« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Whither the Tea Party?

Recent polling shows that just 8% of voters now consider themselves to be Tea Party members, down from 24% shortly after the passage of Obamacare. Peggy Lee’s 1969 classic “Is That All There Is?” comes to mind. (Do watch the video for the full impact.) What happened?

At it’s height, the Tea Party tried to define itself in the mission statement of the Tea Party Patriots: The impetus for the Tea Party movement is excessive government spending and taxation. Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets. Nothing about guns, illegals, abortion, or foreign wars. In that mode, they were the energy behind the Republican wave that gained 63 House seats, 6 Senate seats, 22 state legislative chambers, and 5 governorships in 2010.

In two short years the leaderless movement has almost dissolved. The 49-member Tea Party Caucus in the House, led by Michelle Bachmann, has been unable to stop party leadership from agreeing to the January 1, Obama tax increases or the $60 billion grabbag Hurricane Sandy “stimulus lite”, with its AmTrack upgrades, national highway reconstruction, and all manner of unrelated spending. Financial conservatives have been removed from the Financial Services and Budget committees. None of the Tea Party members in the Senate – Rand Paul of Kentucky; Mike Lee of Utah; Jerry Moran of Kansas – bothered with a filibuster on the tax increases.

The Republican Party is a coalition of interest groups – evangelicals, small business owners, national security hawks, libertarians, gun owners, financial elites. In 2010 the Party leaders welcomed the Tea Party numbers and energy, fearing a “worst case” third party revolt. In 2012, they nominated a patrician who, I believe, would have been a great president, but whose campaign did not articulate or personify the mantra of fiscal responsibility and limited government. We true believers expected that an organized effort and a “fiscal prudence” theme would produce a great turnout. It didn’t. Romney’s defeat was particularly crushing to the amateurs who first became engaged in politics just two years ago. And the media’s constant drumbeat has caused the public to identify “Tea Party” with any form of extremism.

Where to now? Obama apparently believes that he has the measure of John Boehner and the House Republicans and that he can get massive debt limit increases and more tax increases without giving on entitlement reform or general spending reductions. Some 63% of Republican voters think that Republicans in Congress have lost touch with the values of their electorate. Meanwhile, the media have grown tired of the fiscal cliff and ignore the impending automatic spending cuts, having moved on to the more interesting issue du jour, the debate over gun control.

Maybe if there is a bolt out of the blue there will be a rebirth of concern about debt and inflation sometime in the next couple of years, but a better bet is to follow Peggy Lee’s nihilistic advice and “let’s keep dancing.”

—–

This week’s video is candidate Obama’s 2008 demagogueing against President Bush’s $4 trillion in deficits over 8 years – about half of his pace.

www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

 

COMMENTS

  • satchman3

    8% is still a good number that could be influential. The tea party seemed to do quite well in the 2010 mid-terms but they really have little to show for that success. They’ve failed to hold anyone’s feet to the fire though.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      “They’ve failed to hold anyone’s feet to the fire though.”
      That’s completely untrue, just ask the current Senators Lugar, Bennett, Crist, Specter and (who was that establishment guy running in Kentucky who lost to Rand Paul). Not to mention dozens of other races, like a local State Senator in Texas (RINO replaced by Tea party person).
      The GOP House has failed to hold OBAMA’S feet to the fire, but blame that on losing the last election. the real failure if any is convincing most voters that they need to vote for fiscal responsibility!

  • plumely

    The Tea Party is really leaderless.

    • Melody Warbington

      Read FT’s comment above that accurately describes the tea party (not Tea Party). No two are necessarily alike, and there is no national leader. Maybe a loose coalition of the various groups, but our group is autonomous, and we decide our own agenda and strategy.

      I can speak to the fact that my tea party (Birmingham) is active and has gained influence in local/state matters and with our local/state officials. Although we had to cancel last night due to bad weather, we had an event schedules with two state senators as guests for a Q&A. We are rescheduling, and we have no plans to go away anytime soon. The same is true of other tea parties in the state.

      • plumely

        In order for an idea to survive and have the proper teeth such as the Tea Party, you are eventually going to have to flip it to a leader who is charismatic and can articulate the ideals and unify all the factions to work for a common purpose.

        • Melody Warbington

          No. We determine our purpose, which at present, is to influence local and state matters which affect our community. We are not interested in having a national spokesperson or going third party.

  • bobmark

    I prefer to believe the TEA party is more like an iceberg, with it’s bulk hidden below the surface until the collision. The SS DNC took a good hit in 2010, but although it has been taking on water, so far the pumps have been sufficient to keep it afloat. We can hope that the blowback to the various gun grabs being attempted will open another, larger, hole in 2014.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “Obama apparently believes that he has the measure of John Boehner and
    the House Republicans and that he can get massive debt limit increases
    and more tax increases without giving on entitlement reform or general
    spending reductions.”

    The real problem is why would the American
    taxpayer and voter let Obama get away with the most fiscally reckless
    and wrong policies ever? $6 trillion in 4 years and on track to a $20
    TRILLION DEBT this is like an atom bomb ready to go off … and Obama
    makes it worse. To top it off, Obama has already imposed trillions in
    tax increases, both the tax increases hitting now from the fiscal cliff
    and the Obamacare tax hikes.

    Why would the voters (forget the guys in Congress) tolerate this?

    In
    the end Congress will do what voters tolerate and will not do what
    voters will not tolerate. GETTING THE PEOPLE TO DEMAND FISCAL
    RESPONSIBILITY is the key!
    What happened to the Tea Party was a 3
    year incessent campaign of vilification by the liberal media. And YET
    those core principles are agreed by most voters, and certainly the
    Republican voters.

    BTW: It is wrong to describe the Republican
    party as a coalition of interest groups – it is NOT like the
    interest-group dynamic of the Democrats, each out for ‘their share of
    the pie’. The Republican party was founded on principles (free men and
    free soil) and the GOP tent is built on a 3 legged stool of the
    principles that animate the party base – faith & family values; free
    markets & fiscally responsible limited government; and a strong
    national defense and safe communities. When the Republican doesnt live
    up to its principles, it gets in trouble.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    I would add that the confusion over the term “Party” is the problem. “We are having a party” is what the ‘party’ means in Tea party, NOT political party. But people treat it as a political party. It shouldnt be… there should be Republicans, Democrats and independents who ALL care about fiscal responsibility and Constitutional Govt in a movement to make it happen. The fact that Democrats have 100% abandoned any pretense of fiscal responsibility and the Republicans are only half on board is why its reduced to being a disgruntled wing of one party.

    Both the Tea ‘party’ and the Republican party would benefit from being reduced to core agenda and principles.