<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Was Against Disavowing. Before He Was For It.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rightlane1111</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4159</link>
		<dc:creator>rightlane1111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some of you probably don&#039;t agree with Glenn Beck...he did do some amazing things while at Fox...especially Founder&#039;s Fridays where history was corrected.

I believe that this OWS, of which Romney will be the main target...was formed by Obama&#039;s minions...probably an offshoot of one of Soros&#039; little groups.  Why don&#039;t we hear about these things from the press?

&quot;?Despite attempts by Occupy Cleveland members to distance themselves from the five described anarchists, self?described anarchists that were arrested last week for attempting to blow up a local bridge, one of them signed a lease for a West Side warehouse where about a dozen members of Occupy Cleveland live,? Glenn explained at the start of the radio show.

Glenn said that when Occupy Cleveland learned that when alleged bomber Anthony Haynes was arrested, the organization furiously worked to get his name off the lease and the website.

?Now, here?s a question. Did you hear this story over the weekend by any chance? Did you hear this anywhere?? Glenn asked.

Stu added, ?When they don?t report a story about a terrorist blowing up a bridge who has a lease on one of the ?? a movement that many of the, you know, left?s politicians, mainstream politicians have praised and the president of the United States has encouraged. And that?s not even a story?? 

These people...believe it or not are compared to the TPM???????????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some of you probably don&#8217;t agree with Glenn Beck&#8230;he did do some amazing things while at Fox&#8230;especially Founder&#8217;s Fridays where history was corrected.</p>
<p>I believe that this OWS, of which Romney will be the main target&#8230;was formed by Obama&#8217;s minions&#8230;probably an offshoot of one of Soros&#8217; little groups.  Why don&#8217;t we hear about these things from the press?</p>
<p>&#8220;?Despite attempts by Occupy Cleveland members to distance themselves from the five described anarchists, self?described anarchists that were arrested last week for attempting to blow up a local bridge, one of them signed a lease for a West Side warehouse where about a dozen members of Occupy Cleveland live,? Glenn explained at the start of the radio show.</p>
<p>Glenn said that when Occupy Cleveland learned that when alleged bomber Anthony Haynes was arrested, the organization furiously worked to get his name off the lease and the website.</p>
<p>?Now, here?s a question. Did you hear this story over the weekend by any chance? Did you hear this anywhere?? Glenn asked.</p>
<p>Stu added, ?When they don?t report a story about a terrorist blowing up a bridge who has a lease on one of the ?? a movement that many of the, you know, left?s politicians, mainstream politicians have praised and the president of the United States has encouraged. And that?s not even a story?? </p>
<p>These people&#8230;believe it or not are compared to the TPM???????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightlane1111</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>rightlane1111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.wthr.com/video?clipId=7054149&amp;topVideoCatNo=103348&amp;autoStart=true

Now...if that does not get you ticked off...I don&#039;t know what will...and the IRS has to know about this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.wthr.com/video?clipId=7054149&amp;topVideoCatNo=103348&amp;autoStart=true</p>
<p>Now&#8230;if that does not get you ticked off&#8230;I don&#8217;t know what will&#8230;and the IRS has to know about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funwithknives</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4157</link>
		<dc:creator>funwithknives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and day out, way before Hitler/Himmler invented the S S .

But they&#039;re protecting Barry and the allegory has substance...?

The Swastka was in use thousands of years before Hitler and Nazis were even a speck on a timeline. So India was a Refuge for Nuremberg Escapees?

...and we sometimes wonder where Maher gets his material...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and day out, way before Hitler/Himmler invented the S S .</p>
<p>But they&#8217;re protecting Barry and the allegory has substance&#8230;?</p>
<p>The Swastka was in use thousands of years before Hitler and Nazis were even a speck on a timeline. So India was a Refuge for Nuremberg Escapees?</p>
<p>&#8230;and we sometimes wonder where Maher gets his material&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncle_fweddy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4156</link>
		<dc:creator>uncle_fweddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course Obummer is operating outside the structure of our Constitution (e.g., sneaking bills through while pretending that the House and/or Senate are not in session, all these so-called executive decisions passed without, our time-honored process of checks and balances, the unelected Czars, etc.). This is not to mention that his very presence in the White House is a travesty; he&#039;s a usurper, with no legal right to the office of president.

And what about his recent secret passage of the assault on the First Amendment? Am I the only one to notice that the initials of his enforcement / protection arm, SS (Secret Service), are the same as the initials of Adolph Hitler&#039;s personal protectors, the SS (Schutzstaffel)? Let us not forget the fate of those who fail to learn the lessons of history...

And, of course, for these offenses, and hundreds of others that I haven&#039;t enumerated, he should be prosecuted for treason. He has quite literally, and figuratively, violated the US Constitution, and the very oath of office he took, to protect our Constitution.

And so why should Mitt Romney be criticized? What would you have him do? Should he have defended the President&#039;s actions, like McCain did? I think not; the woman making that statement is right on the money. I think Romney&#039;s decision to not reply speaks volumes. Mom often told me: If you don&#039;t have anything good to say, don&#039;t say anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Obummer is operating outside the structure of our Constitution (e.g., sneaking bills through while pretending that the House and/or Senate are not in session, all these so-called executive decisions passed without, our time-honored process of checks and balances, the unelected Czars, etc.). This is not to mention that his very presence in the White House is a travesty; he&#8217;s a usurper, with no legal right to the office of president.</p>
<p>And what about his recent secret passage of the assault on the First Amendment? Am I the only one to notice that the initials of his enforcement / protection arm, SS (Secret Service), are the same as the initials of Adolph Hitler&#8217;s personal protectors, the SS (Schutzstaffel)? Let us not forget the fate of those who fail to learn the lessons of history&#8230;</p>
<p>And, of course, for these offenses, and hundreds of others that I haven&#8217;t enumerated, he should be prosecuted for treason. He has quite literally, and figuratively, violated the US Constitution, and the very oath of office he took, to protect our Constitution.</p>
<p>And so why should Mitt Romney be criticized? What would you have him do? Should he have defended the President&#8217;s actions, like McCain did? I think not; the woman making that statement is right on the money. I think Romney&#8217;s decision to not reply speaks volumes. Mom often told me: If you don&#8217;t have anything good to say, don&#8217;t say anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radicalrighty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>radicalrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;outstanding family man&quot; whose associates have threatened Larry Sinclair, the gay man who has publicly claimed to have sex with BHO twice?  (On a side note, if there were claims about anybody in the GOP like this, how fast would the Dems use it?)  

The the &quot;outstanding family man&quot; who never met an abortion he didn&#039;t approve of, including the killing of babies who survived late-term abortions?

Or the &quot;outstanding family man who has been flying around the country to more fundraisers than all of the previous US Presidents combined while finding time to play more golf than any other, presumably all without his family?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;outstanding family man&#8221; whose associates have threatened Larry Sinclair, the gay man who has publicly claimed to have sex with BHO twice?  (On a side note, if there were claims about anybody in the GOP like this, how fast would the Dems use it?)  </p>
<p>The the &#8220;outstanding family man&#8221; who never met an abortion he didn&#8217;t approve of, including the killing of babies who survived late-term abortions?</p>
<p>Or the &#8220;outstanding family man who has been flying around the country to more fundraisers than all of the previous US Presidents combined while finding time to play more golf than any other, presumably all without his family?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demsaresatanic</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>demsaresatanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[even calling him &quot;a tad socialist&quot; is probably too inflammatory. Maybe we should just stick with your ?he is an outstanding family man,? or perhaps even ?he is an outstanding family man and president, but Romney might be a tad better.?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even calling him &#8220;a tad socialist&#8221; is probably too inflammatory. Maybe we should just stick with your ?he is an outstanding family man,? or perhaps even ?he is an outstanding family man and president, but Romney might be a tad better.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: center77</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>center77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so it appears. I have respect for who he is, but I disagree with 90% of what he does. I don&#039;t enjoy demonizing Obama anymore than when they did it to Bush.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it appears. I have respect for who he is, but I disagree with 90% of what he does. I don&#8217;t enjoy demonizing Obama anymore than when they did it to Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowshooze</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>snowshooze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the comment slide by, and the person who made it was cool enough not to present it as a question, but snuck it in as a statement...  well done on both sides.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the comment slide by, and the person who made it was cool enough not to present it as a question, but snuck it in as a statement&#8230;  well done on both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickbull</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>rickbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He doesn&#039;t have anything to worry about because Bo has more meat on his bones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He doesn&#8217;t have anything to worry about because Bo has more meat on his bones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: center77</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>center77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[should have not left, and Romney should of admonished people who want government to limit the freedom of gay people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should have not left, and Romney should of admonished people who want government to limit the freedom of gay people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: septembergurl</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>septembergurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I have to tell you. Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don?t have to be scared of as president of the United States,&quot; McCain told a supporter at a town hall meeting in Minnesota who said he was ?scared? of the prospect of an Obama presidency and of who the Democrat would appoint to the Supreme Court.
?Come on, John!? one audience member yelled out as the Republican crowd expressed dismay at their nominee. Others yelled &quot;liar,&quot; and &quot;terrorist,&quot; referring to Obama.
McCain passed his wireless microphone to one woman who said, &quot;I can&#039;t trust Obama. I have read about him and he&#039;s not, he&#039;s not uh ? he&#039;s an Arab. He&#039;s not ? &quot; before McCain retook the microphone and replied:
&quot;No, ma&#039;am. He&#039;s a decent family man [and] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that&#039;s what this campaign&#039;s all about. He&#039;s not [an Arab].&quot;

***

Romney&#039;s response was perfect.  He is not going to run the way McCain did.  The Obama cult have to be very nervous.  Well done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have to tell you. Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don?t have to be scared of as president of the United States,&#8221; McCain told a supporter at a town hall meeting in Minnesota who said he was ?scared? of the prospect of an Obama presidency and of who the Democrat would appoint to the Supreme Court.<br />
?Come on, John!? one audience member yelled out as the Republican crowd expressed dismay at their nominee. Others yelled &#8220;liar,&#8221; and &#8220;terrorist,&#8221; referring to Obama.<br />
McCain passed his wireless microphone to one woman who said, &#8220;I can&#8217;t trust Obama. I have read about him and he&#8217;s not, he&#8217;s not uh ? he&#8217;s an Arab. He&#8217;s not ? &#8221; before McCain retook the microphone and replied:<br />
&#8220;No, ma&#8217;am. He&#8217;s a decent family man [and] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that&#8217;s what this campaign&#8217;s all about. He&#8217;s not [an Arab].&#8221;</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Romney&#8217;s response was perfect.  He is not going to run the way McCain did.  The Obama cult have to be very nervous.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnms</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>johnms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that question wasn&#039;t a plant then it should have been.  Yes, liberals, let&#039;s talk about this at great length.  Let&#039;s have a national conversation on whether Barack Obama is &quot;operating outside the structure of our Constitution,? and whether &quot;he should be tried for treason.&quot;  It&#039;s like the dog eating story.  There is no possible way for liberals to spin this into something good, so they have to just shut up and take it, which they HATE.  You can almost see the smoke rising from their heads.

Romney handled it perfectly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that question wasn&#8217;t a plant then it should have been.  Yes, liberals, let&#8217;s talk about this at great length.  Let&#8217;s have a national conversation on whether Barack Obama is &#8220;operating outside the structure of our Constitution,? and whether &#8220;he should be tried for treason.&#8221;  It&#8217;s like the dog eating story.  There is no possible way for liberals to spin this into something good, so they have to just shut up and take it, which they HATE.  You can almost see the smoke rising from their heads.</p>
<p>Romney handled it perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdawk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>pdawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdawk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>pdawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And he is as terrified as the rest of us....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And he is as terrified as the rest of us&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdawk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4144</link>
		<dc:creator>pdawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And he is as terrified as the rest of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And he is as terrified as the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowshooze</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>snowshooze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But life is good now that there isn&#039;t anyone left to criticize him from the right. ( Whew! ) Don&#039;t worry, Obama will. 
  But if Romney becomes Nominee... it&#039;ll be all Romney, all the time... over here. I guess. Dodeedooodoo...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But life is good now that there isn&#8217;t anyone left to criticize him from the right. ( Whew! ) Don&#8217;t worry, Obama will.<br />
  But if Romney becomes Nominee&#8230; it&#8217;ll be all Romney, all the time&#8230; over here. I guess. Dodeedooodoo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JX12</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>JX12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...until the last paragraph when you took the Star Wars detour.  At any rate, I think I get your general point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;until the last paragraph when you took the Star Wars detour.  At any rate, I think I get your general point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdawk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>pdawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as a pastor for 20 years is questioning someone&#039;s failure to speak up against inappropriate comments?  

Not only did he take up for a bigot who threw verbal bombs at whites and Jews, but also stood up for terrorist who threw actual bombs at police stations with the intent of hurting American heroes.  

Yea that pathetic hypocrite has a ton of room to talk.  


If he wants to get dirty this year I can assure you that Mitt Romney is no John McCain.  No one wants to admit that Obama had a cake walk to the nomination last time.  Hillary and Bill were to worried about the black voters turning against them and pulled their punches and McCain just rolled over.  

Romney will turn over every stone and spare no expense on research on this radicals background.  When he gets the dirt on Obama he won&#039;t only throw it, he will cover his entire existence with the mud.

They called it the Death Star for a reason.  Problem is that unlike Star Wars, Obama doesn&#039;t have a Chewbaca to help....because he already ate him..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a pastor for 20 years is questioning someone&#8217;s failure to speak up against inappropriate comments?  </p>
<p>Not only did he take up for a bigot who threw verbal bombs at whites and Jews, but also stood up for terrorist who threw actual bombs at police stations with the intent of hurting American heroes.  </p>
<p>Yea that pathetic hypocrite has a ton of room to talk.  </p>
<p>If he wants to get dirty this year I can assure you that Mitt Romney is no John McCain.  No one wants to admit that Obama had a cake walk to the nomination last time.  Hillary and Bill were to worried about the black voters turning against them and pulled their punches and McCain just rolled over.  </p>
<p>Romney will turn over every stone and spare no expense on research on this radicals background.  When he gets the dirt on Obama he won&#8217;t only throw it, he will cover his entire existence with the mud.</p>
<p>They called it the Death Star for a reason.  Problem is that unlike Star Wars, Obama doesn&#8217;t have a Chewbaca to help&#8230;.because he already ate him..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is a careerist and an opportunist. But he is also SMART. He knows that this election hinges on fiscal conservatism.  I think he also sees that our nation cannot continue in the directions we are going.

And I never doubted that he would take the fight to Obama, hell he has always been a take no prisoners political infighter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a careerist and an opportunist. But he is also SMART. He knows that this election hinges on fiscal conservatism.  I think he also sees that our nation cannot continue in the directions we are going.</p>
<p>And I never doubted that he would take the fight to Obama, hell he has always been a take no prisoners political infighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d_lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2012/05/07/obama-was-against-disavowing-before-he-was-for-it/#comment-4139</link>
		<dc:creator>d_lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/?p=2905#comment-4139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and that he has had no hesitation in taking the conservative argument at Obama.

So far, so good.  I hope he doesn&#039;t get squishy as the election gets closer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and that he has had no hesitation in taking the conservative argument at Obama.</p>
<p>So far, so good.  I hope he doesn&#8217;t get squishy as the election gets closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
