« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Blue Vs. Blue: Left Screaming Bloody Murder Over Zuccotti Park

I honestly dream of moments like this, I really do:

Left-leaning bloggers erupted in outrage Tuesday morning as they awoke to news that Mayor Bloomberg had cleared the Occupy Wall Street demonstration site in Zuccotti Park overnight.

Liberal activists decried the move online, and accused the mayor of silencing the press and violating the right to peaceful assembly.

“Bloomberg’s NY is no place for the 1st amendment. Bloomberg serves Wall Street, now and forever. And Wall Street cannot handle free speech,” tweeted liberal actor Alec Baldwin.

That sound you hear is New York City’s darling mayor to liberals nation-wide, career in politics crashing before him. Any thought of him running for US President is over.

*pulls out a bag of popcorn and puts on 3-D Goggles*

Anyone want any popcorn?

“People who were part of a dynamic civic process were beaten and pepper-sprayed, their personal property destroyed,” said a posting on OccupyWallSt.org, a website for the demonstrators.

Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy. [licks the tears off the hippies's face]

“When New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg decided to stage a middle of the night raid on the Occupy Wall Street protesters in Zuccotti Park, there was one thing he didn’t want … media coverage. So Bloomberg said screw the First Amendment,” reads a posting on the Daily Kos.

“We’ll just hold off on all those pesky rights until it’s more convenient. Or not,” said the blog’s Barbara Morrill sarcastically.

Liberal blogs especially seized upon one incident, in which Village Voice writer Rosie Gray apparently told a police officer, “I’m press,” to which the officer responded, “not tonight.”

“This was real police state stuff,” wrote FireDogLake’s David Dayden after noting the incident involving Gray. “I know that the First Amendment comes with that addendum, “Operative 6am-11pm M-F,” but absolutely nothing about this raid seems justified.”

Whatever. The First Amendment does not give you the right to squat. Zuccotti Park is a privately owned park. I know, tell that to the socialists there the concept of Private Property. It is define as:

1) Title
2) Control
3) Use
4) Ability To Dispose

If Brookfield Properties loses control or the use of Zuccotti Park, then they have loss their property. Granted it is a public park, but it is own privately. So they tossed out some bloody squatters. But I digress.

Mayor Quan of Oakland, CA isn’t getting any love because she, horrors of horrors, talked to other mayors accross the nation. Really people, let them kill themselves (metaphorically, of course) over this.

Here’s your chance New York and Oakland Republicans. Time to elect a few good conservative mayors in these cities. Do not waste it.

BigGator5.net
@biggator5

COMMENTS

  • http://www.reddit.com/user/pi_over_three/ Pi Over Three

    the occupiers have cost the city of Minneapolis (which is heavily funded by the state) over $250,000 (directly putting 5 teachers out of a job).

    They city has given them water, set up porta-johns for them, and provided them with electricity. They even had to forgo winterizing some of the government buildings because the occupiers had signs on them and wouldn’t take them down.

    Now that the cold is setting in, they are demanding access to one of the public buildings in downtown to live in. The city said no, and so now they are all crying about how the tyrannical government is stopping them from protesting.

    No word on whether the ACLU will sue over lack of city-provided hot chocolate.

  • Kyle-MI

    Yet, they are occupying a private park and demanding redistribution of other people’s personal property. Looks like these occupiers are suffering from a massive deficiency of irony.

  • Kyle-MI

    yet somehow its always the fault of the red. And come next election they will vote for Obama and all of the fatcat blue politicians like Pelosi.

    Here’s a clue occupiers: vote 3rd party. I here the Green party is closer to your views. Just ignore that silly 2000 Presidential outcome. We all know those Nader voters would have gone for W.

  • carolina

    a few minutes ago. There was no way the ows could prevail in the courts (legally).
    This makes me very happy (even though there was some benefit to the responsible conservatives from letting the ugly left continue their obnoxious behavior).
    Blue blogs ranting and raving is very entertaining. :-)

  • carolina

    a few minutes ago. There was no way the ows could prevail in the courts (legally).
    This makes me very happy (even though there was some benefit to the responsible conservatives from letting the ugly left continue their obnoxious behavior).
    Blue blogs ranting and raving is very entertaining. :-)

  • nathanalbright

    …it would seem that the desire of many on the loony left is to provoke a tyrannical response against that evil 1%, and instead they find that they are the 1% by their unlawful actions. And don’t complain about the free bath while you’re at it.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    MadBrad over at TheRealRevo found this, apparently, at TheBlaze.com. I love it whenever anyone makes fun of the hypocrisy of leftists:

    http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=60968

    Thank you,

    ColdWarrior