« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A lot more conservative than Mitt Romney

“I don’t claim to be the perfect candidate I just claim to be a lot more conservative than Mitt Romney.”

Newt Gingrich

I am supporting Newt Gingrich for president. I have kept my options open till very recently. There were several candidates whom I could have supported enthusiastically.  One by one they have either chosen not to run or have performed poorly in doing so.

I currently see just four people with any possible path to the nomination: Gingrich, Romney, Perry, Huntsman.

I include Huntsman simply because this has been a very surprising process and his father is a billionaire. My gut tells me Huntsman will get a shot only if Gingrich blows up in the next four weeks.

As much as I like Rick Perry and feel great disappointment at his poor performance this Fall, the fact is that I don’t believe he can beat Barack Obama. Perry is inarticulate to an unacceptable degree and additionally betrays a thin depth of knowledge when discussing policy and history. Obama isn’t the grand orator many pretend he is, but he is gifted at appearing reasonable and erudite.  He would eat Perry alive in the standard debate format.

Over the past five years I’ve gone from finding Mitt Romney acceptable to being uncomfortable with him, to my current feelings of distrust and aversion. If the phrase “lacks authenticity” didn’t exist it would have been minted specifically to describe Mitt Romney.  However Romney is preferable to Barack Obama and is one of probably just two men who still have a chance to defeat The One.

That brings us to Newt Gingrich.  As Gingrich himself admits, he is not perfect. He is however highly gifted and has a conservative track record utterly absent in Romney’s past. He is one of the most intelligent and articulate politicians of the past 50 years.  The combination of those qualities wedded to a through understanding of issues and policy, puts him in a very elite group. Newt Gingrich has the ability to be a great, transformative, and highly consequential president and I am excited about a presidential candidate for the first time since 1980.

COMMENTS

  • superpatriot

    Did you guys hear that Cain is endorsing Newt? I saw a lot of stuff on the web but no official endorsement.

    Anyone else have any news out there??

    Cheers.

    • Common_Cents

      There was a rumor for today, but Cain did say he’d endorse soon. Also rumors it is likely Gingrich from Cain sources, also Cain named Gingrich in a debate as well.

      • don12345

        The difference between Mitt and Newt couldn’t be more clear. You could vote for the guy that thinks he’s God’s greatest gift to mankind or you could vote for Mitt who thinks Christ is.

        Who needs the constitution when Newt’s ego is so much bigger.
        Gingrich doesn’t have baggage; he’s got a landfill full of it.
        How many Newts does it take to make a conservative? Just one with a little seed money.
        How many Newts does it take to make an Obama? Just one with a little seed money.

        With friends like Newt, who needs the left.

        • Common_Cents

          ;)

          • logicalpositivist

            I will be the first to say I told you so.

            Here’s to hoping that Newt’s giant head explodes before he steals the nomination from any one of several other more deserving candidates.

  • devereaux

    Calls Gingrich the most liberal person running. And how many people know that in 1979 Newt voted yes on creating the Department of Education.

    http://tinyurl.com/6surjqo

    Bottom line. Newt isn’t a small government conservative.

    At least in his personal life Romney is very conservative !!

    IMO if Newt gets the nomination he’ll end up dragging the GOP down the drain. Don’t be surprised when more and more Republicans that served in the House with him begin to speak out. Dick Armey for example.

    • Common_Cents

      now that’s conservative. If he governs in the White House half as efficient, we’ll be in good shape.

      Meanwhile the other major candidates are raising 10′s of millions. DEMS are bragging up wasting $1billion.

      • andystone

        Awesome turn of phrase. :)

    • tomatin

      He loves the GOP elite and will shill for Romney the whole campaign.

      It’s simply a lie to call Gingrich the most liberal and he lost all credibility with me a long time ago.

      • don12345

        How many Newts does it take to make an Obama? Only one with a little seed money.

        Newt always says yes to the higher bidder, just wait until the Republican primaries are over and Obama’s friends are providing Newt with the right price.

      • aesthete

        [no text]

  • determinedconservative

    I agree with all the arguments you made. I do think Perry could have had a good chance, but with the latest poll numbers showing that a majority of Republicans consider it unacceptable for him to be the nominee, it’s down to Mitt or Newt and I will take Newt any day! His new ad is great, and he will run circles around Obama in the debates. I’m excited too!

    • don12345

      I don’t think you understand what would happen. Obama has a billion dollars. Newt has a pricetag that everyone can see. Obama provides Newt with a little seed money, and Newt throws the fight, leaving Obama in for 4 more years and making the Right look like idiots.

      • Right Reason

        Bouncing around from thread to thread, leaving your little tidbits of wisdom. Is the Romney campaign paying you by the post or the word?

        I have not seen word one from you Romney supporters on why he’s better than Newt, only your descriptions of the pending apocalypse should we decide not to go along with the establishment’s anointed one. That, to me, speaks volumes.

        • acat

          and it’s coming whether the candidate is Gingrich or Perry.

          Look to see a lot of GOP insiders finding themselves on the outside should either win the nomination.

          Of course, I still have my dream….

          Mew

          • easyb

            That, or Perry/Rubio. I’d be more than happy with either.

      • determinedconservative

        I’m a little offended! Doubt I could run a mile either. There are a lot of us out here in the heartland who can relate to that, you know. Romney’s tendency to take cheese off his pizza, and eat mostly turkey breast and broccoli, reminds me of John Kerry and Barack Obama. They could all eat at the same table and be happy, I bet. No thanks: I’ll stick with people who share my appreciation for Paula Dean!

      • easyb

        Why leave it at policy differences, when you can resort to personal attacks, eh Don?

        Newt couldn’t be a good president…he’s he’s he’s FAT! (The HORROR!)

        Were you also against Chris Christie on similar grounds?

  • texasref

    yet he’s about the same level in the polling as Bachmann, who is far more articulate and educated, and a true blue tea partier like us?

    I like Newt and don’t carry truck for anyone but why are we ignoring the Congresswoman?

    • snowshooze

      But polling isn’t all that good.
      I cannot figure why he is doing so bad in the poll other than the major news outfits are ignoring him to death.
      Newt and Mitt are going to build an ugly mess now, and the Democrats will do everything they can to be neighborly and lend a hand with that.. and that is the point where I would expect Perry to actually make his resurgence.
      Bachmann was at her best the other night, but she didn’t do herself any favors by attacking Perry way back on Guardisill, or more recently with some pretty sizable oversights that she should have checked on before she spoke.
      Anyway.. Perry has a great plank.
      Perry is superior in experience by far.
      A lot of strong points.

      • tomatin

        That’s about it.

        • snowshooze

          Ha. But I had to put wood on the fire…lost track…
          But I will clock the next one.

          • snowshooze

            nt

        • avagreen

          http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/perry-poll-gingrich-romney/2011/12/06/id/420168?s=al&promo_code=DAA6-1
          Texas Gov. Rick Perry, whom some pundits had written off as the GOP’s nominee, may find a second coming in Iowa, if new poll data holds up.

          As Mitt Romney’s campaign has suffered a startling decline in recent weeks, only to see Newt Gingrich eclipse the former Massachusetts governor’s front-runner status, the battle for the Iowa caucuses set for Jan. 3 has become a wide-open race.

          New survey data prepared for the Perry campaign and shared by a source close within the campaign shows that the Texas governor may be poised to do much better in next month

          • avagreen

            http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/perry-gingrich-forbes/2011/12/07/id/420176?s=al&promo_code=DAA6-1
            Steve Forbes Says Perry Has ‘Chance to Move Up’

            Wednesday, 07 Dec 2011 05:29 AM

            By Hiram Reisner
            Share:
            More . . .
            A A |
            Email Us |
            Print |
            Forward Article

            2
            inShare

            Publisher Steve Forbes says he has no trepidation in backing Rick Perry for president, despite his low poll numbers, because the presidential race remains

          • avagreen

            http://www.lifenews.com/2011/12/06/rick-perry-endorsed-by-new-hampshire-pro-life-advocate/?

            Rick Perry Endorsed by New Hampshire Pro-Life Advocate

            by Steven Ertelt | Concord, NH | LifeNews.com | 12/6/11 4:35 PM

            Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry today received the endorsement of the president of a statewide pro-life group in New Hampshire, the location of the second GOP primary election battleground.

            Kurt Wuelper, the president of New Hampshire Right to Life, which is not affiliated with the National Right to Life Committee, endorsed Perry this afternoon as the best pro-life candidate to take on pro-abortion President Barack Obama in next year

          • avagreen

            http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-presidential-election/perry-head-washington/?

            Perry has picked up the support of many of the 25 Texas Republicans in Congress, but at least 10 remain uncommitted to any candidate.

          • avagreen

            December 06, 2011 2:00 AM
            To the Editor:

            The polls have been pretty consistent for months now. Obama has reached a low that no president contemplating reelection has seen before him. We can be confident that the next president will be one of the Republican candidates that we have been seeing.

            The liberal media is showing their bias like never before. Obama was their creation; an obscure candidate whose background was never fully explored. So they are pursuing their agenda with dedication. Destroy all threats to the incumbent. Whoever leads in the polls go after first. The debates are trivial and superficial. This is just a “gotcha” game to embarrass each of them.

            Diane Sawyer led the news every 15 minutes about Rick Perry’s momentary lapse of memory as if it were disqualifying. She fails to realize that the majority of us have had similar experiences. Yet I don’t know of any of the rest of us who think there are 57 states. Why didn’t that get similar coverage? It is high time to look seriously at the Republican candidates. What are the backgrounds? What plans do they offer? What can they show for successful accomplishments?

            These are the reasons I endorse Gov. Rick Perry for our next president. Here is a man who showed a willingness to make the supreme sacrifice for our country early in his life. Right out of college Rick joined the U.S. Air Force to become a pilot. Having similar experience, I know how challenging that program was. He later became a state representative in Texas, then the agriculture commissioner, then lieutenant governor. He is now one of the longest serving governors of Texas, a state that rarely reelects their governor.

            He has shown us his plan for economic recovery, and what gives it credence is the job creation that has happened in Texas. Almost 40 percent of the last year’s new jobs were created in Texas.

            I have been a long-time state representative in New Hampshire. We have studied what other states have done when we encounter a challenge in our state’s government. It is impressive how often the best solution has been done in Texas. They have led in performance budgeting, and welfare reform, and other areas of governing. Rick Perry has been an important part of that state’s government for decades.

            Now that is a resume that deserves your approval. Let’s put accomplishments ahead of empty slogans that make no sense, like “This is the best country in the world and we need to change it!” Why wasn’t that questioned? Let’s stop paying attention to the media who would like nothing better than to destroy any opponent of Obama. Let’s do our own thinking and help our country to recover from the worst president in our history. We need good ideas, not empty slogans. Support Rick Perry in the primary, and for president. Some of these polls amount to “who have you heard about in the news lately?” Thank you.

            State Rep. Ken Weyler
            Kingston
            Chairman, N.H. House

            http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20111206-OPINION-112060350?

          • avagreen

            http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/12/why-arent-we-backing-rick-perry/
            Why Aren

          • avagreen

            http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/04/could-perry-stage-a-comeback/?


            Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour seems to think so:

            ” Q: Is it becoming clear that Mitt Romney will emerge as the Republican nominee?

            A: I don

          • texasref

            just wondering

          • Scope

            but by you asking the question I would say you are. I love how the truth and facts make some heads explode. I just wiped the spatters from your head exploding off my screen, figuratively speaking of course.

          • texasref

            I’m not commenting on the content of their comments, just that a dozen comments all cut and paste in a few minutes time.

            No head explosions here. Nor am I spam.

          • avagreen

            just wanted the reading audience to know that more than RS posters are rooting for Perry, and NO, we’re not in “mourning” or whatever was (wrongfully stated) d/t his “low pollings/ratings (also wrongfully concluded).

            More than one source provided which puts the lie to whatever downing comments that were made about Perry and this site. Actually, I could have provided more, but just didn’t want to blind the eyes of the non-believers. ;)

          • bzip

            I don’t consider it spam and I am thankful for avagreen posting it.

            It seems there is far more important things to discuss then this.

          • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

            Get that info up there! It’s precisely what needs to be making the rounds. Thanks so much, avagreen.

          • circlegranch

            so that in and of itself is a sure sign things are lookin’ up! The only pundit that seems absolutely sure Perry is over and done is hack Dick Morris. Yesterday Steve Forbes did an interview w/ Newsmax and he agrees with alot of people in the know that its way too early to count him out. Those ads in Iowa are working because the Des Moines Register reported Sunday Perry polled very high in terms of which candidate people would like to meet or see in person at a rally/townhall.

          • bzip

            If Chris Mattews hate it – then it has to be good.

            Perry is far from out and Dick Morris is nothing more than full of hot air. I don’t understand why companies pay big bucks for these clowns. Heck anybody could do better then Dick Morris or Chris Mattews at being a pundit.

          • Scope

            because Hillary booted him from Bill’s advisers/staff. Morris came to the Republican party as a protest against Hillary, and his insulting door hitting him on the way out. Morris is still a Democrat in his heart, so he obviously will go with the most liberal Republican he can find. It’s in his DNA. Morris has never predicted anything accurately and I’m not sure why O’Reilly and Hannity and the rest still give him a microphone.

          • bzip

            It would not surprise me. I don’t where Fox gets some of these clowns sometimes.

            Morris so screwy I don’t see how anyone could take what he says seriously.

            Did you see Rick Perry
            s speech on c-span – I posted a link to it; it is really good.
            Republican Candidates Court Jewish GOP Organization:
            Good Speech by Rick Perry today.
            Introduction of Perry starts at: 41:30 and the Rick Perry start at: 44:00 in the video:
            http://www.c-span.org/Events/Republican-Candidates-Court-Jewish-GOP/10737426061/

          • acat

            (no text)

          • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

            We don’t want the village idiot anymore :D

          • pj2012

            Dick Morris is full of “HotGas” right? lol… (did you see the Perry thing on HotAir?) Dick’s a real gas bag… I never believe a word he says.. he always has an ulterior motive.

          • windwaker24

            I just read that. I wonder if he did that on purpose due to the negative comments he receives on a constant basis. Probably not, but it is funny!

          • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

            Maybe Perry called it “Hot Gas” on purpose as an eensy bit of revenge. HotAir is still home to all the Perry haters, it seems, and I’m sure he knows that. (But now I’m registered, so I’m joining the Virtual Perry Posse and we’ll hopefully get some pro-Perry comments in there.)

          • pj2012

            “Maybe Perry called it

          • Scope

            is that Allahpundit, or whatever his name is, has been so anti Perry it is sickening,. That has been pointed out here more then once. If I’m not mistaken, he is the one that put up the poll. Perry comes in second, hahahahaha. Perry was exactly right to call HotAir, the site formerly started by Michelle Malkin, a Perry hater for sure, Hot Gas. Anyone who knows the site knows that Perry is absolutely correct. Allahpundit deserves every smack down Perry can give him. Again, Allahpundit must be turning over in his bed, and having night sweats with the Perry results.

          • pj2012

            I think Michelle Malkin IS Allahpundit sometimes… the god or goddess hot gas! Good for Perry!

          • pj2012

            meant to say… the god or goddess of hot gas!

          • pj2012

            ; )

          • circlegranch

            and maybe the Gov had a little fun with one of his big detractors, Ms. Nobody Should Ever Innoculate Their Kids Plus I’m Really Ticked Sarah Didn’t Run Malkin.

            As for Morris, his personal life almost mirrors that of Newt which is why it may be that both he and Rush have both been so staunch behind Gingrich and Cain. Birds of a feather, and all…..

    • evilleramsfan

      he outraised everyone else in the 3rd quarter and has 55 million available through his super PAC. He has the financial wherewithall to go deep into the primary.

    • logicalpositivist

      Perry was greeted with roses and champagne here when he announced his campaign against Romney, I mean for president.

      But Perry was a flawed candidate.

      There are many posters here who cannot let go of Perry. Let them grieve. It will take time.

      • Scope

        I know you are a more recent commenter, and probably don’t have any RS history to go by, but, let me inform you. EE has been especially harsh on Perry, and as he said in a diary today, he has never been in the Perry camp. I remember many posts by EE where he was very critical against Perry, including saying more than once that Perry won’t be ready for that second look that he may get. I clearly remember EE going on CNN and ripping Perry a new one, and I mean a new one. This morning I saw EE on CNN promoting Huntsman, who at one time he said was in other words not only unelectable, and a sell out to conservatives. I believe EE may have even gone as far as to say that Huntsman was to the left of Romney.

        I would suggest you get a grip, control your wild emotions, and allow the posters to post for their candidate. Obviously your gripe is against the site, which you imply, your argument is against those here who have the dang nerve to still support that dastardly Perry. Please separate your anguish and anger away from the site, and with us horrid Perry supporters.

    • avagreen

      Which lies have been listed someplace else on this forum.

      I’ll dig them up for you, if you’d like.

      • avagreen

        nt

  • tomatin

    to support Gingrich.

    Is it optimal. Of course not but there are no Reagans out there, not Bush’s either for that matter.

    Perry pretty much disqualified himself as a candidate with his terrible debate performances. No I’m not saying he would not be qualified to be president so don’t get all over me. But you have to pass the test to be a good candidate first.

    Like you, I too would not be surprised if people take a look at Huntsman. People are finally realizing he was a conservative in office, well duh. But his association with the Obama administration pretty much disqualified him with most conservatives up front.

    So it’s Romney vs Gingrich and for me that’s an easy choice. Gingrich did a good job passing a conservative agenda as speaker. Romney did a good job passing a liberal agenda as governor of MA. Plus Gingrich is a fighter who can articulate conservative principles in a confrontation with a Dumbocrat. Like I said earlier. I can’t wait to see Gingrich make Obama explain why he revived the welfare state that Gingrich started to take down.

    • logicalpositivist

      Romney blocked as much of the liberals agenda as he could.

      Read about his record on wikipedia before you slander him.

      Gingrich is a sleezebag who cannot ever get elected again. People hate him. Women hate him. My wife hates him. I hate him.

      Gingrich is another Herman Cain. Or Bill Clinton. Whichever you dislike the most.

      • circlegranch

        try to relax, refocus and by all means, speak well of your choice of candidate here and do your best to educate and convince others but do yourself a favor and get past hatred. It’s self-defeating and gains nothing for anyone. God bless.

  • theobnoxiousamerican

    If the choice is Gingrich v Romney, the choice HAS to be Gingrich. I would have preferred a true conservative in Perry, but he cannot debate, and the liberal media will cast him as Bush’s dumber brother. Bachmann has likewise disqualified herself by going so very negative on her competitors, as well as a number of flubs.

    The great thing about Gingrich, in addition to his great debate performance, is that he was a major element in the (perceived) success of the Clinton presidency. Dems can’t credibly attack Gingrich without also attacking their boy, Bubba, as Gingrich really did play a major role in Clinton’s “success.”

    His only drawbacks are his divorces (meaningless in an atmosphere where Clinton who actually raped a woman, is so popular), and his supposed ethics failings (equally meaningless given Pelosi’s involvement in trumping them up).

    • logicalpositivist

      Divorces? Try adultery. Not all divorces are caused by the husband’s infidelity.

      Newt’s divorces were caused by this.

      We can’t support him here. He would give Obama 4 more years in office.

      • bzip

        Newt ha a lot of draw backs and trust is one of them. Between his progressive ways and his adultery – I don’t see how he can go the distance in the primaries. He surely would lose the general with all the draw backs he has.

        There is a new rebound of Perry, I can smell it in the air, I can feel it and I know by my faith that Perry will be the nominee.

        Perry 2012

        • morstar150

          It is the lingering odor of his debate blunders.

          Perry is not a presidential candidate no matter how many texans clamor for him or how many dollars he raises or spends.

          • gekster

            Or Dick Morris himself.

            It is just great that we have all of these political gurus here.
            They know all, see all, and still can’t get a damn thing right.

          • pttx333

            kin or a clone!

            BTW, there’s a moron here called duramater (or something like that) that I just nailed for his/her poor taste. He/she/it should probably be watched.

            Hope everything is great with you, friend!

            Mom

  • Common_Cents

    All polls are confirming. Gingrich is peaking at just the right time.

    What really helps Newt in the upcoming smear attacks is the holidays. People aren’t paying attention to much until after the new year. However, they will be watching the debates where Gingrich is superior.

    I’m surprised he is doing well in CO. I guess there still are plenty of natives vs. CA transplants in Boulder ;)

    He also has a lead in LA? With Jindal endorsing Perry? How the heck can that be?

    NC has a huge lead, didn’t NC go for Obama? That is a good sign to bring that state back from fantasy land.

    Gingrich will lose to Romney in NH but will get a “win” there if he even comes close. NH romney expectations are high and anything less than domination is nearly a loss for Mitt.

    Romney is going to attack Newt on child labor laws and immigration. LOLOLOLOLOL Romney’s glass jaw is going to be shattered. If Romney couldn’t handle Bret , he will be KO’d by Gingrich in one counter punch.

    • wonkish1

      Newt would be doing well in Colorado. N. Douglas county, W. Arapahoe, and SE Jefferson County(Highlands Ranch, Centennial, Littleton, etc.) is a perfect area for Gingrich to dominate in. And I’ve heard his support in Jefferson county is strong as well.

      So its not surprising to me.

      • logicalpositivist

        With independent voters preferring Obama 2 to 1.

        Mitt Romney is in a statistical tie with Obama in Colorado.

        Think before you vote.

      • circlegranch

        and it goes by way of Christian conservatives (home of Focus on the Family), as does much of the Western Slope. In ’10, Jane Norton did well in the Senate primary in the areas you note, but could not overcome the tea party grassroots Christian conservative dominance elsewhere. Yes, the ultimate nominee, Ken Buck, did not prevail but that was because the Elite Establishment sect of the state GOP, lead by prominent elected CO Republicans decided it was better for America to elect Obama’s hand-picked favorite, Michael Bennet, than to put aside their agenda and ensure a tried and true conservative went to D.C.

        • wonkish1

          First, Newt is doing well among Christian conservatives. And El Paso has Colorado Springs which is very military and Newt does well among that group as well.

          Second, if a candidate is doing extremely well in the reasonably populous counties of Jefferson, Douglas, and Arapahoe then they should be up big. When I mentioned those 3 doesn’t mean that he isn’t also doing well in El Paso, Larimer, Weld, etc.

          The reason why Colorado isn’t doing well at the state level is because suburban and exurban conservatives in Douglas, West Arapahoe, Jefferson, etc. counties and rural and small city/town conservatives in Weld, Larimer, Pueblo, etc. seem to hate each other(for mostly stupid reasons). The lack of any “generic conservative republican” territory in Colorado means that they rarely have any mutually acceptable candidates.

          So if the Douglas County conservatives win the primary you get people like Pete Coors. If the Weld county conservatives win the primary you get Ken Buck. And actually Ken Buck was a pretty decent choice, but his base of support wanted to force him into doing and saying some things designed to punish the Douglas county conservatives who they loath and in the process they killed Buck’s own candidacy(talk about self sabotage).

          Colorado GOP needs to learn to learn some lessons of unity, but that is also why I’m less worried about the Colorado in national elections than state elections. The reason being is that Colorado doesn’t pick a national nominee so they have next to zero power to use the primary process and nominees to beat on each other.

          • circlegranch

            you speak truth here and I appreciate your valuble insight. From my understanding, Newt is rising in El Paso Co, much as he is nationally, but Romney has a strong following, as well, which has been hard at work trying to tamp down support for Perry who has enjoyed a growing support base. I don’t think there’s any viable polling at this point that would reveal anything other than what we already know—-things are fluid. An endorsement from the top administrators at Focus on the Family is highly coveted and it will be interesting to see who garners that support which is huge in the values voters community. Romney went to Denver months ago to lock in the elite of the party, including AG Suthers, who also has the ability to pull in alot of votes and $$.

  • Common_Cents

    • snowshooze

      There goes Newt.
      We all love the stuff he says.

  • trelane

    Good article, Newt is the only conservative choice to beat Romney at this point. Some keep hoping for second chances, but the voters have not granted a second chance to anyone. Newt is still on his first look, and hasn’t blown it yet unlike everyone else. If he does blow it there won’t be any second looks, Mitt wins by default.

  • gunslingr45

    Yea well so is my dog. And I won’t vote for him.
    Problems with Newt.
    1-Loves to sign on to gun control laws.
    2-Cheats every chance he gets on what ever woman he is married to.
    3-Loves spooning on the “global warming couch” with Nancy.
    4 HE signs on to gun control laws which we all know for a fact only hurts law abiding citizens!
    5-HE signs on to gun control laws which we all know for a fact only hurts law abiding citizens!
    6-HE signs on to gun control laws which we all know for a fact only hurts law abiding citizens!
    Get my point? You can tell which one upsets me most right?

    “For those who have fought for it freedom has a sweet taste the protected will never know”