« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

David Frum Blames Conservatives for Specter and the Demise of Republicans

David Frum should take a hard look in the mirror if he wants to find the real culprit. 

I was a supporter of President George W. Bush, yet the demise of the Republican Party started during the Bush years and Frum’s former boss deserves a good portion of the blame.  President Bush moved forward on No Child Left Behind (a massive expansion of the federal government into education), the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (a massive new entitlement program), the so called Troubled Asset Relief Program (which never purchased one troubled asset and bailed out poor business decisions on Wall Street to the tune of $700 billion), and committed an inexcusable verbal blunder when he trashed the free market.  Bush made terrible statements about capitalism when he said “I readily concede I chucked aside my free-market principles” and “I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.”   I hope Frum had nothing to do with writing those stupid phrases that committed irreparable harm to the idea of free market capitalism.

Blaming conservatives is a way for the bedwetters, including but not limited to David Frum, in the Republican Party to shift blame from the moderate wing of the Republican Party and to engage in an overreaction to the events of yesterday.  Senator Arlen Specter decided to join the Democrat Party, because it is the only way he can win his seat back in Pennsylvania, a state that is trending Democrat.  No need to interpret Specter’s crass political decision as the beginning of the end of the Republican Party as we know it.  It is a sad state of affairs that Rush Limbaugh bashing David Frum and his holier-than-thou attitude has infected others in the big tent on the right like a bad case of the Swine Flu.

Let’s analyze the David Frum hysteria.  Frum wrote for his center-right (i.e. conservative with caveats) web site New Majority that if we get bad health care policy, we should put the blame on conservative Pat Toomey.

If the Democrats do succeed in pushing through national health insurance, they really should set aside a little extra money to erect a statue to Pat Toomey. They couldn’t have done it without him!

This is classic blame shifting.  The hangover from President Bush’s policies and the uninspiring campaign of Senator John McCain lead the people of Pennsylvania to vote for Senator, now President, Barack Obama.  How is that Pat Toomey’s fault?  Just how, exactly, did Pat Toomey help President Obama to tee up socialized medicine?  The Frum use of exclamation points is evidence that Frum is becoming unhinged.  Frum needs to blame somebody, but it would never cross is well educated mind that his former boss, President Bush, helped to lead the Republican Party into the abyss and moderate influences in the Bush Administration aided an abetted the muddled message of Republicans over the past 8 years.

More Frum hysteria.

The Specter defection is too severe a catastrophe to qualify as a “wake-up call.” His defection is the thing we needed the wake-up call to warn us against! For a long time, the loudest and most powerful voices in the conservative world have told us that people like Specter aren’t real Republicans – that they don’t belong in the party. Now he’s gone, and with him the last Republican leverage within any of the elected branches of government.

Specter himself said just over a month ago to The Hill that “I think the United States desperately needs a two party system.  It is the basis of politics in America.  I think each of the 41 Republican Senators, in a sense, and I don’t want to overstate this, is a national asset, because if one was gone you would only have 40.  The Democrats would have 60 and they would control all of the mechanisms of government.”  What did conservatives do to Senator Specter over the past month to change Specter’s opinion that one party control of government is a good idea?  Nothing.  Specter looked at a poll that indicated that he was going to lose a Republican Primary to former Congressman Pat Toomey, so he switched parties.  David Frum seems to use every opportunity possible to bash conservatives and as Hogan stated a few weeks ago on Red State that Frum and the other bedwetters “please stop telling us what is wrong with… well, US. Seriously, I just cannot take it any more.”  Hogan was correct.  We all know that David Frum thinks he is smarter than the people who go to tea parties and those foul mouthed conservatives on talk radio and the people who want members of the party who actually believe in the platform and the readers of Red State and Mark Levin who Frum has engaged on Levin’s radio show, thanks Ace of Spades, in short — real conservatives. 

The fact of the matter is that Specter was barely a Republican.  According to Congressional Quarterly “the five-term senator has consistently ranked among the Republicans most likely to part company with the party’s conservative majority.”  The word “consistently” is a very important characterization of Specter’s votes.  CQ found that Specter (56%) was only outdone in the Senate, in voting with most Republicans, by the Senators from Maine Olympia Snowe (43%) and Susan Collins (49%).  Snowe and Collins are unlikely to switch parties, because they win elections handily in Maine as Republicans.

Mr. Frum — you are no conservative, so stop pretending to be one.  Your views are not conservative.  You worked for a President who was not a conservative on fiscal spending.  You want to blame conservatives for the demise of the Republican Party, yet you ignore the fact that the last election says nothing about the conservative movement.  Conservatives are showing up a tea parties to boo Republicans who voted for the bailout of Wall Street program and cheer conservatives like Senator Jim Demint (R-SC) who are fighting a principled battle of ideas.  Conservatives are the ones that have new ideas, yet conservative ideas that protect traditional family values, promote small government and a strong national defense.  Please cease and desist from blaming conservatives for the lack of support for Republicans and go look at some of the squishy speeches you penned for President Bush.

COMMENTS

  • dave_in_atl

    It might not be a popular opinion, but I am firmly convinced that without Bush and his liberal tendencies Obama would have never gotten elected.

    • reaganlover

      Without George Bush and his failed presidency, Barack Obama would be a relatively unknown (except in Chicago) Junior Senator from Illinois. George Bush’s profligacy and incompetence directly contributed to the implosion of the Republican Party. Does anyone doubt that?

      • olsmithie

        but, how did he go from unknown inexperienced political hack to occupant of the White House in less than 2 years?

        Same trick Carter pulled off with big money from somewhere…
        Can you say “Same folks that financed the Panama Canal sale?”
        and are still earning interest on the loan.
        (Come on , you remember that deal, the one that gave away US control of the canal so the Red Chinese could takeover the former US bases at each end.. Airstrips designed for fighter planes.
        Yeah, that canal.)

        The question in the ‘O’s case is is:
        “Why is no one looking into where all the millions of anonymous Internet contributions came from?”

        If the Republicans had pulled this shenanigan, there would be congressional hearings on Internet donations by now.

        The days of the Saudis laundering Clinton bribes by donating millions to the Clinton Library and Massage Parlor are gone.
        They have the Internet to launder the political money through.
        Boy, life in the beltway just got easier.

        No longer do the little Chinese nuns who have taken a vow of poverty have to run out and open a checking account so they can place the $5.000 check in Al Gore’s hand personally. They can do it on the Internet.

        When you control the DOJ completely, transparency is a joke.
        The money laundering by the Dem contributors will no doubt continue for now.

        After 2010? we’ll see.

        Regards

  • paulincolo

    that by switching parties so easily, Specter wasn’t even moderately republican, socialized medicine was coming whether he had an R or a D behind his name.

    • reaganlover

      It is irrelevant what party label he affixes to his name. Sen. Specter is a grade “A” weasel and opportunist. He is a member of only one party: the Sen. Specter party. His hackatude is of monumental proportions, and I, for one, am sick of hearing about him.

      • Aaron Gardner

        I care because we have a race in PA in 2010 that we need to win and the person we are going up against is a former “Republican”.

        I care because i want Pat Toomey to metaphorically crush Arlen Specter into oblivion so we will never have to hear about him again.

        I care because if we don’t fight the smears of those who try to say that the party left Specter then we will have once again given up to the left framing the debate and stopping us from getting our message out.

        I care because this fight is not yet done.

        I care because I believe we are right.

        I care because it is my duty to care.

        I care because along time ago some people greater than I got together and made an oath on their sacred honor to stand together for this nation.

        I care because I am a Conservative

        I care because I am a Republican.

        I care because I am an American.

        So the question to me is why don’t your care?

        • reaganlover

          I truly enjoy your response. You have beaten me to a pulp!!!!

          I guess I cannot hide my utter contempt for Sen. Specter.

          • Aaron Gardner

            I am talking about fighting the left in the media…People like Frum. You said you are sick of hearing about Specter…I love hearing about Specter because he is the standard bearer of “Moderates” and I plan to use him as a whipping boy rather than let the left and its implants such as Frum to define the fricken narrative.

      • paulincolo

        Especially since this is a post on Frum: I repeat his third point,

        I care because if we don?t fight the smears of those who try to say that the party left Specter then we will have once again given up to the left framing the debate and stopping us from getting our message out.

        • Brian Darling

          Red State and the conservative movement as a whole needs to fight back against squishes trying to hijack the conservative moniker.

          • Aaron Gardner

            I think some are starting to figure that out, I even saw signs of in in Steele today, after his initial statement which was about a 6 for me.

            Today he called Specter out on his blaming the party for him leaving.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    “The fact of the matter is that Specter was barely a Republican. According to Congressional Quarterly ?the five-term senator has consistently ranked among the Republicans most likely to part company with the party?s conservative majority.? The word ?consistently? is a very important characterization of Specter?s votes. CQ found that Specter (56%) was only outdone in the Senate, in voting with most Republicans, by the Senators from Maine Olympia Snowe (43%) and Susan Collins (49%). Snowe and Collins are unlikely to switch parties, because they win elections handily in Maine as Republicans.”

    Did you measure these numbers with the majority views of their constituents? A Governor or Senator that governs or votes to the Right of his or her constituents is par for course. They are not the problem. This isnt so much a defense of Specter, but of all the ridiculous rants against Republicans in Blue States. Everybody confuses the symtoms for the disease. They are Blue states with Blue voters.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    “The fact of the matter is that Specter was barely a Republican. According to Congressional Quarterly ?the five-term senator has consistently ranked among the Republicans most likely to part company with the party?s conservative majority.? The word ?consistently? is a very important characterization of Specter?s votes. CQ found that Specter (56%) was only outdone in the Senate, in voting with most Republicans, by the Senators from Maine Olympia Snowe (43%) and Susan Collins (49%). Snowe and Collins are unlikely to switch parties, because they win elections handily in Maine as Republicans.”

    Did you measure these numbers with the majority views of their constituents? A Governor or Senator that governs or votes to the Right of his or her constituents is par for course. They are not the problem. This isnt so much a defense of Specter, but of all the ridiculous rants against Republicans in Blue States. Everybody confuses the symtoms for the disease. They are Blue states with Blue voters.

  • antisocial

    as a conservative writer. He is trying to save himself from extinction. So he is throwing all sorts of bomb everywhere. He is living in a make-believe world.

    Ideally we should blame people like Frum and his moderates for the “bad ideas” associated with republicans.

  • Finrod

    As such, that makes him part of the Problem. Nothing he says is going to do anything other than make the Problem Worse.

  • chaney

    He seems to have done a whole post about the Republican party without saying that the real problem is that Sarah Palin is a stinky girl with really bad cooties.

  • crux

    The term “conservative” has become a distasteful word. “Traditional principles” and “family values” are now perjorative terms. To confess to a belief in religion invites ridicule or being labeled as an extremist.

    When Reagan implemented foundational conservative principles, he ushered in many years of prosperity and a strong foreign policy. Republicans riding on the wave of strength and popularity, unfortunately forgot the reasons why they were in the political majority. They devolved into the things they had campaigned against. And were punished for it

    The Republican Party needs to return to the founding core principles that established this nation: Individual freedom, coupled with responsibility, smal government, low taxation, secure borders, a strong military, freedom to express ideas and religious beliefs, and the right to have and keep private property. The party needs to quit worrying about who’s gay and other social issues that have nothing to do with how the government should be run. Howevr, I should not be ridiculed for my core religious beliefs which are the framework of my character.

    The Republican Party must return to principles that have WORKED. If not, we will become a one party system and lose the soul of America forever.

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    Since he’s only about trying to be famous for being famous. First of all, Scott Rasmussen did a report awhile ago showing the shift in popular sentiment shifted from Republican to Democrat in the year 2006. To that point, it was about 50-50. It makes complete sense since George Bush’s number one priority was legalizing 30 million illegal aliens and he felt he had a better chance to do it with more democrats. When you identify as a Republican, it’s hard to call out the leader of the party when he’s the president. And when he and his enforcers scorn and ridicule you and those who got him elected. Bush said after the congressional elections that he was glad more democrats were elected as it helped his cause for amnesty. There’s no reason for Frum or his pals to write any more articles. Mentioning him on this website gives him publicity he does not deserve.

  • Brian Darling

    Sorry to borrow that phrase from the alternative lifestyle leading far left, but it is appropriate to fight back and name names when attacked. If we do not fight the moderates then we will lose. Frum is wrong in blaming Toomey for Specter’s defection and we need to call him on it. No attack should ever go unchallenged.