« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

June 22 Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll: Romney 48%, Obama 43%…Only 33% Approve of Obama’s handing of the Economy

Usually, daily tracking polls aren’t cause for eyebrow-raising since they tend to fluctuate a bit through the general election season. However, the new Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll released today reveals some disturbing numbers for the sitting soon-to-be-replaced president:

Overall match-up:

Romney 48% to Obama’s 43%

Obama Support Among White Voters:

35%, down from 43% in 2008

Percent of Likely Voters Saying Obama is Doing a Good or Excellent Job on the Economy:

33%, down from 41% at the beginning of May

…and most surprisingly, 17% of White Democrats plan to vote for Romney in November.

(Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll)

…or IS it a surprise?

I have contended that any Hispanic bump Obama may receive from his recent amnesty announcement will be counter-balanced (and then some) by the number of non-Hispanic voters who do not care for his dictatorial actions at the expense of the rule of law. These numbers, which would need overwhelming counter-balancing on the part of minority voters, are potentially devastating for Barack Obama’s reelection hopes…particularly when you consider that voters in many swing states in play this November -  FL, OH, IA, WI and MI (I don’t consider NC or MO to be in play for Obama this November) – will not take kindly to Obama usurping immigration policy that is already causing havoc in the United States.

The other thing that is obviously not lost on American voters is the flailing economy, which again released poor jobs numbers yesterday in the form of continued elevated jobless claims numbers. Econoday (2012) spells out the dire situation in graphic detail:

Initial claims in the June 16 week came in at 387,000 which is 4,000 higher than the Econoday consensus. The prior week is revised 3,000 higher to 389,000. Convincingly underscoring the lack of improvement is the 4-week average which shows a fourth straight increase with a 3,500 gain to 386,250 (prior revised to 382,750). The June 16 week was the survey week for the monthly employment report and a comparison between it and the month-ago survey week shows a 15,000 increase. This is a reading that will depress forecasts for June employment data. (p. 1)

Notwithstanding the obvious Bloomberg outlier poll that had liberals in a false state of euphoria, polling is not looking good for Obama heading toward what is almost certainly to be another weak jobs report released on July 6. Any time a sitting president polls at 43% against his challenger, he is almost certainly looking at a reelection butt-whoopin’. Mitt Romney and Republicans have but one central task at this point: STAY ON MESSAGE.

Obama is tossing as much spaghetti against the wall as he can – gay marriage, immigration – with the hope that Americans will be distracted from his terrible economy. While gay marriage and immigration are certainly important to conservatives, what is MORE important is removing this disgrace from the White House with all possible speed. The economy is one topic that resonates with ALL Americans, not just conservatives. Don’t let Obama define the narrative…then watch him sink and his party run from his record (as Joe Donnelly is trying to do here in Indiana) as November nears.

From the depths of academia,

Professor APA Guy

References

Econoday. (2012). Jobless Claims. Retrieved from: http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=450906&cust=mam&year=2012&lid=0#top

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    One is beginning to see this on Dkos, a traditional Dem site. On Firedoglake, one is hard-pressed to find ANYONE who has anything to say about Obama that would be even remotely printable here.

    Even some talk on FDL about voting for Romney; although the subject of the Supreme Court invariably comes up.

    • APA Guy

      Despite the fact that Ras has accurately predicted the last two presidential elections and consistently calculated the most accurate LV models for nearly a decade, the kos kiddies are calling his polls “outliers”. Never mind that Bloomberg poll showing Obama up 13…NO WAY that was an outlier…just like that last 2008 Gallup poll showing Obama up 11 and the Pew poll showing him up 16 weren’t outliers.

      These cats are in full-blown panic mode…and with SCOTUS getting ready to drop the hammer on Obamacare in a matter of days, ANY pollster who doesn’t march in lockstep with propping up Obama is inherently Republican and evil.

      Sad, but it’s what they have been reduced to…

  • Pingback: Halley Oines

  • Pingback: Halley Oines

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: home maid service

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: his response

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay Los Angeles, CA

  • Pingback: Zierfischfutter

  • Pingback: Sizegenetics testimonials

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: Wedding magazine

  • Pingback: how to go camping

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: Male Edge scam

  • Pingback: musica cristiana nueva

  • Pingback: τι είναι web hosting

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: BBCAT

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis telefono

  • Pingback: helpful source

  • Pingback: video

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: foreclosure defense

  • Pingback: diet foods

  • Pingback: excellent site

  • Pingback: fusevision

  • Pingback: Aquaristik Bücher

  • Pingback: recaning service dallas

  • Pingback: Pool Shop

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: great

  • Pingback: หอพักเอแบค

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: central florida contractor tool central florida

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: Robin Engram

  • Pingback: Robin Engram

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: Slide

  • Pingback: tulsa football camp

  • Pingback: credit card merchant processing services

  • Pingback: used car warranty for dealers

  • Pingback: training survey questions

  • Pingback: Explore Talent Login

  • Pingback: Options Trading one two trade

  • Pingback: Live In Nanny

  • Pingback: candida cleanse

  • Pingback: caretaker jobs

  • Pingback: scrapebox forum pricing

  • Pingback: aci Sarault

  • Pingback: Morris Nocon

  • Pingback: computer repairs

  • Pingback: http://www.istarsoft.com/imedia-converter-deluxe-for-mac

  • Pingback: Ali Garlett

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: Mickey Rodkin

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: Arkadas Bul

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: best paid to click program

  • Pingback: a wonderful read

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: payday advance loans

  • Pingback: casino gaming

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: milosc we wroclawiu

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: here

  • Pingback: secrets revealed

  • Pingback: pmu resultat hier cabourg

  • Pingback: surrealismart

  • Pingback: distilling alcohol

  • Pingback: find

  • Pingback: Web Design

  • Pingback: learn more here

  • Pingback: web site

  • Pingback: Ghislaine

  • Pingback: Javier

  • Pingback: breastactives pills

  • Pingback: igra karos online

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: working from home jobs uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: made my time

  • Pingback: Ezra Neisler

  • Pingback: Beverlee Anidi

  • Pingback: Will Bruechert

  • Pingback: alfileres de novia

  • Pingback: loans and bad credit

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Sidney Trundy

  • Pingback: lookup phone number by address

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: Will Brincks

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Frederick Pelletier

  • Pingback: curriculum vitae

  • Pingback: Sidney Chandsawangbh

  • Pingback: madamlux

  • Pingback: Brier

  • Pingback: green coffee beans and weight loss

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: honda bikes

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: uniform supplier

  • Pingback: payday loan cash advance store

  • Pingback: whiskey

  • Pingback: Guy

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: Sook Markham

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: InterServer

  • trimulchio

    although Obama is falling. Odd thing that . . . .

  • mikeymike143

    i expect a reagan/carter type landslide.

  • barleycorn

    Gallup and Rass now show Romney up. Period.

    Rass by 5% among LV and Gallup 1% which given that its among RV pretty well backs up Rass.

    I think you may well have put your finger on the key point. Obama is moving up among 10% of the electorate while moving down among 70%.

  • trimulchio

    Administration does is to put media focus on ANYTHING but the economy, includingthings that are negitiv for the Administration like the “Fast and Furious” controversy. (Nothing like a’98 style Impeachment to stir the Liberal base.)

  • APA Guy

    …it’s important to remember that Rasmussen has correctly called the last two presidential elections on the mark – including the development of a superior likely-voter model that is an equally-superior predictor of electoral results.

    BTW…Fast and Furious, unless there is a MASSIVE involvement by the administration in the model of Nixonian Watergate, is far less important to the American voter than the horrible economy. When we distract from the economy, we turn away swing voters – including Indies.

  • trimulchio

    paragraph is exactly my point.

    I’d still watch In-Trade: you have to pay to play, it is a gambling site in a sense and is very accurate.

  • acat

    Nixonian stonewalling.

    If a human face can be put on it – Brian Terry – then it becomes a usable wedge.

    Better, if many Mexican nationals’ faces can be put on it … that whole immigration hispander just became useless to Obama.

    Mew

  • jude68

    Intrade means nothing…lol!!! In trade makes no reference to Likely Voter Polls and quite frankly takes the sum of averages from RCP to determine where they are at. Remember RCP continues to put in the likes of a blantant misleading poll like Bloomberg so it skews the averages. I laugh sometimes at RCP because they really should do a better job at placing polls on their page. Any poll that skews either way 5-10 points should never be included. As well at this stage of the game RV polls should be trashed. 40 percent of those polled in RV polls DO NOT VOTE!! That is a fact! And they skew DEM at least 2-4 points all the time. So from there Rasmussen does have a great history with providing FINAL VOTER PERCENTAGES for the Elections…Gallup right now is undersampline whites in their polls now…in 2008 they made up 74 percent of the voters yet in 2012 Gallup is only at the highest using 71 percent of whites as voters so Gallup is actually slanting in Dems favor….so 1-2 on Gallup is more likely 3-5 so it really will match Rasmussens!!

  • jude68

    Find anytime when Intrade did not match the RCP average of any election. No matter who is in the lead on RCP averages will always be up in Intrade!! Sorry Intrade does look at RV vs LV polls that is where this is flawed. And in the Presidential Election buddy that matters not Intrade that does not take out slanted polls….you need to learn how to read and analyze polls. Intrade works with limited polls like Wisconsin and Walker was up in every poll…..sorry the Presidential is not the same….but you keep looking at Intrade with those RV polls…lol!

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Romney doesn’t need to sliver off much of the Hispanic vote. The MSM is guilty of some frightening bad data analysis with the Hispanic vote. Nate Silver pointed this out in his 538 blog (and a moment of integrity that he was probably written up for by Sulzberger). Pollsters are taking the pro-Obama latino responses and projecting them out across the entire country in general based on % of population. This would work if we elected President’s based on popular vote but we don’t. Latino populations are settled in specific areas of the country (yes, there is the start of a migration that is normal as an immigrant population begins to mature, but that hasn’t happened yet in large enough numbers). A large latino vote in Texas and Arizona is still going to be overwhelmed by those pesky white voters that liberals hate so much. Likewise, if Romney cut into Obama’s latino advantage in California, New York, and New Mexico…he’d still lose (well maybe, perhaps not New Mexico). The only swing states with a large % latino populations are Florida and Nevada with Colorado’s being significant because Colorado is so close in the polling.

    Looking at Nevada – Latinos comprise 14% of the population, but the MSM wants to ignore that Romney has a firewall in Nevada, LDS. Mormons compose 7% of the Nevada electorate. The LDS turnout for Romney in Nevada has run at practically 100% and he carries about 98% of that vote. Between the turnout advantage of Mormon voters and that Romney will pull 30-35% of the vote in the Latino community means, Obama’s latino advantage in Nevada is offset by Romney’s numbers in the LDS community. That means Nevada will come down to those pesky white voters that were creamed in the housing downturn and have seen no uptick under Obama.

    Looking at Florida – the largest subsection of Hispanic voters in Florida are Cuban-Americans and Puerto Rican-Americans. The immigration issue plays differently in those communities. Cuban-Americans are pretty much in fact granted asylum on demand and Puerto Rican-Americans are US citizens from first breath. Meaning the immigration debate has almost no play in these communities and they essentially vote for the same reasons as other communities (though Hispanics absent of the immigration issue tend conservative on spending and values).

    Looking at Colorado – turnout, turnout, turnout.

    Well, I do believe there is a good swift boat opportunity for a Super Pac with some money and time on their hands. When Obama cries about playing politics, Romney says what he did against Gingrich “Those super pacs what are you gonna do, I can’t tell them what to do”.

  • trimulchio

    buy options. Some of that may reflect polls, but the real value is that people are actually betting money on the outcome.

    I don’t like that Romney has not caught on. Obama is coming down, but Romney is not really going up. People don’t feel strongly enough to bet on him—bad sign.

  • Ausonius

    In the middle of the last decade, InTrade was hyped as hyper-accurate because supposedly it was played by “insiders” with information unknown to regular people: follow the money to predict the future.

    Except that InTrade is easily distorted by outsiders and by insiders betting the opposite direction. I have seen sure things tank in the opposite direction within hours of an election or prediction date.

    Plus, here is one interesting comment from 2008:

    “When it comes to the long shots, remember that InTrade takes deposits in non-interest-bearing cash rather than T-Bills. In the meantime observers need to adjust their expectations accordingly and not interpret all the prices are pure percentages. I recall (Ron) Paul trading at about 7 or 8 percent. Let

  • trimulchio

    people pay to play, nor does it reposnd to that fact that Romney is FLAT.

    I had a felling that, since Obama’s polls were low (approval ratings at 50% or below for much of his term), he would fall and Romney would slowly rise. Instaed, Obama fals with no change for Romney. The Romney “bump” might still happen, but it is not happening yet.

    My guess is that a lot of the Paul vote is waiting to see what he will do. If he is sufficiently lauded at the Convention and Rand Paul is duely advanced along the cursus honorum, Romney will pick up a lot of that vote. If not, it will go to Gary Johnson or for Paul, should he decide to go 3d (4th? 5th?) Party.

    As with ’92, ’96 and ’00, ’12 could be a year where the President does not gain the majority of the popular vote.

  • Ausonius

    As I mentioned above, results of InTrade, especially early results, can be skewed by true believers investing both to distort and to enhance support for their candidate.

    Do you think e.g. Soros could not easily write a check to InTrade to make it look like MAObama has a lock on the election?

    I would not be worried about InTrade: as mentioned below, check out Rasmussen. The only worry right now is the distribution of the electoral college vote.