« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Book Notes: Senator Richard Nixon

This weeks reading gets into the details of the first Hiss case.  Richard Nixon features very prominently in that story.  Chambers goes so far  as to state that without Richard Nixon and Judge Thomas Murphy, the Hiss case may not have been possible:

That the committee did not act on its fears is a fact of history that no one can take from it.  Its stand was greatly strengthened by one man.  Richard Nixon argued quietly but firmly against a switch from the Hiss investigation to any other subject.  He pled the necessity of reaching truth in the Hiss-Chambers deadlock.

By his action, then and later, he became the man of decision of the first phase of the Hiss Case, as Thomas F. Murphy (now Judge Murphy) was to be man of decision of the second phase of the Hiss Case.  Richard Nixon made the Hiss Case possible. Thomas F. Murphy made it possible for  the nation to win the Case.  Without either man, the Case would,in my opinion, would have been lost.  Let any rational fellow who likes explain to the nation how, in that crisis, those two men, and just those two men, one a Quaker and on a Catholic, one a Republican, and on a Democrat, each utterly unlike the other in mind and character, came to be where each, in indispensable succession, was needed.

This is a very different opinion of Richard Nixon than I ever learned in school.  Its also very different than how Richard Nixon is painted by movies, TV, and the media.  As this section unfolds, we  find that Nixon had a very big part to play in discovering the truth about Alger Hiss.  Imagine what our country would look like today if Nixon didn’t push on to discover if Hiss was in fact a communist.  Without the Hiss case, there is every reason to believe that the communist apparatus would be more firmly entrenched in the highest levels of government today.  I think it is a little dissappointing that he doesn’t get more credit in today’s school system.

For TWO Weeks: I have to go to liberal occupied San Francisco this week.   I am going to take the week off.  In two weeks, I want to cover up to section XXX of chapter 11.

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    about a man most of us have little knowledge of in is pre-presidential days. I like Nixon’s voiced thought after his initial hearing of Hiss’s testimony, “It is a little too mouthy.” It often is what is not said vs what is said, except when someone runs on and on in such a mundane way. Nixon caught that about Hiss, and Hiss seemed almost to be ‘playing’ with them.

    One of the most profound insights Chambers voiced, IMO, was when he said:

    For the moment had arrived when some man must be a witness, and so had the man. They had come together. The danger to the nation from Communism had now grown acute, both within its own house and abroad. Its existence was threatened. And the nation did not know it.

    “The nation did not know it” and now it has seeped in the American consciousness with a mantle of respectability, that Chambers would be horrified to see. Everything that he (and others) sought to denounce and warn this country about, has been insidiously placed into the public consciousness as acceptable. Only when the treasonous nature of all of this is once again revealed, will we be able to cut off the head of the snake. But think Medusa here……

    Have a good two weeks, and will resume when you get back.