« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Stay Calm, Everyone. We’ll Get Through This.

The Financial Situation Simmers

The ground is shifting in the acute financial crisis that started around Labor Day, and erupted like a boil into public consciousness about three weeks ago.

While Congress continues its indecision over whether to respond with forceful measures, the crisis has begun to have a powerful impact on the Main Street economy. None other than Warren Buffett (who’s been around for a lot of years and has seen a lot of things) is calling it an “economic Pearl Harbor.”

The stock markets, which appear to be the main barometer that Congress takes its cues from, have been gyrating wildly all week. And the windup of Wall Street has been put on hold by the SEC’s short-selling ban.

But the credit and money markets, where real-world businesses get the day-to-day financing they use to buy materials and to pay their employees, are under extraordinary stress.

I’m going to talk about what are the risks in the system in case Congress passes the Paulson plan today, and in case they do not. I’m also going to tell you how to react to the Armageddon-scare stories that are now rampant in the press.


We’ve had days in which localized stresses were far worse than they are today. (For one, the awful night of September 17-18, when the abyss opened in front of Wall Street and Hell stared back.)

But what is happening this week is that we are settling into a pattern of near-complete inactivity in the term-lending markets.

There’s money available for borrowing overnight. (Mind-boggling amounts of central-bank liquidity have seen to that.) And the small sliver of companies with tip-top credit ratings have perfectly good access to the capital markets.

For everyone else, term-borrowing is available either at impossibly high prices, or not at all. The noose is tightening slowly, a little more each day. People with money to lend are hoarding it, because the last thing they want is to be a creditor to someone who is bankrupt.

And since businesses now have considerably less access to capital markets than in normal times, they’re canceling projects, slowing down hiring, and generally hunkering down until things get a little more normal.

America’s large businesses are very well-positioned to ride out the storm. The financial sector’s balance sheet has been shredded by mortgage losses. But the balance sheets of our large industrial companies are very, very strong.

But as long as they’re in lock-down mode, economic activity suffers, especially in those industries that require a lot of day-to-day capital.

And consumers, many of whom are worrying about their bank deposits, appear to have slammed on the brakes, curtailing large purchases and discretionary spending until the news headlines get less frightening.

This is a one-two punch for the economy.

And there’s a third punch. There’s considerable evidence that managers of banks, hedge funds and money market funds are now liquidating investment positions and raising large amounts of raw cash. They’re afraid of redemptions. They fear that their depositors and limited partners will start calling them and pulling their cash out.

All of these disorders have appeared or gotten much worse in the past two weeks, since Congress has been debating the emergency financial rescue plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson.

Paulson’s original proposal fit onto three widely-spaced pages, and could easily have been enacted in a single weekend. If Congress had had any sense for the gravity of the moment, the system would already have largely stabilized by now.

What’s my evidence for that? Simply this: There aren’t that many more large American financial intermediaries left that are in danger of imminent bankruptcy.

Go ahead, name one. All five of the big Wall Street broker-dealers are gone. We’ve already lost the biggest institutions that had huge exposure to mortgage-finance: AIG (through its credit-default swap portfolio), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of course, a huge well-run bank (Wachovia), and a huge poorly-run S&L (Washington Mutual).

There are a lot of little shoes left that may drop, but those would have been manageable. The Paulson rescue plan would have given Treasury the equipment both to manage the remaining failures in an orderly fashion, and to begin the process of recapitalizing the financial system.

Instead, Congress sat on their hands for two weeks and let the fire keep burning. And now it’s nearly out of control, capital markets are in stasis, and the economy has slammed on the brakes. Nice going, guys.

And let’s never forget the hapless Speaker of the House, the most powerful woman in American politics, who came to her position speaking of using her mommy voice on the President of the United States, and of cleaning out the Augean stables of free-market capitalism and lax regulatory policy.

Speaker Pelosi brought a bastardized version of the Paulson plan to a vote last Monday, and failed to get it passed, making her look stupid and incompetent. And now the remainder of the week has shown us what Congress’s true priorities are.

The bill that passed in the Senate on Wednesday was a classic pork-barrel incumbent-protection act. They quadrupled the size of the legislation in two days.

And now they have the gall to tell us that the extra garbage they added in is what will solve the economic problem! “And oh by the way, we’re giving the Treasury Secretary a watered-down version of that weird thingamajig he came up here asking us for.” Gee, thanks.

We may or may not get passage of the revised Paulson plan in the House of Representatives today. But it may be too late now.

The stock markets have already noted the sudden rash of very poor economic indicators from the month of September. That’s the reason why those markets, which had been obsessively tracking the mood of Congress, have turned decidedly negative in recent days.

The credit markets now are beyond repair. The driver for the stasis is extreme fear, and that’s something that can only be fixed with the passage of time. It looks like we’ll have to go through a few more weeks of relative freedom from disaster. After that, capital markets will start to thaw by themselves.

The situation is very touchy, volatile, and prone to sudden shocks. But as I’ve said, I have reason to believe there is a decent likelihood that we’ll muddle through it.

On the downside, the loss of economic activity over this period of time is real, and we’ll never get it back. We’re going to get a nice, fat recession, with significant job losses.

You can lay the blame for this squarely on the desire of Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid to avoid making a tough decision unless they had a way to blame it on Republicans.

In the meantime, stay calm, everyone. Leave your money in the bank and in your money market funds. Go to the mall this weekend and buy some nice, American-made goods and services. Go shopping for a house or a car.

We’ll get through this.

-Francis Cianfrocca

COMMENTS

  • bags64

    i have no idea who you are, but i have read your posts and look forward to them.

    i am going to go buy a car now!!

  • Jaded

    my take away, DO NOTHING….KILL THE BILL….it is already in it’s downward spiral….go out go see American Carol and buy some dinner and something at the store and the let the markets do their gyrations. LIFE and the markets will recover….America will be fine. It always recovers….it’s AMERICA!

  • StephC

    Is that a big enough purchase? Don’t want or need a car and already have a house so that’s the best I can do… for now.

  • Dougist

    During this financial crisis I have been wandering the halls of academia, blog space and the business world and I?m shocked by our people?s lack of comprehension about what is going on in the economy. The misperceptions about the current banking crisis, its seriousness, the implications, and potential solutions defy understanding. There are times when I just shake my head.

    I have found that the groups of incomprehension fall into four camps and wrote about them here

    Are Americans Worthy of Being Saved?

    I thought you?d be interested.

    Doug

    www.dougist.com

    • blackhedd

      Business exec and investor.

      • blackhedd

        :-)

        • StephC

          I’m trying to talk hubby into pulling his brother-in-law up here to do some stuff in the housing market, perhaps for rental income or resale if he thinks he can turn a slight profit… B-i-L is the real estate expert.

          So far, hubby isn’t going for it but who knows?

  • Charles_Beauchamp

    Francis,

    As always very nice article. I completely agree.

    I simply cannot believe how badly Congress has dropped the ball on this recovery. Waiting 2 weeks to take action on this bill has forced us into a recession that I believe will last abnormally long (I think 1.5 to 2 years, where most of them last 6 to 8 months). I believe the length of the recession is caused by a two-headed monster:

    1. The consumer type recession you describe above, where the inaction of Congress will compound the issue as further freezing of the credit markets occur causing job and productivity losses.

    2. Under capitalized markets killing growth. Congress/Treasury/Fed/Bush have completely failed to address the issue of how to recapitalize markets and stimulate growth (and no sending everyone stimulus checks won’t get it done). I have yet to hear any of them even acknowledge the fact that this problem exists, much less have a plan to deal with it.

    The more unbelievable issue to me is how McCain/Palin absolutely have failed to capitalize on this issue and have let the Dems turn it against Republicans. McCain/Palin and those Senators/House members need to blast on two fronts:

    1. How the Dems have forced through blackmail (including Obama when he was associated with ACORN) bank managers to loan people money when they new those borrowing didn’t have the capacity to pay.

    2. It is Pelosi, Frank (use the O’Reilly interview last night), Dodd, etc. that have delayed action trying to pork-up the current bill (giving ACORN future bank profits).

    I received an email from Senator Hatch this week stating that he is tired of playing Mr. Nice Guy, I agree, it is time to take the fight to the Dems on all fronts.

  • enrique

    Well, the purpose of the bill seems to be basically moot and adding to our debt makes little sense at this time. Unfortunately, McCain not only squandered an opportunity to define himself on this issue but turned his campaign back into the toilet.

    Instead of fighting against earmarks and a power grab by the Treasury (which would also have helped distinguish him from the Bush Administration) he suspended his campaign to try and work out a bad deal that most Americans were against.

    He’s already pulling out of my state of Michigan where Democrats are insistent that 50 out of 50 states for economic growth isn’t good enough. They want Puerto Rico to pass us as well.

    Let’s fight hard for good small government House Republicans of which we found a few these last two weeks.

    • Shiheng_Zeke

      to let me buy another rental property. She thought I was off my nut. I showed her the financials and cash flow even going into a recession.

      We now own another rental property.

      I was one of those people watching the housing market for the last 10 years saying “Have people lost their minds?” I guess the answer was “Yes”.

      Also, the smartest thing I have ever done as an investor was to buy shares of Berkshire Hathaway a year ago when this started. I figured if anyone was going to come out of this smelling like a rose it was going to be Warren Buffett.

  • izoneguy

    For you folks in Michigan

    “It is well enough that people
    of the nation do not understand
    our banking and monetary system,
    for if they did, I believe there
    would be a revolution before
    tomorrow morning.”

    Henry Ford

  • Rod_Patrick

    If Obama wins by November, I think we will be having more of your “THIS”.

    How can we stay calm, Blackhedd? Just how?

  • guesswhosreadytolead

    FACT 1: Obama sued banks for not giving away enough subprime loans. “Obama represented Calvin Roberson in a 1994 lawsuit against Citibank, charging the bank systematically denied mortgages to African-American applicants and others from minority neighborhoods.”
    source

    FACT 2: Senator Mccain did everything in his power in 2005 to both warn and legislate against the current subprime loan financial crisis.
    source: Bill title is – S. 190 [109th]: Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005

    FACT 3: The root of this whole mess is the Clinton administration for both giving out and making popular subprime loans to people who had a stressed ability to pay them back, and Democrats who later repeatedly blocked regulation reform.
    source 1
    source 2

    FULL STORY:
    Freebies From the Obama Camp
    MORE ON OBAMA HERE:
    what you need to know about barack obama

  • kyle8

    recovery but probably not until second quarter 2009. And Maybe much later if the problems in Europe follow the American path. Meanwhile, it is a great opportunity for investment if you have cash.

    I have a little bit, I am looking at real estate. But if stocks become severely devalued, a nice stock fund might be the way to go.

    Instead of a fear reaction, you should view economic downturns as opportunities.

    • Arkie_Liberal

      If we do go a buy a car, is it ok if we play real hardball with the dealer, knowing that we may be the only people on the lot this weekend?

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Republicans have to stop acting like suckers and taking their bait. One bailout bill does not usher in an era of socialism, four years of an unchecked Obama will.

    All Sarah. All Day Long

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Republicans have to stop acting like suckers and taking their bait. One bailout bill does not usher in an era of socialism, four years of an unchecked Obama will.

    All Sarah. All Day Long

  • Mr_Green

    Is there any point in passing the bailout at this point? What would it help if anything now?

    By the way thank you for all your awesome posts, have been keeping track of all of them.

    • drjecdo

      I’ve been hearing now for more than a week how “Main st.” just doesn’t understand what’s going on. I find this elitism offensive. We understand very well what is going on.

      The Democrats without shame or conscience have steered us (purposely, I believe) towards a manufactured economic crisis for political gain, and as an ideological mechanism to nationalize the financial structure of the U.S. The Republicans in Congress, being “moderate” (i.e. feckless) didn’t have the guts to stand up to them and their Media organs. The few Conservatives left in Congress couldn’t convince their linguini-spined peers to stand up against the assault despite their repeated warnings. The Media created an alternate reality narrative to protect this economic coup, then their Trojan Horse Treasury Secretary 6 weeks before the election as McCain is surging orchestrates an economic panic and convinces an emasculated center-left lame duck president that his legacy will be a second Great Depression if he doesn’t succumb to his blackmail.

      How’m I doing so far?

      This Obama-Bush Wall St. Bailout Bill will have two immediate outcomes: 1. It will set the stage for der Fuhrer Obama to socialize the entire economy of the U.S., and 2. It will do nothing to ease the self-inflicted “credit crisis” but will throw another $850 billion after the previous $900 billion already yacked this year that had no effect.

      All of this is foreshadowing the Obama economy that started after the election of ’06. At that time, businesses and productive citizens (i.e. taxpayers) started preparing for the coming oppressive regulation and high taxation; hence, the reason a vibrant economy had the breaks put on by the Democrats and Media.

      Since we are heading for an economic collapse anyway – unemployment, inflation (or deflation), and lack of liquidity – this bill should be rejected to forestall this leftist coup. At least until the rest of America has a chance to vote on whether we retake or surrender our future. We understand only to well; hence, the reason to rush this vote to preempt the one in November.

  • JosephBaileyOne

    This mess is in large part due to stupid consumers, stupid exec’s but also due to Cox and the SEC NOT doing their job. Bush may have handed the Messiah this election by not doing what he could to get Cox out of there. Stupidity run amuck is why this mess is upon us and there has to be some type of rescue package. Granted that we are stronger than in ’29 and there is the FDIC and Main Street has spoken loud and clear-a note that has been dismissed which is extraordinary when one considers how connected Main Street is with investments today.

    The panic led by Bush and Paulson along with that worthless excuse for a Speaker, is what is causing the panic. I say we need a package but at least the coalition of House Dem’s and GOP against this bill have forced everyone to slow down and take a breath before they act. What Speaker would ever go to a floor vote on such a bill and not know ahead of time what will happen? Then her remarks beforehand shows that the cheerleader has no idea what she is doing in her position as Speaker. Add in the panic of Bush and what a mess alright.

    • bags64

      if i’m gonna pay cash for the car, it may be that they are willing to take a little more off the car.

      we’ll see!

      • JSobieski

        and the pork is disgusting

  • Marcus_Traianus

    Treasury professionals I speak to on the corporate side said one reason they are holding onto cash is because they don?t trust any fund that has bank or agency paper. That belies the importance of getting this passed, since they also believe a constructive, wise effort to buy paper with questionable value would directly address their confidence issue. Translation; when companies sit on their cash it is bad for everyone. They are also slowing down R&D spending, which in the long term is really bad.

    Add to this leveraged loans prices are in the basement, quality corporate bonds are being flogged and short term debt markets are ghost towns. Even FHLB auctions are failing because there is no demand. This will all have lasting effects which will ripple through the economy.

    Meanwhile Congress fiddles and adds 450 pages worth of junk to this bill. I am speechless and only have one thought; they all need to go.

    This is your Democrat led Congress who has done zero for the better part of two years. So, I don?t know why we should be surprised.

    This is your Democrat candidate for President,who rejected John McCain?s call for more control over Fannie/Freddie- the starting point for this entire mess.

    Do you really believe Obama has a tax cut for 95% of all American?s? I am just curious how this income redistribution, gets accomplish with $1 trillion in new spending and nationalizing the healthcare system?

    • blackhedd

      It’s needed to prime the pump of getting the financial system recapitalized.

      • JSobieski

        Even if you think the Paulson plan rocks (which I don’t) are you surprised that his “do exactly what I say, ask no questions, raise no objections, or we will all die” approach was ineffective.

        Even if the Paulson Plan was the ONLY way to address the crisis and all other ideas were per se useless and unworthy of discussion, Paulson owed Congress and the American people an explanation of what was going on.

        Sorry, even if interpretted as favorably towards Paulson as possible (i.e. assuming his assessments are 100% right), his behavior was not reasonably designed to achieve his desired result.

        Where I come from, we call that foreseeably ineffective. See also futile.

        • bk

          Well jeez you can’t just stretch 3 pages into 451 pages overnight, can you?

  • Steven_Willis

    Thank you for very helpful analysis.

    I supported the original Treasury Bill. I believed the President when he said we would buy the MBSs and hold them. I trusted they could create a mechanism to value them properly for purchase and to create a sufficient market so that the Treasury did not only acquire the very worst.

    I believe that 1.5 page plan, along with a reform of mark to market rules would have worked – then.

    I am disgusted by a 451-page bill. I do not trust it. I’ve read it and I see too much scattered throughout. I’ve seen this before with Tax Legislation, about which I know a great deal: make it so complicated no one can decipher it and bury the messy parts.

    Hence, I do not trust this bill at all. I deeply regret Senator McCain voted for it.

    While I fear a liquidity crisis, I am becoming more and more convinced that hoards of vulture funds exist with hoards of reachable cash. Once they know how the government will act, they will proceed to pick up the pieces. That is how the market works.

    In the future, we must reform the accounting system for more transparency and also more trust. If a CPA does not understand a type of security, or if a real market for the security does not exist, the CPA must say so and he must issue a qualified opinion or no opinion at all. The Big 4 have not done this. I suspect each of the failed firms has had a clean audit in recent years – were that not true, they would have failed earlier and not so suddenly.

    If some investment products are so complicated that average CPAs cannot understand them, and if they are so limited in marketability that a fair market value cannot be determined, then the holders of them have nothing to report. That should be clear from the start. If it were, these products would not exist long because they could not be reported on audited financial statements. I do not care how cleaver or helpful the investment products and derivatives may be: if the marketers and creators cannot explain them to Independent Certified Public Accountants, then the products are worthless. The creators should find another line of work or something else to peddle. Sarah is right: I do not want to be fooled again.

    And this is important: Sarah Palin is who convinced me. She stood up and said she’d been fooled and it was not to happen again. Well, I’ve taught law and accounting for 29 years. I admit it: I do not understand many of these financial products. I’ve heard so much about how so many others do not understand them and how they are so complicated, only a few people understand them, if any at all. Well, if they are that complicated, it is time for them to go (though I guess for the most part, they’ve already gone). Too much in our financial system relies on faith and trust. If we do not have faith and trust that the overseers (the CPAs, not the government) can properly evaluate financial statement such that they can issue an honest opinion, we have nothing.

    My suggestions:

    1. Let the House Republicans kill the bill.

    2. McCain and Palin should denounce it, too. How they reconcile that with his vote will be interesting.

    3. Force accounting firms to divest themselves of any association with tax planning or management consulting. Until they do so, their audits are untrustworthy.

    4. Do not accept International auditing standards – they are less reliable than are our own.

    • Vegas_Rick

      Do a Google search of his name. He knows what he’s talking about.

  • enrique

    who is more likely than not going to have new unprecedented power over the financial industry. You think the treasury plan to buy securities might not be a little bit influenced by the lobbyists and friends up on Wall Street?

    The determining factor for how much a security is worth will be decided arbitrarily by the treasury. No risk for them to overpay right? No risk that they only buy the worthless securities from their friends first right? The age of cronyism in finance is about to begin big time.

    The real danger of the bill is that it will continue putting capital in businesses and markets that are inefficient. It is the exact opposite of what we should want.

    • Raven

      I’d be buying up every piece of real estate I could get my hands on right now if I did. Beautiful time for it.

      God! But it sucks to be in the lower middle class sometimes…!

      • IJB

        While I was for the original bill, I actually think the whole idea should have been abandoned after Monday defeat.

        Having said that, I think seeing even this current bill defeated a second time would have massively demoralizing psychological impact that would, 1) send the markets down at least 2,500 point (net, over the next few weeks), and 2) would lead to a wholesale slaughter of GOP officeholders at every level of government, in every region of the country.

        So, while I’m now convinced the current bill will probably only help marginally, at best (and does other harm in other ways), seeing it go down a second time would be psychologically disastrous.

        We’re stuck with this pig. We might as well serve him up.

        • IJB

          OK, think through your scenario:

          1. The economy & the markets will tank with or without this bill.

          2. Republican would own defeat of this bill.

          3. As the economy and the markets tank, the Democrats & the Establishment Media will blame those circumstances on the Republican defeat of the bill. They’d tie it around the GOP’s neck.

          4. Any other attempts to redirect the original blame back to Dodd, Frank and the Dems will totally fail (certainly in the short-term, and likely in all but the very longest-term).

          The result: McCain loses by a +10% margin, and the GOP is wiped out of Congress.

          For all these people who want less “socialism” and less “pork”, you’ll get exactly the opposite result you’ll be hoping for.

          Yes, the current bill is almost worthless. But not passing it would be far worse for our side than passing it.

          At least in passing it, the GOP can properly claim credit for “trying to do something to help manage the crisis” (even if it fails).

          At that point, if it does fail, the GOP may have a stronger case in trying to tie this original mess to Nancy, Harry, Barry & co.

          • Dougist

            How’m I doing so far?

            Not too good.

            This crisis is based on a very technical issue in the banking system. It is not self manufactured, it is not manipulative, it is as real as only a real open market can get.

            Confidence has absolutely evaporated between banks and the result is that good assets (and good companies) are being miss-priced, sometimes to $0.

            So I’m sorry you are insulted but the fact is that you are arguing the wrong points and in fact you are contradicting yourself. If the financial markets fail (and I don’t mean stocks and mutual funds, I mean the big global interbank markets) the impact on local markets (where you buy your food and groceries) could be catastrophic. It is in that kind of environemnt that calls for socializm and tyrany flurish.

            So by casting caluminy at a simple provison that allows Treasury to buy miss-priced assets you are actualy argung for a path that would make a call for socialism more possible.

            Seeing so may conservatives (and I count myself as one) on the wrong side of this argument is what is so ironic this debate.

            So no, I don’t think you are doing too good.

          • TheSophist

            Blackhedd worked at the City Opera? He’s a music major who runs tech companies, and knows more about the markets and economics than half the i-bankers I know?

            Francis — seriously… when will you be running for office. I stand ready to support you with money and time.

            -TS

  • someone

    The bill that passed in the Senate on Wednesday was a classic pork-barrel incumbent-protection act. They quadrupled the size of the legislation in two days.

    This is simply wrong. The Paulson stuff was itself attached to a “pork” (not really, but that’s another issue) bill THAT HAD ALREADY PASSED.

    Otherwise, the Senate wouldn’t have been able to act first.

    • speciallist

      pork

  • DGaines

    I so enjoy your posts. Still when considering the huge influence credit deprivation has on the ability of American business to function I wonder how we got here.

    When you run a business with success predicated on the ability to borrow you are ALWAYS at risk. Sure credit is a great tool but it seems many companies are using credit as a primary means to revenue growth rather than a tool — and that, in my view, continues to put the economy at risk. Unless American business rethink their approach to the credit drug, I fear we will be here again in the future.

    • Shiheng_Zeke

      …but watch out for financial traps.

      One thing to really watch is real estate. In the current environment assets of all types are going to be repriced.

      If you look at a property and say to yourself “Gee, it was $800,000 and now it is $400,000. What a deal!” Think twice.

      We went through a weird period of time where values of assets were distorted wildly. For me, I look at say a rental property and calculate how I can make money if I have to commit money to it. Many people bought rental condos at the beach and said to themselves: “Well, the rent does not cover the monthly costs but the value is going up so I am getting rich!”

      Wrong.

      I always want to make money on my money. If I commit $100,000 I expect there to be income generated greater than what I can make if I just plunked it down in a CD.

      • stang

        How does when or how it was previously passed change that?

        • Charles_Beauchamp

          I thought the Paulson plan was terrible, but when credit markets begin to freeze that is a major problem. I totally agree with you that they didn’t educate people as to why this plan was needed.

          My major point was that many credible and respected people (those down in the trenches) on Wall Street had alternative plans within hours. Why does it take the Congress (currently run by Democrats) so long to help us when we really need it?

          I just think the Republican Party missed a golden opportunity with this. All they had to do was introduce a pro-growth plan that maximized the protection for tax payers (complete protection in this situation is not possible) and sell it effectively to the people.

          • JSobieski

            and somehow became the one and only solution.

            Even people like Forbes ultimately became supporters of the Paulson plan because time ran out.

            This rescue plan is GWB’s fairwell kiss to conservatives—-while I like the guy personally, I am glad his term is about to end

          • JSobieski

            We can probably get a group discount—and the aggregate cost will be far less than $700 Billion

  • The_Gadfly

    And they are right to be afraid. Had Congress acted last Friday, or even as late as mid-afternoon on Monday, those redemptions wouldn’t be as much of a threat. Some of the earlier posters have made some good points about the psychology of what is happening now. It is the psychology of a panic. And if you can see the panic coming, and set aside enough cash to whether it, you will come out the other side. Otherwise, welcome to Lehman Brothers St.

    Blackie, as always I trust your read on the markets. If it is true that there are only 4 people in the US who understand these things, you seem to know 2 of them and be able to translate it into English for the rest of us. Right now I’m not sure what I’m going to do. I was preparing to ride out the coming storm. I’ve switched my 401(k) contributions to mostly bonds, but haven’t monkeyed with my accumulated assets yet. On that count, I have been an insane investor, with most of the contributions going into stock, so it was overdue for me to start investing in bonds anyway. But I wasn’t overly impressed with the part of last night’s debate that I watched. I think Palin was on too much of a leash. I think McCain has lost momentum, and doesn’t know how to turn it around. I will go out and pull the lever for him, even here in the People’s Republic of Maryland where I know it won’t make a difference, but I’ll be doing it the same way I would have voted for the bailout on Monday – holding my nose. I can’t even cast a decent protest vote because the Libertarians went and nominate Bob Barr as their candidate, and he seems to have jumped off the same cliff Pat Buchanon did a few years back. I’m thinking about watching the vote today, and if the market bounces up on Monday because they finally did the right thing, moving my stocks to bonds. Not because of the current credit crisis (you are right, that we can weather), but because McCain is returning to feeling like Democrat-light, and I’m starting to think the Marxist just might win. I’ll watch the rest of the debate sometime this weekend and hope the half I didn’t watch gives some signs of hope that McCain can still pull it out. If I don’t, the only reason I won’t be investing my 401(k) money in gold is because it’s not an approved part of the plan. Now my $30K in that plan isn’t a big deal in a multi-million (billion?) dollar fund, but if there are a lot of other people out there thinking the same way I am, those cash hoarders are going to need those reserves.

    On the bright side, I probably will go see An American Carol with a friend tomorrow. I might even follow it up on Sunday by seeing Igor with two friends (the second friend doesn’t care for overtly conservative movies) and buying the overpriced popcorn and soda on both days. But other than that I’ll only be doing my part to loosen the credit markets by paying down my insanely high credit card debt.

    • StephC

      But my brother-in-law does if he feels like it’s a sound plan.

      • drjecdo

        OK, think through your scenario:

        1. The bill fails.
        2. The market tanks for a day, then comes back again as it did this week.
        3. Private interests buy the assets at a much lower price than the government was going to minus all the pork.
        4. Mark-to-market change increases value of assets by $500 billion dollars allowing $5 trillion of lending instantly. The economy goes on.
        5. The crisis is exposed as a scam perpetrated by Paulson to get Obama elected.
        6. Republican own defeat of this bill;hence, the confidence of the people for not panicking and saving taxpayers $850 billion.

        As the economy and the markets hold through the election, the Republican are praised for their stewardship and defeat of the bill.

        1. Any other attempts to redirect the original blame back to Dodd, Frank and the Dems will totally stick (certainly in the short-term, and likely in all including the very longest-term).

        The result: McCain wins by a +10% margin, and the GOP is retakes Congress.

        For all these people who want less “socialism” and less “pork”, you’ll get exactly the result you’ll be hoping for.

        Yes, the current bill is almost worthless. But passing it would be far worse for our side than not passing it.

        At least in not passing it, the GOP can properly claim credit for “trying to do something to help manage the waste (even if it fails).

        At that point, if it does fail, the GOP may have a stronger case in trying to tie this original mess to Nancy, Harry, Barry & co.

        • OccamsRazor

          …I yell ‘suewii’, the house speaker comes a runnin’.

  • OccamsRazor

    Passed.

    Unfortunately (even though I personally profit from it).

  • olderthangandalf

    American made, of course, albeit in the early 1840s. Got it about 40% off the price it was listed at in June.

    People are panicking out there, which means that calm people with cash can pick up some bargains.

    You would have me thank Pelosi. I thank the House Republicans, because I think it is inane to argue that the Democrats should have shouldered the burden of this unpopular bill alone (either it’s a bipartisan crisis or it’s not, and going partisan ex post facto is just tacky; worse than that, partisans on either side that try to pin partisan blame on this just make it less likely that politicians will be willing to come together to solve the next crisis because they will know what’s eventually coming).

    Whoever you credit or blame, this storm will pass, and people who have been prudent, who have avoided debt and stockpiled cash, and who keep their cool will do just fine.

  • gamecock

    We are going to have a very hard time over the next 2-4 years, PERIOD. The only issue of consequence in the medium-long term was whether we were going to surrender to socialism writ large and sentence ourselves to very long hard timeS (see “s”).

    We didn’t, thanks to the GOP.

    But let’s not kid ourselves that any law by Congress can prevent death or the consequences of the real estate party we’ve had for more than a decade.

    The piper will be paid, and very soon we will have a crash, and no one will opine that thank God the crash didn’t come in October 2008.