Eliminate Public Sector Unions!


Back in 1869, the Knights of Labor was founded as America’s first organized labor union. During this time, workers were experiencing a decrease in pay along with a decrease in quality of working conditions. Meanwhile, the industrial revolution was booming making captains of industry, like John D. Rockefeller, very wealthy men. The founding of labor unions was certainly justifiable, and the right thing to do. At the beginning the union members requested reasonable things such as child labor laws, the standard 40 hour work week, and a safe working environment. Upon President John F. Kennedy’s “Executive Order 10988” in 1962, federal workers became eligible to form unions, marking the beginning of a whole new identity of unions.

Compare those modest beginnings with the typical labor unions of today: Public sector unions have been fiercely criticized over the past year. In a study by the Kellogg School of Management, public pensions have an estimated $3 trillion in unfunded liabilities. To make matters worse, in an updated study just released in October of this year, Kellogg found that cities and counties across the nation plop an additional $574 billion onto that already massive debt. How could this have happened? Studies over the past decade (like the recent one in USA Today) have consistently shown that federal public employees, when you include benefits, make more than twice the amount of private sector workers.

An enormous disparity occurs between the pensions offered to the public employees versus the typical pensions received by private sector employees. The public pensions are so out-of-line that they require 2-3 private sector workers to pay for the benefits of one public sector retiree. A further detriment to unions is how their pay scale works: Workers are given raises based upon seniority, not measured results or hard work- such a practice would never happen in a private run business or enterprise. For example, young promising teachers that have not been tenured (aka not fully protected by the teacher’s union) are the first teachers cut during a budget crisis even if their talent far exceeds that of a tenured teacher. In a time when private sector union membership is at low not seen since the 1930’s, memberships in public sector unions continue to increase. In the United States today, a mere 7% of private sector employees are unionized as compared to 37% (and growing) of public sector employees. There is a simple reason why the private industries have been decreasing in union memberships over the past few decades: The free market.

When unions continuously make excessive demands on their employers, it drives up the costs of the company which are then passed on to the consumers. Take, for example, car companies. For decades, GM and Chrysler have been unable to compete with foreign auto makers because the foreign companies can make better quality cars at lower cost due to the fact that they are not on they hook for outrageous employee benefits. In the UAW (United Auto Workers, car union) handbook, there are over 5,000 pages of rules and regulations and if just one is violated, it can shut down the whole assembly line, greatly reducing efficiency and therefore competitiveness by American auto workers. These American car companies were in such rotten financial shape that the federal government literally bailed them out. Most of the time the federal government is not going to bail a company out so typically, those companies that are no longer competitive in the marketplace go under, hence why private companies continue to decline in union membership. On the flip side, think about the government. Here, there is no competition. When public sector unions get together to negotiate for even higher salaries or increased benefits, who to they consult with? Politicians.

Consider a few inconvenient facts: Labor union dues are a huge factor in donations for an election cycle. Of the top 5 contributors to the 2010 elections, unions claimed 3 of those spots. The #1 big spender on the 2010 midterm elections happened to be: The American Federation of State, County, and Municpal Employees (AFSCME) with $87.5 million in donations to Democratic campaigns. All 3 of these powerful labor unions had a mission of electing Democrats to office with a sum total of $171.5 million to spend. The other 2 big donors were groups such as American Crossroads aimed at electing Republicans with a sum total of $140 million to spend. So, when public sector labor unions sit across the table to negotiate contracts with politicians, often times it is with politicians that they helped finance into office. These politicians are eager to help out their friends who helped them win their elections so the two sides can easily come to a mutually beneficial agreement. All the while the group that is actually footing the bill for all expenses incurred by these labor unions is never included in the actual negotiations: the taxpayers. It seems odd and certainly corrupt that the public sector unions, the so-called “public servants,” are organizing to financially screw over, well, the public.

Although the recession has cost a net loss of jobs to state and local government jobs, 198,000 new federal government jobs have been added since January of 2008 due to the stimulus package. Meanwhile, the private sector has lost close to 8 million jobs.  Perhaps in securing and boosting employment by the government, the powers in charge are buying off and baiting a loyal constituency? It seem more than plausible because all the evidence certainly leads to an indictment of the corrupt and disfunctional “union” between unions and the Democrat Party.

Many states on the brink of bankruptcy (California, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, etc.) have only remained solvent because of funds from the stimulus package which will soon run out. These states will continue to hold their hands out wide, looking for more money, until they are taught a lesson in financial responsibility. What needs to happen is for the US House of Representatives to make a procedure for states to declare bankruptcy. Yes, bankruptcy. Just like when individuals or businesses over-commit and live far beyond their means, states, too, should have a process by which they can essentially “start over.” When a business declares bankruptcy, it therefore is no longer bound to union contracts and can reorganize as it sees fit. In this case, instead of having a system where a unionized public sector employee can contribute a mere $62,000 over their working lifetime to their pension fund, but then withdraw $1.6 million from the state pension fund (like in New Jersey), states could redefine pensions to be comparable with private sector pensions: What you withdraw later largely depends on what you put in over the course of your working years, with a little help from your employer. This is known as a defined contribution plan used by practically every private firm for their employees. The only segment of society who viciously refuse to switch to this model are the current public sector employees who operate on a defined benefit pension plan that completely rips off taxpayers. As Dick Morris says, “This measure will return our state and local governments to the sovereignty of the people and take them away from the “thugocracy” of public-employee unions…We may, at long last, have a way to liberate our nation from the domination of those who should be our public servants but who often are our union masters.”

Making this kind of procedure a binding law will be the first of many fights that will happen between lawmakers and labor unions. The end goal must be the dismantling of all public sector unions. Public union employees are being paid twice the going rate of labor and the average taxpayer has had enough. If this dismantling does not happen, eventually the United States will begin to look like Europe: Riots in the street about the retirement age in France, an entirely bankrupt nation like Greece, drastic government spending cuts causing protests in all countries from England to Austria. In America, there is still time to save our republic but we must act now. Otherwise the United States, along with Europe, will be destroyed from within because of squandering their wealth and not acting prudently to remedy their dire situation soon enough, much like the Roman Empire.

This is the first segment in a 10 part blog series from www.alyssakaeding.com


Category:

RSS feed

18 Comments Leave a comment

Great diary - GC recos - Even FDR opposed Public Sector Labor Unions on principle - more later on that principle - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, November 11th at 9:35PM EDT (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com and Charlotte Observer columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 

Bankruptcy is a terrible price to pay, but...

conservativecurmudgeon (Diary) Thursday, November 11th at 11:35PM EDT (link)

…So be it. I just weep for all the bondholders and the wealth that will vaporize.

I might suggest, though, that there are other additional means to declaw the public sector unions, at least in states with the referendum process. These states could, and ought. to make it illegal for public sector employees to bargain for wages and benefits collectively. They could still unionize, (for workplace rules, safety issues, advancement criteria and so on) but their salary and benefit plans would be defined individually, and subject to at-will definition. This would include getting rid of teacher tenure.

Here in Michigan, there has been limited success, for example, in keeping public school teachers from striking in the absence of contracts. While a small step, it is a tacit admission by the courts that the taxpaying public interest may not be held hostage by its civil employees, and in this idea-germ is the pathogen for a great pandemic of freedom and justice for taxpaying Americans.

Good points.

Alyssa Kaeding (Diary) Friday, November 12th at 11:33AM EDT (link)

If unions were kept to their original intent, I would have no problem with them. But now, they are all just dripping with the entitlement attitude.

I do like your ideas though of simply not allowing them to collectively bargain. There are probably lots of ways we could curb the bankrupting power of these unions. Hopefully this next Congress can get serious about doing something before it is too late and innocent bystanders have to sacrifice some of their wealth.

 
 

At least State Bankruptcy localizes the damage.

mdd1956 Friday, November 12th at 8:39AM EDT (link)

The alternative in the end to print more money and we all pay, for all of lets say, California’s business killing policies.

 

A needed study of union History

tex41lb Friday, November 12th at 2:00PM EDT (link)

A better understanding of union history is badly needed. Like many ideas of merit the union movement has been co-opted. Unions today largely serve the master, not the member.

Often, business and government are in bed with unions to the detrement of union members and society in general.

I will be watching for future segments of the 10 article series.

Yes,

Alyssa Kaeding (Diary) Monday, November 15th at 12:06PM EDT (link)

I agree that many people out there are clueless about anything to do with unions. I hope this past election helped some people realize the now-corrupt nature of them.

The article series is planned to come out each Thursday evening. Glad to see you are interested!

 
 

The public sector unions are un-necessary....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Saturday, November 13th at 6:17AM EDT (link)

and they destroy the election process. I work in finance and it is absolutely amazing the “retired” former teachers etc., who are in their mid 50′s living off of 4K a month in the cheapest parts of the Country and btw that is until the day they die, which is a drain on the taxpayer. The pay to play done by the politicians who continue to STEAL Americans tax dollars to lavish benefits on unions who then in turn lavish money back on the politicians is an unacceptable and ruinous policy!

 

My union, the NEA, takes my dues and uses them to support candidates I don't

renny (Diary) Saturday, November 13th at 8:08AM EDT (link)

Not only the NEA, but as ancillaries, I also belong to the NJEA, the OCEA (county), and local, all of which parcel out dues monies to their pet Dem. candidates. Only ONCE in decades did the state affiliate not endorse a Dem. candidate for gov., and that was during Christie Whitman’s second run. They didn’t endorse her, but they didn’t her opponent either.
I am retired and would not have to pay to all the various permutations but I still coach in the public school system and the rationale is I must belong to the union because my coach’s stipend is negotiated.
Beck on the federal level says I do not have to pay dues that are used for contrary pol. support, but I would have to employ a lawyer and bring my own case in NJ to force my associations to allow me to direct them not to use my dues against my wishes. That would cost gadzillions more what the amount of dues I pay is.
Cong. should pass legislation under the next Rep. president to ban the use of public unions’ dues for political purposes. That would begin their strangulation.

 

Bravo Alyssa. Terrific diary.

Danielle Davis (ocleverone) (Diary) Saturday, November 13th at 9:52AM EDT (link)

Very well done.

To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it. — Margaret Thatcher

 

555's Alyssa.....the SEIU, NEA, and their trial lawyers are the biggest detriment to this country short of Obama and the Dems themselves

fpete13527 (Diary) Sunday, November 14th at 11:30AM EDT (link)
 

A great post, Alyssa, though the conclusion opens to a wider point...

LaborUnionReport (Diary) Sunday, November 14th at 3:13PM EDT (link)

Many commenters remark that the public-sector unions should be eliminated. The problem is, while there is a freedom to associate in the Constitution, any attempt to ‘eliminate’ public-sector unions would likely be struck down through the courts (including the USSC).

The same would hold true with trying to limit unions’ ability to influence politics.

HOWEVER, there is a way to effectively cut off their effectiveness in socializing America and that is either through eliminating collective bargaining rights at both the state and federal levels.

At the federal level, as has been noted elsewhere (I cannot recall which post), the power of public unions rose as a result of President Kennedy’s EO 10988. All it would take is a President equally committed to eliminating this cancer to write and sign an EO eliminating Kennedy’s EO.

Just some thoughts.

;)

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine December 23, 1776

In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.-Ayn Rand

LaborUnionReport.com
The Most Comprehensive Source for
News & Views on Today’s Labor Unions.


...Ooops! I hit the 'post' button without completing this.

LaborUnionReport (Diary) Sunday, November 14th at 3:19PM EDT (link)

At the state level, each state has the right to establish its own collective bargaining laws (unless the PSEECA is passed–and public sector bargaining laws become ‘federalized’).

To eliminate the effects of public sector unions there, a National Right to Work law would be the first step.

The second step would be to require unions to have their members approve $$$ spent on politics.

Note: None of these two options are likely to happen in the next two years though.

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine December 23, 1776

In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.-Ayn Rand

LaborUnionReport.com
The Most Comprehensive Source for
News & Views on Today’s Labor Unions.


I've wondered this myself

thurman Sunday, November 14th at 8:37PM EDT (link)

I am baffled why a Pres like Nixon, Reagan or Bush hasn’t rescinded JFK’s EO and banned federal employee unions from collective bargaining, I always wondered if it was that simple

Hopefully with all the light being shone on all these unions now, our next President will consider it

I think it is merely less simple in application

BA Cyclone (Diary) Monday, November 15th at 10:52AM EDT (link)

It has to be a combination of where a President chooses to spend political capital, and also a measure of not-wanting-to-defecate-where-you-work. The President and the administration in some part must use said worker bees to implement policy, and I guess one has to be careful how much dye you drop in that pool and what it is meant to do.

I think the paradigm is shifting in 2 ways: the comparison of public vs. private is more visible + totally unsustainable; and the nature of public financing at large is totally out of alignment.

When “everybody is winning” the waste in the system is more tolerable.

“If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.” — James Madison

“Electing Republicans who don’t have the courage of their convictions may be easier in some circumstances, but it won’t save our country.” — Jim DeMint

BA Cyclone’s blog

BA Cyclone on Twitter

 
 

Great suggestions

Alyssa Kaeding (Diary) Monday, November 15th at 12:11PM EDT (link)

I agree that getting rid of the public sector unions altogether would be very unlikely, but yes there are so many ways that their power could be limited/checked.

I appreciate and enjoy your insight into labor issues. I have enjoyed many of your posts and always find them extremely valuable and educational. Keep up the good work!

 
 
 

Not Quite Accurate

daviddenholm (Diary) Thursday, December 2nd at 5:03PM EDT (link)

It isn’t quite accurate to say that President Kennedy’s 1962 Executive Order started to move toward public sector collective bargaining. The mayor of New York city gave municipal unions monopoly bargaining privileges in 1958 and the state of Wisconsin enacted a comprehensive compulsory public sector bargaining law in 1959. Kennedy’s order provided for union recognition in the federal civil service but there was virtually no scope of bargaining. The real problem in the early 1960′s as more and more states passed laws was the political pressure from the National Education Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. It should be noted that at the same time the leaders of the AFL-CIO, who up until this time had opposed public sector collective bargaining, saw the writing on the wall and realized that their decline in the private sector was having an impact on their power and turned to the public sector as a new source of members and, probably more importantly, MONEY. If Alyssa plans a 10 part series on this, I hope she will contact me at david@psrf.org for additional information.

Hello.

Alyssa Kaeding (Diary) Thursday, December 2nd at 9:22PM EDT (link)

Hi David,

Thanks for the feedback. The intentions of this post was to be an overview of what is, as you allude to, a very complex subject. You are correct in that I did not point out information on the early formation of public sector unions- as you know when you are writing any article you have to pick and choose what facts you want to get across.

The 10 part series is on a range on topics; this one being the only one involving labor unions. I will have to check out your site though. Thanks again for taking the time to read!

 
 

Great thread!

Ned Reck (Diary) Thursday, December 2nd at 6:10PM EDT (link)

And I am all for it…

BUT WHO’S GOT THE GOVERNMENT GUTS TO START THE DANCE? Those union thugs… along with every public-blood-suckin’ relative… would come after the initiator of any such legislation… with all weapons drawn.

I agree with LaborUnionReport… just not happening in the near term.

Still a great thread… I can only dream about it… along with participatin’ in a Victoria’s Secret beach volley ball game.

Ned Reck

On the plains of “Hesitation”… lie the blackened bones of
countless millions… who… at the dawn of victory…
sat down to rest… and while resting….. DIED.
~ Anonymous