Coburn to AWOL Government Workers: Get Back to Work!


New Report Shines Light on Gov't Waste

As if we needed yet another report to tell us that the red-tape laden government bureaucracy was inefficient (shocker…I know), Dr. Coburn’s office has just released a new report with some startling facts.

The report, titled “Missing in Action: AWOL in the Federal Government” notes that:

• Since 2001, federal employees at 18 departments and agencies were absent without leave (AWOL) at least 19.6 million hours.

• Annual AWOL hours in 2007 were 45% higher than in 2001.

• Since 2001, nearly 300,000 federal employees have been AWOL for some period of time.

• Since 2001, the government has lost at least 9,410 years of work from AWOL employees.

• Employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs were AWOL 19 times more often than employees at the Department of Defense.

• The Departments of Veterans Affairs and the Treasury – the two worst offenders – accounted for 61% of all AWOL hours between 2001-2007.

• Between 2001 and 2007, 13 of 18 agencies either saw an increase in annual AWOL totals or remained at approximately the same level as before, despite overall decreases in the aggregate number of employees.

So, what does this mean for the rest of us hard-working, taxpaying Americans? Well, because of the government union strangle hold and the virtual impossible task of being fired from the federal government, the loss of productivity costs us about $7-$10 billion a year.

And just think…if Obama becomes president things will change, that number will DOUBLE!

But, not to worry, ATR is soon launching the new Center for Fiscal Accountability to monitor such actions.

Category: , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

19 Comments Leave a comment

Something doesn't add up

bk Tuesday, August 26th at 10:09AM EDT (link)

Since 2001, federal employees at 18 departments and agencies were absent without leave (AWOL) at least 19.6 million hours.

…the loss of productivity costs us about $7-$10 billion a year.

If my math is correct, then we have $7-10B/yr / 19.6M hrs/7 yrs = cost of around $3K/hr give or take $500. Even if the $7-10B is for the seven-year period, then that gives a rate of around $430/hr +/- $80. If we’re talking salary and benefits paid for no-shows, then it seems hard to believe it would be more than maybe $75/hr or something in that range.

Am I missing something?

You're adding up wages

Neil Stevens Tuesday, August 26th at 10:26AM EDT (link)

Missing people cost any organization more than just their wages though.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 

This AWOL report demonstrates

Achance Tuesday, August 26th at 10:36AM EDT (link)

why even responsible public managers HATE “missions and measures” iniatives!

First, a federal employee, most any public employee actually, once hired is either at work during scheduled hours and days or on leave during those hours and days. There are various forms of paid leave as detailed in the report and then there is an absence without leave which may or may not be authorized and this report does not make that distinction. The distinction may or may not be observed in the underlying data but it is not reported in the formal report. There are many forms of authorized absence with out leave or leave without pay, e.g., educational or other sabbaticals, FMLA leave after paid leave is exhausted, voluntary leave without pay for personal or health reasons - this is quite common when an employee has a chronic or even terminal illness, has run out of paid leave, but the employer chooses to keep him/her on as an employee for benefits or simply for humanitarian reasons.

Second, such reports make the good managers look bad. The way NOT to show up on such a report is to not dock employees for AWOL so you don’t have to report it or simply not track it as appears to be the case with State. It may well be that the poster child agencies, VA and Treasury, are more fastidious about docking employees’ pay for AWOL and the low AWOL agencies such as Education simply ignore AWOL - an entirely believable proposition if you’ve ever dealt with educrats.

And third, it is entirely plausible that the Democrat Administration did little or nothing to control unauthorized absences and the incoming Republican Administration went on a program of adult supervision to track and control it. In an organization the size of the federal government it would take some years to get your managers in place and on such a program, which would in turn show a steady increase in the AWOL hours. Fundamentally, if AWOL time wasn’t being tracked before, it means lots of employees were skipping work and still getting paid. At least if it is being reported as AWOL, they’re probably not being paid, a good step in the right direction. Now next, somebody can start disciplining and dismissing employees for unauthorized absence; it can be done.

In Vino Veritas

Care to elaborate?

bk Tuesday, August 26th at 10:41AM EDT (link)

I can see that to a point, but not where it would cost 6x or, per the original numbers posted, 40x the burden rate.

Well let's see

Neil Stevens Tuesday, August 26th at 10:44AM EDT (link)

Sometimes you lose opportunities completely.

Sometimes you might be late on soething, and have to pay penalties and interest.

Sometimes something gets lost, and you get sued and lose.

Sometimes you have to hire extra people (who themselves end up AWOL, leading to the need for more people hired than you think), and have to train and accomodate them.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

providing info for bk...

Brian M. Johnson Tuesday, August 26th at 1:11PM EDT (link)

Don’t shoot the messenger…

http://www.fcw.com/online/news/153600-1.html

http://ohmygov.com/blogs/a-day-in-the-life/archive/2008/08/22/federal-employees-go-awol.aspx

http://www.ktka.com/news/2008/aug/21/nicejobifyoucangetaway_it/

And if you would like to know more about the calculations, see the full report or contact Coburn’s office.

I assume, opporutnity cost, lost potential, lost time, loss of productivity, lost wages, lost manpower, etc…are all factored in.

Hey, if we can monetize a life for trial lawyers, then I am certain there are ways to put a dollar amount to a government union employee’s time (or lack thereof).

Brian M Johnson

 
 
 
 

It may be a bit exaggerated

MrBrown Tuesday, August 26th at 1:28PM EDT (link)

But the numbers on the veterans affairs I can see. Considering the lackluster treatment our vets have gotten the last few years. Even the ones coming from Iraq.

Compromise is the way of the future…not partylines…

 

Its the fault of the unions

keithcd Tuesday, August 26th at 2:13PM EDT (link)

At one time, unions had their place and were useful. Remember that book from high school about the stockyards? I think it was written by Sinclair Lewis. Anyway, they had a place in society.

All that’s changed. They’re ruining the economy and influencing politics. They have ruined the auto industry and driven more jobs offshore than cheap foreign labor.

God, they make me sick.

been that way for a long time

kyle8 Tuesday, August 26th at 2:20PM EDT (link)

Strangely enough I think Unions could be a good thing in nations like Mexico and China. But you have to have political freedom for unions to work.

Unions got too powerful, too corrupt and screwed their own selves. But they also just were no longer needed as worker rights legislation got passed and as we moved away from an industrial economy.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

Weren't unions always full of Marxists and Anarchists? (nt)

Neil Stevens Tuesday, August 26th at 3:10PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

In the 1880s they were

shooflyguy68 Tuesday, August 26th at 3:13PM EDT (link)

I dare you to call a machinist at a Ford plant a commie or anarchist. :-)


OK, fair enough, the *leadership* then :-) (nt)

Neil Stevens Tuesday, August 26th at 3:20PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 
 
 

2001 to 2007?

NightTwister Tuesday, August 26th at 11:15PM EDT (link)

Where was the Republican leadership then?

We’d be better off if we just turned the entire Republican Congressional organization on its head.

that's not a fair challenge

E Pluribus Unum Tuesday, August 26th at 11:25PM EDT (link)

In closed shops (and a whole lot of open shops) not being in a union rangers from impossible to extremely disadvantageous.

For those that have a free choice and chose to be in a union anyway, I don’t have much respect for people who extort their employers rather than try to earn as much as they can in an open market.

And as for union leaderships - commies and thugs. Every single one of them, and I got no problem saying it to their faces.

Carthago delenda est
Do your conservative t-shirt Christmas shopping at EPU Gear. Save the conservative muse, save the world.

I don't have a problem with collective bargaining...

dhannon_pdx Tuesday, August 26th at 11:33PM EDT (link)

I have a problem with protecting the weakest links in the chain…

Actually, the UAW is just driving jobs from

mbecker908 Tuesday, August 26th at 11:47PM EDT (link)

Detroit to TN. The Japanese are quite successful at building cars in the US.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

the more "collective" the bargaining

JSobieski Tuesday, August 26th at 11:48PM EDT (link)

the less efficient everything works.

Price collusion is illegal when businesses do it, but it blessed by force of law when done by workers at a company.

I support collective bargaining in the context of right to work laws. Outside that context, its just extortion—and it leads to bad things (see Michigan)


and Alabama and other right to work states

JSobieski Tuesday, August 26th at 11:53PM EDT (link)

People here in Michigan are actually talking about making Michigan a right to work state. Amazing, given the strength of the unions here.


Actually, it's pretty much the whole South.

mbecker908 Tuesday, August 26th at 11:57PM EDT (link)

I was in the auto parts business some time back and was utterly amazed at the growth of the auto assembly plants and support services in the South.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.