« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Book Notes: Life in the “Apparatus”

In this weeks reading of Witness, Whittaker Chambers joins the Communist underground.  I continue to find this book fascinating.

Chambers is approached by the communist underground while working at a communist paper.  He is given the “option” of joining the underground (or “apparatus” as they refer to it).  After deciding not to join the underground, he finds out that there really isn’t an option.  He is caught in a situation beyond his control.   Chambers doesn’t really discuss what could have happened to him at this point if he had broken with the communist party.  Likely he would have disappeared.

The rest of this section covers Chambers typical life while working for the operation.  He discusses how he got money from the apparatus, how he learned to look for a tail, and how he learned to develop film and microfilm. I found it interesting that he was also told that he could no longer have any contact with the open communist party.

Perhaps the most interesting part of this section is that Chambers realized he worked for the intelligence section of the Soviet military, yet continued to do it.  He was born in the United States, had grown up in the United States, had even attempted to enlist in the military during WW I.  Yet he was now actively facilitating  intelligence gathering for a foreign nation.  Chambers didn’t have faith in our system of government to solve the problems of the time.  He believed communism was the way of the future.

I feel like there is a lesson there for today.  It has become politically correct to insult our nations history in school.   The current crop of Democrats continually disparage big business and capitalism.  Chambers became a communist in school.  If we don’t teach kids the positive things our nation has done, why would they defend it?  If we don’t teach them why our capitalist system is beneficial, why would they work to protect it?  People yearn for something to believe in.  If they aren’t provided it as they grow up, they will look for it later in life.

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    Communist underground is interesting, including as you noted, that he had to leave his open membership in the party. The whole idea was that he had to become a member of the ‘bourgeois’ cloaked in respectability, and when he actively worked for the intelligence sector of the Soviet military – he was engaged in espionage against his own country.

    Fascinating to me, was his insight and recognition of the Communist underground and it’s “undefined power lurking…” I think that it is an important point applicable to the present day connection between Socialism and Communism. Socialism has defined power, but as it moves to a more totalitarian state – Communism – it holds that undefined power as well. IMO, it translates into fear on the part of the people, certainly for those of us not willing to join the statist State.

    Another interesting aspect he observed about Communism, which I hadn’t thought about, is:

    Communism is a faith of the cities, and can look upon the countryside only to organize, that is to say, to destroy it. As a Communist, that is to say, a man dedicated to directing history, I had no choice. For it is clear that the history of the 20th centruy will be determined by the cities, not by the countryside.

    The above quote is something to ponder, because indeed, our urban centers are the locales where central planning takes place and takes over.

    How far would you like to read for next week, Andy?

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I caught the comment you quoted as well and thought it was very interesting. I continue to believe that socialism is simply a transition phase. If you follow it to its logical conclusion, you will end up with communism

    For next week, I am going to read up to section VII of chapter 7.