« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

WaPo and Politifact Agree Sequestration Was Obama’s; Obama Once Vowed Veto to Keep

Is anyone else getting a little bit tired of the President of the United States continuing to blame Republicans for sequestration?

Time for some flashback —

On November 21, Obama gave a speech explaining the failed Super Committee. He discussed the automatic cuts to the defense budget (sequestration) and the need for a balanced approach (cuts and taxes for the wealthy) to deficit reduction.

Standing firmly behind the automatic cuts, Obama then vowed to veto any efforts to undo sequestration. The video and link below comes from whitehouse.gov

“Already some in Congress are trying to undo these automatic spending cuts. My message to them is simple: No, I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off ramps on this one”

Fast forward a year to the tail end of the Presidential election season. Two major media sources, Politifact and Washington Post, both examined the source of sequestration and found it to have originated in the White House.

They were responding to Obama’s new claim during the 2012 Presidential debates that it was Congress who was responsible for the looming sequestration. Both media sources rated Obama’s blaim claim as “mostly false”".

Politifact (Tampa Bay Times): Barack Obama Says Congress Owns Sequestration Cuts

Obama said that the sequester — and the defense cuts that would result from it — was not his proposition. “It is something that Congress has proposed,” he said in the debate.

But it was Obama’s negotiating team that came up with the idea for defense cuts in 2011, though they were intended to prod Congress to come up with a better deal for reining in the deficit, not as an effort to make those cuts reality.

Meanwhile, members of both parties in Congress voted for the legislation that set up the possibility of sequestration. Obama’s position is that Congress should now act to avoid those across-the-board cuts.

Obama can’t rightly say the sequester isn’t his, but he did need cooperation from Congress to get to this point. We rate the statement Mostly False.

Washington Post: “Obama’s Fanciful Claim the Congress ‘Proposed’ the Sequestration”

No one disputes the fact that no one wanted sequestration, or that ultimately a bipartisan vote in Congress led to passage of the Budget Control Act. But the president categorically said that sequestration was “something that Congress has proposed.”

Woodward’s detailed account of meetings during the crisis, clearly based on interviews with key participants and contemporaneous notes, make it clear that sequestration was a proposal advanced and promoted by the White House”

So, let’s review:

– Obama’s administration proposed sequestration.

– Obama was willing to veto any effort to get rid of sequestration if he didn’t get his tax hike for the wealthy — which he finally got as a result of the Fiscal Cliff negotiations; that was the revenue side of the “balanced approach”.

— Now that the actual threat of sequestration remains high and the public is exceedingly worried about its implementation, Obama is patently changing the narrative and is currently passing the blame to Republicans.

— Obama’s administration proposed sequestration — what are Obama’s alternative cuts to avoid it?

COMMENTS

  • westcoastpatriette

    He’s a pathological liar. And I think it is becoming apparent to more people.

    • http://www.alanjoelny.com alanjoelny

      I hope so! Question then becomes…what is to be done about it?

    • funwithknives

      If you dual-up the ‘pathological liar’ fact with the other fact that [seemingly] a large number of The Boobus Americanii faction will eat anything spoon-fed to them by those media they can easily access , and not have to ‘think’ too awfully-critically about.
      Face it,… Barry’s a carny-barker and the rubes and noobs are everywhere.
      He knows it, counts on it and every time it works [even slightly more than 50% effective] he doubles-down and does it again.
      I have said since I cannot remember when, that Barry is simply Gambling and playing Chicken with Us, truly.
      So who is gonna start driving in the other direction and has the larger ‘stones’ to do so?
      No more fun and games, guys and girls. The guy who cannot even shoulder a shotgun and wears Mom-Jeans is double-dog-daring you to go at it.
      Takers……?

  • torpedoh

    See this is the stuff that galls me. The MSM is silent on it now, and is complicit in Obama’s lies. The only thing we can do is share it amongst our own networks

  • rosenstern

    I do not think we should enter into a “blame game” over the sequestor, Republicans voted for them. To suggest that they voted for them against their will makes the President seem far more powerful than he is.. Further, trying to shift blame for them implies that the cuts are bad. They are not, they are necessary. Perhaps the sequestor tool is a more blunt instrument that is ideal but we are finally imposing some cuts on government spending. If we hang tough and weather the PR storm, people will see that the world doesn’t end when government is cut and we will emerge as the grown-up party prepared to do what is necessary for the long term good of the country!

    • ww2nd95

      I agree. It was Obama’s idea, but Congress passed the law. The blame game is silly. Of course Beohner said after the bill was passed he got 98% of what he wanted and felt pretty good. Now he’s saying “this wasn’t out fault.. it was HIS idea, even though was passed HIS idea”. They either need to work out an alternative or let it happen, but they need to stop trying to pass the blame, as it makes them look small.

    • http://www.alanjoelny.com alanjoelny

      I agree that cuts need to happen (sequestration or otherwise). But we need to point fingers back to Obama to expose the tactic. He pushed this forth in the first place because he gambled that threatening to cut the one things he assumed GOP would cling to (Defense), would force them to cave on tax hikes for the wealthy.
      He got his tax hikes for the wealthy and moved sequestration to coincide with debt ceiling next. Now that the debt ceiling is moved till May and sequestration is isolated, Obama changed the narrative that he started it sequestration and is blaming Republicans — for the express purposing of painting them as the bad guy to get them to, once again, compromise (for the sake image and electibility) and cave to get more tax hikes. This is why Obama started the talk up about “balanced approach” again. He wants more taxes. Plain and simple.
      I think the GOP feels duped because they agreed to more tax hikes at the fiscal cliff, and now they are trying to push back and hold the line for no more. But this narrative that it’s the GOP fault needs to be pushed back hard and make Obama own the sequestration and push back that Obama therefore needs to find the alternative cuts (with no tax hikes).
      Obama has understood that Americans have short memories and has been able to, too many times, just change the narrative to his benefit. No more!

      • rosenstern

        I suppose my real beef here is with our own leaders in Washington. Ideally, we’d start with our policy principles which would be supported by legislative tactics and communication strategy. Somehow our congressional leadership manages to work themselves into a furball and the legislative tactics or communications strategy get disconnected from our policy priorities. It ends up looking like the past couple of days where we are trying to shift “blame” for the cuts to the President (implicitly suggesting cuts = bad), instead of making the case that cuts (even to defense as you suggest) are required for our country’s long term benefit. I think this is because we fear that our policy priority (reducing spending) will not be popular so we twist ourselves into these knots. Well, we are not particularly popular right now, so let’s stick to our policy priorities and be the principled party, I really believe we will be surprised at how popular principled party will be…