« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Book Notes: Final Thoughts on Mere Christianity

In this weeks reading we finished Mere Christianity.  I think the book met my expectations for a great introduction to Christianity.  I think Lewis makes some very compelling arguments for a belief in both a god, and the Christian God.

In this final reading, I found a section in Chapter 9 very interesting.  Lewis discusses the “cost” of following Christianity.  In this case, Lewis argues that the cost of following Christianity is that the Lord will not just help us with those parts of our lives we don’t like, he will help us with all of it.  We can’t ask the Lord to help us with something like alcoholism, and not expect the Lord to affect our everyday lives.  Lewis uses this explanation:

When I was a child I often had toothache, and I knew that if I went to my mother she would give me something which would deaden the pain for the night and let me get to sleep.  But I did not go to my mother — at least, not till the pain became very bad.  And the reason I did not go was this.  I did not doubt she would give me the aspirin, but I knew she would also do something else.  I knew she would take me to the dentist next morning.  I could not get what I wanted out of her without getting something more, which I did not want.

I think there are times when we all face this.  We all would like help with the big things.  We would all like to be good Christians.  However, embracing Christianity means that we let God fix ALL of the problems with us.  The problems we want help with (like gluttony at Thanksgiving) as well as the problems we may not want help with (such as loving our neighbors as ourselves).  However, Christianity isn’t a cafeteria menu.   God loves us and wants to make sure our tooth doesn’t hurt anymore.  He will take away the pain we have tonight, but he will also work within us to fix that tooth for years to come.

There is a temptation to let God help us with the immediate problem, but not our entire life.  We would like to be a little bit better person, but not necessarily the person God wants us to be.  Lewis has a response for this as well:

We may be content to remain what we call “ordinary people”:but He is determined to carry out a quite different plan.  To shrink back from that plan is not humility: it is laziness and cowardice.  To submit to it is not conceit or megalomania; it is obedience.

I pray that I have the strength, the courage, and the obedience to follow God where he will take me.

For Next Week: I had planned to cover “Free To Choose” by Milton Friedman next week.  However, with the events in Egypt, and the involvement of Muslim Brotherhood in the protests demonstrations, I am considering shifting books.  “The Grand Jihad”, by Andrew McCarthy covers a number of things.  However, it also talks about the Muslim Brotherhood’s relationship to Hamas.  Which one would you prefer to read?  I will post a comment here around Wednesday with the final selection and what pages I will cover for Sunday.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • penguin2

      Some of Lewis’ final words were prose but “felt” like poetry.
      In contrasting Christianity with other religions

      God is not a static thing…it is a dynamic, pulsating activity, a life….If you want joy, power peace, eternal life, you must be close to, or even into, the thing that has them…They are a great fountain of energy and beauty spurting up at the very centre of reality

      He goes on to discuss how men are “mirrors or carriers” of Christ for other men.

      Christ says “Give me All. I don’t want so much of your time and so much of your money and so much of your work: I want You.”

      And finally, Lewis makes note that:

      And, whatever you do, do not start quarreling with other people because they use a different formula from yours.

      Mere Christianity is an excellent essay detailing Lewis’ discovery of Christianity, and his transformation to a life with Christ.

      For our next read I would like to stay with the planned book of “Free to Choose” by Milton Friedman. Was able to get a copy of it. :)

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I’m leaning towards Freedom to Choose. It seems some of the readers were looking forward to it.

  • ntrepid

    Great job andyd. I didn

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Yes, God has a plan to make us his sons that can live with him forever or we can choose to be our own God and reap what that sows.

    I look forward to reading the next book you choose. Witness and Mere Christianity are two of the most influential books in my life (as is Free to Choose). I have read them all many times.

    I would like to read a new one now.

    God bless

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Jihad.

    Other good ones are

    Bodansky’s Bin Laden: The Man who declared war on America and Lewis’ What Went Wrong?

    both published right before 911

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    does it come with the same pay as the other Czar’s? Thanks for the links too. I am always interested in what others think of the reading.

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    You’ve created a niche here which will grow in appreciation…unless all the readers in the universe die off. It could happen.
    Cheers

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    It’s one of those books I go around recommending to everyone; one of those that I’m forever wishing every American would read.

    There’s a lot of overlap between McCarthy’s book and the landmark report on which he was one of the contributors, “Shariah: The Threat to America.”

    Very important stuff. EYE-OPENING.

  • http://politicalfriendsblog.com andyd

    I think I am going to stick with Friedman’s “Free to Choose”. For Sunday, I plan on covering Chapter One.