« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Book Notes: “The Lesson” from Witness

With 50 pages left in Witness, it may be a little premature to claim to know the one lesson we should learn from this book.  There are a number of incredible themes and lessons from this book I will take with me.    However, during this week’s reading, I found what I think should be the lesson we take from this book as part of the Book Notes project.

Chambers discusses how he felt like parts of the government were more interested in silencing him than in learning just how far Communism had penetrated the government.  During the espionage trial of Hiss, Chambers notes that two Supreme Court Justices testified to Hiss’s character.  He also pointed out that the Secretary of State made a very public statement of support for Hiss.  Saying, “I will not turn my back on Alger Hiss,” Secretary of State Acheson could well have spoken for many in the federal government when Chambers decided to expose the communist infiltration.  But why?  What possible benefit could these individuals gain from defending a Communist who was spying on our government?  Even if these men thought Hiss innocent, they risked destroying their careers by trying to protect him.

It was tempting to chalk this up to “partisan politics”.  However, Chambers says he thinks it was something deeper:

The simple fact is that when I took up my little sling and aimed at Communism, I also hit something else.  What I hit was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which, in the name of liberalism, spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades.  This is not a charge.  My opinion of that revolution is not at issue.  It is a statement of fact that need startle no one who has voted for that revolution in whole or in part, and, consciously or unconsciously, a majority of the nation has so voted for years.  It was the forces of that revolution that I struck at the point of its struggle for power.  And with that we come to the heart of the Hiss Case and all its strange manifestations.

This is the lesson we should take from Witness, and the lesson we should remember going forward.  Socialism, Progressive policies, and liberalism are all fellow travelers of Communism.  These policies simply haven’t thought through their own beliefs.  Once they do, they will either reject communism, or realize that they are heading towards communism themselves.

Conservatives must point out how close these beliefs are to communism.   We should do this not as a way of insulting progressives and statist, but to show voters where these beliefs lead.

For Next Week: Finish the book!!

In Two Weeks: I am still taking suggestions for the next book for our reading list.  I am still leaning towards C S Lewis’ Mere Christianity, but I am looking for other possibilities, and am looking for titles for the Book Notes reading list.

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    Book-notes project is a good one. Also, here is the link to the diary that I did last March after compiling a list from the readers here at RedState, of a number of books that would contribute to our conservative education. A short bullet synopsis was included, so maybe you would like to look it over.

    http://www.redstate.com/penguin2/2010/03/10/conservative-education-a-wealth-of-knowledge/

    I will write my comment for your post tomorrow morning. Get a better comment that way. :)

  • JadedByPolitics

    set up your twitter name in your profile, so that you and I and other Redstater’s can tweet out your excellent editorial diaries on books that most will not have the time and for some the inclination to read but throughly enjoy your take on :)

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I pulled a number of titles off of it for future book notes reading. I still want to finish the original list that Eric came up with. However, some day, we are going to need more books!

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    …to point out the symbiotic link between statism (communism) and bureaucratism. Since 1992 the debate has linger on as to what really killed the USSR, Homo Sovieticut, Home Rus (the Russians) or Home Bureaucraticus, which i, for place at the foot of the fall of virtually every civilization known to man. It is our demon seed. Our one cancer.

    The bureaucracy will repel any attack from outside, even if that attacker holds a scalpel trying to remove a tumor.

  • mriggio

    and I strongly endorse your choice of Mere Christianity as your next project. If you haven’t yet studied it, I’m positive you’ll be richly rewarded and eagerly anticipate your analysis!

    Vassar: and when the bureaucracy acts to repel invaders, it does so with the wholehearted alliance of every statist within shouting range; the exact nature/place of the bureaucracy doesn’t matter, it always seems to work out this way. Cheers!

  • acat

    In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely.

    – Jerry Pournelle

    This is why bureaucracies are such great hiding places for communists and their weak-minded fellow travelers.

    Mew

  • penguin2

    Erick Erickson’s and Aaron Gardner’s Booknotes idea. If you check my sig line, there is also a link for the first diary I did on incorporating the two.

    Your post on this section emphasizes a theme I found disturbing and strangely parallel to our government, and in particular, our Leftist government, today. Chambers makes several remarks throughout the book alluding to your statement: “Chambers discusses how he felt like parts of the government were more interested in silencing him than in learning just how far Communism had penetrated the government.”

    Chambers says this:

    I had been warned repeatedly that the brunt of official wrath was directed, not aginst Alger Hiss, as a danger, but against me for venturing to testify to the danger.

    Though he does add this…

    At that time, I was convinced, however mistakenly, that no one of any power int eh Government wanted to know the real truth about Communism in Government. i ws convinced that, on the contrary, the official purpose was to bypass or stifle that truth wherever it threatened to emerge.

    IMO, because of the pervasiveness of Socialism/Communism throughout several of the structural foundations of our society – academia, judicial, government and even the churches – we see even greater attempts to suppress the truth against that which would destroy our Constitutional Republic. Interesting that the Washington Post of that era supported Alger Hiss, though doesn’t surprise me.

    Whenever the Democrats are in power, and now they are truly of the Left, there are these attempts to cover how deeply infiltrated this country is with people who are intent on bringing down/changing this country as we know it. Chambers would be disappointed, but not surprised, that we now have a Marxist as president.

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    is done