« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Barack Obama, a Black Man, is Now the Most Grotesque Slave Owner in History

By: Blue_Collar_Muse (Diary)  |  November 9th, 2009 at 01:22 PM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

In my inbox Sunday morning was an email from the President of the United States.  He is a black man, or at least black enough that he feels compelled to cast his election in terms of America’s repudiation of racism.  Obviously, such a position has its taproot sunk deeply into the history of slavery in our country.  Which begs the question.

If Barack Obama, the black man, and Democrats, many of whom are black, are so opposed to and horrified by the notion of slavery in our country and are determined to move the country beyond it, why then did they just vote to become the most grotesque slave owners in history?  Other despots in our history merely hated America and the Liberty she stood for and wanted to destroy the United States. Barack Obama and his fellow slave owners hate America and the Liberty she stands for yet do not want to destroy us; they want to compel us to work against our will to provide for them.  The very definition of slavery.

According to Dictionary.com, slavery is: “The condition of a slave; bondage. The keeping of slaves as a practice or institution. Severe toil; drudgery.”

Its synonyms and their meaning are even more damning to Democrats:

Thralldom, enthrallment. Slavery, bondage, servitude refer to involuntary subjection to another or others. Slavery emphasizes the idea of complete ownership and control by a master … Bondage indicates a state of subjugation or captivity often involving burdensome and degrading labor … Servitude is compulsory service, often such as is required by a legal penalty …

That Barack Obama and Democrats may be offended by this truth or deny it is irrelevant.  They are slave owners, now.  They have subjected millions of Americans to work to provide for them involuntarily.  They own this nation’s Producers and control them.  They determine what will be produced and will require millions to labor to produce it for millions more under penalty of fines or imprisonment.  No one has the right to fail to participate.

What they are forced to participate in is not the recognition of a human right such as Life or Liberty. That would make those orchestrating the conflict liberators and visionaries.  What they are being forced to provide under threat of serious penalties is a consumer good. Like the cotton of the first American slave owners, health care will now be produced by today’s slaves for sale to eager consumers willing to be purposefully ignorant of the circumstances under which it is produced.  This brings profit to the slave owners and happiness to the consumer on the backs of the slaves. The analogy is both proper and complete. Barack Obama is not a liberator.  He is a slaver. His legacy will be that a sitting President of the United States – once the symbol of Liberty around the world – trafficked in human flesh for his own profit.

What remains to be seen is how this Master deals with the inevitable slave’s rebellion. It is coming and it will not take decades. Because I will not submit to shackles. I will not be compelled to labor for the comfort of others. I will not live a single day as less than a free man. It is my heritage and my birthright as both a Christian and an American.  I am free and will remain so. I will not be a slave. I am not alone in this. If Barack Obama and Democrats think they have won some sort of victory here they are as ignorant of history as they are of human nature.

I will be free or I will die fighting for my freedom. Barack Obama calls for me to lay down my Liberty.  I dare him, if he is man enough, to come and take it from me himself.

Cross posted from Blue Collar Muse

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • Warrior

    Once the gubmint, at all levels, takes mores than say, 25% of my income, I have become enslaved to them.

    I will gladly provide up to 25% to allow for national defense, state troopers, garbage, collection, fire police and the courts. It is more than enough if used responsibly.

    Again, the problem is that TOO MUCH MONEY GOES TO DC! Sorry for the capitals.

    Corruption inevitably follows, as everyone from municipalities to states subject themselves to greater and greater servitude to get “their share” of the dole. It must stop.

    To understand their mindset, one must see it as they do:

    Politics is the new religion.
    Gubmint is the new church.
    The Law is the new scripture.
    Sex is the new sacrament.
    (And of course we know who the new Annointed One is)

    Plug in just about any action or philosophy by the Dems/Libs and it will fit into this formula.

    As the inimitable G.K. Chesterton said:

    “?When men stop believing in God they don?t believe in nothing; they believe in anything.?

  • extirpates

    The White House occupant is not black. His mother was white, so he is a combination of ingredients product.

    You certainly cannot call a Zebra black or white, but both and neither.

    Additionally, Zebra’s are not a native species to the United States.

    • http://bluecollarmuse.com Blue_Collar_Muse

      If you’ll re-read the diary you’ll see I noted his “less than complete blackness” from the very beginning.

      In my inbox Sunday morning was an email from the President of the United States. He is a black man, or at least black enough that he feels compelled to cast his election in terms of America?s repudiation of racism. Obviously, such a position has its taproot sunk deeply into the history of slavery in our country. Which begs the question.

      The point is not that he is a black man. In truth, at 12%, I am almost as black as he is. The point is that Obama, the media and the Left and on and on are harping on his blackness. To them, he is 100% black. Which is fine. I don’t really care.

      But the question is still valid. How can this black man justify his enslavement of a nation given the history of blacks in America?

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    When I hear people talk of this, that’s the only reference made. I cannot remember if there is one race that have never been enslaved by another at some point in history, often by peoples of the same race.

    Africans were sold into slavery by other Africans. Some of the first slaves in the colonies were the Irish headcount bound to servitude, most of whom were unwilling to be so shackled but were prisoners of one sort or another. The continent of Australia was settled using the labor of convicts from English prisons.

    The Romans enslaved many in their quest to expand their empire. And so on throughout history.

    This administration and liberals as a whole neglect history and concentrate on only the most superficial qualities to make their claims.

  • Leopard1996

    It was my contention all along, that Obama’s election was to put a black face on white Berkley Liberal policies.

    Oh BTW, for those that don’t know I am black, so for those that are going to make the racism charge, they can shove it.

  • derhoosier

    The Democrat Party is now and always has been the party of slavery and death.

  • JadedByPolitics

    to the federal government…..GREAT diary!

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    in his memoir, “My Grandfather’s son,” and said when a friend challenged him with this idea he finally woke up and started understanding the ideals of conservatism.

  • marshmom

    the “rich” (people who make $200,000 or more) will have to begin paying 45% in federal taxes to pay for “health care for all”. Then you’ve got state taxes and all other taxes.
    Before all is said and done, some will be paying 50%-60% of their salaries to the government–whether they agree with how their money is spent or not. If that’s not slavery, I don’t know what is.

    The scary part is……that still won’t be enough and if people let them, they won’t stop until they take everything we have. These people HAVE to be stopped!!

  • mosander

    While chains were not used as they lived on a big island and kept in such poverty and they could not own land and worked for the landowners who were nobles but must pay tax to the crown for the land assigned to them. See “Brave Heart” which is Hollywood’s version history to realize the price it takes to gain freedom. Blacks were certainly not the only slaves. And now a black man is taking them down and everyone else at the same time.

  • Return to Revolution

    my thoughts exactly.

  • jasonva

    He comes by it honestly. Remember – his ancestors, on his mother’s side, were documented slave owners. On his father’s side, as ruling class, Muslim, East Africans, there’s a very good chance they were slave traders. Maybe we need to lay off the hate and realize that he is merely a victim of his heredity.