« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Selling green electricity to the grid at 45 cents/kwh and losing money doing it

What’s wrong with the following story?

CHARLESTON TOWNSHIP — Last August, owners of a new solar-energy business here said they were committed to “doing something that’s never been done in Michigan.”

But that hope has taken a hit under state tax assessment guidelines.

Kalamazoo Solar owners are appealing the company’s first property-tax bill of $27,394, which they say is higher than the retail value of a year’s production of electricity by the farm. The energy generated by the solar farm, which began operating in February, is being sold to Consumers Energy under a 12-year contract.

The company’s 3-acre solar farm on East L Avenue was assessed at $578,700, said attorney Sam Field, who leases the land from Rick Schmitt, a minority owner in the farm. Its 756 solar panels were “literally assessed (at) 2.2 times more … than what we paid for them,” he said.

“I am not a person who doesn’t like to pay his taxes,” he said. “I’m not remotely against paying taxes, but the tax bills should be for the right amount.”

Field said the State Tax Commission’s manuals are out of date and don’t reflect how prices of solar equipment have decreased as renewable energy has become more popular.

The answer comes further down in the piece. 

Consumers Energy is offering incentives to encourage the building of solar farms.  Kalamazoo Solar, for example, is earning 45 cents per kilowatt hour from Consumers, Field said.

Let’s put that in perspective.  In Texas, no favors, at retail, electricity is offered at eight to nine cents per kilowatt hour.  Here is the link for that rate: http://www.texaselectricityrate.com/counties/stephens.html

Closer to home, here are the electricity rates available to customers in Michigan:  http://www.keyframe5.com/michigan-natural-gas-electricity-prices-april-2011/

They range from 5 to 25 cents per kwh. 

The solar farm is getting paid 45 cents a kwh, and losing money at that. 

Look, I don’t really care that real estate taxes on the solar farm are on the high side.  I care that we as a society are paying five to nine times retail for green energy sold into the grid.

The link is here http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2010/05/tax_bill_threatens_solar_farm.html

COMMENTS

  • onemovoter

    I found it through Drudge,

    http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2011/05/solar_farm_near_climax_loosing.html

    It’s even more enlightening when they compare the tax bill of the nuclear plant and it’s tax per Kwh to the same with the solar farm.

    Even if they adjusted the tax bill, the tax per Kwh produced would still be 300% higher than the nuclear plant. Yes 300%, you read right.

    Not to mention all the other costs of current solar panels and associated subsidies, this just goes to show what a boondoggle green energy of this time is. Yes there is new solar tech being developed but we should let the free market work on this, not a government bureaucrat.

    • ashland_avenue

      Thanks. The late Bernard Meltzer, who had program on WOR radio in NY used to say:

      When your outgo exceeds your income,
      Then your upkeep becomes your downfall.

      Very appropriate in this case.

  • steve010

    the utilities are required to separate charges into pure fuel cost and operating cost. I am paying about 4 cents for fuel and about 5 cents for other operating expenses. That is a total of .09 at the retail level.

    I’m appalled at this 45 cents figure!!

    In FL, 50% of power fuel is NG, 30% is nuke, only 7% is fuel oil.

    • ashland_avenue

      And how much we are spending to subsidize it.

  • ashland_avenue

    Nt

  • YnotNOW

    Otherwise, why would anyone need an “incentive”?