Lee Bollinger's Big Surprise
By Kevin Price Posted in Culture — Comments (27) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I'm watching it as it is happening. Columbia President Lee Bollinger is giving Iranian President Ahmadinejad the public tongue lashing he has long deserved.
Beginning with a warm introduction, Bollinger followed with an inventory of questions that highlight the threat Iran is to the world, including the US. Furthermore, he listed the numerous Human Rights violations the Iranian regime is famous for. Bollinger ended his series of questions by stating that he didn't expect Ahmadinejad to have the "intellectual courage" to answer the queries.
I was shocked. So was the Iranian President who basically countered that Bollinger had "bad manners" according to Iranian standards. The wonderful thing about it, Ahmadinejad spent much of the address countering Bollinger's well put attacks.
So why did Bollinger get tough? I can only speculate, but a few thoughts came to mind:
* He probably got a little tired picking up newspapers and seeing that providing this forum was the equivalent of giving Hitler a forum, giving the President's view of Israel and the West. I'm not sure if that is how Bollinger wants to be remembered.
* I'm sure he has personal disdain over the views of Ahmadinejad. How could he not?
* Maybe it was a planned "set up." An opportunity to take the Iranian president to task with an unusually large audience to watch both in an auditorium and TV.
* He was probably influenced by personal relationships. I'm sure family, friends, and business associates raised questions about the wisdom of such a decision.
* This is my opinion, but the most important reason is that "money talks." How many alumni of Jewish descent threatened to pull the plug on the institution? How many veterans who saw their band of brothers killed at the hands of Iranian terrorists protested? How many supporters of the university who experienced little pain directly from the Iranian monster, but had abundant enough common sense to not tolerate such a choice by the university?
I doubt seriously that Bollinger received "common sense," but instead was influenced by "dollars and cents." I guess we should be glad that, at least on one small level, Bollinger did the right thing. It would have been so much better if he had done the right thing for all the right reasons, which would include not giving this dictator any audience at all.
_________________
Kevin Price is Host of the Houston Business Hour, M-F at 7 AM on CNN 650. Read his opinions at www.BizPlusBlog.com and hear his show 24/7 at www.HoustonBusinessHour.com.
US in Iraq. This was a major admission from the Left and shows just how vile has been their attacks on Bush and prior silence on Iran.
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
short of his resignation from Columbia.
He gave the little tyrant a forum to preach down to us.
No one over there is going to give a fig about Bollinger's questions. All they will see is the little killer standing up at the center of izonist American and preaching to us. Which, by the way, is what a good moslem does before he stabs you in the back.
Bollinger is a self-absorbed twit who deserves no place at the table of prestige or power.
You summarized the damage Bollinger and Columbia University have done.
Bollinger was SCHOOLED. Ahma sidestepped most all his criticism and made it his own forum. You cannot put an amateur in the ring w/ a guy like Ahma, he has no rules. They should have surprised Ahma with Gingrich or someone who can at least debate and not let that weasel weasel out of questions.
The chink in Ahma's armour was the "no homosexuals in Iran" statement. He obviously wasn't prepared for that. If you take away his game he will crumble just like mighty mike tyson.
Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you. Washington Elected Elite
for the point about not being prepared. Did you see the video of John Stossel in the USSR that was up here at Redstate a week or so ago? The person being interviewed did the same thing. Pressed about poverty-stricken Russians, he simply said there was no poverty in Russia, with the same tone to his remark.
Mahmoud knew that question was coming. This was the answer he chose. To prove he didn't have to answer. To prove it was his forum.
absentee
There are no homosexuals in Iran because they kill them.
Is the featured speaker at the 2008 Democrat Presidential Convention. Don't be too tough on him. Look at it this way, at least that bumps foul mouth Whoopie off the list.
so what. Ahmadinejad's audience is not the Western media but the Middle East media. Does anyone hear really think the Middle East media is going to spin this as Bollinger gave him a tongue lashing. They are in love with conspiracy theories over there and they will fall for all of his. Bollinger is a useful idiot for Ahmadinejad.
"The nine most dangerous words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"
Ronald Reagan
that Lee Bollinger is a patriotic American. And when it comes down to it, 99% of the country will stand against this man. Its only the far left loonies that stand quiet. Despite all our political divisions, all Americans liberal and conservative, will stand behind this country and our president against a terrorist like the Iranian president.
-------------------------------------
"As nations can not be rewarded or punished in the next world they must be in this."
- George Mason
a vote of the student body at Columbia to reinstate ROTC on campus, just said "no".
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
him into saying what he all along has known is true but never wanted to say, because to do so means that he would have to accept the logical response, i.e. that we must wage war against a nation that is waging same against us or
admit cowardice by advocating appeasement.
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
I have no doubt that he thinks he is doing the right thing, however he just doesn't understand who he is dealing with. If he thinks this was anything but a PR coup for Ahmadinejad he is fooling himself, he fooled himself frankly into believing that this would do anything but raise this guy's profile at the exact moment that he was starting to be quite isolated. Here is how I saw it...
http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/09/mahmouds-whirlwind-tour-of-...
You have to understand who you are dealing with and Ahmadinejad is a sociopath. He is only going to manipulate this to his advantage the way he always manipulates everything. Do you really think it hurts his public standing that Bollinger questioned him on civil rights, the Holocaust, etc. He wasn't performing for our media or the Western media in general. He was performing for the Middle East media, and they won't spin it as being called out, but rather standing up to the mean, mean Americans and showing them who is boss. His standing in the Middle East just improved exponentially thanks to the useful idiot Lee Bollinger.
"The nine most dangerous words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"
Ronald Reagan
his lack of judgement running a public institution. He needs to step down, now, or be forced out by the NYS legislature. The legislature can take away state funding and/or kill their expansion plans in Harlem.
====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison
in politics, there would be far fewer politicans.
--disc: i am very much against violence.
Name your top three [sociopaths-as-politicians]. Next post, please.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
LBJ--violent outbursts, no guilt for physical attacks on other legislators.
GWB--again, violence, more evidence for nonconformist(see one below)
Nixon--enemies list, lying to America [okay, so this may not have been the worst thing wrong with nixon. he deserves a place here, still]
dsmiv criteria:
1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
4. irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others
6. consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain steady work or honor financial obligations
7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
I am not claiming to be a psychologist, but I can read.
Bye.
Blam*.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
*Feel free to post on some other site about how I'm a psychopath, too. I'm sure that I'll eventually egoogle it. "Egogoogle?" I'm sure there's a word for the practice.
Read my opinions on the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visit to Columbia.
Is Ahmadinejad a dictator or is he being vilified as one?
http://www.hotconflict.com/blog/2007/09/ahmadinejad-say.html
http://www.hotconflict.com/blog/2007/09/columbia-univer.html
Looking at the Hottest issues in the News, Politics and PoP Culture, from inside the Muslim Mind.
It seems your point is that "from inside the Muslim Mind" Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a sympathetic figure, more so than Lee Bolinger.
There certainly appear to be non-Muslims in America who are also sympathetic to the Iranian president's views. Many of his foreign policy positions can be found in Democrat stump speeches, lefty blogs, Democracy Now and so on. And I suppose that his emphasis on piety appeals to a certain segment of Conservatives.
There is a very large portion of us that have absolutely no sympathy for this Iranian though.
This makes for a significant conflict. Since resolution is your expertise, what's to be done? Can you and I resolve our conflict with will and effort?
This includes Bollinger's introduction, too
http://www.theisraelproject.org/atf/cf/%7B84DC5887-741E-4056-8D91-A38916...
Well, who in the world of politics and current events has not watched, analyzed, reviewed, and wondered in-depth just what to say about Columbia inviting the President of Iran to speak on campus? There he was in his trademark outfit, beard, and appealing to the Almighty, as well tsk-tsk to the Columbia President for engaging in bad manners but did he have a good point? I think he did and here is why.
Ahmadinejad knew full well that today's event was a PR gift the Almighty. The leader of the world's number one state-sponsor of terrorism getting to address an Ivy-League school in the same city where 9/11 happened, are you kidding me? Bollinger looked tough and actually said some gutsy things but it was all staged and the speaker took it well. What did everybody think would happen? That Ahmadinejad would go on a rant about blowing Isreal to bits, storming America, and running them out of Iraq? The fact that he kept his composure at all will play well on world and especially Iranian television. Then he says that Iran is a friend to the world, loves Jews, and would not bomb Iran-are you serious? Yet, how many liberal-loving-hate-America-MOUTH'S were clapping at him several times?
Iran is the sole reason that terrorism exists in the world today. Everything about terrorism from either Sunni/Shiite, does not matter, and terrorism stems from what they did on 4 November 1979 and several times thereafter. This is the leader of the country who backs Hezbollah (and lest we forget that prior to 9/11 this organization had the distinction of killing more Americans than al-Qaeda), questions the Holocaust, had stated on more than one occasion that the destruction of the Zionist (i.e., Isreal) is his goal, and believes that the 12th Imam is alive and well in the world today.
Underestimating this one country has been the case for decades. First, Nixon and his team (as beloved as old Dick is to me) completely missed the signs that were there in the early 1970's. Then Ford just skipped it altogether and Carter shows his ignorance of everything (and did because he thought he was God's messenger to Egypt & Isreal). How that the 14 February Revolution could have been missed by any intelligence agency is beyond me. The signs were there and when they took over what did they do? They began a program of going after America that has been pursued ever since.
I am sick of everyone in this country saying that most Iranians love America. We don't know that and the fact that such a high percentage of them vote (even if it is Iran) is a sign that perhaps many Iranians don't care for America at all. Letting the world's number one psycho speak at a university only shows what an idiot he is (and for that I am grateful) but outside of that did it do any good? Only time will tell.
I was interested in hearing Bollinger talk of Columbia alumni serving in the military since the ROTC is not allowed on campus, the Minute Men founder was run off stage last October, and how many of those Columbia students/alumni have ever recited the Pledge of Allegiance?
Joseph Bailey
that was why Nixon was parading around a country that was in reality like a powerkeg.
That was how America dismissed the intel saying that Sadaam did not have WMDs (even though it came from a more credible source).
It's always a danger in people who think alike, to exclude those who think differently.
which is why Democrats should never, ever be trusted with national security.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
While regualrly tolerating the suppression and exclusion of American conservatives, demonstrates the truth in the old saying that degeneracy is when a person cannot recognize the difference between threat and non-threat. And in the final stages of degeneracy, one cannot only not tell the difference, but cannot even be roused to self defense when attacked.
Columbia is very near the final stage of degeneracy.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Can't wait to hear from
by bloochI'm ashamed!
by jdmbamd2It does depend where you are
by Riskytrue dat
by kyle8*Many people [that don't
by ThreeNineNineTrollese
by bloochwhile i think it is great to know a 2nd language
by uglyandproud7Seriously.
by wennejunkMan, but you guys *bristle* so...
by Moe LaneAs far as I know
by ThreeNineNineUpdate: T. Boone Pickens in WSJ today....
by kowalskiI wonder if the D-koz is 'pre-aproved'. n/t
by Jim TomasikI just don't think many
by ThreeNineNineKissy face? How about
by swift93When Mr. Friedman is running
by swift93
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



to the brief news summary of the speech that is up on Drudge. Ahmadinejad's criticisms against the US included "warrantless wiretapping?" You can not make this stuff up.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RS0A5O0&show_article=1