« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Hispanic Vote

“Mankind is facing a crossroad – one road leads to despair and utter hopelessness and the other to total extinction – I sincerely hope you graduates choose the right road”    ―    Woody Allen,    Mere Anarchy  

  I thought about writing about California – top income tax rate raised to 12.3%; sales tax raised to an average of 8.25%; corporate taxes raised $1 billion; Republican registration below 30%; Republicans in Assembly and Senate below one-third needed to block anything; exodus accelerating – but I decided to take the other road.

The unequivocal message of Tuesday’s vote is that Republicans cannot win presidential elections without a fundamental change in the approach to Hispanic voters. “W” got some 40 % of this vote; McCain 31%; Romney under 30%. The good news is that most of the illegals are here to work and to provide a better life for their families. If the Republican Party cannot connect with that, we are done.

What is needed is not just outreach and marketing, and being the party of small business is not enough. There is, however, a set of positive policy prescriptions available that should not offend conservatives:

- Expanded use of e-verify to enable employers to confirm the status of those they hire, with penalties for non-compliance.

-  A renewed “guest worker” program for seasonal workers;

-  Long term residency cards without citizenship or voting rights;

-  Citizenship for military volunteers, and perhaps some similar other groups;

-  Access to schools, drivers licenses, and healthcare for those here legally. Full tax payment required.

Fortunately the Republican Party has a core of prominent leaders who could formulate a plan, sell it to party activists, and market it to the public – Governors Susana Martinez, Brian Sandoval, and Luis Fortuno; Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz; former Governor Jeb Bush; Governor Rick Perry. Those in the border states get it; Northerners and Californians do not.

The Democrats? They have have no Hispanic governors and but one senator. Cynics would like the status quo which works well for them; others might demand full citizenship. They are beatable.

For those who doubt the need for urgent change in the Party’s policies affecting Hispanics, we have seen the future – and it is California.

—–

Here’s the most important person in the Republican Party speaking about Hispanics. One hopes that he has learned something betrween August and November.

www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

 

COMMENTS

  • checkmate2012

    555′s RightinSanFran!!! I’m hopeful when I read your post that you didn’t indicate we conservatives change our principles to suit the Hispanics. To me, R’s need to do a better job getting them into our tent since mostly they match our values. A guest worker program is the answer to many of both citizen’s and non as a win-win; Reagan allowed this too I think. I disagree on regular driver’s licenses if that is the id needed to vote; it should be notated like if you have to wear glasses, contacts, etc. that they are not allowed to vote but are here on a work visa.

    Lasly, this sentence perplexes me, “Those in the border states get it; Northerners and Californians do not.” Huh? CA is a border state with more immigrants than my TX state so not sure on your meaning. CA is going broke due to their illegal immigrant policies of handouts to non-citizens.
    Good post and guest workers with id’s are the way to go…the farmers need them!

  • Dave_A

    The problem is that we have accepted anti-any-immigrant rhetoric, in an attempt to beat the Democrats at playing a populist schtick to uneducated lower-class ‘blue collar’ whites… ‘They stole your job’ and so on… BS!

    What we need to do, is make it clear that the issue is one of law-enforcement, not opposition to foreigners being here.

    ‘Illegal is the problem, not immigrant’

    The rest, is pretty much along the lines of what you suggest…

    1) Increased legal immigration (the ‘long term resident’ card exists now – it’s the commonly-referenced ‘green card’ – although IMHO they should be smart-cards with digital signatures)….

    2) E-verify, and measures to combat ID theft (eg, ‘Real ID’ but with teeth) so that you can’t easily get verified with false info.

    3) Citizenship for legal immigrants who serve is already the rule. Fees are waived, the process is expedited. I know one guy I served with who actually went through this process to become a citizen.

    4) Agreed on the work-visa program as well…

    5) My addition: Any enforcement mechanisms should be tailored to be invisible and aimed at violators of other laws.

    EG, if you are going to do a state-level enforcement program, you don’t do it how AZ tried – you don’t say ‘police may investigate immigration status’… Instead, you pass a law requiring all agencies to check immigration status at booking-time… Anyone brought in for a crime gets checked, and action may then be taken… If you want, make driving without a valid license on file a must-arrest misdemeanor – that way anyone without a DL on file (not on the person – that would be just a ticket) gets booked & checked….

    The impact of the above, is that it avoids the racial-profiling charge. The only way you get checked for status, is if you are already being booked into jail for something else…. The DL part works, if you don’t give DLs to illegals (it’s also good for throwing citizen DUI offenders back in jail)….

  • keven

    Although I agree that winning more votes from the Hispanic community is important and I am cool with all your ideas. I think your over the top Woody Allen quote is well….over the top. Also your quote …”The unequivocal message of Tuesday’s vote is that Republicans cannot win presidential elections without a fundamental change in the approach to Hispanic voters. “W” got some 40 % of this vote; “… is untrue and NOT the main message from the election. If Romney had won 40% of the Latino vote, Romney would not have won ANY additional states. NONE. And even if he had won 60% Latino’s in each state, he still would have lost to Obama in Ohio and Virginia and the overall election.

    The Latino vote is still only 10% of the vote. It is projected to be just 11% in 2016. And about half of that 11% will be in 5 non battle ground states. Its an important demographic. But not as important as the female vote or the working class white vote. Which we failed to do what we needed to do to win this election.
    When we win 40% of the Hispanic vote in Florida, Nevada and Colorado and still lose those states, which we would have, then there is much bigger problems then the Latino vote.

  • Pingback: Morris Nocon

  • Pingback: Nick Carnes

  • Pingback: Brady Twyman

  • Pingback: Desire Even

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: alcoholic beverages

  • Pingback: randki w tarnowie

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: stencil art

  • Pingback: rubinetti prezzi

  • Pingback: Try This Website

  • Pingback: Hop Over To Here

  • Pingback: Why Not Find Out More

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: gold and silver investments

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: madamlux

  • Pingback: online jobs uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: Union Flooring Installations

  • Pingback: Tyree Pascal

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: curriculum vitae

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: Zella Asher

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: learn more

  • Pingback: phone numbers for

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: randki internetowe