« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Non-Partisan Look at Sarah Palin:

“Sarah From Alaska: The Sudden Rise and Brutal Education of a New Conservative Superstar” is a new book about former Governor Palin and the VP Campaign.  The writers are two reporters who covered her extensively during the campaign and then came back to Alaska for further research.  I haven’t read it yet, but I know all the people quoted in the linked Juneau Empire article and I respect their opinions.  It also has the ring of truth from my own observations.  Here’s the article: http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/112309/sta_528072912.shtml#mdw-comments

Pat Forgey is a local reporter for the Empire and I’d consider him pretty objective.  You’ll note that the quotes closely conform with much that I’ve said about She Who Was Once Governor.  Maybe hearing it from somebody else will cause less hysteria than hearing it from me.  So, to avoid having another thread shut down, I’ll leave this diary too short and let the linked article speak for itself.

Tags: ,
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    I see the excitement about Palin is not necessarily how she governed as more informed people have pointed out, but rather what she is REPRESENTING to a wider audience.

    Palin’s popularity is demonstrative of the pent up demand for real conservative leaders. This should be a big signal for all those who want real conservatism to take action on any scale capable.

    We should not be having a referendum on Palin like the lame stream media is but rather recognize that she is on to something and continue with it.

    • Common_Cents
  • aesthete

    Say it isn’t so!

    BTW, nice article. I’d heard about the book last week, but had no idea how good it was, facts-wise. I might have to check it out.

  • http://www.thats-right.com thatsright

    Nothing substantive as far as I’m concerned. It basically says she was a politician.

    Great. Thanks for the insight Juneau Empire.

    The fact that articles and books like this are even written just proves my point that one way or another, Sarah Palin was going to be exactly where she is right now and that she didn’t need anyone to “bring” her.

    I’m just not sure what the point of the article is? There’s nothing in it that I haven’t heard before and there’s not much in the way of insight, so I’m just puzzled as to what I’m supposed to take away.

    • aesthete

      1) She built a fluid coalition on several issues, including “raising oil taxes, pushing for a natural gas pipeline and ethics reform”, with Dem support. If we excoriated McCain for doing just that, why shouldn’t we do so for Palin?

      2) As with Obama, much of her support comes from the perception that she’s not like other politicians. As this article points out, she basically was just a typical “bipartisan” pol while she was governing.

      Note, I don’t have a problem with her current persona, and she’s a great stump speaker. That doesn’t mean we have to construct a hagiography for her to make her the Great White Conservative Hope.

      • Vegas_Rick

        I have no problem with a Republican working with the Donks to get what WE want. The trouble with McCain was he did it to get THEM what THEY wanted.

        While I am not a Palinbot, I do like the way she pokes the donks in the eye. AND, I have yet to see any of you bashers hoisting your oh so much better conservative representative up the pole for a salute.

        Until you have a better standard bearer, perhaps the old song… “If you can’t say anything nice…” would apply.

        • aesthete

          I’ve always seen you as a Palin supporter, but not as a Palinbot, and I appreciate that. Here’s my reply to that:

          Do you have any evidence to indicate that Palin worked with the Dems to get conservative items passed? I suppose it’s possible, but virtually all effective conservatives, even in blue states, have been successful in spite of Dem majorities, not because of them (see: Rudy and the NYT/City Council, Romney and the Mass. legislature, et al). Palin governed in a majority Repub state, and still apparently saw the need to ally herself with Dems in opposition to the Repubs in the state.

          Like you, I have no problem allying with Dems to get what we want, and sometimes we have to work with more moderate Dems, simply because we don’t have enough of our people in place (case in point: the current healthcare debate). But considering the scarcity of cases where working with the Dems is more effective than with the Republican majority, I’d need some evidence that Sarah’s adventures in bipartisanship yielded conservative results.

          • Achance

            When oil came along, lots of Democrats wanted to tax those evil profits. Cooler heads, conservative Democrats and Republicans prevailed and Alaska predicted it’s take of NS revenue on production since it was something we could readily measure with the resources of a small state’s government. Conservative Democrats in Alaska died along the way sometime in the ’80s except for Rep. Foster of Nome and even he died, literally, this fall. It has been Republican dogma since the late ’70s that we would tax on production since the producers can’t move the production the way they can move the profits.

            Enter Sarah Palin, the Un-Republican, and she comes back to the idea that the McGovernite Democrats got defeated on in the ’70s. This time with the help of the FBI, she gives the Democrats their wet dream, a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil producers. No, it wasn’t co-opting Democrats to accomplish conservative goals; you really can’t usually do that. It was Sarah working for the greater glory of Sarah and practically running the oil industry out of Alaska in the process.

  • AceInTX

    the score settling seems to be a new line of attack on her as if the same can’t be said of those who are going after Palin.

    I will say…I’d like to know more about the discussion of her working more with Democrats and having a reputation for only attacking Republicans. At first blush this is troubling for me since it’s one of the things I have a problem with in the party…that said…it depends a lot on what it is she is supposed to have worked with Democrats on.

    I’ll try to get my hands on the book and I look forward.

  • Stan(ley) Pruss

    Palin isn’t Reagan. But she can excite the base and raise money. Who is a better candidate? Conservatives had the same problem in 2000 when the choice was Bush or McCain. I want a better candidate than Bush or Palin, but who?

  • Section9

    A lot of water has passed under the bridge between Art and Sarah, but this sounds about right: the notion that coalitions in Alaska are often ad hoc affairs around different issues. I’m not surprised that Sarah was blindsided by Elton and Kertulla’s support for Obama and the whole Wooten thing. She obviously expected the whole AGIA/ACES thing to carry over into the next legislative term and forgot that they were Democrats.

    Sometimes, education can be a brutal thing.

    One of the things I always agreed emphatically with Art about, despite my overwhelming support of Palin, was the fact that Palin couldn’t expect support from a Republican legislature filled with members with whom she had burned so many bridges. Had she tended to the Party more in the first two years of her Administration and given them actual cause to support her, they would have rallied to her when Axelrod’s minions came after her after the election with the whole Alinskyite tactic of ethics violations and FOIA requests.

    As it was, she had no one to defend her. So her leavetaking from the Governorship was actually inevitable-but it didn’t have to be.

    Now more and more Alaska Republicans in the legislature will probably end up supporting Palin. Why? Well, the article explains things: she’s aiming squarely at national Democrats. Who knows? Even Jay Ramras might be happy with her.

    My takeaway? Coalition building in Alaska politics is built strictly around issues-although Party trumps those things at election time if you’re a Dem. I’m somewhat surprised Sarah didn’t get that early on.

    She does now; that’s for sure.

    • Achance

      Elton was far and away the most liberal and partisan Democrat. Most Republicans wouldn’t be in the same room with him if they could help it. French isn’t far behind him and is just an unpleasant, arrogant ass of a former government lawyer. Kertulla is a little easier to get along with and is in better stead because her family goes back so far, her dad was a longtime legislator too, but she’s almost as partisan as Elton. Both of them represent my town and I wouldn’t go to them for anything or rely on Kim for anything, maybe, only maybe, I could rely on Beth for something not too controversial.

      Frankly, the only Democrat in the Alaska Legislature I would associate with beyond the grip and grin level was Richard Foster, who caucused with the Rs, and he died this fall.

      As to the Rs, you just can’t run on a message that you’re better than everybody else and expect that everybody else to like you much. In “Going Rogue” she talks about how former Sen. Rick Halford was a key mentor and inspiration to her. It is significant that Halford’s behind his back nickname in the Legislature was “Captain Chaos.” It was all about Rick; you couldn’t rely on him, his name on a chit sheet didn’t mean much ’cause he’d just change his mind right before the vote. But he was in many ways the archtypal Mat Valley Aginner. They all know they’re against most everything but they don’t know what they’re for and they don’t know what to do if they have to do something because just being agin it ain’t working. They’re sorta a Republican equivalent of the Democrat CAVE people – Citizens Against Virtually Everything.

  • Finrod

    .

  • SteveLA

    Art,

    I saw an interview of the two folks who wrote the book, I think it was on Bill O. They seemed pretty much down the line sorts, not ax to grind or ox to gore, pretty much as you described.

    Might have to go buy this book to get the real story of Sara from Alaska without filters of ether the Liberal sort or the other kind.

    • Achance

      See my comment in the other thread; thought it was pretty good.

      • SteveLA

        So Art, the real question for us non-speed readers, is it worth the money to buy the book? I wasted money this summer buying and reading a couple of Rodger Clemons books, and came away more disgusted, not a comment related to Palin, just an observation about the so called Rocket.

        • Achance

          are very satisfying. As they go, this one is worth the Costco price, I guess, but I’m not a good judge, I knew most of it first hand.

          Even in “Going Rogue,” the “young” ethics supervisor and leg liason who became Exxon’s lobbyist used to be nominally my boss; he was above me on the org chart and had the good sense to not try to be my boss, we remain friends as that word has meaning in the political world anyway. I know exactly what happened when he went to see her about the issues with Randy Ruedrich and it is very different from her version and I have a very different view of his involvement with gas line negotiations in the Murkowski Administrattion. I thought Going Rogue was worth the $9 I paid for it at Amazon but I don’t think I’d have paid almost $30.

          On the other one, for $17, it is about an accurate look at her as I’ve seen; go read the Amazon reviews and judge by that.

  • hbgconservative

    Any comments from you on Palin are far from non-partisan…or factual. Thought you weren’t spending anymore time on her, haha.

    • SteveLA

      Gary, or Josh_Painter, is that you? Your posting style seems vaguely familiar of one of our long gone PalinBots. As a three day wonder, you do have some big opinions, based on no posting history which makes one take your comments with a large caliber grain of salt.

      How’s about you try writing a blog about the substantive and verifiable record of good governance and real accomplishments of Governor Palin from her long time in office. We’d all like to be enlightened.

      • Achance
        • hbgconservative

          So much for “being done with me” huh? lol

      • hbgconservative

        I joined because I wanted to respond tired people like you bashing her not with facts, but liberal-like false attacks. That’s why I have a small posting history…but during my brief posting time here, all my postings have been substantive, about her and her accomplishments and her great substance. Of course, you’d know that since you have apparently read my posts (not). All you Palin-bashers seem to be capable of are false attacks, with nothing to back them ups. I also felt the need to point out phonies when I see them, and will continue to do so whenever I please. You guys clearly can’t handle that, since we so-called “Palinbots” keep getting under your skin. I will say this, I enjoy watching you phonies make fools of yourselves, so keep it up, haha.

        • SteveLA

          Name a substantial piece of Legislation championed by Governor Palin during her 3 years as the Governor of Alaska.

          We’ll make it easy, just one piece, how it effected the lives of ordinary Alaskans like Art. But it has to be a piece of legislation which was the Governor’s signature issue.

          Show us how much you know hbg Gary.

      • hbgconservative

        All of my posts are factual as well, factual being the key word.

        • SteveLA

          hbg

          We’re still waiting for you to tell us all about those legislative accomplishments of Governor Palin during her long three years in office. No leftest smears, no personal attacks, just talking about real records of real accomplishment which will appeal to I’s a D’s needed to win elections.

          You can do it! Show that mean old Art that you know what you are talking about.

          • gekster

            it seams that hgb doesn’t know how to do a web search.
            just for a starter, here’s this from Generational Dysfunction:

            http://ehvogel.blogspot.com/2009/10/sarah-palins-accomplishments.html

            I’ll just sit back now and read.
            Again, I am NOT taking sides.

            I was thinking of not posting because of the wrath I might incur.
            But what the hay.

          • Achance

            Now, really, I’d rather never hear her name again in realtion to Alaska except as our former Governor, but she’s out being St. Sarah the Good and all the Bots are out and all ga-ga over her all over again.

            I enjoy her poking Comrade Obama and the National Democrats. See, e.g., fmr. Speaker Chennault’s remarks about her finally figuring out which party to attack in the article and book I cited. That said, when the Bots come around with their canonization ritual, well somebody has to speak or we might have to forever hold our peace.

          • gekster

            Just feeling sorry for a guy in a battle of wits who appears unarmed.

            LOL

        • Achance

          from her press releases and C4P, and I assure you, that stuff ain’t factual.

    • Achance

      It frustrates me and irritates you. You haven’t written anything here yet that didn’t sound like something you copied off C4P or from a Sarah press release. When you demonstrate some actual knowledge and thought, you might be worth more keystrokes. As to the factual part, write your rebuttal; just remember I know more about her and about Alaska than just fantasies and press releases.

      • SteveLA

        Art

        Probably Gary or Josh Painter or one of the other hard core PalinBots long gone, not much to say in the way of substance. Even some of the regular PalinBots at least try to make coherent arguments about actual accomplishments of SWMNBN, this one not so much.

      • hbgconservative

        You obviously are spending time on me since you keep responding to me. My posts are nothing but knowledge and thought, which is why it takes me time to write. Anything with thought requires time. I’m not irritated by anything, but obviously you’re irritated that I you have zero substance to your responses, except for the anti-Palin talking points. As for knowing Alaska politcs, I know way more than you think. I’ve researched the horrid corruption in your state (not everyone, of course) that seem blind to and I’ve seen your posts. You’re a bitter Murkowski hack that can’t get over her winning that race and you’ve been bashing her with a vengeance ever since.

        So keep up the silly attacks, because they aren’t fooling anyone.

        • hbgconservative

          I meant “because” instead of “that I”. I meant to put “you” in front of “seem”.

  • Third Street

    I’ll go check it out at Barnes & Noble tomorrow night.

    The 2012 election will turn on experience. After electing a neophyte jackass with a five-minute career in ’08 and subsequently watching him wreck everything in sight, independents will flock to a GOP alternative who is seen to be sober and steady, with a demonstrable record of achievements. Since Sarah Palin’s half-term as governor is the centerpiece of her political career and the only concrete basis we have upon which to calculate what kind of president she might make, it is crucial to understand what kind of governor she was. From everything I’ve learned about her term in office so far, she wasn’t much to shout about. Her main political legacy in Alaska seems to have been a fracturing of the Republican Party that allowed the Democrats to wrest control of the State Senate while still in the numerical minority. The way she left office suggests anything but a capacity for sober, steady leadership.

    If Palin is the GOP nominee in 2012 I’ll be with her, come hell or high water. I will not be with her if she decides to give Obama a second term by pulling some third-party stunt — which, given her history as a self-proclaimed “maverick” who stuck knives into the backs of other Republicans, I don’t see at all outside the realm of possibility. It is well worth remembering that if not for Sarah Palin, the Democrats would not now be in the current, filibuster-proof position they are vis a vis ObamaCare. (The Dems really ought to love her for using their own “culture of corruption” catchphrase from the ’06 cycle to take down a key Republican herself.)

    As aesthete pointed out above, we abhorred this behavior coming from McCain — why should we put up with it from Palin?

    • Achance

      Alaska should never, ever have had a Democrat Governor, yet Knowles served two terms. The first because of Republican fratricide and not a little voter fraud inThe Bush. The Republican bete noir here has long been the far right and the libertarians who often align with them; they can’t get elected, but they can sure keep a more mainstream Republican from getting elected by going third party, usually the AIP. Hickel’s Lt. Gov, Jack Coghill didn’t thing the nominee was conservative enough, so he ran AIP and elected Knowles. The second time around was almost like we were astroturfed. The Democrat dominated AKSC opened our primary and a guy that political players all knew was a scumbag and who no real Republican would vote for spent a bazillion bucks from his Chicago mob connected wife’s fortune. All the NPs only saw great commercials and the Ds didn’t have a contest so they all crossed over. As soon as he was the nominee, the Ds and the ADN unloaded both barrels on him and literally forced his withdrawal as a candidate. A month from the general election, the Alaska Republican Party had no nominee and the ballots were printed. Even with the Rs only having a write-in candidate, Knowles couldn’t get a majority but unbeliievably, he got re-elected. I assure you that after eight years of Democrat misrule, Alaska Republicans were hungry!

      When Murkowski said he was coming back to run for governor, there was practically dancing in the streets. Frank was never as popular as Ted, but he still won handily over former Juneau Mayor and Knowles’ Lt. Governor, Fran Ulmer. We did some good and needful things but we never recovered from Frank’s appointment of Lisa, the jet didn’t help, and then there was Sarah Palin. It is ironic that she complains that she was hounded from office by the ethics complaints when that is exactly what she did to the Murkowski Adminiistration, an administration that actually had preferred her for Lt. Gov and which had given her one of the State’s plum patronage jobs.

      We would NEVER have countenanced Randy Ruedrich doing Republican Party and private business from his State position and we did respond to it. The only responsibility Sarah had for ethics on the AOGCC was to report/refer issues to the Department’s Ethics Supervisor, the Deputy Commissioner. Typical Sarah, she rather went to the COS and maybe the Gov as well, so her complaints about Randy had to come back down to the Department. I know they did because the DC, new to government and also a friend of Randy’s, came to me about how to handle it. He was sensitive to the issue because both the director of personnel and I had given him a stern talking to about the limits of politics on State time and equipment. We determined that he would do an investigation as if we were dealing with classified, unionized employees rather than more or less at will appointees. He goes to Sarah to document her complaints so Randy can be confronted and she blows him off and tells him that its been handled between her and Randy. No complaint, no ethics charges against Randy, case not closed but certainly not front burner and a stern talking to with Randy. Next thing we hear about it is when Sarah loudly resigns and runs to play kiss and tell with the Anchorage Daily Worker. Along the way, she teams up with the Democrats and files ethics charges against Murkowski’s AG and brings him down on a nothing charge because he owned some stock, not a lot and certainly no controlling amount, in a company the State did some business with. So, now we are battling the Lisa appointment, the jet, and Sarah has us drowning in ethics charges over stuff that nobody would have known or cared about had it been a Democrat doing it or if she hadn’t been practically sky-writing about it. So, Sarah Palin becomes the Democrats and the Anchorage Daily Workers’ favorite Republican.

      Enter the FBI. GWB’s DOJ couldn’t stop treasonous leaks in DC, but they sure had a lot of time to spend in Alaska over penny ante allegations of corruption. The prosecutorial team was from Eric Holder’s alma mater, the Public Integrity Section, and was, of course, led by a holdover Democrat Hellbent to run run Ted Stevens and his son Ben to ground. They never got Ben, lost Ted, though it cost him his Senate seat, and a half-dozen or so Republican legislators were collateral damage, four or five were convicted, one awaits trial pending an appeal to the USSC. Two of those already convicted have been freed because of the same kinds of prosecutorial misconduct that resulted in Ted’s conviction being over turned. But all that was in the future, when the Democrat’s favorite Republican announced she was running for Governor against Governor Murkowski and the corrupt old boys in Juneau.

      So, by the summer of ’06, we have Sarah proclaiming from the rooftops that she’s Alaska’s savior and is going to clean up the corruption. Whatever else the FBI is or isn’t good at, they are superbly able to script their actions for dramatic effect on elections and they’re crawling all over the state. Our poll numbers were in the toilet and the wheels were off the Administration. Murkowski dithered about making his announcement, so there really wasn’t a campaign. John Binkley had piled into the Primary as well since he’d never forgiven Frank for not appointing him to the Senate seat. My boss quits the Administration to go become Binckley’s campaign manager. The free for all inside the Administration both disgusted me and had me worried about becoming collateral damage myself. I had nothing to gain by sticking it out to the end and at that time, I and most others figured Knowles was going to win. He would, of course, fire me as director but I had rights to my old job in the merit system. Sarah wouldn’t have fired me, I don’t think, but I wouldn’t have worked for her long before we’d have come to some contretemps; I don’t do insecure control freaks very well. So, I retired on July 1, ’06, and watched the whole thing from the sidelines.

      Anyway, by the time Sarah takes office, most Republicans are mad at her for trashing everybody in her campaign. She compounded the ill-will by firing practically every Murkowski appointee, who happened to be most of the Republicans in Alaska who knew where the light switches and rest rooms were. She rubbed salt in that by bringing back a bunch of people who’d left the Murkowski Administration in a huff.

      The Legislature was in dissarray. Several had not sought office because of the cloud over them, several had been arrested, most had had their offices and files tossed by the FBI. Nobody would be seen with or talk to anybody for fear that one, the other, or both had a wire. The normally busy watering holes and restaurants in Juneau were practically empty because people were afraid to be seen together. Grip ‘n Grin receptions were sparsely attended by people who came late, left early, and said little in between.

      Along the way, the Senate that had been solidly Republican since the ’70s becomes a coaltion with very liberal Democrats holding powerful positions, e.g., Elton, French, and Ellis, and the split was in large measure about who would and wouldn’t work with Gov. Palin. We still had a majority in the House, but it was shaky. Four years before, we’d had a veto-proof majority. And Sarah was Hellbent on an agenda that was anathema to most Republcans, so she teamed up with the Democrats. It was a very anti-industry agenda but the times were such that if you didn’t vote against the industry, you got tarred with the corruption charges that Sarah and the FBI had hanging in the air. So, Sarah got her way with ACES, but the industry has all but given up on Alaska as a result.

      So, now that this has practically become a book itself, that’s the way I saw it from inside up until July 1, ’06, and from pretty close since then. I’d like to think that with their wings clipped, the FBI will leave us alone for awhile, but I don’t think any Red state is safe under Comrade Obama. Sarah likes to claim credit for “cleaning up,” but really all she did was take out a couple of pretty good, though not blameless, Republicans. The FBI unleashed Hell in Alaska and Sarah just glommed on to it and became first Governor, then VP, nominee, and now a celebrity writer. I and most Alaskans will be happy for her to stick to being a celebrity and leave the governing to others.

      • mschmitt

        … if you are the one writing the book, I’ll definitely buy it.