« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s Romney’s to Win (It Really Is !)

This was written Wednesday afternoon, but is doubly true after the first debate.

Those of us who obsess over a second Obama presidency need to stop offering unsolicited advice to our chosen candidate and realize that this is not his first rodeo. It might be useful to instead reflect on the broader shape of the election and the advantages that Romney has.

First, I will stipulate that Obama Is leading by low single digits, a bit more in the battleground states than in the country in general. Time is short and he has slipped a bit in the past month, but the next phase involves an intense exposure of the candidates directly to the electorate.

A year ago, the premise of many was that in an election involving an incumbent the voters first look at the incumbent’s record. If it is OK, game over. If not, they look at the challenger to see if he/she is OK.  Beginning with the Republican primaries, the Obama strategy has been to debunk Romney rather than to defend Obama’s record or to offer strategies for short or long term  economic recovery. That leaves a major opening for Team Romney.

1. The Romney campaign does not need to exert much energy pointing out that Obama’s economic stewardship has failed. Even the most passionate liberal understands that 23 million unemployed and $16 trillion of debt reflects an ongoing misery. Heck, even Joe Biden is ranting about “the middle class that has been buried the past four years”. Ditto foreign policy where our troops are dying as we skulk out of Afghanistan and the State Department’s incompetence and cover-up in Benghazi reflect a naive belief that weakness will bring peace to our friends – governments and individuals – in the Middle East. The 15%  of the electorate who still need to be convinced understand the state of the nation.

2. Likewise, there is no question about Romney’s competence and experience – his education, in business, as governor, in the Olympics. With the millions of dollars of personal attacks, virtually none have been about competence. That’s not nothing.

3. So the challenge for Romney – in the debates, in pesonal appearances, in advertising -  is to demonstrate that his experience and success in business and government are relevant to the country’s problems. This has two parts:

-  He is a data-driven numbers guy. He doesn’t really need to teach the electorate about the relation of marginal corporate tax rates to deficits. He just needs to demonstrate that he understands and cares.  Less is more.

-  He needs to demonstrate that he is a decent guy who is concerned about all of the people. Notwithstanding his 47% gaffe, his performance as governor and in his personal life demonstrate the reality.

Pundits will dwell on a phrase or the details of an answer in the October 3 debate, but it will take a few days to determine what the public really saw. The good news for the Romney camp is that at this point the election is about Romney. With three unfiltered shots at 50 million viewers, he has the controls.

—–

This week’s video is an Illinois legislative candidate’s reprise of a famous cartoon.

www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

COMMENTS

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    I think the reason we want to give Mitt Romney the unsolicited advice is that we just want things to progress faster. Impatience is neither a vice nor a virtue in a political fan–it’s just a fact. We hear or see him pass up opportunities to whack-a-mole and we want to make sure he doesn’t miss the next one, out of fear that there may not BE a next one. There were several examples of this last night. The budget issue (Where is yours, Mr. President?) The incumbency issue (if your ideas are so good, why haven’t you implemented them?) The lack of a plan (You’ve told everybody what MY plans are {inaccurately}, but not what YOUR plans are). I only hope that he PLANNED to miss those openings, leaving them for Paul Ryan or himself on a later day.

    But I take a little issue with the first two of your concluding points. You make the same mistake that I hear every time somebody tries to analyze this campaign, and I don’t know if Romney is making it too, or not.

    “Even the most passionate liberal understands that 23 million unemployed and $16 trillion of debt reflects an ongoing misery.

    …there is no question about Romney’s competence and experience….”

    The audience Romney needs to reach now DOESN’T understand or know those things. They are neither passionate liberals nor knowledgeable conservatives. That audience is the “persuadable uncommitted voters” that today comprise about six to twenty percent of the electorate, and they will be the difference in the election. The fact that they are uncommitted/undecided tells us that they haven’t been paying attention or they simply don’t understand what is going on.

    So it makes sense for him to campaign NOW as if he were trying to win the Martian vote–Martians who know little or nothing about either him OR Obama. Therefore, although I agree with your final point, I think it does need more. He needs to bring those people into the world of informed citizens. He needs to point out to them exactly why Obama’s policies AND BEHAVIOR are hurting us, not helping, and why his own will be better, precisely because they DON’T know these facts. This is why it drives us crazy when he calls Obama a “nice guy” and doesn’t hammer him when he leaves an easy opening.

    And yes, he needs to do that while also demonstrating that he himself has a history of competency and success while not being a mindless and cold robot who just makes money, but a decent guy in the end.

    • Kyle-MI

      The strange thing is that Romney did extremely well in the debate, but he actually could have done better. I am not sure though if it would have translated into a greater affect. There was so much that Romney did well that at some point a lot of people would have reached information overload, especially the swing voters who have not been following the race.

      On the bright side, this still leaves Romney a lot more that he can hammer Obama with during the rest of the campaign.

      • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

        Yes. I hope that things are proceeding according to plan. But I agree that it’s just nit-picking to carp about what Romney delivered–it worked, and what WE might have said may have led to darker areas. He kept things out in the light.

  • Pingback: Melaine Mcmenamin

  • Pingback: Brady Twyman

  • Pingback: Errol Christensen

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: wine

  • Pingback: βελτιστοποίηση ιστοσελίδων

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: alcohol distillery

  • Pingback: wedding planner italy

  • Pingback: Christmas ideas

  • Pingback: PC

  • Pingback: Check This Site Out

  • Pingback: Try Here

  • Pingback: breastactives pills

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: online jobs uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Yajaira Raugust

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: Cory Doro

  • Pingback: http://wwww.loansandbadcredit.org

  • Pingback: telephone numbers reverse

  • Pingback: Will Brincks

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: Dylan Vandresar

  • Pingback: aloe vera side effects

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Luanne Courtney

  • Pingback: Sidney Chandsawangbh

  • Pingback: Mack Paugh

  • Pingback: home alcohol distillers

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: LoansAndBadCredit

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: refurbish PLC mitsubishi

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia