« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Republican Leaders Must Put Principles Before Parochial Politics

If McCotter and Camp want to be GOP leaders, they should renounce auto bailout

Reps. Thaddeus McCotter and Dave Camp want to be among the next generation of House GOP leaders. McCotter is running for reelection as chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee and Camp is angling to be ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee.

Both lawmakers hail from Michigan, and for that reason, they support a bailout of the Big Three automakers. Congressmen should take the interests of their constituents into consideration — and no doubt that’s precisely what McCotter and Camp feel that they are doing. But they need to remember that if a precedent is set for bailing out ailing private industries, this will hurt their constituents immensely in the long run.

Party leaders should never let parochial politics trump principle. That’s what led to the GOP’s downfall in the first place. If the auto bailout is a test of principles, members of the House GOP need to give deep thought to the men they put in control of these two important posts. It helps that there are credible alternatives; both races feature conservatives who oppose the auto bailout.

Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Tex.), currently vice chairman of the Policy Committee, has been working overtime to unseat McCotter. Burgess’ approach to the job is both innovative and inspiring. He’s crafted an eight-point Contract with the GOP Conference and wants Republicans to stop being so reactive and engage on issues like health care.

McCotter, who like Burgess voted against the $700 billion bailout, last month joined with his liberal Michigan colleagues to support government intervention in the auto industry. “In this current economic environment it is imperative that the government ensures that liquidity is restored so that the U.S. auto industry is able to function until normalcy is restored to credit markets,” McCotter wrote to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke with other members of the state’s congressional delegation.

I like McCotter personally and appreciate his candid approach to politics, but if the auto bailout is the GOP’s first chance at redemption, what message does it send if the chairman of the Republican Policy Committee supports government intervention?

The other race, which won’t be decided until early December, pits Camp against Rep. Wally Herger (R-Calif.) for the top GOP spot on the powerful Ways and Means Committee. This job requires someone who can go toe-to-toe with Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.). One account of Camp’s involvement in the Detroit bailout describes him as “making the case for the automakers with the White House.” We don’t need a dealmaker. We need a fighter.

If McCotter and Camp want to be GOP leaders, they should renounce the auto bailout. Otherwise, Republicans should think long and hard about who they anoint as leaders of the party.

COMMENTS

  • Kayla

    Hello??? If you produce a product but you can’t sell it at a price to cover your expenses, you will go under. Economics 101. Even if the Big 3 is given this bailout in 6 mos they need another, because their business model is flawed. So NO BAILOUT!!!!

  • Pingback: ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Bad Policy From GOP?s Policy Chairman

  • Pingback: ledeagenda.com » Rep. McCotter Needs To Resign From The GOP Policy Committee

  • aaronbg

    Principled leadership is a must.

  • mikefisk

    …I don’t see how a Michigan Congressman can really effectively oppose the bailout and then gain re-election in 2010… there aren’t really many “safe” seats for Republicans in the state (besides maybe Hoekstra in MI-2), principles aside.

    As much as I hate the bailout, holding that against otherwise sound conservatives like Camp and McCotter sounds like a continuation of the circular firing squad the party is going through at the moment.

  • izoneguy

    When the auto industry tanks, it will be like a nuclear bomb has hit Detroit. The fact you had the auto execs fly to Washington in private jets and stipulate that having them is non-negotiable kinda tells the other part of the story.

    Michigan won’t be the same place in 2 years and if all democrats will have to run on is that they say it was the Republicians fault that the bail-out did not go through and that is why Michigan is in a depression…

    Michigan will keep losing people and business’s and it won’t have near the importance in America that it used to have.

  • E_Pluribus_Unum

    All the way with you, Bluey. I’ve been on balance pretty pleased with McCotter – but this union-sustenance thing (auto bailout) is NOT something any serious conservative should even closely consider.

  • Augustus

    I am a lifelong conservative from Michigan although I don’t live in either Camp’s or McCotter’s district. I am totally opposed to the auto bailout. However, the only blood oath a Congressman has sworn is with his constituents. It is Camp’s and McCotter’s responsibility to represent their constituents and their district. If Camp and McCotter feel they are best serving their constituents and districts by supporting the auto bailout, then so be it. The auto bailout won’t pass anyway so long as the Senate Republicans hold the line so why should Camp and McCotter commit political suicide over one issue that us armchair bloggers have the luxury of disagreeing with!

  • eburke

    This auto bailout is a moment of truth in the GOPs reascendance (or continued decline)

    If the last 2-4-6-8 years should have taught us anything it’s that while ‘bipartisanship’ sounds all warm and fuzzy in theory, in reality it’s doomed to fail because it’s, well, fuzzy. You can’t distinguish yourself from you ideological opponents if you have a record of supporting half of his agenda (please reference our last presidential candidate on a litany of issues not the least of which was the $700 bailout)

    This auto bailout is a hanging curveball for the GOP. Outside of the union halls of MI, this tawdry bailout strikes a nerve on Main Street America – bailing out greedy unions and fat cat corporate execs…again. This is tailor-made for a primer on free market economics and to pound home the point that the Rs stand for the average person and capitalism, and the Ds stand for business as usual, influence pedalling and socialism.

    I understand that both these gentlemen might both lose their seats for taking a principled stand (although not necessarily) However, whatever short-term negative impact there is to those two seats will, IMO, be vastly outweighed in the rest of the country as the Republican party is able to speak with one voice to the rest of the country that we are the party that rewards success and doesn’t subsidize failure with your money.

  • Pingback: Bluey’s blog » Bad Policy From GOP’s Policy Chairman ::

  • Pingback: Bluey?s blog ? Republican Leaders Must Put Principles Before …