« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Today in Washington – November 16, 2010

Not much happening in the House and Senate today.  Both parties are conducing elections for leadership positions and amendments to conference rules.  It appears as if Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) has won his battle for the Senate Republican Conference to take a 2 year break from earmarking.

The House has 6 bills scheduled for a vote on the Suspension Calendar.  The Senate is out of session for the day.  Plans to deal with taxes, spending and the 12 pending appropriations bills are still taking shape.

Senator DeMint has won his fight to ban earmarks within the Republican Caucus for 2 years.  According toh the Washington Post:

In an abrupt reversal, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday endorsed a moratorium on earmarks that GOP conservatives are seeking to send a signal that the Republican Party is serious about curbing federal spending.

Now the fight goes to the whole Senate and House.  Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) has indicated that he is willing to push for a Senate wide ban on earmarks.  According to the Denver Post:

Democratic Sen. Mark Udall said Monday he would support a total ban on earmarking, the process whereby members of Congress can hand-pick items — usually ones in their own districts — to receive funding.  “Out-of-control spending has caused us to rack up huge deficits, which now threaten our future economic prosperity and our national security,” Udall said in a statement. “The American people want us to show them that we’re serious about taking action to solve this problem.”

Now that both House and Senate Republicans have agreed to ban earmarks for 2 years, the fight goes to the House and Senate floor.  The House can adopt a rule in the 112th Congress, which starts in January of 2011, as part of the rules package to ban earmarks for the whole Congress.  That would make it against the rules to earmark in the House.

In the Senate, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) has pledged to offer an Amendment this year to the Senate Rules to make it against the rules to earmark.  This rules change would take 67 votes.  WIth the support of many Democrats in the House and Senate, the fight against waste in Congressionally directed spending may be won in the 112th Congress.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • crowseye

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/critical-mass/

    • Brian Darling

      I completely disagree with the hypothesis that 9/11 was a conspiracy. The 9/11 thruthers have yet to produce one person involved in this so called “conspiracy” and that should be telling to those who are drawn to the conspiracy theory.
      I have met two people who lost loved ones in the planes that went into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. For people to continue this ridiculous conspiracy theory is an outrage. These are real people and I have met them.
      I am offended that you used my post to continue this theory, because it is based in fantasy. You denigrate the memories of all those lost on that terrible day when you post this garbage.
      Mr. Crowseye, please know that I am not aboard the 9/11 Truth train and will never be. I have met too many people who lost loved ones on that day. You really need to take a step back and understand that the weight of the evidence proves that your theory is bunk.

      • Brian Darling

        Clearly this was a conspiracy by Islamic Extremists, not by the US Government. That conspiracy has been proven, yet your wild conspiracy that somehow the US government covered up a grand conspiracy in 9/11 is not supported by the evidence. Wikileaks has been a spigot of the disclosure of thousands of pages of classified documents that shows activites by the US government. I don’t think you will ever see WikiLeaks produce any information to prove your theory, because it does not exist.

    • streiff

      go find some other place to exhibit your paranoia.

  • Randy

    Yeah a lot of change was made in the Senate…. genius… NOT!

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Just saw that was Rangel found guilty at the house ethics trial…

    I guess the less ethics one has the shorter the trial over them can be…

    • melissatx

      What I want to know is if he is disappointmented that it took so little time to FIND him guilty or that he WAS found guilty.

  • shermantank

    Only one thing matters. Only one thing will make a difference: Get this BAD president out of office. If you want to stop this type of terrorism, start working to get this guy out. That’s the bottom line, no post, no billboard, no yelling, will make any difference. Move to get this guy out of office. To that end, today I got some change at a garden center after paying with a large bill, the back of some of the US Greenbacks said “F*** OBAMA.” People, do what you have to do to spread the word.

  • paulnashtn

    I would appear that Sen. John Cornyn has been re-elected to the post as NRSC Chairman.
    Now THAT should send a thrill up your leg