« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Mitt’s Excellent Adventure

With the business-ignorant president howling about the timing of Mitt Romney’s leave of absence from Bain to save the 2002 Olympics, and some conservatives arguing for a “tax records for college transcripts” challenge, it is useful to take a step back and look at the broader campaign.

The highlights:

-  Romney navigated the primaries despite a series of media-hyped alternatives and the Obama campaign’s active efforts to get a different opponent through attack ads, advocacy of cross-over voting, and enflaming social conservatives who would support Rick Santorum.

-  Romney has eliminated Obama’s fundraising advantage, both through the conservative PACs, which are limited in their flexibility, and his more recent surge to a $100,000,000 monthly take in contributions to his campaign and the Party. Obama will not have the huge fundraising advantage that helped bury John McCain in 2008.

-  Romney has managed to keep the party largely united, with potential wild card conservatives such as  Jim DeMint, Rush Limbaugh, and Sarah Palin joining the team. Unlike Obama who campaigns alone, Romney is surrounded by people like Paul Ryan, Rob Portman, Tim Pawlenty, and Marco Rubio. He has Reince Priebus while Obama is stuck with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Romney needs to navigate the Ron Paul faction, but there will be no splinter candidate of the Tea Party and efforts to promote a viable third party disruptor have fizzled.

-  Despite a $100,000,000 blitz of negative advertising by the Obama campaign in which Romney has been outspent four to one in the few swing states, the polling continues to show a virtual dead heat.

-  “Wrong track” continues to poll at 65 %; a strong plurality of voters continue to consider the economy to be the primary issue; Obama’s favorability rating continues to linger in the dangerous 45 – 47% range (much worse on his handling of the economy.)  Unemployment sucks. Housing sucks. Trillion dollar deficits continue. A “fiscal cliff” of tax increases and spending cuts looms on January 1. The GDP growth rate remains at an anemic 1.9%. The 2008 candidate of Hope offers none, just division and envy.

-  The bin Laden bullet has been fired, and there is not much else to crow about internationally: Syria; Iran; Egypt; Israel; Pakistan/Afghanistan; Europe; Russia; China. No help for Obama there.

- Easy targets abound – ones that the public understands with a catch phrase: Solyndra; Keystone; Fast and Furious; Leading from Behind. The president’s prized initiative, Obamacare, remains double-digit unpopular. 

At this point the Romney campaign has the feel of front line infantry watching and waiting while the enemy rushes across the open space whooping and hollering.  Romney’s been here before. He’s run senate, governor, and presidential campaigns.  He’s won and he’s lost. He understands strategy, pacing, and management of resources. He’s plenty smart and successful. His focused to do list:

1. Select the best vice president possible. My expectation is that he will lean in the direction of who can do the best job, with the hope that the public appreciates qualifications enough to convey some political advantage.

2. Take the tour of Europe and the Middle East to expand his knowledge, establish some relationships, and – most importantly -  gain a bit of international credibility.

3. Manage the August 27 to 30 convention as a launching pad for a two month sprint.

At this point there is plenty of time. There are plenty of good issues. There is no profit in trying to explain a “leave of absence” and legal tax deductions to a media that is only interested in gotcha’s. And Obama’s economy isn’t going anywhere.

—–

For anyone offended by the above “business-ignorant president” comment,  this week’s video is President Obama’s explanation that small business owners did not create their businesses. It is great when he gets on a riff about what he really believes.

www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

 

 

COMMENTS

  • civil truth

    Pacing is important: it’s summer and we haven’t had the conventions yet. It’s a marathon, not a sprint to November.

  • elizaliza

    then, that Mitt still lags in Ohio and Florida, I don’t know whether Romney can get Ohio, Colorado and Nevada back. Obama can even win it with just Co. NH and NV, without Ohio, Virginia and Florida. And with the latest bad news from Dakota….

    “Democrats are on the side of crony capitalists”
    Yah, stop dreaming, get real. No Independent is gonna believe that.

    • commonsenseobserver

      I find Virginia concerning as well, in addition to OH, FL, and CO. Conflicting polls all over the place in many states.

      Okay, crony socialists? Solyndra’s just one example.

    • aesthete

      and projects like Soylandra might help to convince them that Dems have a very preferential relationship with a whole series of corporations, and that almost all of their legislation is designed not to hurt the shareholder value of the companies of large donors.

      You’re correct, however, in that Democrats go one step further than the standard crony capitalist by suborning the companies under their control into meeting various goals of the dirigiste state, rather than maximizing shareholder value: the structure of the GM bailout was designed to advantage unions and to advance the interests of environmentalists looking to advance “green” technology. This philosophy is hardly novel but in the modern era, such economic policy — with its pseudo-syndicalist power arrangements, emphasis on national goals, and political direction of the “commanding heights” of the economy — has been associated with the fascist economies of Europe and South America.

      As it stands today, the Republicans are corrupt crony capitalists, and Democrats are fascists in their economic policy.

      • jakeofalltrades

        The demonrats do not force companies in bed with them to pursue national goals. They simply try to get corporate special interests to pay off the non-corporate special interests that constitute and fund the demonrat party. Ideological fascism exists, of course, but I think it’s primarily about gaining and keeping power and influence for the individual demonrat politician.

  • elizaliza

    Mitt

  • Pingback: Salvatore Capek

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • commonsenseobserver

    John Key in New Zealand and Tony Abbott, as well as John Howard, in Australia, are excellent Conservative leaders (and election winners). Don’t forget our next door neighbour’s Stephen Harper either.

    (And in Australia, the similarities between Rudd’s and Gillard’s Labour and Obama’s Democrats are striking.)