« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

What the Sandy Bill Really Says About Congress

As the Senate prepares to pass the Sandy Hurricane Relief Act for $50.4 Billion next week, it’s worthwhile to consider this piece of legislation within the bigger picture of looming the fiscal crises. No one will deny that those citizens who were effected by this catastrophic and legendary storm deserve help. However, the bill perfectly encapsulates the dysfunction of our Congress.

How many months did our elected officials argue and argue over tax rates, spending cuts, revenue, and debt? Finally, with much hand wringing, frustration, wheeling and dealing, Congress finally voted on something. By raising the tax rates on the wealthiest citizens — a longtime objective of Obama’s — they finally had something tangible to soak the rich so the rich could “pay their fair share”. This, we were told, was absolutely necessary to raise revenue because of our deficit, despite the likelihood that such a measure would have negative repercussions in the economy. This tax hike will provide us with $600 Billion in revenue over ten years.

And then there was Sandy, a bill with good intentions which metastasized into the monstrosity that is before us. It is a bill that is half-pork barrel spending and half-relief spending; a bill with spending not offset by equal and opposite cuts. This measure fully adds $50.4 Billion dollars to the deficit, after the House Republicans defeated the Mulvaney “amendment that would have forced the government to pay for a $17 billion Hurricane Sandy relief bill with a 1.63 percent cut to discretionary programs”.

Sandy is more than just relief. She includes items such as “$500 million for weather forecasting and to help create an ocean zoning plan–the later one of Obama’s pet projects. Also included are $10 million for FBI salaries $2 billion for road construction across the country, as well as funding for the Head Start program, roof repairs at the Smithsonian, and $150 million for fisheries across the country.”

On Tuesday, the Democrats will, in about 15 minutes of time, eliminate months of work in Congress that included some of the most vile infighting ever witnessed in modern politics. The roughly $600 Billion dollars over ten years that the Democrats had to have from the rich — which boils down to about $60 Billion in revenue a year — will be wiped out by the Sandy Bill. By voting up the $50.4 Billion in “Aid” that was crafted, Congress will spend nearly the entire sum of a year’s worth of revenue from the rich’s “fair share” , with most of it going to fund more government , in one fell swoop.

Sandy exposes some of the more odious truths about the majority of our Congress 1) Not enough are serious about reducing our deficits 2) Raising taxes on the wealthiest citizens in order to reduce our deficit is a sham. The Sandy Bill is the epitome of why our government is in dire fiscal straits.

Crossposted at alanjoelny.com

COMMENTS

  • Sir Aaron

    I’m against any Federal aid and against FEMA in general. They should have planned and prepared for disaster. We keep offering aid which prevents people from getting serious about disaster prepardness and savings in general.
    And, btw, I don’t think this is a federal government problem. It’s a people problem. Statistics tell us that the average American has no savings and a credit card debt of something like $6K. If the average American doesn’t believe in a personal budget why would the elected leaders of the average American believe in a government budget?

    • http://www.alanjoelny.com alanjoelny

      You are correct that people aren’t very well prepared. I am from NY, and state studies have been warning for the potential of an emergency of this magnatude this since the 70s…and yet here we are.
      My point was more of the false rhetoric and posturing that continues to go on in Congress (on both sides) with no real solutions — as the Sandy bill clearly evidences. It is very frustrating to watch.

  • thirdeblue3639

    The government needs to set aside $5 – $10 billion a year for disaster relief. Major disasters like Katrina or Superstorm Sandy cannot really be planned for on a local scale, but nationwide, major disasters such as these happen fairly regularly. Make disaster relief a normal part of the annual budget.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      You miss the point. There is about $20 billion in real disaster relief (it could or should be less, more like $10 billion) and another $30 billion in various pork. The senate, by failing to pass a budget and not having any ‘pay-go’ to make sure bills like this are paid for, has engaged in ‘open season’ on wasteful spending, pork and deficits out of control.

      “The govt needs to …” HAVE A BUDGET, not just for FEMA, but for everything, and we havent had a budget since 2009, about $6 trillion in deficit spending ago.

      “Make disaster relief a normal part of the annual budget.” Yes, but step one is HAVE THE DEMOCRAT SENATE ACTUALLY PASS A BUDGET.

    • Ann_W

      They probably do set aside a large amount. But the reality of Congress is that they always want to be seen to “do something.” So there will always be pressure to pass a special bill with more money in it.

  • norris

    Spending bills with equal and opposite cuts are just treading water.
    Let’s get serious eliminate several departments ,and cut all the rest by an actual 10% cut each year till the deficit is gone . The defense department could get along just fine with 25% less generals and admirals, the education department and the EPA could eliminate everyone.

    • http://www.alanjoelny.com alanjoelny

      Absolutely. There’s a lot of deep, systemic cuts that needs to happen — agencies/departments, etc. No one seems to have the will to tackle the hard questions because the majority are all afraid of re-election. We are still outnumbered in Congress.

    • Kyle-MI

      That is not the point. The point is that our government is so messed up that we cannot even cut the pork out of a bill like this, let alone get spending offsets.

      Or to put it another way, you are expecting us to run a Marathon in record time when we cannot even crawl.

  • Notre Droite

    Exactly. Had we nominated a true conservative for President, we would have had someone that would have called out FEMA for the pork spending that it is. If you are impacted by a natural disaster, that is what charity is for. We needed to teach everyone hit by Sandy that they shouldn’t live by the water if they can’t afford the consequences.