« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Rep. Dennis Ross (R-FL-12): Hey, Let’s Do Zero-Based Budgeting

I knew there was a reason I liked Representative Dennis Ross (R-FL-12):

Before I was honored by you, my fellow citizens, to serve in Congress, I spent the past 20 years owning and operating a small law firm in Lakeland. I met a payroll, provided health insurance and knew that every dollar of waste was a dollar too much.

I also understood that just because we did something last year, doesn’t mean we need to do it again this year. In business, before you spend money, you must ask at least three questions: Why are you spending the money? What you are spending the money on? And, after the money is spent, did you get what you paid for?

Unfortunately, in government, none of those questions are being asked — until now.

I plan to introduce my first piece of legislation as a member of Congress on Monday. It will be titled the Zero Based Budget Act. The legislation will demand the federal government, including Congress, move to what is referred to as a zero-based budget. This method of budgeting is nothing new in business, but it will be a dramatic change for Washington.

Investopedia defines zero-based budgeting as, “A method of budgeting in which all expenses must be justified for each new period. Zero-based budgeting starts from a ‘zero base’ and every function within an organization is analyzed for its needs and costs. Budgets are then built around what is needed for the upcoming period, regardless of whether the budget is higher or lower than the previous one.”

Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Dennis Ross is my newest hero. But wait, there’s more! Not only does Dennis Ross want to do Zero-Based Budgeting for the federal level, but he has many reforms where many government groups will have to work for their money:

In addition to demanding a zero starting point, my legislation accomplishes a few other necessary reforms.

First, every department and agency of the federal government, when submitting its budget request each year, must provide a description of each activity for which a department or agency receives an appropriation.

Second, every department and agency of the federal government must cite to Congress the legal basis under which they may lawfully receive an appropriation.

Third, every department and agency of the federal government must offer three alternative funding levels. Additionally, two out of the three must be for less money than the prior budget year. This innovative budget mechanism will allow agencies and department leaders to help Congress cut waste, or risk Congress taking an across-the-board approach. Tell us where to cut or we will cut for you.

Lastly, for each activity for which a department or agency requests money, they must provide a summary of its cost effectiveness and efficiency to the taxpayer. This will allow Congress and taxpayers to judge whether we are truly getting our money’s worth.

I approve. There is many local governments moving to this kind of budgeting* and I also like the reforms mentioned in this article. So of course I would support the act he just described.

I suggest you call your representative/senator and tell ask them to support Dennis Ross’ Zero-Based Budget Bill.

[Cross-Posted On Practical State.com]

BigGator5.net
@biggator5

*I know one of my School Board members is asking the School Board head in that dirrection.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Steve Fonda

    This is an idea that should be pushed at all levels of government.
    You never know…

    It’s being hailed as “the new normal” for New Jersey’s budget process:

    http://nj.gov/governor/news/news/552011/approved/20110222c.html

    A few states here, a few counties, a few boards and commissions and pretty soon you’re talking real money.

  • lineholder

    Get them to have to make legal and budgetary justifications for their expenses, just like we have to do out in the real world of the private sector. And have a watchdog of some sort to define “yea” or “nay” to those budgets.

    When they decide to start implementing productivity and efficiency measures, then we’ll be getting up to a standard that will make long-term differences.

  • Common_Cents

    is “use it or lose it”. The way they do it now in govt and many large companies actually encourages more wasteful spending. That needs to be changed.

    We might even look at some incentives for congress to cut. Incentives and comp plans are how you steer your organization into the right direction. Right now they are incentivized to spend spend spend in exchange for re-election money and support.

  • Common_Cents

    Let citizens earmark a portion of their taxes to various buckets of govt spending?

    It would be limited to some % to avoid a total mob rule but would give the average citizen a little more input where it counts beyond the the ballot box.

    • BigGator5

      Even if we limit the percentage of the budget, it won’t work. Who would decide which of the public’s projects go in?

      We have a Republic for a reason.

      • Common_Cents

        It might be big buckets not individual projects. Maybe looking at compensation programs for congress hitting targets.

        An effort to empowering/incentivizing them to take a freakin look at how much money and where it is being spent.

        I struggle with voters as victims being deceived by campaign promises to apathetic people getting what we deserve by not paying attention and doing our homework.

        We need some new thinking in engaging America and encouraging more oversight/pressure on government to perform efficiently.