« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Marco Rubio should be the VP running mate

Why Marco Rubio should be the VP running mate

By Adam Alan Isackson

In a presidential race there are few decisions more important than who the vice presidential nominee should be and it’s a decision that rests squarely in the hands of the presidential nominee. While very few voters vote for a ticket base solely on this decision it’s still seen by many as that first major judgment call by a nominee and oftentimes becomes a window into what that administration will look like and where the priorities truly lie.

First and foremost the goal is to select someone that will do no harm to the ticket. Any amount of baggage, despite its practical relevancy, will serve at the very least as a distraction. The last thing a ticket needs down the stretch is a national media focusing on something other than the campaign’s core message. A more serious issue can do much worse, and undermine the message entirely. Additionally the running mate needs to be someone focused and credible with the political savvy to stay on topic and not become bogged down on issues of less relevance. Rubio seems to meet all of these basic qualifications.

Subject to the scrutiny of one of the most intensely followed senate races in the country in 2010 Rubio showed striking maturity for a candidate who was only 39 at the time. Winning 50% of the vote in a 3 way race by running to the right of your own party’s governor and a Democrat in a moderate state is no easy feat. In the end his opposition threw everything but the kitchen sink at him and nothing stuck. If that isn’t some serious vetting, nothing is. In Rubio you have someone who can stick to the game plan, deliver the message, handle the media and deal with tough criticism all while coming out of it squeaky clean. If this was all that Rubio brought to the table he would be a solid choice.

Meeting all of these considerations what else does Rubio bring to the table? Well for one you have a sitting senator from a critical state. Above and beyond the states won by John McCain in 2008, after census reapportionment, the Republican ticket needs to pick up 96 additional electoral votes to reach the all critical 271. The state of Florida accounts for 29 of those 96 electoral votes and is a must win state under almost any realistic strategy. Imagine the buzz that a Rubio selection would deliver considering the location of the 2012 Republican Convention in Tampa, FL.

The state of Florida however isn’t the only place he gives a campaign a real shot in the arm. His Cuban heritage and a rapidly growing Hispanic demographic nationally, very well could make his selection critical. 16% of the US population, according to the 2010 census, identifies themselves as Hispanic and that number is higher in Colorado(20.7%), Nevada (26.5%), where Rubio grew up, and New Mexico (46.3%), all of which are or could be in play with Rubio on the ticket. In the long run a Rubio selection could do much more than helping the ticket in a few key states, it could help the party’s overall image with Hispanic voters, undoubtedly critical to the future of the Republican party considering that more than half of the US’s population growth in the last 10 years was due to increases in the Hispanic population.

The other strong possibility is that Republicans may nominate a candidate, like Romney or Huntsman who many within the conservative base or Tea Party movement might be less than enthusiastic about. Who better than a guy like Marco Rubio, who received strong Tea Party backing in 2010, to unite the party? A Rubio selection, and the threat of a second Obama term, could do that almost overnight and additionally bring a lot of volunteer enthusiasm that might otherwise be missing. He’s also the kind of guy who can excite the base without scaring off the all important moderate / independent vote, equally critical in any presidential race.

In closing, while Senator Marco Rubio certainly isn’t the only compelling option there’s little doubt that he is one option that the eventual nominee will find difficult to ignore. Rubio is young, smart, charismatic, Hispanic, has solid conservative credentials, would be a strong media presence and undoubtedly would be a big asset in the electoral race. Rubio’s a rising star in the GOP, and for good reason. He would bring a lot to the table while at the same time being a safe choice. The left wing media would have a difficult time trying to demonize the guy; he’s just to likeable and to politically savvy to get boxed into a corner. The only big questions remaining are if he would be willing to run, he has so far expressed little interest, and whether the eventual nominee has the foresight to recognize all that he would bring to the table.

About the author

Adam Isackson currently resides in Tacoma, Washington where he has managed, consulted worked on and volunteered for countless campaigns since the 90’s. Most recently managingthe campaigns of now State Rep. Jan Angel (R), who took an open (D) seat in ’08, and who was resoundingly reelected in 2010. If you have any questions, comments, or interest in political services you can contact the author at adam_isackson@yahoo.com or by calling and leaving a message at 253-678-1707

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • powertothepeople

    but I agree with little of this. Not going to address the whole thing, just some key points.

    Rubio has proved little yet. He is a relative unknown outside of conservative circles. To place him on the ticket as the second man does little to boost the ticket.

    Your assertion that somehow Hispanics will flock to a Rubio ticket is absurd. The Hispanic bloc is the new Black bloc of voters. No more will the Blacks vote for a republican ticket just because Cain is on it then will the Hispanics vote for our party just because Rubio or any others republican Hispanic is on the ticket. Just does not work that way in real life.

    His association with Karl Rove raises some eyebrows as to his wisdom in choosing political associates. 10 years ago, Rove was gold, now he is simply toxic. You also bring the “Sarah Palin spent a ton of donor money on clothes” issue with Rubio considering as FL’s speaker of the house he put over $110,000 on the party credit card in one year for such things as fixing his van, wine, groceries, etc. While he may have been within the law and it did little to affect him in the FL race, it will be a raised issue at the national level.

    Rubio does not guarantee us Florida nor does not having him on the ticket hurt our chances of taking the state. It will be won or lost by who we put up and what kind of job Obama is doing and what kind of job we are doing.

    Sorry, but I can not see many positives with a Rubio VP ticket.

  • Flagstaff

    Where does that come from? You disagree with his opinions?

  • Flagstaff

    See below. “Reply To This” got missed.

  • gpclaw

    Hispanics will never vote as a block, the way blacks do, because Hispanic’s don’t self identify that way. Hispanic’s identify themselves based on their national origin, in the same way European descendants don’t identify themselves as “European”, they identify as Irish, Italian, British, German, etc.

    For example, my wife is Panamanian, and identifies that way. She doesn’t relate to Mexican’s, Cubans, Puerto Rican’s, etc, any more than any other nationaliity, because they are all culturally different. This is why the voting patterns of Cubans in Florida, are different than Mexican’s in California.

    Part of the reason Blacks identify as a group, is because they are the same race, Hispanics don’t identify in this sense, because Hispanic is not a race. Latin America probably has the largest ethnic diversity of any continent, with White, Europeans making up the largest ethnic group in Latin America.

    You are correct when you stated that Rubio would not guarantee the Hispanic vote, for the same reason an Irish VP nominee wouldn’t guarantee the French vote.

  • powertothepeople

    Karl Rove was considered to be the greatest political minds during his Bush years and was feared by the left and even the ones on the right who did not have him. But since then he has become a loud mouthed destructive force in our party. He has consistently endorsed moderate and liberal republicans over conservative ones with NY being the most recent example, he has bad mouthed numerous candidates trying to win their seat and beat non conservative republicans, he has jumped behind RINO candidates and promoted them in the public view, and so on and so on.

    He has been discussed here many times and no conservative would want to be associated with him on a political level.

  • gekster

    When you’re right, you’re right. ;)

  • Flagstaff

    works for any Republican or for the Republican party. I agree that he has said some things as a Fox News analyst that were not helpful to certain people, among them Christine O’Donnell, I think. He has been right about some of them, wrong about others, but the point is he has no obligation to tout the conservative in a race when asked about “the horse race.” He correctly predicted what would happen to O’Donnell, but it wasn’t his fault she lost, it was the fault of the Maryland ‘Pub Party and the putz who had been primaried by her. Had THEY supported her, and it was THEIR obligation to do so, she would probably have won.

    In any event, I hardly see how association with Karl Rove at some point in the past, or even presently, has any effect on a candidate’s chances beyond getting good or bad advice.

    It’s all moot. Rubio has said unequivocally that he won’t run for VP (of course, if he’s asked…) and if he does he’s immediately a flip-flopper and a liar an all those other things politicians and politijunkies like to call each other.

    With the current field, I give even odds on a Romney-Bachmann ticket, in that order, with Bachmann-Cain a distant second.

    Pawlenty completed the flop tonight to go with his flip on Monday regarding Obamny care. I’ll bet he never realized that clever turn of phrase would end up hurting him more than it did Romney.

  • powertothepeople
  • acat

    it’s good to have someone else join the chorus.

    You have utterly *nailed* what’s wrong with 80% of the GOP “hispanic” outreach – it seems to be entirely based on the experiences of Cuban exiles from 30-40 years ago .. i.e. the more anti-communist or “conservative” Cubans arrived in Miami… and some commuted up I-95 to D.C. and lobbied.

    Mexicans, Panamanians, Colombians, and so forth have, as you point out a totally different experience, so .. naturally don’t respond to the same talking points the same way .. heck, Cubans who emigrated in the last 20 years don’t respond the same way either…

    Mew

  • MellowFellow

    I don’t think I totally agree. I believe what you say with respect to your Panamanian wife, of course, but my experience has been a little different.

    I’ve worked with Hispanics of many different nationalities (mostly blue collar folks in factories out West), and find that many do identify as Hispanics (in addition to their national identity). Language is one obvious driver for that, and I can relate…when I’m overseas, I like talking to people in my own language when given the opportunity. It makes my jokes funnier.

    It would hardly be surprising that this more frequent association may lead to like-mindedness and then bloc voting patterns. Same thing happens with some religious groups, though they might be very diverse otherwise.

    So, Rubio could help with non-Cubans more than you might think.

    Plus, nominating any person of color goes against the grain of the “Republicans are the racist party” meme which — like it or not — is still very prevalent in blue collar black and hispanic neighborhoods. ‘Could be part of the reason Obama did well with Hispanics.

    Still, I’m not advocating an affirmative action over meritocracy approach to the VP selection. But there would definitely be benefits, esp as a signal that the GOP is diverse and open.

    And I happen to think Rubio is awesome on his own, in any color or nationality. :)

  • cpaguy

    Hispanics (latins or whatever) are becoming a solid democratic bloc.

    They do districting here in Houston primarily based upon race…with the hispanic bloc being very important (given massive illegal immigration…and then the impact of the mis-interpretation of the 14th amendment). They just say…”hey, there are a bunch of hispanics living in this area who are getting older” (i.e. more likely to vote)…”lets put a district there.” To be fair, they do that for all races/peoples/groups…whatever.

    Cubans are a bit of an outlier, but I don’t know how strong that will continue to be.

  • gpclaw

    It is my understanding that the majority of Hispanics in the Houston area, are of Mexican decent. It shouldn’t be surprising that immigrants of the same nationality, vote as a group, just like recent Italian immigrants in the early 1900′s voted as a bloc. Don’t confuse Mexico, and Mexican culture to be representative of the rest of Latin American.

    The only reason Hispanics will vote as a group, is if we continue to treat them as one. The fact is, over 65% of Hispanics – and in the case of Mexicans, 75% – are of white European decent. Ultimately, national origin, and socio-economic status will play a bigger part in voting tendency, than the Spanish language does.

  • acat

    Okay, not *just* genetics.

    Look at Chicago. Every ethnic group gets a neighborhood, a holiday with a parade, and a food. Oh, and a voting bloc.

    It’s culture, not ethnicity, that drives the blocs. For instance, the Pakistani and Indian blocs along Devon Ave. have a lot of cross-over but are distinct on some issues.

    Mew

  • dee47

    His parents are not, We need to find out if they were naturalized before his birth,.
    Did you notice when trump showed his birth certificate the left went right for the throat. “His Mother was born in Scotland It proves one important FACT!! they know what our founding fathers meant by Natural Born of two US citizen, Well he was able to come tight back to show his mother was a US citizen since 1936, ten years before his BIRTH,

    If we put up Rubio we can call them to challange he he he. I also love Marco Rubio

  • Flagstaff

    Perry-Bachmann.

    But Perry-Cain or even Perry-Fudd would win. After all, Obama-Snerd was elected.