« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Is the Dream Ticket Right There in Front of Us?

I have been very torn in recent weeks over which candidate would be a better nominee to take back the White House…Newt Gingrich or Rick Perry.

Both men have flaws…and let’s be honest, ALL HUMANS have flaws. But it occurs to me that among this list of flawed candidates rests some pretty terrific talent to bring conservatism back to the forefront in American policy making at a time when it has never been needed more.

Given those realities, I have come to the conclusion that a Perry/Gingrich ticket is the best available to conservatives…and here are just a few of the reasons why:

1. Rick Perry has the money, record and value system to advance conservatism in a big way. He is terrific on the stump…and despite my shrinking concerns about his debating skills, many on this site have convinced me that his ability to derail the calm, cool and collected demeanor of Romney and Obama will be on display full force should he get the nomination. I agree with this premise more each time I read and consider it.

2. One of the reasons I like Newt Gingrich is his ability to intelligently and articulately express why conservatism is good for the country. That is no small task on the big stage. However, why couldn’t he advance these ideals as the #2 on the ticket? He’ll be campaigning with Perry and debating JOE BIDEN, of all people. If that isn’t a stage for success on the policy communication platform, I don’t know what is.

3. These two candidates, presented in this ticket, will rally conservatives AND Independents alike. Indies LOVE winners…and there are few who have won as much during their careers as Rick Perry. Plus, we will have a ticket that has balanced budgets and created jobs…the two most important economic tasks facing a new administration.

4. It is becoming abundantly clear that the media is scared stiff of the possibility of Obama facing someone like Perry. That same media has always feared Gingrich, as they remember when he took it to Clinton on welfare reform and balanced budgets. Plus, their mantra of the idiot conservative would pretty much vanish into thin air with a Ph.D. and historian on the ticket. Their dream ticket of Romney/anti-Romney would also be crushed – as would Obama’s chances of re-election – if we didn’t nominate someone with such easily-exploitable policy flaws as Mitt Romney.

Call me crazy, but I think this is the path to certain victory in 2012. As always, I welcome your spirited dissent in the comments to follow!

COMMENTS

  • auntvick

    This has been on my mind for several weeks. Is the “ego” willing? That’s the real question. I could not even dream of a better ticket.

  • Pingback: Nelda Dimsdale

  • Pingback: Maximo Narro

  • Pingback: Salvatore Capek

  • Pingback: Morris Nocon

  • WA_Cowboy

    for all the reasons you said.

    Perry and Newt balance each other out greatly. The Intellectual and the Pragmatic. The History professor and the Veteran. The patient reformer and the wrecking ball.

    Plus they’d bring people together on the Right.

  • APA Guy

    The ability to pull together the Right is a HUGE part of a 2012 victory. If we mobilize our side, it won’t matter who Obama can or can’t get to the polls.

  • APA Guy

    The ability to pull together the Right is a HUGE part of a 2012 victory. If we mobilize our side, it won’t matter who Obama can or can’t get to the polls.

  • dpmapper

    It would be great if we kept every single McCain voter on our side… but that won’t be enough. We also need to flip Obama voters.

  • APA Guy

    That’ll be us after our side gets out the vote with this ticket and theirs sits home whining about how Obama isn’t liberal enough.

    Don’t believe me? Hold your nose and peruse a lefty blog for about 5 min. About half of his own party can’t stand him.

  • izoneguy

    They are really “dependent” voters. The wishywashy
    Center like the cheese in an omlet. This whole idea of
    independent voters is supported by the lamestream
    media to the point of having no meaning. Really these
    so-called “independent” voters when asked who they support will always
    tell you – “it depends”. “Depends” are diapers, and
    voters that have no true core beliefs are just
    like the stuff in dirty diapers.

  • dpmapper

    Someone would be in the lead because indies vote for him, not the other way around.

    And you are *seriously* overestimating the disgruntledness of the left. Where do you think the 40-45% of the population that approves of Obama’s job performance comes from?

  • WA_Cowboy

    Most indies value perceived Leadership skills above any political platform. Portray yourself as a competent leader and you’ll get independents.

    Leadership that woos independents involves (in no particular order):

    Optimism
    Strength of Character
    Personal Convictions
    Listening to the will of the people
    Apologizing when wrong and accepting blame even when subordinates mess up
    Giving credit to subordinates when things go well

    I think that Perry shows all of these. Newt 2.0 seems to does well with most, outside of his “baggage” from the past.

    I would excitedly endorse a Perry/Newt ticket.

  • APA Guy

    They have little love for the guy…think he sold out on a number of issues and isn’t “progressive” enough. Go to the sites and read…you’ll see what I’m speaking of.

    Plus, Obama will not have quite the same appeal this time around…can’t really sell hope and change anymore. If we put this ticket in play, we win…PERIOD.

  • gabs

    While some voters who are not members of a party may lack core beliefs, a number worth paying attention to are not members of any party precisely because they do. It would be poor strategy for the general election to ignore that.

  • APA Guy

    …and I was speaking electorally, of course. They typically vote with the leader for the same reason he IS the leader :)

  • WA_Cowboy

    King b.o. has none of these.

    Neither does Joe “I bet my IQ is higher than yours.” Biden.

  • azaeroprof

    though I’d prefer Gingrich/Perry. We’d have a much better chance of sweeping all of the debates that way. I cringe at the thought of Perry debating Obama, and Gingrich would likely generate sympathy for Biden by reducing him to a blob of blabbering plasma. :)

  • jakeofalltrades

    “and Gingrich would likely generate sympathy for Biden by reducing him to a blob of blabbering plasma. :)

    Which would be redundant…

  • lastgopinillinois

    Newt is clearly at least somewhat narcissistic. He has a very big ego. At this point he has rejected any notion of considering the position of vice-president. I would fall off my chair if he agreed to run as VP with anyone.

  • chrysostom15

    Neither Perry nor Gingrich would be an ideal VP. I would be surprised to see either.