« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

This Week in Washington – April 19, 2010

As President Obama prepares to throw some fastballs at the heads of the American taxpayer, Conservatives need to be aware of the issues at the plate on Capitol Hill.  Liberals in Congress have plans that will transform America into a European style social democracy.  The Senate is gearing up for another battle over a liberal Supreme Court nominee and Congress has quite a few left wing legislative issues in the on deck circle.  Bailouts, Global Warming, nominations, the War Supplemental and guns are big issues this week in Washington.  If you are a Tea Partier who cares about conservatism, the Congressional agenda is full of ideas that will raise your taxes, reinterpret the Constitution and use your tax dollars to bailout terrible business decision’s of Wall Street.

The issues for conservatives to watch are the following:

  • Financial Regulatory Overhaul – Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) may file cloture and attempt to commence debate in the Senate on the Dodd bill conservatives call “TARP II.”  The legislation crafted by Senator Chris Dodd(D-CT) includes a provision creating a $50 billion slush fund for Wall Street bailouts.  The President last Friday requested that this provision be removed from the bill, yet this legislation contains other provisions providing bailout authority for the Federal government that have yet to be removed.  Conservatives argue that this legislation perpetuates “too big to fail” policies that lead to massive exposure by the taxpayer for the errors by the financial services sector of the economy.  Nowhere in this bill will you see real reform in the form of a repeal of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) or Fannie and Freddie reform.
  • Goodwin Liu – Last Friday, the Senate Judiciary Committee commenced a contentious hearing on the nomination of Goodwin Liu to be justice on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  Congressional Quarterly reports (subscription required), “Senate Judiciary Republicans appear to be laying the groundwork for a possible filibuster of Goodwin Liu’s nomination to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based on his qualifications, rather than simply his judicial philosophy.”  Conservatives argue that Liu has evidenced a liberal activist bent and Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) told CQ that Liu is at the “forefront of a progressive legal movement.”  As quoted in the Washington Post, Liu defended himself at the hearing by arguing that “whatever I may have written in the books and the articles would have no bearing on my action as a judge.”  If a new standard is set up in the Senate where Senators disregard explicit writings by nominees, then there is no way to discern a nominee’s judicial philosophy.   The Senate might as well just become a rubber stamp for (insert name of Administration)’s nominee.
  • War Supplemental – Markup later this month for the $33 billionWar Supplemental.  It will be interesting to see what language is inserted to deal with Gitmo detainees and if funding relating to timelines for withdrawal in Iraq and Afghanistan are referenced in some way.
  • Kerry-Graham Global Warming Bill – A draft is expected to be released next week from Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) addressing so called “Global Warming.”  Conservatives should keep a close eye on this job killing idea.  According to the New York Times, “President Obama expects the Senate to move on to comprehensive energy and climate change legislation once it finishes work over the next few weeks on Wall Street regulatory reform.”  Cap and Tax legislation has already passed the House and the Senate is expected to walk the political plank of Global Warming as things heat up in Washington, D.C.
  • DC Guns – The House is scheduled to take up the so called “District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act” with language inserted by Senator John Ensign (R-NV) to grant gun rights to the residents of the District of Columbia.  Big question is how the House will deal with this issue.  Will they leave the gun language in the bill and send to the President or will they remove the language and schedule a vote on a separate bill that will never make it to the President’s desk?  Conservatives are winning gun votes in Congress and the liberal gun grabbers are using every procedural maneuver possible to thwart the efforts of Second Amendment Democrats and Republicans to enact important civil rights legislation restoring the 2nd Amendment to all Americans.
  • For more information of what to expect out of Washington, check out my Human Event’s Legislative Lowdown Column this week.  My title was “Repeal Obama’s Ideas and Replace with Conservative Ones.”  Now that is a “Repeal and Replace” theme that all conservatives can support.

The schedule for the Senate this week according to the Senate Majority Leader’s web site:

Senate convenes at 2pm today and enters a period of Morning Business until 3:00pm with senators permitted to speak  therin for up to 10 minutes each.

Following morning business, the Senate will proceed to Executive Session to debate the nomination of Lael Brainard to be Under Secretary of the Treasury. At 5:30pm, the Senate will proceed to roll call vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the Brainard nomination.

As a reminder, Senator Reid filed cloture on the following nominations:

- Lael Brainard, of the District of Columbia, to be an Under Secretary of the Treasury;
- Marisa J. Demeo, of the district of Columbia, to be an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia;
- Christopher H. Schroeder, of North Carolina, to be an Assistant Attorney General;
- Thomas I. Vanaskie, of Pennsylvania, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit; and
- Denny Chin, of New York, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit.

5:30pm cloture vote on the nomination of Lael Brainard to be Under Secretary of the Treasury.

The schedule for the House this week according to the House Majority Leader’s web site:

MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2010

On Monday, the House will not be in session.

TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2010

On Tuesday, the House will meet at 12:30 p.m. for Morning Hour debate and 2:00 p.m. for legislative business with votes postponed until 6:30 p.m.

Suspensions (6 Bills)

  1. H.R. 4178 - Deposit Restricted Qualified Tuition Programs Act (Rep. Cleaver – Financial Services)
  2. H.Res. 1257- Supporting the goals and ideals of National Financial Literacy Month, 2010 (Rep. Hinojosa – Financial Services)
  3. H.R. 3553 – Indian Veterans Housing Opportunity Act (Rep. Kirkpatrick – Financial Services)
  4. H.Res. __Honoring the life and achievements of Dr. Benjamin Lawson Hooks(Reps. Conyers/Cohen – Judiciary)
  5. H.Res. 1104 – Supporting the mission and goals of 2010 National Crime Victims’ Rights Week to increase public awareness of the rights, needs, and concerns of victims and survivors of crime in the United States (Rep. Costa – Judiciary)
  6. H.Res. 1116 – Supporting the goals and ideals of Multiple Sclerosis Awareness Week (Rep. Lee (CA) – Energy and Commerce)

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2010 AND THE BALANCE OF THE WEEK

On Wednesday and Thursday, the House will meet at 10:00 a.m. for legislative business. On Friday, the House will meet at 9:00 a.m. for legislative business.

Suspensions (10 Bills)

  1. S. 1963 - Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act (Sen. Akaka – Veterans’ Affairs)
  2. H.Res. 855 – Expressing support for designation of May 1 as “Silver Star Service Banner Day” (Rep. Blunt – Oversight and Government Reform)
  3. H.Res. 1262- Expressing condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones of the victims of the fire at the Tesoro refinery in Anacortes, Washington (Rep. Larsen – Oversight and Government Reform)
  4. H.Con.Res. 255 – Commemorating the 40th anniversary of Earth Day and honoring the founder of Earth Day, the late Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin (Rep. Obey – Oversight and Government Reform)
  5. H.Res. 1182- Congratulating Radford University on the 100th anniversary of the university (Rep. Boucher – Education and Labor)
  6. H.Res. 1239 – Commending the University of Connecticut Huskies for their historic win in the 2010 NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Tournament (Rep. Courtney – Education and Labor)
  7. H.R. 1585 – FIT Kids Act (Rep. Kind – Education and Labor)
  8. H.Res. 1263- Expressing support for Mathematics Awareness Month (Rep. McMorris Rodgers – Education and Labor)
  9. H.Res. __Recognizing the continued importance of volunteerism and national service and commemorating the anniversary of the signing of the landmark service legislation, the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act (Rep. George Miller – Education and Labor)
  10. H.Res. 1216- Congratulating Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin on his tenth year of service as Chaplain of the House of Representatives (Rep. Lipinski – House Administration)

Motion to Go to Conference on H.R. 2194 - Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act (Rep. Berman – Foreign Affairs) Motion to Instruct Conferees.

H.R. 157 – District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act (Rep. Norton – Judiciary) (Subject to a Rule)

* Conference Reports may be brought up at any time.

* Motions to go to Conference should they become available.

* Possible Motions to Instruct Conferees.

(HT to the Daily Kos for their own “This Week in Congress” product that gave RS the idea for a conservative educational weekly update)

COMMENTS

  • disintelligentsia

    Hatch has vowed to filibuster a vote on the DC Voting Rights Act. See: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/92415-hatch-vows-filibuster-of-dc-voting-rights-bill

    The District could only be granted voting rights and a representative in the House by way of a constitutional amendment because the Constitution limits representatives to States. Just such an amendment was presented in 1978 and died without passage. However, the 23rd amendment was ratified in 1961 and it granted DC the right to have electors for the presidential election. This is the approach that should be taken for granting the DC a member in the house (other ways would be to convey the non-governmental areas of DC to Maryland or otherwise making DC a state). If Congress and the several states that ratified the 23rd amendment felt it was necessary to amend the constitution and acknowledge that the words District and State DO NOT mean the same thing,why should they now?

    Last year an almost identical bill was passed by the Senate. **Hatch at that time voted for it** – and the bill passed 61-38.The fact that he was willing to sell out the Constitution for the sake of increasing power solely for Utah is disturbing.

    However, because the bill was modified in the House so that the new representative in Utah would be elected at general instead of from a district, Hatch has changed his mind and vowed to filibuster it.

    When it passed last year we didn’t have Scott Brown from Mass. We’ll see whether he’s willing to stand by principals and stick with the Constitution or try to be a populist. We need this bill filibustered – period. The relevant portions of the Constitution are:

    The Constitution states:
    Article I, sec. 2:The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several *States*. No Person shall be a Representative … who shall not, when elected, be an *Inhabitant of that State* in which he shall be chosen. Representatives … shall be apportioned among the several *States* which may be *included within this Union*.

    14th Amendment:
    Representatives shall be apportioned among the several *States* according to their respective numbers

    23rd Amendment:
    Section 1. The *District* constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct:

    A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the *District* would be entitled *if it were a State*, but in no event more than the least populous State; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the *States*, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a State;. . .

  • cabanon

    or just the method? For example if they were to become a state?

    The problem seems to be that the people of D.C. should have representation, they do pay taxes and if ‘taxation without representation’ applies to anyone it would be them.

    • IJB

      If not having members of Congress that much bugs DC residents that much, they can easily move 10 miles to VA or MD. Or they can push for a Constitutional Amendment (good luck, suckers!)

      The people of DC know what the Constitution says – they have two different remedies for it.

      The Constitution says that they get no voting rights – with what public sector unions have done to destroy this country, I am quite comfortable with the residences of DC *never* getting full voting rights.

    • Achance

      should be prohibited from ANY partisan political activity – and not just in DC, in the whole damned Country. They have the right to vote and nothing else; no party office, no contributions, to political action AT ALL.

    • disintelligentsia

      One – procedure is substance. In the law process protects substantive rights. In this instance, we have operated under the rules provided for under the Constitution for 200+ years. DC is not considered a State, but a federal enclave – a CITY. Congress has *exclusive* power over DC under the Constitution. Likewise, the reason the 2nd amendment wasn’t incorporated against the States in Heller is because the case came out of DC – which is a recognition that it is not a State but a federal enclave. If the Constitution provides that only *States* have representation, then that was the bargain that was struck at the beginning. If DC is to get representation in Congress, then it must do so through amending the Constitution – just as was done for DC regarding Presidential electors through the 23rd amendment.

      Further, if they get representation in the House, then the next step will surely be getting two senators – which will be a much greater change in the dynamic in our political body because DC will be a Democrat lock for as far as anyone can see – Obama got 92.5% of the DC vote to McCain’s 6.5%. Were ANY States even remotely that lopsided?

      DC simply doesn’t reflect an ordinary citizenry. An inordinate percentage of DC residents are made up of “public servants” and union members and lobbyists. It’s like if the SEIU were able to set up its own state and elect Senators and Representatives – it’s too bizarre to contemplate. No other state reflects the percentage of government employees that DC has. DC is just altogether different because it *is* the center of our Nation’s capital. There is a real concern about the incestuous relationship between the residents of DC and our National Government. Because such a large percentage of the DC residents ARE the government, it’s almost like saying that the government should decide who is in the government. Also, it’s not like the residents of DC have no political power – rather its their close alliance to political power that cautions against even more.

      As I stated above, if DC is to get Congressional representation, it should be either by Constitutional amendment, ala the 23rd amendment, or by becoming part of Maryland (which it was until 1790 when Maryland ceded it to the National government to become our nation’s capital.

      What other *CITY* in our Nation has exclusive representatives in Congress and Senators (which would inevitably be the next step)?

      • cabanon

        What the U.S. citizens do for a living be it public servant, union member or lobbyist should not determine whether they get a vote in their government. Whether it is lopsided for Obama or not shouldn’t be relevant either so I disagree with your position there.

        I think they should have representation in this representative democracy I don’t believe we should deny people democracy.

        • IJB

          There’s a reason the framers didn’t give DC residents the vote.

          If you don’t get that, you’re not informed enough on this topic to make debating you worthwhile.

          • cabanon

            The framers did not specify that residents of D.C. do not have the right to vote. It does not state that anywhere.

            Insisting that the framers wanted over a half million U.S. citizens not be fully represent in this democracy is absurd.

        • disintelligentsia

          That remains the important question – the answer given by the democrats is to enact legislation, but this would directly contradict the plain words of the Constitution. You haven’t answered that question. If you support their right to have representation, then does that mean you support this unconstitutional legislation? Or are you saying you would support an amendment or that you think they should be absorbed back into Maryland? I’m fine with either of the those alternatives, just not this legislation. Personally I think that the nature of this aberration – this artificial construct created by the centralized nature of our national government should be eliminated by the decentralization and reduction of the size of our national government. That’s the conservative solution to the representative issue – reduce the size of government so this artificial political construct is reduced and incorporate their rights in a manner that is consistent with our highest law. The dems simply want to ignore our highest governing document and impose something for their political gain by whatever means they can.

  • cabanon

    or perhaps Statehood would be the best options, probably not likely but the best. U.S. citizens being denied participation in democracy should not be politicized.

    The fact still remains that they are U.S. citizens, pay taxes and yet are not fully represented.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    Just make DC residents exempt from Federal taxes. Bingo! Problem solved.

    It’s not like half of them pay any taxes anyway…