« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Red State Book Notes: The Statist as a Central Planner

It is, for example, at least conceivable that the British automobile industry might be able to supply a car cheaper and better than cars used to be in the United States if everyone in England were made to use the same kind of car or that the use of electricity for all purposes could be made cheaper than coal or gas if everybody could be made to use only electricity.

I realized in this weeks reading that today’s statist is the new central planner.  Their goals are the same, their place in time is the only thing that has changed.  The statist believes the government can solve almost any problems put before us.  The central planner believes the government can better organized our lives than we can.  Both believe that the only way to a utopia is through heavy interference from the govenrment.

Is there any doubt that the President is a central planner?  I am sure there are a number of posts here at Red State that have pointed out his statist tendencies.  The health care bill, cap and trade, and the financial bill from this week are all examples of legislation our President is very proud of and that heavily interfere in an individuals freedom of choice.

To take this argument one step forward, in the reading on The Road to Serfdom, I believe Hayek is trying to argue that socialism leads to fascism and tyranny.  A society can’t just stop at a “beneficial socialism” because central planners (or statists) will see more and more problems that need the governments benevolent hand.  Fixing these problems through government interference will continue to suck away the liberties of its citizens.  President Obama has also shown this in the last few weeks.  Not happy to settle with the courts determining if BP was guilty of crimes in the Gulf, he forced them to set aside $20 Billion for the White House to manage (despite what he claims in public) to help “those affected by the spill in the gulf”. The President has no authority to do this under the Constitution. Yet, President Obama believed the government had to act and act quickly.  The government had already driven the price of BP stock down by bad mouthing the company daily, and by threatening to kick their a@@.  Why, we had to get the money before the company went bankrupt.  To wait for the courts, and to go about suing BP, would simply take to long.  The government had to act, and it had to act now.

The scariest thing about this is how many people believe what the President did was right. Central Planning has come a long way in the United States, and I am worried about how far it can go before we stop it.

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    Hayek is right to argue that socialism leads to fascism and tyranny. The only way a statist or central planner can achieve directed economic production and control, is to eliminate competition and the freedom of choice. Once you take away choice, you are taking away liberty. Each successive intrusion upon the people with laws and regulations essentially reduces choices, thus reducing liberty.

    The tyranny comes in because of the abuse of power by the government. A statist government must have power and the only way to get it is to take it. Now there are two paths, the people giving it up mindlessly and 2) the outright grab for it–which we are seeing daily with this administration.

    Of interest and one of the most apt comments by Hayek was his inclusion of Adam Smith’s belief, “to support themselves they are obliged to be oppressive and tyrannical.” Government has to feed and grow to sustain itself; once a bureaucracy is created, it must maintain the purpose for it’s existence. How can a welfare office stay in business if there are no welfare clients? Government never wants to put itself out to pasture.

    The people in this country have incrementally given up so much power to a central government. All it takes is for an abusive power structure to come along and you have the road to fascism and tyranny. Hayek was right–this is what socialism brings. Amazing and downright scary to see this unfold before our eyes.

  • JadedByPolitics

    impressed that you are still allowing US the lessons of your insights. I have recently started reading the 5000 year leap while I hit the treadmill it has the benefit of allowing me a higher incline and I have better memory recall because I am concentrating so intently on the book :)

  • Bill S

    See here

  • redneck_hippie

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704911704575326500718166146.html

    Thanks for the post, Bill. One of my radio host faves brought this up, but forgot to look up the link.

  • Bill S

    Thanks for the update, r-h.

  • Bill S

    The only way I can get to it is by searching for the article on Google and accessing via their link.

    It’s a conspiracy.

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I couldn’t get to the article without “subscribing”.

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I appreciate the encouragement. I am learning a lot in this experiment, and I plan to see it through. I also really liked 5000 year leap. When you finish it, let me know if y

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I appreciate the encouragement. I am learning a lot in this experiment, and I plan to see it through. I also really liked 5000 year leap. When you finish it, let me know if you think it should be added into the list.