« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Is 2012 Different ?

Over the course of my political lifetime most presidential races ended up going the way you would expect them to.

In 1980 Carter was awful, the economy was awful, hostages in Iran, killer rabbits in Georgia. It was no contest really. Once people were reassured that Ronald Reagan wouldn’t launch a nuclear strike at 12:01 pm January 20, the choice made itself.

In 1984 the only question was Reagan’s age and mental state. Once he answered that question it was a laugh all the way through.

1988 was a bit tougher but by this time of the year it was clear that absent some awful gaffe by GHWB, Dukakis was toast.

1992 was a weird year what with Ross Perot popping in and out, but by this stage of the campaign it was clear that while it would be close, Clinton had the upper hand and frankly GHWB just wasn’t well set up as a candidate to come from behind. He wasn’t eloquent. He wasn’t passionate.  He had broken his tax vow. Independents were cranky and restless and decided this was a good time for a protest vote.

1996. Poor Bob Dole. Bless his heart. Where was the outrage?

2000 was a nail biter from start to finish. It went the way I expected in the sense that it was so close I didn’t know who would win. I stayed glued to the TV for something like 10 hours straight on election night/morning and STILL didn’t know.

2004 was another tough one but again by October Kerry seemed to be floundering and Bush was strong enough that I was reasonably confident.  Lingering concern about 9-11-01 kept the “security moms” on the Bush team.  Unfortunately when another four years had passed……

In 2008 John McCain had a massive mountain to climb beginning with the foothills of his own demeanor. I’ve never been as unenthused about a Republican nominee for president as I was about McCain.  I actually liked Poor Bob Dole. I admired McCain’s service but that was about it.

So what in the devil is going on in 2012? By any historical metric, Obama is a failed president so why is he leading in the polls? He won by a solid margin but in large measure that is because of GOP apathy.  Had Republicans came out and voted in 2008 it would have been along the lines of 51-48, something similar to 2004.

So why is Obama ahead in the polls? It defies logic and commonsense.

Either the polls are accurate or they are not but if the great mass of polls is correct and Obama is comfortably ahead of Romney, then something has happened that I have not seen before. A failed president is defeating a middle of the road, highly successful, articulate, intelligent opponent.

COMMENTS

  • everdiso

    Pretty simple, IMO.

    The only two real criticisms of Obama – the economy and the intransigence in congress – are being rightly blamed mostly on the republicans, and the last thing america wants to do is return to the same policies which created the economic disaster, or reward the republicans for their permanent hijacking of congress.

    People are generally favourable of Obama’s moves on health care, immigration, foreign policy, and social issues in general.

    Doesn’t need any more explanation than that.

    • streiff

      If we wanted Dem talking points we would be at a site called “daily Kos” or “Democrat Underground” not at RedState.

      As Obama controlled the House and Senate for two years and still screwed the pooch on everything he touched it is hard to see how someone without syphilitic dementia could conclude Republicans are to blame.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        and I am going to go out on a limb and say most Americans don’t approve of apologizing for the 1st Amendment in order to cover your own rear parts and running from AQ and MB when they drag an Ambassador through the streets after killing, torturing and perhaps sodomizing him – #JustSaying.

  • gnb0279

    The answer to your question is simple. The polls are incredibly inaccurate. What has changed since 2010. The nation roundly voted to kill ObamaCare and changed the House (+63 seats), almost changed the Senate (+6). I will acknowledge that 2010 was NOT a presidential election, however there is no way that this country wants 4 more years! We are on the verge of a huge recession, layoffs are already announced across multiple industries.

    • deltawing

      I’m not playing that game this time around. If the polls say Romney is losing, he’s losing.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    barley’, I do think the American electorate is a bit different from 2008 from a liberal standpoint, but 2008 was no great shakes either. The electorate has been getting increasingly stupid for many years. But I think the most significant way in which the 2012 electorate is different from 2008 works for conservatives in that they now have been given 3.5 years of data on the results of liberal Democrat policies. The press is what is most different from 2008. It is in the tank and doesn’t much care about lost revenue below their niche audience level.