<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/ben_domenech/2011/02/18/the-economists-terrible-health-policy-coverage/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:11:50 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Economist's Terrible Health Policy Coverage</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Here&amp;#8217;s a bit of press-critiquing weekend reading for you. I know it&amp;#8217;s generally unwise to rely on The Economist for coverage of American domestic policy, simply because it&amp;#8217;s not their focus. But I am far less likely to do so after reading this error-filled piece on the Florida court decision, unsigned (as all Economist pieces are) and published three weeks ago, which prompted the letter below from myself and an attorney friend. It also inspired Dan McLaughlin to send along this link to a quote from Michael Crichton about the foolishness of trusting mass media. It applies to a number of situations:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:44:35 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ben Domenech]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/ben_domenech/2011/02/18/the-economists-terrible-health-policy-coverage-n38012</link></item></channel></rss>