« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

President Romney: It can happen

Now that virtually everyone including Newt Gingrich believes that Mitt Romney will be the GOP nominee it is time to pivot toward the general election and cast an eye on how Romney matches up with Barack Obama.

While many conservatives are quite glum about our prospects, in recent weeks I have become more hopeful as it appears the macro factors are increasingly in Romney’s favor. Political contests are a mysterious mixture of design, luck, and perception. I think the latter two factors are starting to favor Romney. It remains to be seen whether his team is up to the task of out working and out thinking the Obama campaign.

The economy continues to splutter and some economists are even starting to talk about recession again. Foreign policy is as much a mess as ever but its hard to see how Obama gets much credit beyond the killing of Bin Laden and exiting Iraq. Afghanistan is a disaster that is directly attributable to Obama. He ran in 2008 on the platform that Afghanistan was the “good war” that he would reemphasize as the Iraq War wound down. That hasn’t worked out very well and the American public is increasingly war weary after eleven years of body bags and little to show for it.

The perception of Obama has changed over the last year or so. More people are speaking up about his short-comings and at times he has come dangerously close to becoming an object of ridicule.  Events such as the “flexible” gaffe show him to be at best a typical double-talking politician and at worst a dangerous poseur.

Mitt Romney can win this by hammering at Obama’s failings and keeping the campaign focused clearly on the economy, repealing Obamacare, and returning our foreign policy to a more familiar “American” approach. Obama’s competence should be hammered incessantly. I suspect that while centrist American’s have growing doubts about Obama’s ability they also don’t want to see him vilified as a socialist or “the other” etc.

To the extent Romney gets caught up in junk like contraception or trying to explain “self-deportation”  he will lose. To the extent he keeps the conversation focused on Obama’s lack of answers that don’t involve a few trillion more in debt, he will win.

COMMENTS

  • xymbaline

    that he’ll make McCain look like an electoral genius.

    He’s got Bob Dole’s agility and Gerald Ford’s brain.

    • barleycorn

      I’ll add your user name to the “ignore” list.

      • xymbaline

        Not unusual for Romneybots.

    • Bill S

      I think MSNBC is still looking for a replacement for Keith Olbermann. You may fit the bill.

      • xymbaline

        Put three of you together and there wouldn’t be one complete brain.

        Mitt Romney will lose just like John McCain lost, like Bob Dole lost, like GHW Bush lost, and like Gerald Ford lost. I’m old enough to have followed each of those campaigns, and it’s been clear for decades that no Republican Moderate/Liberal ever wins.

        GHW Bush only won on the strength of his claiming to follow in Reagan’s footsteps. When it was clear he was no conservative, he lost to Bill Clinton and Ross Perot.

        GW Bush won by claiming to be a Conservative, and even though, he could *barely* squeak by Al Gore, arguably the most offensive Liberal on the planet.

        Mitt Romney is the complete archetype of the rich, elite, insensitive Republican that Democrats have been running against since the 30′s. You couldn’t make a more perfect patsy for Obama if you tried.

        Of the major Republican candidates, he’s the only one who could *never* win.

        And yet, you support the perfect loser.

        Me, I’m behind Newt and am overjoyed that he Lives Again.

        So what do you want? The Contract With America or the Contract With Liberals?

        • gekster

          Claiming to support Newt just won’t work when you posted;
          “complete archetype of the rich, elite, insensitive Republican that Democrats have been running against since the 30?s. You couldn

  • cheetah2

    I think they can.

  • xymbaline

    And that was pretty sad, if you recall.

  • gekster

    .//.//.//.

  • Martin Knight

    The “He lost to John McCain” argument was always a weak and stupid one.

    Luckily, Republicans in 1980 didn’t think like you or Reagan would never have been nominated.