« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Poor Judgment as USSC Qualification. What’s Next?

After appointing a tax evader to run the Treasury Department, a Homeland Security Secretary that doesn’t know what a terrorist is, and don’t forget one of the more comical choices (I bet Obama wishes he could) the gaffe machine VP- I guess considering the track record of the President’s appointments that it should come as no great surprise they have actually had to hold press conferences for his choice for United States Supreme Court to discuss her admittedly poor judgment.

Obama’s top spokesman, Robert Gibbs, told reporters about Sotomayor: “I think she’d say that her word choice in 2001 was poor.”… “I’m sure she would have restated it,” Obama flatly told NBC News, without indicating how he knew that.

What’s next? Contracting the French out to run the war effort? Turning over election oversight to Acorn?

If poor judgment is acceptable and the primary qualifications for a justice are instead diversity and empathy, obviously then justice is not a main concern nor will it be served.

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    But he can’t. Either can Soto. Until Obama or Algore invents time travel. But she is getting a pass in the mean time.

    Ends justify the means, affirmative action, and all that stuff.

  • BooBooKitty

    and someone pursuing that level of office should know better regardless of the fairness. Yet she stated a belief and even elaborated (notice no one claims this was out of context)- he was burned by the media and she gets a promotion by the President.

  • Common_Cents

    Nobody but political opponents will pay for their words.

    Words matter!