« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The SOTU in Perspective

The President’s State of the Union speech provides a warning to conservatives: he remains a skilled orator; the mainstream media still loves him (see the New York Times’ “fact check”); he does have some accomplishments to talk about – killing bin Laden, saving General Motors, ending the war in Iraq; he will have $1 billion to vilify those who would divide us; the economy is probably mending; and he moved from governing to campaigning several months ago. After three months of focus on Republican campaigns and primaries it is chilling to watch Obama deliver an hour’s worth of applause lines.

As for the speech itself, three categories of thoughts:

1. The mood. Optimism and “fairness” sell. Much of the conservative storyline is cast in negative terms – the debt; the weight of regulations; protection of the fat cats. Mitch Daniels did a nice job of expressing Republican principles of liberty, opportunity, and American exceptionalism in his little-watched response. Any successful Republican (at any level) needs to get beyond defending himself and attacking Republicans and Obama, and instead become identified with a positive program that affects real people.

2. The errors. Moderate Factcheck.org, liberal Politifact, and others can handle the small stuff, but a few things stood out to me:

- Obama claims improved relations with our allies – camera pans to a beaming Hillary. That would be except Canada, the United Kingdom, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Mexico which have been directly offended. Places like the European Union, Japan, China, India, Russia, and Brazil seem to be about the same. Who knows what is happening in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and the rest of the Middle East. Maybe he is referring to Burma.

-  His policies are creating jobs at a rapid pace – 3 million by his count. This will definitely be a second derivative argument – it’s not about where we are (25 million unemployed, underemployed, or given up), or the direction (well short of the 200- 400,000 hires per month that we would have been seeing for the last year or two in a normal recovery); it is about the rate of change of the change – getting a bit better.

- We have put in place effective sanctions against Iran. Except that the European embargo does not begin for six months and Russia, China, India, and other Asian  countries are not included.

3. The omissions. Something has to be cut out when you only have an hour to talk – or when you do polling on voter response.

-  Health care – his “signature achievement” got hardly a mention.

-  The $16 trillion debt or its cousin, the European debt crisis.  That’s the obsession of the nasty Republican obstructionists.

-  Entitlements. Let the Republicans wander into that brier patch.

The note for Republican partisans is that the president has lots of opportunities to give speeches and he is good at it. Gingrich might be able to trounce him in a debate, but there will be only one or two of those even if Newt gets the banner. On the other hand, the comparison between the Obama approach of more government solutions to every problem and the conservative approach of small government, free enterprise, and personal responsibility could not be more stark. Let’s find an optimist who believes in the wisdom of the people.

——-

This week’s bonus is a “Green Papers” starter kit for readers who want to track the nominating process through the Republican convention in Tampa in late August.

www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

 

COMMENTS

  • http://www.skiloveland.com skicougar

    Obama put forth that govt works in the SOTU.

    Gutsy, but you gotta give it to him.

    When Solyndra falls apart, no one sees that directly hit their wallet.(and those who worked their aren’t getting a chance to vent on TV)

    When Bank of america has a layoff, it makes all the news services.

    Obama just has to keep telling the people what he’s done has worked and what the GOP and Bush did, did not work.

    As long as Europe doesn’t start a global recession before lection day, it’s Obama’s to lose.

    And if that happens, the calls that Next makes of an Obama depression, will start coming true in 2013; because he’s not changing.

  • renny

    However, he is giving the same speech he’s given since 2008, with occasional additions or substitutions (like adding OBL and neglecting health care–at one the THE reason to exist), but it is the same speech, and millions of those people who swooned in 2008 have gotten over the vapors.

    o needs more and better news but gasoline is on the rise again, food stuffs have it a very obvious 5+% inflation, and despite the deceptive # of less than 9% unemployment, people still know who among their friends and family are not at work and have not been at work for a year or two.

    he’s bringing home troops that he plans to campaign on, altho’ the Iraq time table was Bush’ (fault), but now the vets who were often denied timely absentee ballots or had their ballots discounted (as in VA in 2008 where a notary signature was suddenly required and was absent on 98% of the ballots) will be home to cast their own heavily cons. votes in person. Remember, Gore, candidate of the little guy, fought tooth and nail not to re-count military ballots in the FL debacle.

    o is soon going to be seen wanting another TRILLION AND A HALF, so that people are not so easily going to forget that problem or overlook the vast and dangerous spending o has been doing. Is that why the Sen. has not had a budget in 3 years? They think no one sees the deliberate criminality of unregenerate spending without legal basis?

    Iran is not going to go away and sanctions will have little to no effect, Godonlyknows what else could happen in the Middle East between now and Nov. and Seal Team 6 is not going to be able to save o’s rear if Iran really does bomb some nation or seriously disrupts oil. Those are not situations the o could never confidently address. he is obviously uncomfortable with American military power, knows nothing about the Pentagon, and leads from behind. None of those choices get presidents re-elected. Ask Carter.

    Beating an incumbent is always tough, but the o has set himself up for a fall (believing in the usual socialist fashion that his attacks and depredations against capitalism would somehow not kill the golden goose while he was busy stealing the golden eggs of production). With a GNP of 1.7% for 2011, he has kept the US at the rim of recession for years, and when the Reps. get a nominee, no one will be able to forget how much better the US could be under a different administration.