« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

What’s in Your Stocking This Holiday Season? What’s in Al-Qaeda’s?

What’s in Your Stocking This Holiday Season? You won’t need Shawn and the Guster on the case if you are one of the over 50 million US citizens that will travel by air during Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. That’s because the answer is all too easy- it will be the latex gloved hand of a TSA agent that you will find in your stocking… and inside the waistband of your pants, feeling you up, and patting down your nether regions. However, the question that apparently may require a psychic detective since I don’t see this issue being pushed vigorously is what will be missing from your stocking this year- your rights. Because this Christmas those rights have been gifted to Al-Qaeda (and yes, I know they don’t celebrate the season… or go to strip clubs).

Personally, the touchy, feely smurf hands of the TSA don’t bother me too bad. Yes I have been through the pornoscanner and no, I didn’t feel the need for a shower afterwards. As a fairly frequent business flyer I cannot risk a no-fly/red flag designation on my ID, so I stay in-the-know on current protocols and plan in advance to avoid problems in the security queue. For the most part, I think the TSA is just doing their job. If I had to complain about the TSA it would not be the scanners or pat downs, but instead the occasional soup-nazi glare and attitude they give to inexperienced and foreign flyers for not understanding “the system”. It may be their job and my livelihood, but the occasional traveler is more concerned about getting to grandma’s house or the game on time than the fluid capacity of their shampoo bottle. IMHO, if the TSA and HS spent half as much time on sensitivity training and how to treat all passengers with dignity and respect like they do for adherents to Islam this would greatly ease the current tension.

No my main problem is that we, as in the media, the left, the right, all seem to be fixated on the process instead of the cause- the terrorists. Yes- concerning pornoscanners and body searches I am infuriated that we have to subject ourselves to this indignity, but we need to stop blaming the TSA. Focus our fury instead on the terrorist and how we have gifted them our rights instead of destroying the enemy. So the next time you have a latex glove shoved under your waist band get mad, get furious, and demand a better solution. Demand that our soldiers operate under logical rules of engagement that allow them to efficiently eliminate the enemy. Demand intelligent profiling; certainly this is no worse than any of the other aggressive measures to which we are all now subjected during a time of war. Demand that terrorists are dealt with under the rules of war, not in our civil system where Ahmed Ghailani was appointed better legal representation that any common citizen could have imagined to receive. Demand that our politicians push to prosecute this war with vigor and without apology. Both parties seem so concerned about how you define victory so I’ll lay it out easy for them- victory is when an act of terrorism is considered an aberration, the act of a psychopath instead of the latest success of a known group that has the stated intention of destroying our way of life.

I think we should all focus on the real enemy here which is the terrorist, not the TSA. Yes, I am sure there is improvements they can make to the system but they are a necessary evil as long as these bad people make it a habit of trying to blow planes out of the sky. Let’s drop the PC and sensitivity and make sure our government does the same- we are at war and we need to destroy the enemy post-haste. Next holiday season if we all have to go through the latest TSA protocols, then let’s make sure that Al-Qaeda gets a visit from Sully the Seal instead of a stocking filled by Santa with our rights!

COMMENTS

  • spainishirish

    I seriously doubt the “pedophile pats” and the Porncameras will make one iota of difference as to whether or not there is another plane-related terror attack. On the other hand, we need to direct our ire at those truly responsible for this debasement of our lives and civil liberties, and demand our policymakers take substantive actions against the terrorists here and abroad.

    The enemy isn’t the TSA. It is al-Qaeda and policies crafted by our craven MoC’s and president to give the illusion of security even at the expense of basic human, civil, and constitutional rights.

  • eastbaylarry

    will stop the next attack. Even if we throw in ‘criminal profiling’ ala El Al, the scanners and pat-downs will not be any help.

    And after the next ‘man caused disaster’ is traced to explosives in a body cavity, will you then be ‘ok’ with body cavity searches for yourself, grandma and toddlers?

  • Menlo

    First of all, Islamic terrorists aren’t half the threat of free Chinese trade.

    Secondly, I wouldn’t give a fig even if it did keep planes safer (and one would have to be delusional to think it might). It would STILL be wrong! Such attitudes show surrender to the Islamic terrorists (that again are not the greatest threat to the nation).

    As I said earlier, nothing more is warranted than what was done 30-40 years ago.

  • BooBooKitty

    did you hire Shawn and Gus or are you just so absolutely sure of your expertise in the field that these methods are totally ineffective- even if just indirectly? And no, I’m not OK with body cavity searches and consider such an argument as pointless since I do no think anyone is so why debate it- but do want them to try to do as much as possible to keep grandma and the toddlers safe.

    As stated, I do think they could improve the system but still see the greatest results coming from making life for the terrorist so difficult that they lay off anything that affects me, my family, or country in any manner… or they are eradicated. Either way- it’s the only way I know that effectively addresses the root of the problem.

  • BooBooKitty

    Question: Would you say that the threat of free Chinese trade is the more of a danger to the passengers of a Boeing 767 out of Logan International than an Islamic terrorist?

    As for the other part of my “nonsense” piece; Yes, I do think things could be improved but thinking that nothing more is warranted than what was done 30 to 40 years ago is not a solution but surrender and just accepting an attack as inevitable. I prefer a more proactive solution.

  • BooBooKitty

    Question: Would you say that the threat of free Chinese trade is the more of a danger to the passengers of a Boeing 767 out of Logan International than an Islamic terrorist?

    As for the other part of my ?nonsense? piece; Yes, I do think things could be improved but thinking that nothing more is warranted than what was done 30 to 40 years ago is not a solution but surrender and just accepting an attack as inevitable. I prefer a more proactive solution.

  • Menlo

    If China makes the parts for the plane, then it would be a greater threat. If Boeing has not yet jumped on the Chinese bandwagon, I’m sure it will soon.

    I’d say you are the one surrendering (to the government). I do believe that the government is the enemy in this case. While I understand a lot of the concern, I think a lot of people have gone overboard, and it seems many have become paranoid since September 11.

  • eastbaylarry

    For all the hype about ‘keeping us safe’, the current procedures are not even effective at finding possible *real* threats:

    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/adam-savage-tsa-saw-my-junk-missed-12-razor-blades.ars

    The link above tells of 12 inch razor blades brought through the TSA screening, (accidently), without being detected.

    Is this the ‘level of safety’ we are willing to buy with the sale of our Constitutional rights?