« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

In Nobody’s Camp

For this primary season, like many other conservatives I know, Perry was my man.  If he jumped in the race today, he’d still be my man.  Nevertheless, I believe in moving on, and I’ve been earnestly searching for a replacement since the great state of Texas took back the great hope of conservatism.  CPAC provided a great opportunity to gain insight from many people who’s opinions I highly regard.  What it did not do, however, was provide a clear answer as to who I should cling to in the bitter fight for my Bible and guns.

I’ve been in the anyone but Romney camp since the beginning; apologies to those that are in the Romney camp who I know and love.  I simply can’t get behind a guy who couldn’t even beat McCain.  While he seems smoother and slightly less robotic after 6 years of campaigning, he still stands behind his government mandated healthcare.  America just isn’t going to care about the nuances between RomneyCare and ObamaCare and that gives the Democrats a huge strategic advantage.  One of the biggest issues facing our country today will be off the table for discussion; unless you can get a country full of politically disinterested people to hone in on the intricacies of federalism when most are already tired of politics not even midway through the primary season.  It shouldn’t go unnoticed either that the media has been working extra hard to beat us into the submission that Romney is, in fact, our eventual candidate and we should fall in line as quickly as possible or risk being alienated (since we don’t know what that feels like). Anyone backed by the media is worthy of a healthy dose of skepticism.

Very much not backed by the media is Santorum and I’ll admit to having been on the fence with the guy.  I love the role his faith plays in his everyday life.  He understands what it means to be a Christ follower and he’s unafraid to stand firm in his beliefs; a rare find in the political world.  He also gets conservatism and what it stands for.  Unfortunately, he follows that up with big government solutions that would further confuse the public, many of whom already think Bush represents conservatism.  So while Santorum gets it … he kind of doesn’t.  What really threw me over the fence, however, was the difference between his public persona and his personal one.  People that I know (and trust) who have met him in person have found him to be as whiny as his reputation.  I haven’t personally met Santorum, which is funny because I was supposed to at two different times during CPAC.  Only, while he said he was going to be available for the little people like me, he stood us up; not once, but twice.  I can take a hint.  You love Jesus, but you don’t love me.  It’s cool.  You’ll be stuck with me in Heaven, maybe we can chat then.

That leaves me with Newt, who I voted for in my primary.  His personal life has never been an issue for me.  As a Christian, I understand the power of redemption and I stand with Newt and everyone else on the planet as a sinner.  If you don’t understand the concept of Jesus’ saving grace, I’d be happy to discuss it with you. ‘Nuff said.  As for his record, he presided over the first Republican congressional majority in decades.  Budgets were passed, taxes were cut, welfare was reformed.  But like Perry, the people simply aren’t responding.  The reaction to him at CPAC was tepid and it comes as no surprise that he placed third in the straw poll. Overall it seems he has the credentials, but for some reason he’s just not that exciting.

So I’m left in nobody’s camp.  It’s becoming a comfortable place actually.  I don’t mind my friends criticizing each other’s candidate, I’m not married to anyone.  I can still hope for a VP that may infuse some excitement into the race; as long as the media doesn’t rape them as they did Palin.  Unlike the lackluster McCain candidacy, this campaign doesn’t have to blow away the competition.  America has lived in Obama-Land for some time now and many are ready to reclaim the freedoms, and jobs, they’ve lost over the last four years.  I look forward to backing whoever wins the GOP nomination and, in that sentiment, I know I’m not alone. Being ready for this dreary primary season to be over is the only camp we all seem to agree on.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • texastaxpayer

    Left with know one to vote for just a list to vote against. I can’t believe its come to this. What a shame.

    • keepourrepublic

      You know, the guy who is pro-life (he delivered thousands of babies), served in the military and gets more donations from active duty military then all the other candidates combined, and who genuinely wants to limit the federal government to the bounds of the constitution.

      Or would voting for the conservative in the race be too extreme or something? But in your heart you know he’s right.

      • ceili_dancer

        Using it on Israel. If the vessel is cracked, it doesn’t work as well as it should.

        • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

          but he doesn’t truly get it or he would keep our men and women in uniform out there keeping the wolves off our doorsteps.

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    I “cain’t” improve what’s been said with comment. No Text.

  • acat

    If Perry were to un-suspend, I’d have to take a hard look at the maps and see if he has a chance, but .. I’d prefer him to the weather vane, the horndog, the nanny-statist, or the quack.

    We really don’t have a good choice, just less bad ones.

    Mew

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    But first, I rarely actually spell out the entire user names of commenters, but Breeanne is so lovely and so unique that I had to show my admiration…

    As a long time member of since soon after the beginning in the mid-2000 naughts and a conservative epiphany convert in the Summer of 2001 after 20 yrs as a Dem party activist, I am quite familiar with and a proud participant in the Redstate conservative mission to push the GOP ever further to the right for smaller government and remain so, BUT

    Can we get real about the word “big” in Big Government? Especially concerning those Republicans that have actually served in government and that ran for same.

    Who is for getting rid of Soc Sec in specific terms at an early date? Same with Medicare and Medicaid? None. Not even Ron Paul.

    Pols have to deal with the reality of a people that have been smoking the BGov crack pipe for 70+ years and to call Santorum a BG despite his sterling voting record for 15+ years is to exalt the perfect over the very good.

    Even Perry, who I supported until his Bain attacks pre-SC, doesn’t meet the imagined test. and he had the luxury of having never served in DC.

    Even most tea partiers elected in 2010 have voted for BG many times.

    Do let’s stop pretending that its the 19th Century…

    more later

    GREAT COLUMN

  • Viet71

    Obama’s a con man supreme. Go ask the Left. Neither Newt, Romney, nor Santorum is.

    Americans always fall for the con. The serious money is on Big O.

    Given this, while I largely agree with your diary and could vote for Mitt, I’m thinking it may be better to go out with a bang rather than a whimper.

  • Change Jar Conservative

    Romney — not sure he can win given Romneycare. not sure how he’d govern.

    Santorum — not sure he’d reduce the deficit. not sure that he has a chance.

    Gingrich — The least electable of all in the polls and in the people I talk to on a regular basis.

    Paul — Probably the most likely to win. Would probably do fine on fiscal efforts. have no idea if he’s a crazy racist or just stupid on international issues.

    If I thought that a brokered convention would have the best chance at getting us someone else then I would go there with whatever strategy would work for that.

    As it sits, I will probably vote Gingrich in Georgia to hope he splits the vote.

  • JSobieski

    Just got an robo call inviting me to a telephone town meeting. Heard an add playing Santorum’s 2008 endorsement of Romney. There are a couple of anti-Santorum ads being run by Romney, but not even one single positive Romney ad.

    I wonder if I am the only one who finds Romney’s ads to be annoying?

    I am so hoping for a brokered convention and a change of heart by Mrs. Daniels.

    Daniels/Perry?
    Perry/Daniels?
    Bush/Daniels?
    Daniels/Bush?
    Bush/Ryan?

    Lord help us!

  • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

    Romney-Agree his record looks much the same as Obama’s and I’m certain he’ll run to the center in a general. I can’t support that.

    Santorum-His voting record is Romeny-light as far as I can tell, but he at least has never passed socialized medicine and as far as I can see really is a social conservative.

    Gingrich-I’d like to hear how his willingness to divorce two women can be overcome in the general and isn’t a character issue for conservatives but I agree with you there.

    Paul-Totally disagree. He’s the least likely to win. He is totally unelectable imo. The only reason he is running as a republican is because it gets him the spotlight and a shot. If he ran as what he is, a Libertarian, he’d never be heard nor have a shot. Ron Paul is only interested in what is good for Ron Paul staying in a position of authority.

    I’m currently voting Santorum but I’d support your vote for Gingrich over Romney as he’s (Gingrich) currently my #2.

  • elayman

    Reagan had to make coalitions with the religious right and social conservatives but at the end of the day he talked the talk much more than walked the walk. Santorum has fashioned a career on fighting libertarianism , makes hateful, off color, incendiary remarks the cornerstone of his campaign and I have no faith at all doesn’t believe the federal government needs to enforce his ?conservative? personal beliefs on everyone. He can talk now about Reagan principles of strong national defense, limited government and individual liberty but the record his more like an George W. Bush Republican.

    Gingrich is perhaps the most genuinely conservative but they are all three basically bigger fans of more government than they are of more freedom,

  • acat

    It’s either Mitch Daniels / Rand Paul, or Jeb Bush / Rand Paul.

    Think of how different ’68 would have been if, instead of Nixon/Agnew, it had been Reagan/Rockefeller …

    Mew

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Every one of them quit, either before or duing the election.

    Why are we suddenly interested in nominating a quitter? What if the general election gets too hard and they decide to quit during that one like McCain did?

    Sorry, I just don’t see selecting (not electing) a quitter to represent us as being a winning strategy.

  • belcatar

    Scott Walker and Paul Ryan? There’s a ticket I could support.

  • Scope

    especially when everything bad that has happened was w fault, still to this day. Seems it was like yesterday when many R’s ran from the R party straight to the Independent status because of Bush’s big spending, compassionate conservative policies. Try putting a third Bush positive into a 30 second sound bite, which obviously the voters seem to be going for big time.

    Another Bush in Nov. 2012 is the fantasy of those that are willing to see Obama win in one of the biggest landslides in history. Hel1, I will not vote for another Bush again in my lifetime.

    One of the greatest W quotes- ” Fool me once……shame on …..me, and you can never fool me again.”

  • Matt Genk

    You’ve wrapped up my sentiments exactly. I hoped to be inspired at CPAC, but left regretting my attitude and presumption that one of the remaining candidates could raise my hopes. Instead, I wish I would have spent more time talking to you while I had the opportunity, and the same can be said for thousands of other conservatives. I popped my CPAC cherry, and now know what to expect.

  • Viet71

    Why would Reagan/Rockefeller (yuk) have been so much better in 1968. No scandals, no Watergate? If so, suggest you read “Secret Agenda.” eom

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    No more Bushs, and no more Clintons, ever, Let’s close the book on that sorry chapter of our history.

  • acat

    Ron Paul throws his delegates and his unfaithful-romney-delegates to someone in exchange for Rand getting the veep slot.

    Mitch Daniels and Jeb Bush are two compromise candidates who – on paper – should be able to appeal enough to the establishment and activist wings of the party to seal the deal.

    I don’t think another Bush is a great idea – although the “Third time lucky” slogan might work – but at this point I’m not sure he’s worse than what’s left.

    Mew

  • JSobieski

    The entire campaign season has been about trying to find the least depressing candidate.

  • jamesm

    get a big cat and take away their cheese.

  • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

    How’s that workin’ out for us?

  • Viet71

    Obama is a con man supreme in that he’s a psychopath on some level.

  • elayman

    Or maybe he has the normal amount of empathy for the epitome of a greedy wall street type and it is more a Mormon (?) temperament thing.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    .

  • funwithknives

    a Ham on Rye ,w/Swiss, could whip Barry by 10 points or better. But then a reality check intruded, and Ms. Howe sums it up, quite rightly.
    A Brighter Beacon is needed to snap the GOP electorate out of this stupor.
    The Progressive alternative is not frightening enough, it would seem. In November, 2010 who would’a thunk it? Incredible.

  • resser

    that will make the nominee — Romney or Santorum, I guess — palatable and will bring people to the pols. Of course, that didn’t really work out for McC, so who knows.

  • WillWong

    nt

  • razor

    > Being ready for this dreary primary season to be over is the only camp we all seem to agree on.

    Amen on that. I’m also (still) in no one’s camp, and will rally fervently to the aid of whomever is our guy. I like how you addressed each candidate’s strengths and weaknesses.

    The one part I’d take issue with is Newt being exciting. He *can* fire up a crowd and excite people, but right now his influence is down. Florida took a lot out of him, and he’s regrouping. Plus, he’s got no wind in his sails without debates to push him forward. His last couple of debates weren’t his strongest, so even the prospect of that wind blowing again does not encourage his supporters. But all of this is a temporary snapshot; it won’t last, and he’ll excite conservative crowds once again.

    All in all, a sound analysis.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    great work

  • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

    n/t

  • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

    I’m walking along beside you in the undecided category right now. Sorely disappointed in who we have to choose from.

  • Dave_A

    To avoid being called the ‘male Palin’…

    He’ll win, of course, but he has to stick around for it…

    And Paul Ryan really, really doesn’t want the job.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    and that goes double for the Bushes

  • tnguy

    I feel much like this myself.

    The only thing I would add to it is this: if Romney and Santorum are who they appear to be, we’re going to go another 4 years without a conservative president, regardless of who wins in November. Another 4 years without the dramatic changes that I believe are immediately essential if our way of life is to be saved, and even then, I’d add the caveat that a solution may no longer even be possible.

    Still worse, if a republican non-conservative wins in November, then we’re staring at a full 8 years with no hope of a conservative in the white house. That should be a very sobering thought for everyone here.

    We need massive changes now, and the only person who even hinted at that has already been dismissed from the race. Few even seem willing to acknowledge what we’re facing, but rather discuss this as if it is a football game, and they’re just hoping their team can win.

  • explodinghead

    First glimpse back at Red State. Since Perry dropped out I stopped wanting to be involved. Thanks for the diary. I understand where you are coming from Breeanne. For my own sanity I have stopped following the primary. My vote will be “against Obama”.

  • belcatar

    If Walker lost the recall, it could be like Obi-Wan Kenobi…”Strike me down and I will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.”

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    I think Newt excites people, but they know he has little chance of beating Obama. Romney likely did not even hurt his image as much as showed people that a few million can harm him, what will a billion and a blast of the MSM will do to a candidate that has so much baggage. I am fully in the, I forgive Newt camp, but I am also in the camp that believes that his baggage will turn the ones we need off, and that make him toxic to those who put winning above all else.

    I am not so sure about Obama being as hated as some contend, because I have not seen that in the data outside of Republican circles. In the world I live in, he is not liked many people, but those are the same people who never come out to vote, who blame whoever is in power, and really do not have a clue about what is really going on in the country outside their jobs, their church, and whatever they choose to do in the meantime. I think this is the people we have to meet and convince to come out. I just know we have to get through the MSM to do that, and that alone will be hard enough, now adding a candidate like Romney or Gingrich in the mix, I see pending doom.

    Where is all the true patriots when we need them. I have also tried to like these candidates as I did Perry, but it is hard when I know deep down there is so much to not like.