« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Fairness Doctrine on Steroids is On the Way

The evidence is mounting day by day that the left is getting ready to use the new power they have in the Obama Administration and Congress to reinstate something similar to The Fairness Doctrine.  Two Senators recently expressed an interest in providing government mandated “balance” to talk radio.  Liberal Democrats are preparing to use the full force of the federal government to attack conservative talk radio, especially leaders like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Matt Drudge, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and other conservative/libertarian leaders.  

Liberal Senators will use the roadmap written by the left wing Center for American Progress I refer to as the Fairness Doctrine on Steroids that would implement a comprehensive stifling of conservative talk radio. The lefty’s idea is different from the fairness doctrine, yet it would be a more effective tool to stifle conservatives on the radio. So much for the First Amendment.

Two good catches by Michael Calderone of the Politico that show liberal Senator’s intentions. Calderon linked an interview by Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) with lefty talk show host Bill Press on The Politico.  Press cried about liberal talk radio failing and the need for government mandated balance and Harkin responded the following:

That’s why we need the fair — that’s why we need the Fairness Doctrine back.

Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich) recently talked to Press and Press asked Stabenow whether the Fairness Doctrine should be reinstated.

I think it’s absolutely time to pass a standard. Now, whether it’s called the Fairness Standard, whether it’s called something else — I absolutely think it’s time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves. I mean, our new president has talked rightly about accountability and transparency. You know, that we all have to step up and be responsible. And, I think in this case, there needs to be some accountability and standards put in place.

Stabenow referenced the bait and switch that the left is using to attack talk radio.  They say that the Fairness Doctrine is not the correct way to mute Rush — they have a new plan.

In the Center for American Progress paper titled The Structural Imbalance of Talk Radio the left complains that

Our analysis in the spring of 2007 of the 257 news/talk stations owned by the top five commercial station owners reveals that 91 percent of the total weekday talk radio programming is conservative, and 9 percent is progressive.  Each weekday, 2,570 hours and 15 minutes of conservative talk are broadcast on these stations compared to 254 hours of progressive talk—10 times as much conservative talk as progressive talk.  A separate analysis of all of the news/talk stations in the top 10 radio markets reveals that 76 percent of the programming in these markets is conservative and 24 percent is progressive, although programming is more balanced in markets such as New York and Chicago.

The problem from their perspective is that conservative talk radio absolutely kills with the ratings, therefore they need the government to help force feed boring liberal talk radio on America.

The solution they propose includes three specific government actions for a de facto nationalization of talk radio:

  1. Limit the number of stations one evil conservative company can own both locally and nationally;
  2. Shorten license terms so they can use government pressure to get snoozers like Bill Press on more radio stations; and,
  3. Require that these broadcasters prove that they operate in the “public interest” including the government mandated reporting requirements that the content of the programs contain both popular conservative viewpoints and unpopular liberal viewpoints.

If Big Brother deems your content to not be in the public interest, your company will have to pay a tax to fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.  Get ready for the liberals to use the power of the federal government to shut up Rush.

COMMENTS

  • bs

    they have to use force.

    But their biggest problem is that they’re so bloody boring that no one wants to listen to them.

    • Rod_Patrick

      When they speak lies, it’s about freedom of speech. When we call their attention for their incompetencies and lies, they call it “unfair”. Fairness Doctrine of the Dems is tantamount to “Hey, Reps, Shut Up!!!”.

      Why didn’t they push for it during the time of the last administration? Simple. It would work against them…they would never be in a very satisfying position like the current one, if (un) fairness doctrine had been pursued by the Bush Administration.

      So to the Dimwits, stop it!…. Just stop.

  • jimmuy8

    On so many fronts–and we can’t even rally to win on ONE! Everywhere I look I see the GOP abandon the field, retreat and roll-over.

    Find a line, hold, counter-attack. Start with the easy targets within your ranks, those who work against, fail to fight. Better a focused minority than a listless amalgam. I’ll take concentrated focus over “big tent” every day of the week.

  • katesmith

    Most of them would be happier without radio too. When Trent Lott was in the Senate, he was quoted saying talk radio is a big problem.The only people who care in sufficient numbers are outside DC. Those conservatives interested in this issue might focus on forcing Katie Couric to sit next to Rush Limbaugh while sharing the news. ABC, NBC, MSNBC, Fox, NPR, all PBS news shows, all C-span hosts should have to share with Dr, Savage at least 1 day a week. This is the only approach to take about this issue and the correct one.

  • EagleWatcher

    Let this be a wake up call to all the conservative pundits who are trying to paint the Obama Administration as a centrist administration. To Michael Medved, Bill Kristol, David Brooks and the rest: Obama is not our friend! Obama is the classic charismatic leader fronting for a piousness agenda. Him and his administration need to be apposed with all our energy.

    At this rate they will make Clinton look like Ronald Reagan.

  • rick554

    We lost the “stimulus”only because 3 RINOs cut-and-run. A total of 3 reps voted for this pokulus. I think thats a helluva good start.
    Better get ready to fight for your 1st Amendment Rights next. And after that , the 2nd will come under attack as well. These next 2 years won’t be for the weak.
    I’m betting that we will see a march on D.C. before too long. Unless you want to be France or learn Russian!

    • EagleWatcher

      They say Rush is out of touch, but he can see through these guys like thinly sliced baloney. He has been warning us about this since Obama first entered the presidential race. He’s now predicting that things like this will cause a conservative revival and back lash. Conservatives will be so outraged that they will one day regain control of this monstrously bloated government and use it against the very Libs who created it. Let’s hope his record for predicting the future holds up on this one.

      • JDidSaint

        “Conservatives will be so outraged that they will one day regain control of this monstrougly bloated government and RESTRUCTURE IT TO AGAIN RESEMBLE A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT.”

        As much as I’d feel vindicated if the GOP came back in to power and started imposing the Fairness Doctrine on Keith Olberman and Chris Matthews, the victory would be empty. Here’s hoping that when we regain power we’ll have the self-control to beat the liberals’ swords into ploughshares.

    • Old_Crow

      Conservative talk radio holds Congress accountable. Don’t expect anything more than a superficial resistance to the democrats. If we want to resist this legislation, than we must devise a plan that does not rely on Congress.

  • Vladimir

    Let’s call a spade a spade.

    The Fairness Doctrine is a frontal assault on the First Amendment.

    Broadcast airtime is determined by the marketplace. If there were a market for liberal talk radio, Rupert Murdoch & Clear Channel would be blanketing the airwaves with it.

    But there’s simply not a market for it.

    Life’s not “fair”. Congress cannot pass a law to make life fair.

    Hey, if we’re talking about monopolies, the Left has a total monopoly on giant papier mache effigies — we conservatives demand that they start making effigies of Barbra Striesand, Hugo Chavez and George Soros!

  • seandparnell

    I?ve been reading all these reports from the left describing fears about the return of the so-called ?Fairnes Doctrine? as simply paranoid delusions by the right, and an excuse to gin up direct mail fundraising.

    A false alarm on a new ?Fairness Doctrine? (LA Times)

    Fairness Doctrine Fears: A Fake Right Wing Firestorm (Huffington Post)

    Bum Rush (The New Republic)

    Seems like every time a Senator or Representative spouts off in favor of this, we see an Officer Barbrady Chorus of ?OK, people, move along. There’s nothing to see here? telling those of us concerned about the issue that there?s no actual effort to gut the First Amendment.

    I wonder when these people think we?ll have *real* cause to get concerned – when it hits 60 Senators and 218 Representatives, or when it hits 3 out of 3 FCC Commissioners?

    So far, in the Senate, I?ve got: Durbin, Boxer, Feinstein, Schumer, Bingaman, Harkin, and Stabenow. Anybody know of any others?

    Sean Parnell
    President
    Center for Competitive Politics
    www.campaignfreedom.org
    sparnell@campaignfreedom.org

    • seandparnell

      The articles were suppose to be links – you’d think I could figure this stuff out, I’m married to a web designer for crying out loud!

      Anyway, for anyone wishing to read about the paranoid delusion concerning the so-called “Fairness Doctrine,” here goes:

      A false alarm on a new ?Fairness Doctrine? (LA Times) http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/14/nation/na-onthemedia14

      Fairness Doctrine Fears: A Fake Right Wing Firestorm (Huffington Post) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/20/the-fake-firestorm-of-the_n_145334.html

      Bum Rush (The New Republic) http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=68d07041-7dbc-451d-a18a-752567145610

      Be sure to pick up your copy of the DSM-IV after reading it so you can start your treatment right away.

      Sean Parnell
      President
      Center for Competitive Politics
      www.campaignfreedom.org
      sparnell@campaignfreedom.org

  • janis

    They currently own the White House and Congress, not to mention a majority of governorships. It’s not like talk radio is standing in between them and near-total power these days. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a huge sign of weakness on their part. After the years I’ve spent listening to talk radio, they should consider that it’s not just conservatives on the right who listen to it, but Dems and independents as well.

    They are getting ready to over-reach, as they usually do, and they will find themselves with more of a fight on their hands than they can manage.

    • theBlur

      The whole premise of though on the left is built on a house of cards that has been proven time and time again to fail. Conservative talk radio is a thorn in their sides because hosts constantly point this out, and people do listen. In their minds, silencing talk radio (might as well include Fox News, for that matter), or at least restricting it as much as possible, will keep those who question their agenda at a minimum, thus allowing them to keep stacking more cards onto their shaky old house. Ever tried arguing with a liberal? They don’t want to hear facts at all and rely on “known facts” (usually lies) and empty talking points to support their case.

      The good news, according to a legal eagle friend of mine, is that since so much money is now involved in conservative talk radio (ad revenues, salaries, etc.) this time there is reason to believe any move by congress to implement some sort of “fairness” standard will end up challenged in the courts and likely end up at the SCotUS.

    • red4ever

      Even if this passes, the Repubs and Libers need to do to this what the Left did the porn law. Immediately tie it up in court to keep it from being implemented, then get it declared unconstitutional. The Constitution forbids litmus tests for content on speech.

      Although, I am for anything that gets Chris Matthews to stop talking about his tingling when Obama speaks. We can also use it to hammer the MSM bias.

  • TxCon

    Staying at home and pouting instead voting has consequences.