« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Finally: The Herman Cain TV Ad We’ve Been Waiting For

I say it’s about time (Via Jammie Wearing Fools):



People have been waiting for a Herman Cain TV Ad, well here it is people.

I honestly don’t know if this is planed to be a tv ad, but it should be in any case. Any Cain campaign stuff reading this should think it over and send the suggestion to the top. It is simple and to the point.

So the URL of that video takes you here and to this video:

But don’t take my word for it. Art Laffer, a real economist, has this to say about Herman Cain’s 999 Plan:

It used to be that the sole purpose of the tax code was to raise the necessary funds to run government. But in today’s world the tax mandate has many more facets. These include income redistribution, encouraging favored industries, and discouraging unfavorable behavior.

To make matters worse there are millions and millions of taxpayers who are highly motivated to reduce their tax liabilities. And, as those taxpayers finagle and connive to find ways around the tax code, government responds by propagating new rules, new interpretations of the code, and new taxes in a never-ending chase. In the process, we create ever-more arcane tax codes that do a poor job of achieving any of their mandates. …

(Crunching The Numbers) In the recent past, federal tax revenues from the personal and business income taxes, all payroll taxes, and the capital gains, gift and estate taxes have averaged $2.3 trillion, while gross domestic product has averaged about $14.5 trillion. The total revenue from these taxes as a share of gross domestic product averages around 16%. Sometimes it’s a good deal higher, as in the boom of the late 1990s, and sometimes its lower, as in today’s “Great Recession.” But a number in the 16%-19% range is as good as you’ll get under our current tax code.

By contrast, the three tax bases for Mr. Cain’s 9-9-9 plan add up to about $33 trillion. But the plan exempts from any tax people below the poverty line. Using poverty tables, this exemption reduces each tax base by roughly $2.5 trillion. Thus, Mr. Cain’s 9-9-9 tax base for his business tax is $9.5 trillion, for his income tax $7.7 trillion, and for his sales tax $8.3 trillion. And there you have it! Three federal taxes at 9% that would raise roughly $2.3 trillion and replace the current income tax, corporate tax, payroll tax (employer and employee), capital gains tax and estate tax.

The whole purpose of a flat tax, à la 9-9-9, is to lower marginal tax rates and simplify the tax code. With lower marginal tax rates (and boy will marginal tax rates be lower with the 9-9-9 plan), both the demand for and the supply of labor and capital will increase. Output will soar, as will jobs. Tax revenues will also increase enormously—not because tax rates have increased, but because marginal tax rates have decreased. …

This is the type of tax increase I wholeheartedly support. I support collecting more in taxes from people with high incomes who choose to actually pay taxes at lower tax rates than use lawyers and accountants to avoid taxes at higher tax rates. Some tax revenues at low tax rates is a heckuva lot better than no tax revenues at high tax rates.

While the 9-9-9 plan has captured people’s imaginations at this moment, it’s not all that different from California Gov. Jerry Brown’s 13% flat tax when he ran for president in 1992. As you may recall, he came in second behind Bill Clinton in the Democratic Party primary.

In 1986, President Reagan passed a major tax-reform bill that lowered to 28% from 50% the top marginal personal income tax rate. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 also raised the lowest marginal income tax rate to 15% from 11% and closed many loopholes, making for a flatter tax structure. Reagan’s bill passed the Senate in a landslide 97-to-3 vote. Who says a flat tax can’t be a bipartisan proposal?

If this video and Art Laffer’s endorsement doesn’t get you excited about the 999 Plan, I honestly don’t know what will. If the 999 Plan was passed, there will not be seas big enough for all the business coming our way. I even have a business idea myself.

I support Herman Cain. I have been since he announced that he would be running. I’m on the CainTrian until it reaches the White House. I will then be a tireless supporter of the 999 Plan. Herman Cain might not be a polished politician, but that is what I love about him. Cain is a man who makes mistakes, like me. Personally, he is the only person running right now that I would love to sit down with a beer. The 999 Plan shows he is also bold and thinks out of the mainsteam box.

Some of us is waiting for the second coming of Ronald Reagan. I am not one of those people, for he is not coming. Leave Reagan where he is, resting in peace. We should be instead looking forward to the future and for a new kind of leader. I believe Herman Cain is that leader. Climb aboard this train with me, and we will the conductors of our own future.

BigGator5.net
@biggator5

COMMENTS

  • wacowboy

    under the 999 plan, my taxes go up by about 5k annually. yes, I figured in the disappearance of the payroll tax.

    I’m an average american, make about $50k/year, 2 kids. I don’t qualify for an “empowerment zone” or the “poverty rate” 909.

    tell me how this is good for america.

    you can tell me my costs will go down. I’ll believe that when I see it.

    • wacowboy

      not trying to rain on anybody’s parade here. I just don’t get what’s so great about the 999 plan when it is going to do to lost of other americans what it will to my family.

      if someone can explain how my taxes won’t really go up by $5k annually I’d love to hear it.

    • ohiohistorian

      With those two, you are actually paying about 13% of income besides your income tax.

      What if Obama does away with the Bush tax cuts (allowing them to expire) and your marginal rate goes to 15%? Does that change anything for you?

      • wacowboy

        I did include those on both sides.

        I also question whether employers will pass the payroll tax savings on to employees or simply pocket the savings as extra profit. I’ll admit that there’s no way to answer this question until such a system is actually implemented.

        to be honest, if the marginal rate went up to 15% it wouldn’t really change things for me because my taxable income is at or near 0

        like I said, I’m not trying to be a troll or rain on anyone’s parade. I just would like someone to explain to me how the 999 plan won’t raise taxes on the thousands of other americans in situations like my own.

        For the record, I’m all for closing loopholes, etc. and I’m not strictly opposed to my taxes going up — just not by $5000.

    • Finrod

      This includes things like housing, since I doubt you’re planning on buying a brand-new house.

      • wacowboy

        I don’t think used houses are taxed under the current system,, are they?

        • Finrod

          Your money is getting taxed before you can even use it to buy a house. So yes, this is a change.

  • ohiohistorian

    No, I am NOT talking about corruption or “Teapot Dome”. I am instead talking about the man who cut the Wilson government spending (and taxes) by about 33%, ushering in the “Roaring Twenties” when the middle class made REAL gains.

    • Xasteius

      Harding was a windbag, but he never claimed to be misinterpreted.

  • Tbone

    It looks like Cain had at least one for 13 years. She probably dumped him for cheating on her.

    Maybe we should ask Newt that after, say, 10 years you can count your mistress as a “legal” wife?

    • williamjameson

      With all the lies and media con jobs these days, the women are unimportant till one of them actually has proof. One of the five never made the news because she was actually upset that Cain talked about some royal OPEC lady or whatever, the story was a flash in the pan just the like the first 4.

      Congress would never pas 999, by the time dems got through with it the number would look more like a toll free number with 12000 pages of text.

    • nathanalbright

      As do the people they sleep with, since they’re already married and all.

  • izoneguy
    • Tbone

      make sure she didn’t know your real name.

    • reggie182

      Cain is done anyway.

      Barring the unbelievably unforseen it’s Newt vs. Mitt.

    • determinedconservative

      …is that Cain responded to the reporter initially by saying “these are more false allegations”, but then his lawyer issued a statement that basically admitted they were true. That just makes me wonder about his other denials.

  • Xasteius

    Since the tax is not supposed to apply to used goods, people and businesses will come up with a million ways to reclassify new goods as ‘used goods’ in some fashion. And to deal with this situa,tion, the IRS will have to be given new enforcement powers (or some Commerce version of the ATF will be created) and more federal regulations will be have to enacted to classify what exactly is a ‘used good’ (employing all the lawyers and accountants that formerly puzzled out the last tax code).

    The net result is that nothing will change from the old tax code,

    • Scope

      My husband and I have bargained many times with Lowes to get a price reduction on display models when it is the last one left, they were in essence “used” items by the store. Oh how right you are that the cleverness of consumers will abound. Then go to the new side of the argument, medicines and food are never “used” but are some of the most important purchases the poor make, and they would be the first to suffer from 999.

    • donald_24

      Car dealers can drive new cars around the block a few times and then classify them as “used” cars so that customers don’t have to pay the 9% sales tax. Or in cases of new houses, the builder can live in the house for a few months and then sell it as a “used” house.

  • Xasteius