Barack Obama seems to have ended his bipartisan outreach effort on the most important legislation of his presidency. To me at least, it seems to have gone something like this:
Barack Obama: Because no party has a monopoly on good ideas, I want to hear all suggestions. If someone has a better proposal, I’ll take it. My first goal is to get the economy moving again, and I think it’s critical that both parties come together on a plan to make that happen.
Republicans: We have some ideas.
BO: I want to hear them.
GOP: We think a permanent rate cut would be a great way to increase consumer confidence and put a little more money in people’s pockets. It enhances the confidence of wage earners about where the economy is headed, and helps restore consumer demand.
Obama: Hhmm… that’s an interesting idea! But I thought it over, and no.
GOP: OK, how about a small business tax credit? It would help the firms that are the lifeblood of the economy and get them hiring again. And it’s not as if this is a tax cut for the wealthy or anything. This is for small businesses.
Obama: Very interesting, but no. Besides, I’m worried about future deficits, and the legacy of debt we leave to our grandchildren. You know, with interest on the package, it already costs more than $1.1 trillion! My conscience tells me that more than $1.1 trillion would be morally reprehensible.
GOP: OK then…. Well, what if we end taxation of unemployment benefits — so at least if you’re out of a job, you don’t have to worry about paying taxes on your benefit down the road. That won’t even cost all that much in tax revenue.
Obama: No to that one.
GOP: OK. This is getting us nowhere. Tell you what. How about you push Congress to move the overall balance of the package back toward the 70/30 spending/tax cut split you originally asked for?
Obama: No, Nancy and Harry tell me it’s fine like it is.
GOP: Hhmm… we’re running out of ideas to compromise on. Oh — here’s one! Why don’t you reduce some of the spending overall, especially given your proper concern about the huge increase in the debt.
Obama: Well, I don’t think we can afford to make it any smaller. This is exactly right for getting the economy back in gear — as long as we bail out the automakers and pass TARP II and national health care as well.
GOP: But wait a minute. This bill is already $50 billion or so larger than your initial request. How can you say that it can’t be any smaller?
Obama: Well that was a few weeks ago. This is now. The problem is bigger now, so the bill needed to be bigger. In fact, it needs to be exactly as big as it is right now. Except for the contraceptives. It needs to be as big as it is now, minus the contraceptives. And the new grass for the mall. You cut away any more than that, and it’s Depression-city.
GOP: And that’s it? There’s not a single thing more than can be added or subtracted, or it will ruin the bill? Is that your idea of taking all the good ideas, regardless of where they come from? That’s your idea of building a bipartisan product?
Obama: Look, it sounds like you’re going down an unproductive line of questioning here, so let me just save you some time.
I won.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Obama's idea of "bipartisan"
fmaidment (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 10:39PM EST (link)…is when Republicans roll over and play dead, allowing the Democrats to have everything they want.
And the press lets him get away with it…
Recommended.
Follow Me on Twitter
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”
– - Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791
Sorry...
fmaidment (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 10:44PM EST (link)That was supposed to say “Recommended reading for all in the media.”
A little problem with my touch-pad…
Follow Me on Twitter
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”
– - Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791
Close..
merkurfan Tuesday, January 27th at 10:48PM EST (link)The big O is pushing the pubs to vote for his bloat-out to marginalize them. How can you run against big government when you vote for it?
It give O and Co someone to blame if things go bad, Hey look, they voted for it!
And don't forget the real reason for "bipartisanship"
Elizabeth Christian (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 10:50PM EST (link)from the democrats:
take credit if it goes good
and
blame the Republicans if it does not work or anything goes wrong
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
~Benjamin Franklin
The fact Obama,and particularly Reid and Pelosi, want GOP
spainishirish (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 10:52PM EST (link)cover is because they know the purpose here is pork and not stimulus. Any Republican who attaches his or her face to this monstrosity is a fool. Let the Dems own this steaming pile of crap.
I agree and to those fools that do support it - may they be sent home in 2010
Elizabeth Christian (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 11:01PM EST (link)n/t
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
~Benjamin Franklin
And we are going to do everything in our power
Praying (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 11:02PM EST (link)to keep this from happening, right? It seems that with some of these RINOs we’re going to have to shoot them with a dart gun and then physically carry them to the press the “NAY” lever on their desks, but hey, whatever it takes. I’m willing to do it for the good of the country and my children.
No!!!11!1!!1!1! The Bilderbergers are coming
The GOP'ers In The House Aren't The Problem...
IJB Wednesday, January 28th at 12:36AM EST (link)…I expect all, or nearly all, House Republicans to vote against this “stimulus”.
The problem is Senate Republicans – Specter won’t even vote against Holder, so you’ve got to expect upwards of 25 to 30 Senate Republicans *want* to vote for this idiocy.
Whether we’ll let them get away with that is the question now…
(As things stand now, I can easily envision as scenario in 2010 where Republicans gain seats in the House, but *lose* seats in the Senate – right now, I can’t imagine that very many rank-and-file Republicans are enthused about voting for *any* Senate Republicans, beyond people like DeMint and Coburn…)
One thing we have for us
Rapunzel46 Wednesday, January 28th at 1:45AM EST (link)Is senators like McCain and Specter are up for re-election next year. People need to remind them who they work for,