to be the crass, shallow and petulant children they really are.

They’ve puffed themselves up to be “would be” king makers and she proves with each mile on the odometer of her bus that they are irrelevant to her. Her fate rests in HER hands and they are powerless to stop her if she chooses to run…

Therein lies the reason for all the vitriol, propaganda and naked hatred of Sarah Palin by the so called “objective press”.

They can’t stop her. They can’t intimidate her. They can’t make her play by their rules. They can’t trash her as they have so many other conservatives and have their narratives stand unchallenged because she’ll take it back from them and beat their brains in with it….and that scares the ever living hell out of them.

I’m not a Palinista and as of now I have no plans to back her should she run, (unless Perry or another big gun refuses to come in to supplement the current lackluster Republican field…at which point I’ll be giving her another look). But this kind of crap makes me WANT to back her and give my full throated support for Palin if for no other reason than to spit in the eyes of the Molly Balls of the so called objective press!

Have you no decency Molly?…and what of the rest of your Journ-o-list cronies?.

ABC?…CBS?…NBC?…CNN?…MSNBC?…NYT?…Wa Po?

At long last….is there no decency or truth left in any of you?

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    There’s going to be lots of “stuff” in those emails that both the Shriners (and I certainly don’t consider you to be one of those) or the people looking for ammunition will find and attempt to use. Yawn.

    The issue is whether Palin actually responds to the media when they print something – or broadcast it – that she thinks is wrong. She’s avoided the hostile media for two years. Pick a reason. We’ll likely disagree, but that really doesn’t matter. What matters is that the “general public” thinks that an unanswered attack is true. And you answering the attack doesn’t count. This is precisely the thing that sunk the last several years of GWB’s Administration. He refused to rebut outright lies and let all attacks go unanswered. Palin has done the same thing. It won’t work any better for her than it did for Bush.

    • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

      Yes our leaders need to respond, but we shouldn’t meekly accept the way the media formulate the questions/attacks but need to point out and reject the hidden presumptions so that you can move things positively (counterattack) rather than just be on the defensive.

      But of course they first need to recognize the need to engage and fight back, which was your point.

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        Hell, I was willing to shed blood for GWB. At the time, my son was an active duty Marine and his guys WERE shedding blood for him.

        The bottom line for real leaders is simple. They have to confront attacks directly. Once they do that, their lower level defenders have credibility and they (we) can carry on an effective defense and actually move to the offense.

        Examples (one good and one not so much)… When the Republicans went after Clinton on the impeachment, he personally went on the attack. The end result was that the Republicans momentum on the Hill died a violent death and Clinton’s Presidency was “saved”.

        And then there’s Ronald Reagan. There are a bazillion examples, but my favorite occured after the first debate in 84 when RR appeared to be confused and the Ds were whining about his age. At the beginning of the 2nd debate, Reagan said something on the order of “There’s been a lot of talk about age lately and let me tell you that it’s simply wrong. I will not address the youth and inexperience of my opponent and I will condemn anyone who does.” [NOT A QUOTE, but the idea is correct]

        The crowd broke out into laughter and then applause, Mondale and the debate moderators laughed as well. Everyone knew the election was over right then.

        Reagan ALWAYS took on the media and the Ds directly and quickly on any and every issue.

      • aesthete

        as was Reagan (both in different ways). I can’t think of too many Republicans who had the same finesse at challenging loaded questions as those two. Chris Christie and Paul Ryan are both very good, but neither is quite as good as those two.

      • AceInTX

        confront them by going around them and make them irrelevant…this is what Palin has done…she’s answered their challenges head on…but not by accepting their premises but by going around them and ridiculing them into irrelevance.

        I pray our next nominee will learn this lesson and use it@

        • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908
        • JSobieski

          (1) Go around the media AND
          (2) Go THROUGH the media (steam rollar style)

          Reagan was great at both. Palin doesn’t even attempt (2).

          Ever talk to an independent voter who doesn’t watch Fox News? Those folks (who are reachable) have an unfairly but nonetheless incredibly low opinion of Sarah Palin. What is Palin doing to create Palin democrats in the way that Reagan created Reagan democrats?

          How is Sara Palin’s media strategy going to go after those folks? She has ceded that field to her detractors who pummel her each and every day. Is going French helping her?

          It is not that hard to turn the tables on Chris Matthews, but even Chris Matthews can out argue an empty chair.

          • azaeroprof

            by doing nothing. See Jon Stewart video below! :)

          • azaeroprof

            Yes, she should do more interviews with the non-Fox folks, and I’m certain she will IF she decides to run. If she doesn’t plan to run, then she needs do none of that.

            But if I were her advisor (and she’d do well to hire me! :) ), I would tell her not to go on Chris Mathews. That would be a no-win situation and, frankly, he is such a loon it would be a step down for her to go on his show. Really, same thing with any MSNBC show.

          • JSobieski

            Leaving the hard work of converting independents, “moderate” dems, and actual liberals to other people is hardly what I am looking for in a leader.

            Reagan didn’t tell GHWB to handle the independents or the hostile press. To the contrary, he purposely put himself in difficult “no-win” situations.

            Ever hear of his debate with RFK? Given the obstacles in his way, that was a true “no win” situation.

            I am not pushing any PARTICULAR show. I am simply pointing out that if you can’t go into enemy territory, you aren’t really ready for prime time.

            There is actual work to be done. If Palin wants to do it, she can get my primary vote. However, I don’t see her doing that work as of today.

          • AceInTX

            what she’s doing right now is proving them to be irrelevant, crass and classless boobs…the fact that John Stewart and people like Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher are crying fowl about the medias ham fisted attempts to destroy Palin says something doesn’t it?

          • azaeroprof

            She can do interviews with the alphabet soup folks (like MTP, etc.). I don’t have a problem with that. But for her (or any GOP candidate for that matter) to appear on MSNBC only elevates that supposed “network”. I wouldn’t suggest she, or any others, appear on Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, or Colbert either. These are advocacy folks and their only reason to have her on would be to push their own agenda. At least the big 3 networks, and to some extent CNN, still make some modicum of effort to appear neutral (at least SOME individuals on those networks do).

            And there is a difference between debating an opposition politician and appearing on a liberal talk show. For Reagan to debate RFK at that point in his political career actually would have stood to elevate Reagan. If the Dems had a big-name leader at this point who wasn’t Pres or VP, it wouldn’t be a bad idea for Palin to debate that person. But anyone I can think of in the Dem party would be elevated to be on the stage with Palin! ;)

          • JSobieski

            Haven’t you ever seen a conservative go on a MSM show and kick tail? Rush used to do it in the old days. William F Buckley did it all the time. Ronald Reagan did it with a smile.

            Even a mediocre high school debater could go on a typical CNN or MSNBC show, refute the underlying premises being spewed by the talking head, and look good in the process.

            Why are you so convinced that Palin is unable to do what Breitbart does every time?

            You have far less confidence in Palin’s capabilities than I do. Paul Ryan can go behind enemy lines and score some points. Why is asking Palin to do the same thing the equivalent of asking her to crawl?

          • azaeroprof

            and I think she will, but on her terms and her timing. If she’s going to run in 2012, it will (or better be) soon. If not, then she can go whenever she decides (or not, for that matter).

          • JSobieski

            Say saving the country?

            Most of our candidates and not-yet-candidates are totally silent on the issue of Medicare reform.

            If Palin is serious about helping the country, either as a candidate or as a non-candidate, why not (1) talk substance and (2) go behind enemy lines.

            The problem with relying on people like Paul Ryan is that he can’t get enough attention to actually explain the R position on Medicare reform.

            Palin can. She could do it on a MSM show, and help both herself and the country.

            Why not use her fame to actually win some arguments?

          • AceInTX

            Who is she trying to appeal to….who watches MSNBC that she is going to appeal to?

            My thing is this…I’m enormously entertained by what she’s managed to turn them into…the vision of all these reporters descending on Podunk Alaska digging through trash…or the mental images of reporters assigned to follow her bus tour scrambling keystone cops style to get in their cars as she hops on the bus without telling them anything lest they lose the caravan…and then having to stop and take a wiz along the side of the road because they don’t know when she’ll stop again…these visions are almost orgasmic to me…

            and then to have them go through what they’ve gone through over these emails…publicly advertising for and enlisting an army of bloggers to comb through every word and syllable foaming at the mouth at the prospect of finding something juicy only to come up with a competent governor going about being governor on a daily basis, caring about her constituents….then watching them go through the paroxysms like Mrs. Ball’s here….saying yeah she used to be competent and caring and now she’s an incompetent partisan hack is joyous to behold.

            PDS has blinded them…and unmasked them…and I find the whole thing to be exquisite in it’s beauty, irony, and humor!

            Not not a Palinista…but I Love this woman and everything she’s done to these clowns…they all have egg on their faces and it is obvious to everyone…just ask John Stewart!

          • JSobieski

            Time to shift attention to actual policy. The egg is on our face, not Stewart’s or anyone elses. Obamacare is the law of the land. The economy is going nowhere fast. We have been monetizing our debt, and are approaching the point of no return.

            So we can cheer on her efforts to make the media look bad, or we can focus on something else—like helping Paul Ryan explain the R position so we don’t have Medicare shoved down our throats in 2012.

            I know what my preference is. Frankly egg on John Stewart’s face doesn’t even register in my view.

          • AceInTX

            I’m as concerned about those things as you are…but I can enjoy a little comeuppance when it’s dealt to the so call “Objective media can’t I?

          • JSobieski

            to make a different all by herself. Ryan needs help. Palin does not utter the word “medicare” nearly enough. The issue needs to be explained, explained, and explained. Otherwise, we are going to have problems, and Obamacare will survive (unless the courts tank it).

            This (medicare reform) is a serious issue. We have doubled down on it. It is our hill to either die on or prevail.

            Given its importance, I wish Palin would enter the frey in the most substantive way possible. Frankly, it would help her individual reputation while also helping the country.

          • AceInTX

            by turning the media into circus clowns and exposing them for the partisan hacks they are to the point where even Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher notice the idiocy, she’s taking the bite out of the media’s ability to hurt republicans by hyperventilating over the Medicare issue

          • JSobieski

            We need to move public opinion. The more time focuses on other things, the less time there is to educate the public. Time is in favor of the D’s on this. The more people focus on Weiner, Paul Revere, or anything else, the more our side is at risk.

            Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher will start producing ads saying that Ryan wants to kill seniors. These little tactical victories of Palin that you point to and take so much pleasure in are strategically irrelevant. They don’t translate into anything that matters. They are a distraction.

            Forget about beating up or discrediting the MSM. Focus on educating people about the precarious position of medicare in the SQ and the need to do something about it.

            If Obamacare is not repealed in 2013, it won’t ever be repealed. We don’t have time to line up Hollywood idiots to launch a 100 years war to discredit the MSM.

          • aesthete

            None of this partisan sniping matters — none of it. Like it or not, a relatively unknown Congressman from Wisconsin has moved the ball more in our direction by discussing our entitlement problems lucidly like an adult, than big stars like Palin have by picking fights with the media and engaging in other distractions that have made them personally popular with the base (while moving conservatism forward not a whit). Tell me, what is gained by having the media have to issue a mea culpa because it said something petty about one of Palin’s daughters? This is a problem that is not unique to conservatism, but which Palin is uniquely suited to address. Palin could do more for conservatism and America by talking about entitlement reform for 15 minutes to her supporters (and ginning up support for it among elderly conservatives), than she could by spending the next 2 years on what she’s spent the last two years doing.

          • AceInTX

            the issue needs to be explained That’s a given and I’ll grant you that

            So how do you reach people to explain it?

            And what’s the biggest thing standing in the way of explaining it so people will support it?

            The so called OBJECTIVE PRESS is the answer….I’ll go you one better….what is the biggest threat to what Ryan wants to do on Medicare?

            Mediscare right?

            and what is is allowing/enabling and assisting the Dems in propagating the mediscare strategy?

            The so called OBJECTIVE PRESS that’s who

            so It could be argued…that she is doing more for RYAN by what she’s doing right now than she ever could by droning on and on about the details…she’s exposing the Obamedia as a fraud…she’s destroying their credibility…she’s making them a laughing stock and people aren’t buying the line about an Objective press any more.

            and what’s done more to destroy their claim to objectivity and unmasked them as the partisan hacks they are?

            3 unending years of PDS in the so called OBJECTIVE Press that’s what!

            It’s entertaining…it’s a flipping riot and a gargantuan barrel of laughs…and it is doing Ryan’s work for him…

            As I say….I pray she keeps doing just what she’s doing She can keep the base stirred up…she can endorse and bring the spotlight on the right candidates and she can keep the spotlight on the nakedly partisan press like noone else can.

            Palin for perpetual candidate for POTUS…it’s the only way to keep showing the press for the fraud and the liars they are!

          • JSobieski

            You do however need to explain, explain, and explain. The only person on our side doing any explaining is Ryan, and he has disappeared from media coverage once the Presidential debates started.

            Saying that we have to first expose the MSM as a bunch of frauds (i.e. that we need to win the 100 years war first) is not a strategy I agree with. The war will be over way before then. Failure to repeal Obamacare in 2013 means it will be with us on our death beds.

            We need more attention on Ryan, not less. We need more people explaining the issue, not fewer.

            Palin and others can suck the oxygen out of a room . . leaving us with the status quo.

            You can spin you victories vis a vis Demi Moore and her boytoy anyway you want,but inertia and time are against us.

            The clock is ticking, and frankly the only two candidates I have heard say anything even remotely helpful on the topic are Bachmann and Pawlenty. What they said was supportive—but it was NOT doing the hard work of selling Medicare reform to the American people.

            I wish our presidential contendors (and those who are potential contendors) would actually spend at least 5% of their time talking about Medicare.

            You and I agree on substance, but I fear your tactics are far too clever by half.

            What would Reagan do? He would advocate for the issue—going around or through the MSM. Is Palin really advocating for any issues at the moment? Is any other Presidential candidate?

            Note that I am not singling out Palin in my criticism. It is simply that she has the biggest megaphone to make her voice heard.

            Palin is not doing Ryan’s work for him. She isn’t helping him in any way. Neither is anyone else on the Presidential stage.

            Tactics do not make for a strategy.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908
          • JSobieski

            I really am concerned that our side is not making effective use of time on this issue. The Democrats will be more than happy to focus on irrelevant topics (the facts of the day don’t favor them), and then go into full mediscare mode for the final stretch.

            I fear that our Presidential contest is actually going to prevent people like Ryan from making the case unless the candidates actually try to educate the public themselves.

            When CNN asks questions like Coke vs. Pepsi, you know we would be better off talking HSAs and medicare reform.

          • David123

            See the attached link. She talks about the Ryan Plan favorably at the 8:20 point.

            http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/06/05/palin_ryans_plan_will_save_medicare

            I’d say that Sarah is following Ace’s goal of draining the swamp – exposing media bias – , and she’s killing some alligators as she does it – addressing specific issues to benefit America.

          • JSobieski

            than taking the time to explain to the American people over and over again why X is so important.

            I actually take 2012 pretty seriously. This medicare issue is either going to kill us, or become a source of strength in the election.

            Talking about the plan once or twice is NOT doing the hard work of selling the plan.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            elected to anything. In the world of dumb strategies, yours takes the cake.

          • JSobieski

            Conservatives focus on results, not intentions.

            First of all, Breitbart does a far better job of exposing media bias than Palin and all presidential contentders put together. We don’t need candidates to do that jon.

            Second, draining the swamp is having no demonstrable impact on the swamp. Is the media less biased now? is the media less able to medismear Republicans now because of Palin’s two year media campaign?

            We need to convince the American people of some things. There is hard work to be done. I don’t see a lot from our Presidential candidates on this issue.

            Palin has an extremely large megaphone. If Ryan had that megaphone, we could actually turn this issue around. Instead, people on our own side pats ourselves on the back at sideshow events like the Palin e-mails. We are also “winning” the Wiener issue.

            Can you not see how the 2012 election is going to come down to a couple of issues, such as jobs and entitlement reform?

          • AceInTX

            Sitto Public Sector Unions….

            Palin and I’ll throw in Brietbart are doing a necessary job in exposing the Bias and Palin is doing it in spades by exposing how over the top the press is in trying to destroy her.

            You said yourself above that the message isn’t getting out…and why is that? because the press wouldn’t LET anyone address this issue substantively.

            You keep bringing up Reagan. I’ll point out this isn’t 1980. The press was biased in 1980 to be sure….but that bias pales in comparison toi what it was then. I can remember the policy debates being part of the every day news.,..today it is nothing but puff piece on Democrats, hit pieces on Republicans…and what Lady Ga Ga has on her feet at the latest Hollywood confab.

            This is why the main stream press is seeing their numbers in the tank and Fox is at the top because there is at least some discussion of issues on Fox News

          • JSobieski

            If you think it is, contact Paul Ryan’s office and he will set you straight.

            Your fixation on the the unfairness of the media is not productive. Your belief that the Ryan plan currently has popular support is untrue.

            If it is within the unilateral power of the press to keep our message from getting out, we might as well shut down red state since shutting down our message on mediscare is precisely want they want to do.

            The press is not omnipotent. They cannot win the war by simply deciding to win. However, we cannot win if we don’t explain, explain, explain.

            Who on our side is explaining the mediscare issue?

            Who?

          • JSobieski

            and less on how the media is trying to destroy her.

            http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/polls-show-dangers-for-gop-in-pushing-ryans-medicare-privatization-plan.php

            Paul Ryan can use some help. Is it too much to ask that our Presidential hopefuls and potential candidates use some of their attention to sell entitlement reform to the American people?

          • azaeroprof

            The discussion here has strayed into a mischaracterization of Palin’s actions of late. She has not displayed a strategy of attacking the media. In fact, she has said little or nothing negative about the media of late, other than mentioning that she doesn’t owe them anything. Our discussion went down this path because a few of us mentioned how cool it was that the media discredited itself over the email stuff. Palin had nothing to do with the emails and has said absolutely nothing about them. That is not a strategy on her part, or any of ours, just a nice side benefit.

            She could, and should, argue the Medicare case. I don’t have the transcript in front of me, but as I recall from her appearance with Chris Wallace on FNS she was asked about the Ryan plan. She defended it rather well, I believe, with the salient arguments and comparison to the Dems plans (or lack thereof).

            The only deliberate news she has made in recent weeks was the bus tour. Other than drawing attention to herself or simply having a family vacation, the main purpose appears to have been reminding Americans of our founding, our founders, and the founding principles. While not specifically dealing with contemporary issues like Medicare, I do believe that is a worthwhile endeavor. I would bet we’ll hear a lot more about Medicare, etc. from her in the coming months, especially if she runs.

          • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

            since the trend among most, if not all of the Republican candidates (even the ones with “executive experience”) is to tap dance around embracing his plan.

          • JSobieski

            But I absolutely agree otherwise. Thus, I would love to see Palin focus on this issue. She could make a big difference. She would drag the other candidates kicking and screaming into the right direction.

            Palin has a lot of power. I just wish she would use it.

          • JSobieski

            He has however not backed away from moving Medicare towards a patient-driven system that is government subsidized.

            Pawlenty has actually shown some courage on this, which is why he is my first choice at the present time.

    • Finrod

      I’ve read the complaint from other Palin critics that she ‘takes the bait’ too often responding to criticism about her. From what I understand on her bus tour, she’s been taking any and all questions (which is where the whole Paul Revere flap came from); maybe that’s a good sign for her future, I dunno.

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        Yes and no.

        She takes the bait on personal and non-political issues but responds on Facebook or through “friendly” media.

        What she does not do – or at least has not done – is take on the unfriendly media face to face. I haven’t seen any change in that with the bus tour. We’ll see.

        • AceInTX

          …by doing so she is showing them to be irrelevant. One of the things I wish the rest of our party would learn from her is to do what you know is right, stop muddling your message and watering down what you believe cowtowwing to people openly working for your destruction just because they happen to call themselves news reporters

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            And, it’s not a bad strategy at all, Reagan used it VERY effectively. He went around the press and spoke to the American public. All of us. And sold his programs. And he also went nose to nose with both the Democrats and the press when he had public momentum building.

            Palin is no Reagan. In any manner, means, shape or form. She goes around the press, fine. She, however, doesn’t speak to the American public, she talks AT a slice of the base, ignores the public at large and shuns the press in general, unless she can find an interviewer who will just toss softballs.

            Reagan never cowtowed to anybody. He won the day. Again, Palin is no Reagan.

    • AceInTX

      Three days into this and NOTHING. In fact they show Palin to be far smarter, far more engaged and far from the incompetent monster she’s been portrayed to be.

      Thus Molly Ball and her attempt at “yes Palin was competent as governor but that’s not who she is now” routine.

      the reality doesn’t fit the media narrative so now they have to come up with a way to justify the narrative

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        First of all, I’ve said all along that I’d be shocked if there were a “smoking gun” in the Palin emails. However, what is there is more than enough to feed both sides of the Palin question. Some people will focus only on emails that they think show her to be the greatest Governor on earth while others will focus on emails that show she’s petty or whatever. There will be enough ammo for both sides and the email review will drag on for what will seem like forever.

        The real point is: what is Palin doing? The answer? Absolutely nothing. She’s on a bus tour feeding red meat to the Shriners and she’s ignoring the general public. She’s also still ignoring the media. If she’s going to make a serious run she can’t continue to do those three things.

        She’s a marginal candidate – maybe in the primary and certainly in the general – because she’s made herself marginal. You can also see JS’s comments above, they are right on the mark.

        • azaeroprof

          First, the bus tour. The media reports show that she is interacting quite a bit with the general public, at least in small numbers. And the reports mention that she spent an incredible amount of time talking to the media and answering their questions. Spending so much time that it makes Piper impatient. The story I read compared that to Romney, whose folks cut off any of his impromptu press appearances at 7 minutes.

          And on the email issue, that narrative is set. There won’t be anything dragging on forever, at least not negative. This video pretty well says it all (I’ll put the link below in case it doesn’t embed.)

          http://www.hulu.com/watch/249475/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-pmail

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            where the tour has been.

            Don’t hold your breath.

        • AceInTX

          and foremost.

          She’s made them a laughing stock as they dig and dig and dig for ANY smoking gun they can find to the point where their bias is so obvious that Jon Stewart of all people are starting to make fun of them.

          I don’t want her to run for POTUS…I hope she goes on a four year bus tour and makes them chase her to the ends of the earth so they’ll look even MORE pathetic.

          • azaeroprof
          • AceInTX

            as she conducts one bus tour after another to every landmark and back watter tourist stop she can think of….continue to act like these weenies don’t exist…and address them…or talk about running for POTUS only when they seem to be losing interest in her.

            She could attack one or two leftist sacred cows halfway between each bus tour to drive them into a frenzy again and then trot off on another tour!

            I Love it!!!

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            Palin is great at sound bites that whip up the third standard deviation on both sides of her.

            Unfortunately, other than that she does exactly nothing. And has done exactly nothing.

            We don’t need somebody to drive the press crazy, we need somebody who can work with a hostile Congress and reduce the scope of government. Nothing, absolutely nothing, in her experience says she can do that.

  • Pingback: aci Sarault

  • Pingback: Alexis Fyler

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: wine making

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: randki warszawa

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: girls in white dresses

  • Pingback: corporate events in italy

  • Pingback: Epping

  • Pingback: Have A Peek Here

  • Pingback: here

  • Pingback: over here

  • Pingback: breastactives

  • Pingback: igra karos online

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Markita Pardee

  • Pingback: Union Millwork Installers

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: call center services

  • Pingback: distill magazine

  • Pingback: kids bikes