« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

How To Create An OBAMA Voter From Your Own DNA!

Looking at the cloudy crystal ball of the future known as “American children and their parents,” I offer now a primer on the possibility that our future may be doomed to become a Leftist future, given what too many parents – wittingly or unwittingly – are teaching their children in word and by example.

The following guidelines have been deduced from the last 20 years of observing parents and children at various private and public schools of various economic levels, as well as at the playgrounds and malls and family gatherings, and go beyond just my experiences, but include items from other teachers and assorted professionals from throughout the country.  Obviously I will still not claim any kind of scientific accuracy behind the observations: and yet, when one hears so many similar stories from parents and teachers at conventions throughout the country throughout so many years, when one reads so many similar stories in so many sources, it does make one wonder how widespread the following tendencies are.

And so…

Starting as early as possible, do not let your children experience ANYTHING negative!  Fuss and flutter and hover around them constantly, placing pillows at the end of the slide, assuming that the slide is not TOO HIGH to begin with, and be sure to say: “BE CAREFUL!” so much that your children become risk-averse and want to just sit in front of a nice safe video-screen.

NEVER let your children, when they are old enough (9, 10, 11…),  go to a playground alone, or play outside alone, or meet with a group of other unsupervised, unparented kids to organize a baseball game.  Make sure that the only time they play sports is with a gang of screaming immature adults lining the field and acting like idiots over a muffed ground ball or a fumble in football or, worst of all, over anything in a soccer game.  This will guarantee that they cannot deal with issues on their own and need to be told what to do by some authority!

Make sure that they are told all the time that they are all winners even when the truth is painfully obvious.  Tell them that the other side cheated, or that the referees and umpires are morons.  Tell them that you will file protests with whomever and try to change the outcome.  Criticize the volunteer coaches or managers as the ones responsible for the losses, and claim that they play favorites:  tell your children they are the best players on the team, but because of unfair favoritism among the coaches or managers they did not have a chance!  The deck was stacked against them!

Also important: show absolutely no personal discipline!  e.g. Be sure to pack on the pounds as the years go by, as you grow to become 80 pounds or more overweight.  Drink to excess, smoke the funny or the unfunny weeds, throw the first wife or the first husband away because you “have fallen out of love,” meaning that you were too stupid and selfish and undisciplined  to avoid that affair.  The children of divorce are always well-adjusted!

Buy things you cannot really afford!  Live in a too expensive house, drive a too expensive car, buy so many things that the garage is stuffed with stuff and you need to rent a “storage facility” to handle all the overflowing extras.

Show no discipline in what you do for your children: go overboard on everything!  Spend hundreds of dollars on each child at Christmas, buy them phones when they are 5, and computers at 7, complete with Internet hook-up, so that they can find out about Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Licentiousness at an early age. 

Reinforce the idea that they are entitled to all sorts of things without having to work for it!  Do not have them do chores around the house for a small wage: and if you do attempt to have them work for an allowance, give in to their whining when they want more than they deserve.  When they fail to do what they agreed to do, sigh and do the job yourself, because you got tired of nagging them.  Be the first to give into their power plays, and then hand them money whenever they ask for it without any conditions!

Accompany them to R-rated slasher movies when they are in the Seventh Grade, because you got tired of them whining about it, and anyway, at least it is nothing pornographic.  Speaking of whining, let your 10-12-year old daughters dress like street-walkers, because you cannot say No, and anyway, you do not want your daughters to be be considered Amish pariahs.  For the boys, buy those $150. gym shoes and sign the waiver for the tattoo: you do NOT want to be the uncool Dad with a loser son!  Indulge them because they really do deserve it, and it is just easier!

Stay unchurched or unsynagogued or whatever, or even better: drop your kids off at Sunday school or even send them to a religious school, but do not bother actually practicing your religion and entering a church more than twice a year, so that the left-wing sneering about religious people being hypocrites will seem true!

When they are teenagers under 18, tell them you will buy them beer or wine for parties you will sponsor at your house, because the law is really unrealistic and should not apply to you and your realistic-thinking family!

In school…where do I start?!  How about this?   Set an example by NOT reading anything much and by constantly watching TV or surfing the Internet.   When years go by and your child’s handwriting is still an illegible scrawl, just shrug your shoulders and say: “Oh well!  My handwriting’s no good either!  And anyway, who needs it in the era of the computer?”  Trust the A’s and B’s from your child’s public school (and even from some private schools) to mean that everything is fine: ignore your children’s inability to read beyond the 3rd or 4th Grade level , when they are in the 8th Grade.  Ignore their inability to handle fractions or decimals or any kind of higher Math. What are calculators for anyway?   When your 8th Grader is unable to write one logical paragraph, shrug it off: you can always download stuff from the Internet!  And do not bother going to parent meetings: the grades say everything is just fine!  Of course, the newspapers say that the school system has a 25% graduation rate, or is below the already ridiculously low standards set by the state.  But that is not the case at YOUR school!

But let’s assume that maybe your children attend a competent and challenging school!  Be sure then to complain about too much homework!  Argue with teachers about everything possible: if a foreign language is offered, be sure to tell your children it is irrelevant and that the world should learn English.  Pooh-pooh the importance of Art and Music!   And feel free to cheat and do work which your child is supposed to do, because the work is unfair anyway, and everybody else has parents cheating for them!  When grades show that your children are not the geniuses you believe them to be, complain about the unfair grading system, the unfair teachers, and threaten lawsuits unless your children’s grades are changed.

And whether your school is competent or not, if your children get into trouble, contest every detention and demerit!  Demand that their records be expunged, and threaten lawsuits unless your whining brings results.

Claim that everything your children say is The Truth.   Maintain that the teachers and administrators are lying!  When your children bring home wild stories about what happened in the classrooms, Believe EVERYTHING they say because Your Children Do NOT Lie!

This hypocrisy and plasticity about The Truth will help them become left-wing relativists, where the leftist end will always justify the leftist means.

And so…

Combined with the above tendencies to be passively risk-averse, of being unable to deal with problems on their own without needing an authority to dictate a solution to them, of expecting most things to be handed to them because of their winning and entitled natures, of lacking basic physical and mental discipline and refusing to suffer any consequences from any over indulgence, of believing that, because Life is about fairness and NOT achievement, the rules of society should not always apply to them, all of these will produce far too often by age 18 a true blue Democrat who will be unable to think of any reason why BIG BRObama is not the obvious choice for president.

People do change: we can only hope that the modern American children described above do not become a majority, and that somehow they find their way out of the “kulcheral” darkness all around them and can rectify the deviant paths in their backgrounds.

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    I know what you describe exists. But what I see among my clients (a well-adjusted group psychologically who almost all vote Dem even if they
    loathe Barack Obama) is a true devotion to the well-being, especially including a first-rate education, of their children.

    Anecdotal, of course.

    • Ausonius

      Many thanks for your recommendation and comment!

      Concerning the parents, for some it is their over-dedication which causes too many of them to be micro-managing monsters who refuse to face the truths that their children e.g. are not Little Einsteins, need to be disciplined when they misbehave, need to be allowed to fail, need to be held back a year, etc. etc. etc.

      We have parents at my school (upper-class Catholic) who actually come into the building and stand in the hall by the lockers at the end of the day to be sure that Sonny Boy has all his books, has written down his homework assignments, etc. etc. etc.

      Let the kid alone!!!

      Not a majority of parents, thank heavens, but around 10%: such things NEVER happened in earlier years! :)

      • Viet71

        n/t

      • westcoastpatriette

        I read a piece in the local paper a few days ago that highlighted this very problem with parents who are unable to recognize how destructive their conduct is. The parent wrote in to ask a question of the columnist whose column is called “The Office Coach” and is designed to answer tricky problems that may emerge at the office. The parent’s question was “My son is getting ready to graduate from college and I am going to have to buy him a new wardrobe to prepare him for job interviews. How formal should the attire be?”

        The Coach bypassed the psychology behind such conduct and dutifully told the parent what kind of clothing is appropriate for job interviews. But my mind went immediately to the issue you are addressing. Helicopter parents hover over their children, and are unable to trust them or allow them to be responsible for themselves including allowing them to fail from time to time as part of the developmental process. And it does have a detrimental impact on the kids as it makes them become timid and less able to solve problems for themselves as adults. Psychologically, these kinds of parents are fulfilling their own selfish need to dominate and control to prevent what they perceive as abandonment and rejection should the child become strong enough to break free from the control. Sadly, some never break free and allow their parents to manipulate and control them their entire lives.

        • westcoastpatriette

          “helicopter governments.” It reminds me of a very distasteful interaction I had yesterday with “lapert the great” whom viciously attacked me and avagreen because we dared to question the wisdom of EMTALA — the federal unfunded mandate requiring all Emergency Rooms to treat whomever walks through their doors regardless of ability to pay or citizenship status. The very questioning of this law prompted lapert the great to accuse us of heartlessness and being void of basic decency and humanity. In lapert’s view, (which he/she adamantly insists is “conservative”) all medical practitioners would be evil, heartless monsters allowing our fellow man to die if we were not ordered by the government to care about them as our all-knowing political betters do. And lapert really resented me applauding her/him for being a socialist void of any answers that might lie outside of government interference.

          And I reacted with the same rebellious response that children develop when their maladjusted parents try to control them — always for their good, of course. These kinds of sick relationships produce a reaction called “dependent rage” and it ensues when one party in the relationship dominates and controls the other in order to keep the weaker partner dependent on them. Never works. And it always creates the exact opposite of the desired result. This is the kind of rage we are seeing in America right now as Obama pushes Obamacare and foodstamps down our throats and struts around proud of himself for all the good he is doing. Sick. Real sick.

          • lapert

            The “faux conservative” – the person who hides behind conservatism to justify their own biases and hatred as if that is what conservatism is about. Most of these people were successfully purged from the movement by Buckley et al back in the 60′s but thanks to the wonders of the internet some have found a new home here.

            These people think that morals are important only when they correspond to their own biases – inconvenient morality is to be ignored.

            These people are so ignorant of the arguments they make that they say stupid things like EMTALA requires ERs to treat anyone when all it requires is to treat people in an emergency. These lies never penetrate their brains because they are so overcome by their own ignorance that they won’t allow anything to inform them of the truth.

            These people are so ignorant about the facts that they have never heard of patient dumping, that they use strawmen argments like suggesting that their adversaries said that ‘all’ medical practitioners would be evil when anyone with half a brain (and half a heart) knows that just it only takes a few bad apples to require laws against their actions. These ignoramuses provides arguments that would suggest we need no laws against murder because to do so you must believe that without them all men will go on killing sprees.

            They have moved so far into the veil of ignorance that they couldn’t differentiate between conservative morality that has stood the test of time and liberal morality that is invented today – if it doesn’t validate their chosen hatred than they reflectively assume it is of the ‘left’ even when it was fully supported and championed by the right and rests on longstanding traditional notions of moral responsibility.

          • funwithknives

            and the John Birchers for “not getting into line”.
            Were they false conservatives? Various of their beliefs and talking points are germane, even today. Did they bring falsity or lies?
            Someone ‘more tuned up’ than me will undoubtedly show me 25 variations to my contentions and this I welcome.

            But I find this labeling of incremental purity standards really tiresome, and counterproductive. Being a conservative means you do not know enough,and strive to always keep looking. Building straw men and women is practised by our differing opponents, and illustrates Rediculosity(sic?) in large amounts.

            Please, just look for 60-75% agreement and work to understand the rest. We need a meeting place, not an echo chamber.Thank you for your indulgence, and this writer’s ramble.

          • westcoastpatriette

            Thanks for sharing your perspective. Not sure what to make of lapert and his or her hatred that he’s unable to recognize. Don’t even know him and this is the second time he has singled me out to spew insulting rage at. So, he is on my permanent ignore list. (I don’t allow abusive people in my life.)

            Anyway, you gave an interesting perspective. Personally, I don’t think we can afford to leave any stone unturned as far as looking at how we have gotten in this mess in our country — but lapet’s rage is so palpable that it repels me and makes rational discussion impossible. I guess this is our side’s version of a tyrant — and it’s their way or no way. But I can think of lots of alternatives to EMTALA that would work way better. And that is about all I was trying to say when lapert flew into his rage. Wow.

            Don’t want to go into detail now but I just wanted to say something kind to you as you have always been that way with me. And I am sorry you had to view all of this. I am still learning how to deal with monsters on political blogs and sometimes I vacillate between ignoring them and defending my honor.

          • lapert

            Yo weren’t trying to offer alternative ways of implementing EMTALA you were ranting that we as a society that value life aren’t willing to deny someone emergency healthcare simply because they are an illegal alien – despite you wanting to watch them die.

            You are the monster on the blog – so blinded by your own hatred you can’t even see it.

            And Buckley was right for chasing away the Birchers and Randians, they were a cancer for the movement to be associated with (as are Paul and his followers today).

          • westcoastpatriette

            3 weinerschnitzels finely chopped
            1 brown onion finely chopped
            1 large dill pickle finely chopped
            2 hard boiled eggs chopped

            Stir ingredients together and serve to lapert. May add mustard and relish if desired.

          • funwithknives

            E V E R ???

            You bring to mind an axiom: ‘”A mind, can be a terrible thing….”

            Thousands upon thousands of potential allies are a cancer?
            Who’s a fricken’ monster?? “Blinded by your notions, you are, Youngling….”

          • funwithknives

            Buy ‘em off, or beat hell out of ‘em, it all pays the same.

            Actually I invite abuse [and receive regular amounts] as a teaching aid. The best teacher is always reality, in any form.
            But that’s just me…..

          • Ausonius

            I hope you are correct!

            What scares me is the mind-set of people “schooled” by the leftists in charge of our public and in some cases private educational systems. We know that a good number believe in higher gas prices, believe in confiscatory taxation, believe in class warfare against the productive and creative people, and believe in greater government interference in American life.

            The political mathematics which we see leading to BIG BRObama’s defeat is either incomprehensible to them, or they view it as irrelevant.

            What gives me some hope is that people can change, but they need to have eyes that see and ears that hear.

  • Ausonius

    That is precisely the thesis of my little essay, and it is no stretch to say that the acceptance of domestic drone aircraft now being proposed by assorted levels of government brings the term into new and – possibly – frightening territory.

    As always, such things are done “for our own safety,” just like government mandated “Hell-th Care” is for the good of the nation.

    I once spoke with the nun-principal of an all-girl Catholic high school concerning a controversial\ decision at the school. I will never forget her main argument as to why she could not be wrong: “Everything I do is for the good of the school.”

    And therefore, because her intentions are good, the decision cannot be misguided!!!

    Even when the results show otherwise! :)

    Needless to say, she was a squishy Catholic liberal! But this is the whole conceit of the Left: they are “fighting for the poor” or are “fighting for working families” and therefore nothing they do can be wrong.

  • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

    60s who spit on our troops and burned the American flag. Liberals and Socialists have been around longer than “helicopter parenting.”

    Living in MA for many years I got to see how the real liberals raise their kids. here is some of the rules they live by.

    1. Parents pay for everything. Precious “putrid” liberal kid is not even allowed to have a part time job after school or to pay for college. Parents buy little “putrid” a car and every thing else he desires.
    2. Liberal families take “international” vacations. Rte 66 and Disneyworld are just to “corny and unsophisticated” It is important that little”putrid” knows he is a citizen of the world.
    3. Appreciation of the Arts. Every good liberal appreciates the “Arts”
    4. Atheism is the “state” religion and it should be obeyed. Liberals believe that parents who take their kids to church ought to have those kids taken away by state social service agencies and given to “nice gay”: couples to be raised. (You think I am kidding?)
    5. Kids have a “right to self expression”.
    6.The masses are too unsophisticated to govern themselves. Only smart liberals are qualified to do that. (The NH Democrat Party.has always pushed for a reduction in the size of our 400 person citizen legislature for this very reason.)

    That is the real left and that is what they believe and what their kids are raised to believe.

    • Ausonius

      The spoliation of the Baby Boomers (born after 1945) came from parents who suffered during the Depression and World War II, and thus over-reacted – in too many cases – by giving their children everything, so that their children would have a better life.

      Your points are well taken, and can be found in different guises above in the essay, e.g atheism, allowing the child to “express” himself and accepting everything as “great” even if it is nonsense.

      As far as the Arts are concerned, I have no problem with that, as long as tax dollars are not spent. e.g. Ohio has two world-class symphony orchestras in Cleveland and Cincinnati, and a very good one in Toledo. I try to attend one or two concerts per year, especially for Bruckner symphonies played by the Toledo Symphony in the Toledo Catholic Cathedral. The Toledo Museum of Art is one of the top in the country: entrance costs nothing, and (at least when I lived there) it receives no tax dollars, since it is supported by a foundation established decades ago.

      “Artists” receiving state stipends as in Europe because nobody will buy their crap is obviously something no COnservative will countenance.

      • Ausonius

        I recall some years ago a 60 Minutes expose’ about a Dutch law which forced the government to buy the “artworks” of “artists” in order to support them.

        Huge warehouses full of “art” purchased by the government were the result: the “starving artists” did not starve at all, but led very comfortable lives, given the broad definition of who could declare themselves “artists.”

        From a commentator named John Borstlap on the Dutch finally cutting subsidies to the Arts:

        “The Dutch government funding of new art has led to a cultural climate not much different from the former Soviet Union: subsidies are distributed according to the tastes of advisory boards at the art funds, who themselves are the receiving parties, so that they can make sure that the flow of funding goes into the ‘right’ direction, all informed by outdated theories of avantgardism which simply cover-up purely financial considerations…

        “Also it has to be stated that in the Netherlands, BECAUSE of such an extensive government subsidy network for the arts, a tradition of corporate sponsoring or private funding of new art has never developed. Result: there will be no money whatsoever left in the near future, thanks to the ‘visionary’ new art scene and the populist resentment towards it. So much for Holland as a ‘haven for the arts’.”

        See:

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/tomserviceblog/2011/jun/20/classical-music-funding-cuts-dutch-netherlands

        • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

          but growing up in MA, going to the public school system, that is all you heard about was how we all need to appreciate the arts. Kind of setting the stage for the type of entitlement mentality like you mentioned in Holland and with the NEA here in the USA.

          It is common knowledge around here in New England that if a town or city has artistic cultural attractions that usually means it is magnet for liberal Democrat voters. I have made it a point not to live near these people and their socialist politics.

          • Ausonius

            Perhaps it is the idea of “artistic license” being confused with political license.

            The artist as outsider is an old idea, as is the artist as revolutionary, going back to the late 1700′s and the roots of Romanticism. The persistence of the idea is interesting.

            Conservative artists do exist, but they tend to be a minority. e.g. Writers Flannery O’Connor and Tom Wolfe, sculptor Frederick Hart (the 3 Soldiers statue at the Vietnam Memorial, plus assorted statues at the National Cathedral).

    • briteness

      There is a good deal of truth in what you write. However, I would take issue with some of it. First, in terms of long-term economic strategy, it is not at all clear that sticking a kid in some low-paying job just so he/she can earn their own money makes any sense. If one focuses everything on education/college strategies, they might get into an elite school, and we can hardly question the fact that the financial outcomes for those who do are far better on average than the norm. Certainly this is the goal of these parents.

      Also, you say, “6.The masses are too unsophisticated to govern themselves.” This is not really a left/right issue. The leaders on both ends tend to think this. The founders of America had real doubts about whether it could work. I think it was Churchill who said (roughly) that the strongest argument against democracy was to be found by talking to an ordinary, random person on the street for five minutes.

      • Ausonius

        Many thanks for your comments!

        Recall those 2008 interviews with voters for BIG BRObama who within seconds proved themselves to be complete dunces about basic economics.

        True, you can probably find complete dunces among Republican voters.

        Democracy can seem depressing in times like these. Keep in mind, however, that:

        An illiterate, under-educated, and in some cases just downright drunken electorate produced a great country – long-term – under limited voting e.g. no women voted until the 20th century, property qualifications, poll taxes, indirect election of senators, etc.

        One can indeed debate whether the expansion of the franchise, complete with the de facto acceptance of voting by illegal aliens and the spread of fraud by unions and other leftist groups, has led us to the Fearless Leader currently occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

        The 19th-century electorate voted for their share of disasters and mediocrities and corrupt characters. At the same time, great leaders emerged and were supported.

        Whether our present electorate can overcome similar mistakes, whether any great leaders currently exist or can be created by historical circumstances, and if so, whether the electorate will support them, all this remains to be discovered.

  • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

    Couldn’t have said it better myself -

  • Ausonius

    Okay, I just had a parent conference and vented to some teacher acquaintances about it, who added their own recent stories.

    We all have 30 to 40 years of experience, are all in private schools (mainly Catholic, which makes the summary of our stories more disconcerting), and have in the last days undergone the following:

    The children involved are snobs, passive-aggressive, lazy, and very entitled, because their parents are not in control.

    The mothers are dressed in designer clothes displaying more Ponderosa in the north 40 than Lorne Greene ever owned, and are nervous wrecks, while the fathers are obese, disengaged, staring at the ceiling, or arguing with the mother/ex-wife.

    The generic child in question has 110 I.Q. and no “learning disabilities” as proven by a battery of tests demanded by the parents in the hope that a learning disability will be found and lead to a magic pill to cure everything.

    Generic Mother: “Your school is TOO challenging! I want a challenging school but this is ridiculous! I end up doing the homework because THERE”S JUST TOO MUCH! 6 Hours a night! I don’t know why he/she can’t be given an A for getting most of the homework done! And the tests aren’t testing what he/she has studied! THEY AREN”T FAIR!”

    Generic Father: “Yup.”

    Okay, here is the problem: none of this true! The mother ends up doing “6 hours of homework” (in fact it is 90 minutes at the most for junior high) because her child has won the battle of wills. One of the mothers admitted to doing a Science Fair Project completely (!!!) because the daughter refused to lift one finger for it.

    So the parents cheat for their children, openly, because Life is too hard, too unfair, etc. The parents berate teachers for fantasy amounts of homework and want their child to be “given” a grade that is unearned, a grade based on going through the motions, even motions not provided by the student!

    So I was thinking of my weekend essay here: checklist time!

    Gimme a grade – Entitlement – Check!
    It’s too hard and isn’t fair – Fairness – Check!
    Cheating isn’t really cheating with an excuse – Voter Fraud – Check!
    Seemingly educated, but the student is hollow – OBAMA – Check!

  • Pingback: read more